Factorio Rocket Fuel Vs Nuclear Fuel at Christopher Brunell blog

Factorio Rocket Fuel Vs Nuclear Fuel. for what it's worth, rocket fuel is better than solid fuel if you make it with a productivity bonus of more than 20%. 10 rocket fuel has 2250 mj and nuclear fuel while having. The more powerful the fuel used, the faster the locomotive's acceleration and top speed will be. compared to rocket fuel, nuclear fuel not only gives a higher acceleration bonus, but also. locomotives are burner devices and require fuel to run; nuclear fuel only lasts 53.78% of the duration that a stack of rocket fuel would last. The fact is though, the. i think a lot of players just don't bother with nuclear power at all, so they're not set up to make uranium fuel. It lasts a lot longer but. nuclear fuel is expensive in terms of distance traveled compared to the rocket fuel used to make it. i'm just trying to justify using of nuclear fuel in trains. it's better to stick to solid fuel until you can start handling uranium and make nuclear fuel since it has even better.

it's better to stick to solid fuel until you can start handling uranium and make nuclear fuel since it has even better. i'm just trying to justify using of nuclear fuel in trains. The fact is though, the. The more powerful the fuel used, the faster the locomotive's acceleration and top speed will be. i think a lot of players just don't bother with nuclear power at all, so they're not set up to make uranium fuel. for what it's worth, rocket fuel is better than solid fuel if you make it with a productivity bonus of more than 20%. nuclear fuel only lasts 53.78% of the duration that a stack of rocket fuel would last. nuclear fuel is expensive in terms of distance traveled compared to the rocket fuel used to make it. It lasts a lot longer but. locomotives are burner devices and require fuel to run;

I just made a 100 fuel efficient nuclear reactor r/factorio

Factorio Rocket Fuel Vs Nuclear Fuel locomotives are burner devices and require fuel to run; nuclear fuel is expensive in terms of distance traveled compared to the rocket fuel used to make it. i think a lot of players just don't bother with nuclear power at all, so they're not set up to make uranium fuel. The more powerful the fuel used, the faster the locomotive's acceleration and top speed will be. nuclear fuel only lasts 53.78% of the duration that a stack of rocket fuel would last. The fact is though, the. for what it's worth, rocket fuel is better than solid fuel if you make it with a productivity bonus of more than 20%. compared to rocket fuel, nuclear fuel not only gives a higher acceleration bonus, but also. locomotives are burner devices and require fuel to run; i'm just trying to justify using of nuclear fuel in trains. It lasts a lot longer but. 10 rocket fuel has 2250 mj and nuclear fuel while having. it's better to stick to solid fuel until you can start handling uranium and make nuclear fuel since it has even better.