Torchlight 2 Flame Hammer Vs Emberquake at Mayme Ginger blog

Torchlight 2 Flame Hammer Vs Emberquake. In what context would flame hammer be preferable to emberquake or is emberquake just strictly superior across the board? It is also easier to level with. I personally dropped flame hammer for emberhammer and kept emberquake, and use emberhammer as my lmb, dynamo. I heard flame hammer works better on single targets, emberquake on multiple targets. I haven't done any damage tests myself, but. While flame hammer's splinters won't convey weapon. Flame hammer has comparable dps, and synergizes very well with supercharge and charge reconstitution. Flame hammer is based on your weapon dps (mainly derived from strength, +attack speed on your gear and ofc your weapon) and. There's no strategical difference between dealing physical damage and magical damage or different elements, there's not even any monsters that. Emberquake has only one competition, flame hammer.

There's no strategical difference between dealing physical damage and magical damage or different elements, there's not even any monsters that. It is also easier to level with. I personally dropped flame hammer for emberhammer and kept emberquake, and use emberhammer as my lmb, dynamo. Flame hammer is based on your weapon dps (mainly derived from strength, +attack speed on your gear and ofc your weapon) and. While flame hammer's splinters won't convey weapon. In what context would flame hammer be preferable to emberquake or is emberquake just strictly superior across the board? Emberquake has only one competition, flame hammer. Flame hammer has comparable dps, and synergizes very well with supercharge and charge reconstitution. I haven't done any damage tests myself, but. I heard flame hammer works better on single targets, emberquake on multiple targets.

Torchlight Bundle Kupahrej.cz

Torchlight 2 Flame Hammer Vs Emberquake It is also easier to level with. In what context would flame hammer be preferable to emberquake or is emberquake just strictly superior across the board? Emberquake has only one competition, flame hammer. Flame hammer has comparable dps, and synergizes very well with supercharge and charge reconstitution. There's no strategical difference between dealing physical damage and magical damage or different elements, there's not even any monsters that. I heard flame hammer works better on single targets, emberquake on multiple targets. While flame hammer's splinters won't convey weapon. I haven't done any damage tests myself, but. It is also easier to level with. I personally dropped flame hammer for emberhammer and kept emberquake, and use emberhammer as my lmb, dynamo. Flame hammer is based on your weapon dps (mainly derived from strength, +attack speed on your gear and ofc your weapon) and.