Photography Art Or Not at David Jasmin blog

Photography Art Or Not. There’s a fantastic debate on this website about whether or not photography is art.* while some arguments can be easily dealt with (“photography is just pressing buttons”), others. There are people who assert that a still photograph is never art, while there are others who assert that photography is considered art under the right circumstances, but that not every photograph taken is automatically considered a work of art. For decades, art enthusiasts and critics alike have debated whether photography can or should be. Now we know that photography is indeed an art form, moreover, its unique features make it distinctly different from its closest relative: Well, according to the definitions, yes. But through much of the 19th century, photography was not merely a second class citizen in the art world—it was an outcast. Today, photography is commonly accepted as a fine art. There’s tons of artistic value in photography, from expressions. Now that we’ve defined art, the question remains:

There’s tons of artistic value in photography, from expressions. Well, according to the definitions, yes. Today, photography is commonly accepted as a fine art. But through much of the 19th century, photography was not merely a second class citizen in the art world—it was an outcast. Now we know that photography is indeed an art form, moreover, its unique features make it distinctly different from its closest relative: For decades, art enthusiasts and critics alike have debated whether photography can or should be. There’s a fantastic debate on this website about whether or not photography is art.* while some arguments can be easily dealt with (“photography is just pressing buttons”), others. Now that we’ve defined art, the question remains: There are people who assert that a still photograph is never art, while there are others who assert that photography is considered art under the right circumstances, but that not every photograph taken is automatically considered a work of art.

Photography is an art and photographer are an artist Look Info

Photography Art Or Not There are people who assert that a still photograph is never art, while there are others who assert that photography is considered art under the right circumstances, but that not every photograph taken is automatically considered a work of art. Well, according to the definitions, yes. For decades, art enthusiasts and critics alike have debated whether photography can or should be. Today, photography is commonly accepted as a fine art. There’s a fantastic debate on this website about whether or not photography is art.* while some arguments can be easily dealt with (“photography is just pressing buttons”), others. Now that we’ve defined art, the question remains: There are people who assert that a still photograph is never art, while there are others who assert that photography is considered art under the right circumstances, but that not every photograph taken is automatically considered a work of art. Now we know that photography is indeed an art form, moreover, its unique features make it distinctly different from its closest relative: There’s tons of artistic value in photography, from expressions. But through much of the 19th century, photography was not merely a second class citizen in the art world—it was an outcast.