Why Panties Is Singular at Arthur Lamotte blog

Why Panties Is Singular. Trousers is plural partly because of a fairly simple misunderstanding. The answer is actually fairly straightforward. They were put on one at a time and then secured around the waist. Straps that pass over the shoulders to hold up trousers. Plural nouns for clothes and accessories. According to some, the phrase “pair of pants” harkens back to the days when what constituted pants—or pantaloons, as they were originally known—consisted of two separate items, one for each leg. Pants, in common use, are actually collections of pairs, not a plural of pant. “panty” is singular in the same way “pant” is singular—part of a thing that can only exist as a pair. We’re reminded that we once answered a reader who asked why his wife put on a “pair of panties” but not a “pair of. Ie, it is possible to have 1 pant (half a pair), 55 pants. However, the one place where pants actually are referred to in the singular is in the world of fashion. Why do we say a pair of pants when it’s actually only one piece of clothing? Well, even though there’s no answer all linguists agree upon, there are two dominant theories that we will analyze in this article. It’s one of the most common oddities of the english language:

Why do we say a pair of pants when it’s actually only one piece of clothing? We’re reminded that we once answered a reader who asked why his wife put on a “pair of panties” but not a “pair of. Pants, in common use, are actually collections of pairs, not a plural of pant. They were put on one at a time and then secured around the waist. It’s one of the most common oddities of the english language: The answer is actually fairly straightforward. “panty” is singular in the same way “pant” is singular—part of a thing that can only exist as a pair. Plural nouns for clothes and accessories. According to some, the phrase “pair of pants” harkens back to the days when what constituted pants—or pantaloons, as they were originally known—consisted of two separate items, one for each leg. Well, even though there’s no answer all linguists agree upon, there are two dominant theories that we will analyze in this article.

7 types of women's underwear cuts MeUndies — Beyond Basics by MeUndies

Why Panties Is Singular “panty” is singular in the same way “pant” is singular—part of a thing that can only exist as a pair. It’s one of the most common oddities of the english language: Straps that pass over the shoulders to hold up trousers. However, the one place where pants actually are referred to in the singular is in the world of fashion. Pants, in common use, are actually collections of pairs, not a plural of pant. According to some, the phrase “pair of pants” harkens back to the days when what constituted pants—or pantaloons, as they were originally known—consisted of two separate items, one for each leg. Ie, it is possible to have 1 pant (half a pair), 55 pants. Trousers is plural partly because of a fairly simple misunderstanding. The answer is actually fairly straightforward. “panty” is singular in the same way “pant” is singular—part of a thing that can only exist as a pair. We’re reminded that we once answered a reader who asked why his wife put on a “pair of panties” but not a “pair of. Why do we say a pair of pants when it’s actually only one piece of clothing? Well, even though there’s no answer all linguists agree upon, there are two dominant theories that we will analyze in this article. They were put on one at a time and then secured around the waist. Plural nouns for clothes and accessories.