After Minor Revision Under Review at Juan Frost blog

After Minor Revision Under Review. How to review revised manuscripts. Get inspired by explanations, sample comments and examples! If you review a manuscript and struggle to formulate your feedback to reflect a ‘minor revisions’ verdict, look no further: If the paper is not with reviewers, the status should be 'with editor'. Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it. The status was with editor for three weeks, then it changed to under review, since 2 weeks. For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the. When to decide on ‘minor revisions’. If the editor made a decision, it should be 'decision in. I submitted my paper to a springer journal. Common reasons for a ‘minor revisions’ decision. After two months, i received minor revision as the decision. What i have heard was that minor revision does not require another round of revision in.

I submitted my paper to a springer journal. Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it. If you review a manuscript and struggle to formulate your feedback to reflect a ‘minor revisions’ verdict, look no further: For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the. The status was with editor for three weeks, then it changed to under review, since 2 weeks. Common reasons for a ‘minor revisions’ decision. How to review revised manuscripts. When to decide on ‘minor revisions’. What i have heard was that minor revision does not require another round of revision in. If the editor made a decision, it should be 'decision in.

PPT My View Points on SCI papers and Review Process PowerPoint

After Minor Revision Under Review When to decide on ‘minor revisions’. I submitted my paper to a springer journal. Common reasons for a ‘minor revisions’ decision. After two months, i received minor revision as the decision. Get inspired by explanations, sample comments and examples! If you review a manuscript and struggle to formulate your feedback to reflect a ‘minor revisions’ verdict, look no further: For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the. If the paper is not with reviewers, the status should be 'with editor'. How to review revised manuscripts. When to decide on ‘minor revisions’. Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it. What i have heard was that minor revision does not require another round of revision in. If the editor made a decision, it should be 'decision in. The status was with editor for three weeks, then it changed to under review, since 2 weeks.