Why Pants Are Plural at Justin Backhaus blog

Why Pants Are Plural. Trousers is plural partly because of a fairly simple misunderstanding. There is no singular form like “pant” in common usage when referring to the. It's true that at one. Pants, in common use, are actually collections of pairs, not a plural of pant. The answer is actually fairly straightforward. Ie, it is possible to have 1 pant (half a pair), 55 pants. Think of items that are usually referred to in plural—often preceded by “pair of” or something similar, even when there is only one item: As we wrote on the blog in 2012, words for leggy items of clothing are generally plural—“pants,” “jeans,” “shorts,” “trousers,”. From its inception in english, pants has been plural. Unlike most nouns, “pants” is inherently plural. Given that the french word for scissors is plural, they're familiar with the concept, but they went the opposite way on pants.

It's true that at one. As we wrote on the blog in 2012, words for leggy items of clothing are generally plural—“pants,” “jeans,” “shorts,” “trousers,”. The answer is actually fairly straightforward. Ie, it is possible to have 1 pant (half a pair), 55 pants. Given that the french word for scissors is plural, they're familiar with the concept, but they went the opposite way on pants. Think of items that are usually referred to in plural—often preceded by “pair of” or something similar, even when there is only one item: There is no singular form like “pant” in common usage when referring to the. From its inception in english, pants has been plural. Pants, in common use, are actually collections of pairs, not a plural of pant. Unlike most nouns, “pants” is inherently plural.

Plural Clothing Nouns Enchanted Learning

Why Pants Are Plural Given that the french word for scissors is plural, they're familiar with the concept, but they went the opposite way on pants. The answer is actually fairly straightforward. Ie, it is possible to have 1 pant (half a pair), 55 pants. As we wrote on the blog in 2012, words for leggy items of clothing are generally plural—“pants,” “jeans,” “shorts,” “trousers,”. There is no singular form like “pant” in common usage when referring to the. From its inception in english, pants has been plural. Unlike most nouns, “pants” is inherently plural. Think of items that are usually referred to in plural—often preceded by “pair of” or something similar, even when there is only one item: Pants, in common use, are actually collections of pairs, not a plural of pant. Given that the french word for scissors is plural, they're familiar with the concept, but they went the opposite way on pants. Trousers is plural partly because of a fairly simple misunderstanding. It's true that at one.