Why Don't Female Jeans Have Pockets at Michael Stover blog

Why Don't Female Jeans Have Pockets. But it wasn't until the 1970s, when women regularly wore pants, and especially blue jeans, that females moved a step closer to pocket parity. If the fact that a piece of clothing has usable pockets further incentivizes you to purchase said garment, you certainly aren't alone. Have you ever wondered why women’s jeans don’t have pockets? Women's slacks, dresses, and blazers often have no. A lot of women's clothing is still predominantly pocketless, or equipped with tiny pockets that can't hold more than a key. Tiktok user, video creator, and “fact guy” @dougiesharpe took some time to create a tiktok that reveals this mystery by providing useful. Anecdotal evidence (which is the most scientific) suggests that women would like to a) have pockets so they don't always need a purse, b). It’s a puzzling phenomenon that has left many scratching their heads. The answer is tangled up with a host of social issues, our critic writes. There's perhaps no greater feeling than trying on the dress of your dreams only to find out that it has the one rare feature women's clothing never has: A reader wonders why pockets in women’s wear remain “small and useless” — when they’re included at all. But the biggest problem might be the lack of pockets in the first place: Hearing all those jokes about how women “suffer” from a lack of this detail posed the question of why exactly women don’t have pockets in their pants and other pieces of clothing. But their progress appears to have stalled. You pull on a pair of jeans, ready to tackle the day, only to realize there is no place to stash your phone, keys, or even a few dollars for emergencies.

Anecdotal evidence (which is the most scientific) suggests that women would like to a) have pockets so they don't always need a purse, b). A reader wonders why pockets in women’s wear remain “small and useless” — when they’re included at all. Have you ever wondered why women’s jeans don’t have pockets? Women's slacks, dresses, and blazers often have no. But it wasn't until the 1970s, when women regularly wore pants, and especially blue jeans, that females moved a step closer to pocket parity. Hearing all those jokes about how women “suffer” from a lack of this detail posed the question of why exactly women don’t have pockets in their pants and other pieces of clothing. You pull on a pair of jeans, ready to tackle the day, only to realize there is no place to stash your phone, keys, or even a few dollars for emergencies. But the biggest problem might be the lack of pockets in the first place: A lot of women's clothing is still predominantly pocketless, or equipped with tiny pockets that can't hold more than a key. There's perhaps no greater feeling than trying on the dress of your dreams only to find out that it has the one rare feature women's clothing never has:

Why Jeans Have Tiny Pockets in Them » TwistedSifter

Why Don't Female Jeans Have Pockets But the biggest problem might be the lack of pockets in the first place: The answer is tangled up with a host of social issues, our critic writes. Have you ever wondered why women’s jeans don’t have pockets? You pull on a pair of jeans, ready to tackle the day, only to realize there is no place to stash your phone, keys, or even a few dollars for emergencies. Hearing all those jokes about how women “suffer” from a lack of this detail posed the question of why exactly women don’t have pockets in their pants and other pieces of clothing. It’s a puzzling phenomenon that has left many scratching their heads. But the biggest problem might be the lack of pockets in the first place: If the fact that a piece of clothing has usable pockets further incentivizes you to purchase said garment, you certainly aren't alone. A reader wonders why pockets in women’s wear remain “small and useless” — when they’re included at all. Anecdotal evidence (which is the most scientific) suggests that women would like to a) have pockets so they don't always need a purse, b). A lot of women's clothing is still predominantly pocketless, or equipped with tiny pockets that can't hold more than a key. But it wasn't until the 1970s, when women regularly wore pants, and especially blue jeans, that females moved a step closer to pocket parity. But their progress appears to have stalled. Tiktok user, video creator, and “fact guy” @dougiesharpe took some time to create a tiktok that reveals this mystery by providing useful. Women's slacks, dresses, and blazers often have no. There's perhaps no greater feeling than trying on the dress of your dreams only to find out that it has the one rare feature women's clothing never has: