Is Suetonius A Reliable Source at Richard Kuykendall blog

Is Suetonius A Reliable Source. Suetonius is useful as a source because he establishes a chronology of events in the lives of historical figures as well as establishing the. His sketches of the habits and appearance of. My personal opinion (as someone who studies roman emperors, especially in the 1st century) is that his unreliableness has been overstated. Suetonius is free from the bias of the senatorial class that distorts much roman historical writing. Biases in his sources, imperial propaganda , and the limitations of ancient. Witty, urbane and sophisticated, but not very historically accurate. On the other hand, the account of caesar and augustus were written. Most conspicuous source of information on an author of some consequence is a telling sign of the neglect suetonius and his work have. However, suetonius' accounts weren't always reliable. The value of suetonius’ account of nero as a source for accurate historical information is surrounded in doubt and.

Witty, urbane and sophisticated, but not very historically accurate. However, suetonius' accounts weren't always reliable. The value of suetonius’ account of nero as a source for accurate historical information is surrounded in doubt and. My personal opinion (as someone who studies roman emperors, especially in the 1st century) is that his unreliableness has been overstated. Suetonius is useful as a source because he establishes a chronology of events in the lives of historical figures as well as establishing the. Biases in his sources, imperial propaganda , and the limitations of ancient. His sketches of the habits and appearance of. Most conspicuous source of information on an author of some consequence is a telling sign of the neglect suetonius and his work have. Suetonius is free from the bias of the senatorial class that distorts much roman historical writing. On the other hand, the account of caesar and augustus were written.

March 1 st, Problematic. Contemporary historians (i.e. Tacitus

Is Suetonius A Reliable Source The value of suetonius’ account of nero as a source for accurate historical information is surrounded in doubt and. Suetonius is useful as a source because he establishes a chronology of events in the lives of historical figures as well as establishing the. The value of suetonius’ account of nero as a source for accurate historical information is surrounded in doubt and. Biases in his sources, imperial propaganda , and the limitations of ancient. His sketches of the habits and appearance of. However, suetonius' accounts weren't always reliable. Suetonius is free from the bias of the senatorial class that distorts much roman historical writing. Witty, urbane and sophisticated, but not very historically accurate. My personal opinion (as someone who studies roman emperors, especially in the 1st century) is that his unreliableness has been overstated. Most conspicuous source of information on an author of some consequence is a telling sign of the neglect suetonius and his work have. On the other hand, the account of caesar and augustus were written.