Read the following paired texts and answer the questions that follow.
Text A
The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) represents not a threat to artistic integrity, but its next great evolutionary leap. Throughout history, artists have embraced new tools—from the oil paints of the Renaissance to the digital tablets of today. AI is merely the latest instrument in this lineage. It democratises creation, allowing those without years of technical training to translate their visions into compelling visual forms. Far from replacing the artist, AI acts as a collaborator, a muse that can generate endless variations on a theme, pushing human creativity into unexplored territories. The true artistry lies not in the mechanical execution, but in the vision, the curation, and the conceptual framework that only a human mind can provide.
Text B
To equate generative AI with the painter’s brush or the sculptor’s chisel is a fundamental misunderstanding of the creative process. These traditional tools are extensions of the artist’s hand, directly translating intention into form through practiced skill. AI, by contrast, operates as an intermediary, an algorithm that generates output based on a vast dataset of pre-existing human art. The process can feel less like creation and more like sophisticated curation. While the results may be visually appealing, they risk becoming homogenous, an echo chamber of styles devoid of the unique struggle, intention, and personal history that imbues authentic art with its soul. We are in danger of trading the profundity of human experience for the shallow perfection of a machine.
Which statement best describes a key difference in the viewpoints of the two authors?