Why Do We Call Trousers A Pair at Martha Folkerts blog

Why Do We Call Trousers A Pair. It’s one of the most common oddities of the english language: Pair of pants (plural) ~ pants,(plural); Not all leg coverings are plural either. According to the accepted answer here, why is the word pants plural?, it's because trousers were originally made in two parts and fastened together when worn. Ever wondered why we say ‘a pair of pants’ or ‘a pair of jeans’ when there is only one piece of clothing involved? The reason why a pair of is used for an item of clothing worn on legs is partly related to the history of clothing and tailoring. Calling them a pair of pantaloons, or pants, as they were eventually known, made sense when there were two components. Dress, and skirt are singular because there is only one. The phrasing was retained even after pants were made into one complete garment. It is one of those. It's true that at one time, the upper part (breeches) was separate from the lower part (hose or stocking), meaning that the full garment really. This sounds like a folk. The terms for these objects are always. Why do we say a pair of pants when it’s actually only one. In addition to pants and trousers, there are eyeglasses, scissors, tweezers, shears, pliers, and so on.

According to the accepted answer here, why is the word pants plural?, it's because trousers were originally made in two parts and fastened together when worn. It's true that at one time, the upper part (breeches) was separate from the lower part (hose or stocking), meaning that the full garment really. Dress, and skirt are singular because there is only one. This sounds like a folk. Pair of pants (plural) ~ pants,(plural); Pair of underwear (plural) ~ underwear (singular). Why do we say a pair of pants when it’s actually only one. However, there doesn’t seem to be much evidence in reference sources to support this theory. The phrasing was retained even after pants were made into one complete garment. It is one of those.

How To Copy A Pair Of Pants YouTube

Why Do We Call Trousers A Pair It's true that at one time, the upper part (breeches) was separate from the lower part (hose or stocking), meaning that the full garment really. Calling them a pair of pantaloons, or pants, as they were eventually known, made sense when there were two components. Why do we say a pair of pants when it’s actually only one. It's true that at one time, the upper part (breeches) was separate from the lower part (hose or stocking), meaning that the full garment really. In addition to pants and trousers, there are eyeglasses, scissors, tweezers, shears, pliers, and so on. It is one of those. Pair of underwear (plural) ~ underwear (singular). Pair of pants (plural) ~ pants,(plural); Ever wondered why we say ‘a pair of pants’ or ‘a pair of jeans’ when there is only one piece of clothing involved? The reason why a pair of is used for an item of clothing worn on legs is partly related to the history of clothing and tailoring. For example, pants (short of pantaloons, u.s. It’s one of the most common oddities of the english language: The phrasing was retained even after pants were made into one complete garment. However, there doesn’t seem to be much evidence in reference sources to support this theory. Dress, and skirt are singular because there is only one. This sounds like a folk.