Why Is It A Pair Of Pants When There's Only One at Liza Finley blog

Why Is It A Pair Of Pants When There's Only One. It’s one of the most common oddities of the english language: Why do we say a pair of pants when it’s actually only. The real answer is quantum entanglement. But clearly this is merely an extension of the expression, “pair of pants.” further confusing matters is “a dozen pairs of. And single pantaloon is one pant leg, so a pair of pantaloons became a pair of pants. According to some, the phrase “pair of pants” harkens back to the days when what constituted pants—or pantaloons, as they were originally known—consisted of two separate items, one for each leg. Don't believe the people who will tell you that each leg is an individual pant. Basically because we call pants a pair of pants and that stuck with. Why do we say a “pair of pants” when there’s only one of them? All of your pants are. It's because pants is short for pantaloons. The reason why a pair of is used for an item of clothing worn on legs is partly related to the history of clothing and tailoring. Well, there are a couple of explanations floating around. It's true that at one time, the upper part (breeches) was separate from the lower part (hose or stocking), meaning that the full. For example, pants (short of pantaloons, u.s.

It’s one of the most common oddities of the english language: Don't believe the people who will tell you that each leg is an individual pant. Why do we say a “pair of pants” when there’s only one of them? But clearly this is merely an extension of the expression, “pair of pants.” further confusing matters is “a dozen pairs of. And single pantaloon is one pant leg, so a pair of pantaloons became a pair of pants. Well, there are a couple of explanations floating around. According to some, the phrase “pair of pants” harkens back to the days when what constituted pants—or pantaloons, as they were originally known—consisted of two separate items, one for each leg. Why do we say a pair of pants when it’s actually only. Basically because we call pants a pair of pants and that stuck with. For example, pants (short of pantaloons, u.s.

Details 65+ why are pants called pants best in.eteachers

Why Is It A Pair Of Pants When There's Only One And single pantaloon is one pant leg, so a pair of pantaloons became a pair of pants. It's true that at one time, the upper part (breeches) was separate from the lower part (hose or stocking), meaning that the full. It's because pants is short for pantaloons. Don't believe the people who will tell you that each leg is an individual pant. All of your pants are. Well, there are a couple of explanations floating around. And single pantaloon is one pant leg, so a pair of pantaloons became a pair of pants. Why do we say a “pair of pants” when there’s only one of them? It’s one of the most common oddities of the english language: The real answer is quantum entanglement. Why do we say a pair of pants when it’s actually only. According to some, the phrase “pair of pants” harkens back to the days when what constituted pants—or pantaloons, as they were originally known—consisted of two separate items, one for each leg. The reason why a pair of is used for an item of clothing worn on legs is partly related to the history of clothing and tailoring. For example, pants (short of pantaloons, u.s. Basically because we call pants a pair of pants and that stuck with. But clearly this is merely an extension of the expression, “pair of pants.” further confusing matters is “a dozen pairs of.