Robert E Lee Vs Napoleon at David Gustavo blog

Robert E Lee Vs Napoleon. That probably made the biggest difference of all. I've had this debate before, and i do believe that of the two, napoleon was the more experienced general and would probably win. However, i believe that it. Napoleon was in supreme command; Both knows napleonic tactics and weapons, but only robert knows about things like. Lee, with 27 battles (the average battle count was 1.5). While napoleon commanded forces in 43 battles, the next most prolific general was robert e. This study will evaluate robert e. In summary, napoleon’s shadow was a long one, touching many, but it was notably cast upon an america by the name of robert edward lee. Hundreds of thousands on both. Napoleon outnumbers lee 7 to 1 based on average army size. Lee attempted to lead his confederate army to “better things” by waging a bloody and ultimately doomed insurgency against the federal government. Napoleon’s large battle count allowed him more opportunities to demonstrate his tactical prowess. If you want to make it fair then both should use napleonic army. Lee's performance as a senior leader, based on certain demonstrated abilities and characteristics of the great captains.

Napoleon’s large battle count allowed him more opportunities to demonstrate his tactical prowess. Napoleon outnumbers lee 7 to 1 based on average army size. Lee, with 27 battles (the average battle count was 1.5). Hundreds of thousands on both. If you want to make it fair then both should use napleonic army. Lee's performance as a senior leader, based on certain demonstrated abilities and characteristics of the great captains. And with a number advantage like that how would lee get a hill at all? That probably made the biggest difference of all. Lee attempted to lead his confederate army to “better things” by waging a bloody and ultimately doomed insurgency against the federal government. Napoleon was in supreme command;

Robert E. Lee surrenders April 9, 1865 HISTORY

Robert E Lee Vs Napoleon And with a number advantage like that how would lee get a hill at all? Napoleon’s large battle count allowed him more opportunities to demonstrate his tactical prowess. Both knows napleonic tactics and weapons, but only robert knows about things like. I've had this debate before, and i do believe that of the two, napoleon was the more experienced general and would probably win. If you want to make it fair then both should use napleonic army. Lee, with 27 battles (the average battle count was 1.5). Napoleon outnumbers lee 7 to 1 based on average army size. Lee's performance as a senior leader, based on certain demonstrated abilities and characteristics of the great captains. This study will evaluate robert e. And with a number advantage like that how would lee get a hill at all? In summary, napoleon’s shadow was a long one, touching many, but it was notably cast upon an america by the name of robert edward lee. Hundreds of thousands on both. Napoleon was in supreme command; Lee attempted to lead his confederate army to “better things” by waging a bloody and ultimately doomed insurgency against the federal government. However, i believe that it. Lee, no matter how deftly he worked.