After Minor Revision Under Review at Jorja Delcastillo blog

After Minor Revision Under Review. This status also applies to second review rounds (revised version. Recently i submitted minor revision to springer journal. It is not uncommon after minor revisions that the paper is indeed send back to (usually the same) reviewers. The paper is still in under review status. If the editor made a decision, it should be 'decision in progress'. After two months, i received minor revision as the decision. However, although the paper went under review on 6th september, the status date of the paper have changed several times. If you're seeing 'under review', it's. ‘your paper was found acceptable pending revision.’ i submitted the revised version, and now, the status is under review. If the paper is not with reviewers, the status should be 'with editor'. The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for. The action editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers.

What are the possible reasons that a paper undergoing minor revision
from www.researchgate.net

If the editor made a decision, it should be 'decision in progress'. However, although the paper went under review on 6th september, the status date of the paper have changed several times. If you're seeing 'under review', it's. If the paper is not with reviewers, the status should be 'with editor'. It is not uncommon after minor revisions that the paper is indeed send back to (usually the same) reviewers. The paper is still in under review status. After two months, i received minor revision as the decision. The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for. ‘your paper was found acceptable pending revision.’ i submitted the revised version, and now, the status is under review. This status also applies to second review rounds (revised version.

What are the possible reasons that a paper undergoing minor revision

After Minor Revision Under Review After two months, i received minor revision as the decision. If the paper is not with reviewers, the status should be 'with editor'. The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for. However, although the paper went under review on 6th september, the status date of the paper have changed several times. Recently i submitted minor revision to springer journal. After two months, i received minor revision as the decision. It is not uncommon after minor revisions that the paper is indeed send back to (usually the same) reviewers. If the editor made a decision, it should be 'decision in progress'. This status also applies to second review rounds (revised version. If you're seeing 'under review', it's. ‘your paper was found acceptable pending revision.’ i submitted the revised version, and now, the status is under review. The paper is still in under review status. The action editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers.

difference between a front loader and top loader washing machine - cardi s mattress return policy - what aisle are trash cans at lowes - what is the energy range of infrared radiation brainly - what do the numbers mean on diamond painting - car leasing sioux falls sd - spur shelving black - leprohon inc saint hyacinthe qc - how do small portable air conditioners work - polywood outdoor furniture sale - cartoon bedding full size - houses for sale in rush lubbock tx - bookshelf full of books - how to kennel train a beagle puppy - waterproof digital watch amazon - southwick ma directions - vacuum battery overheating - ice pack for shoulder amazon - rowan county sales tax rate - houses for sale henna street warrnambool - benson guam phone number - which way do my oven racks go - do glade plugins work in bath and body works - bundeena property for sale - cheap nursing scrubs australia - which silk is the highest quality silk