| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| 00 | Table of contents |
II. Summary Part A: Information about the offeror or the person seeking admission to trading Part B: Information about the issuer, if different from the offeror or person seeking admission to trading Part C: Information about the operator of the trading platform in cases where it draws up the crypto-asset white paper and information about other persons drawing the crypto-asset white paper pursuant to Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 Part D: Information about the crypto-asset project Part E: Information about the offer to the public of crypto-assets or their admission to trading Part F: Information about the crypto-assets Part G: Information on the rights and obligations attached to the crypto-assets Part H: Information on the underlying technology Part I: Information on the risks Part J: Information on the sustainability indicators in relation to adverse impact on the climate and other environment-related adverse impacts |
| 01 | Date of notification |
|
| 02 | Statement in accordance with Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
|
| 03 | Compliance statement in accordance with Article 6(6) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
|
| 04 | Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), points (a), (b), (c), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
|
| 05 | Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), point (d), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
|
| 06 | Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), points (e) and (f), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
|
| 07 | Warning in accordance with Article 6(7), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
This summary should be read as an introduction to the crypto-asset white paper. The prospective holder should base any decision to purchase this crypto-asset on the content of the crypto-asset white paper as a whole and not on the summary alone. The offer to the public of this crypto-asset does not constitute an offer or solicitation to purchase financial instruments and any such offer or solicitation can be made only by means of a prospectus or other documents pursuant to the applicable national law. |
| 08 | Characteristics of the crypto-asset |
The original supply of CHZ (pre-Dragon8 hard fork) was issued by The Chiliz Group Limited under the CAP-20 token standard and serves as the gas token and governance token of the Chiliz Chain, with an initial total token supply of 8,888,888,888 CHZ. Following the Dragon8 hard fork, the CHZ supply is subject to an inflationary model where the supply increases at a protocol level based on a pre-determined inflation rate. CHZ tokens are a digital representation of a value that can be transferred and stored on the Chiliz Chain. CHZ tokens are fungible and do not purport to maintain a stable value. Hence, under MiCA, CHZ qualifies as a crypto-asset other than asset-referenced tokens (ARTs) or e-money tokens (EMTs). |
| 09 | Further information about utility tokens |
-Pay gas fees for on-chain transactions, including when transferring tokens or invoking smart contracts. -Run a node validator to participate in the PoSA consensus mechanism by creating blocks and validating transactions, which requires staking a minimum of 10,000,000 CHZ. -Participate in the PoSA consensus mechanism by delegating CHZ to a node validator, which requires delegating a minimum of 0.01 CHZ. -Submit and vote on on-chain governance proposals. |
| 10 | Key information about the offer to the public or admission to trading |
Despite the current listing of CHZ on numerous exchanges, The Chiliz Group Limited, in its capacity as the original issuer of CHZ, is seeking admission to trading of CHZ in the European Union on MiCA-compliant trading platforms, and outside the EU, where the trading of CHZ is not prohibited under applicable laws. |
| N | Field | Content | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A.1 | Name |
|
||||||
| A.2 | Legal form |
|
||||||
| A.3 | Registered address |
|
||||||
| A.3 | Country | |||||||
| A.3 | Sub-division | |||||||
| A.4 | Head Office |
|
||||||
| A.4 | Country | |||||||
| A.4 | Sub-division | |||||||
| A.5 | Registration date |
|
||||||
| A.6 | Legal entity identifier | N/A | ||||||
| A.7 | Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law |
|
||||||
| A.8 | Contact telephone number |
|
||||||
| A.9 | E-mail address |
|
||||||
| A.10 | Response time (Days) |
|
||||||
| A.11 | Parent company |
|
||||||
| A.12 | Members of the management body |
|
||||||
| A.13 | Business activity |
|
||||||
| A.14 | Parent company business activity |
|
||||||
| A.15 | Newly established |
|
||||||
| A.16 | Financial condition for the past three years |
Over the past three years, The Chiliz Group Limited has steadily transitioned toward financial strength and operational efficiency. After a near break-even performance in 2022, marked by high expenditures, the company experienced a significant increase in revenue in 2023, albeit with proportionally rising costs. Recognizing the need for long-term margin sustainability, management implemented focused cost optimization measures that led to a substantial improvement in financial performance in 2024. By 2024, these efforts yielded clear results, with key financial indicators reflecting strong and deliberate progress:
The financial information included hereinafter is extracted from the audited financial statements of The Chiliz Group Limited for the financial year ending 31 December 2024. Summary of Consolidated Statements of Financial Positions: (A) Assets Total Non-Current Assets – €28,095,985 Total Current Assets – €83,254,858 Total Assets – €111,350,843 (B) Equity Total Equity – €83,762,317 (C) Liabilities Total non-current liabilities – €800,616 Total current liabilities – €26,787,910 Total liabilities – €27,588,526 Total equity and liabilities – €111,350,843 The Total Non-Current Assets of The Chiliz Group Limited primarily consisted of Property, Plant and Equipment amounting to €15,851,665, whereas the Current Assets were predominantly composed of Trade and other receivables amounting to €63,884,960. The Non-Current Liabilities of The Chiliz Group Limited as of 31 December 2024 amounted to €800,616 and are composed of long-term borrowings (lease liabilities). The Current Liabilities comprise short-term borrowings amounting to €172,742 and trade and other payables amounting to €26,615,168, which are predominantly owed to the parent company and related parties. |
||||||
| A.17 | Financial condition since registration |
|
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| B.1 | Issuer different from offerror or person seeking admission to trading |
|
| B.2 | Name | N/A |
| B.3 | Legal form | N/A |
| B.4 | Registered address | N/A |
| B.5 | Head office | N/A |
| B.6 | Registration date | N/A |
| B.7 | Legal entity identifier | N/A |
| B.8 | Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law | N/A |
| B.9 | Parent company | N/A |
| B.10 | Members of the management body | N/A |
| B.11 | Business activity | N/A |
| B.12 | Parent company business activity | N/A |
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| C.1 | Name | N/A |
| C.2 | Legal form | N/A |
| C.3 | Registered address | N/A |
| C.4 | Head office | N/A |
| C.5 | Registration date | N/A |
| C.6 | Legal entity identifier | N/A |
| C.7 | Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law | N/A |
| C.8 | Parent company | N/A |
| C.9 | Reason for crypto-asset white paper Preparation | N/A |
| C.10 | Members of the management body | N/A |
| C.11 | Operator business activity | N/A |
| C.12 | Parent company business activity | N/A |
| C.13 | Other persons drawing up the crypto-asset white paper according to Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | N/A |
| C.14 | Reason for drawing the white paper by persons referred to in Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 | N/A |
| N | Field | Content | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D.1 | Crypto-asset project name |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| D.2 | Crypto-asset name | N/A as DTI is provided in F.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| D.3 | Abbreviation | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||
| D.4 | Crypto-asset project description |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| D.5 | Details of all natural or legal persons involved in implementation of crypto-asset project |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| D.6 | Utility Token Classification |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| D.7 | Key Features of Goods/Services for Utility Token Projects | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||
| D.8 | Plans for the token |
The CHZ token was initially minted in 2018 by The Chiliz Group Limited, with total supply of 8,888,888,888. CHZ was distributed through a private placement, later listed on multiple third-party exchanges. and the initial sale of CHZ took place through a private placement process. CHZ is currently listed on multiple third-party exchanges, such as Binance, Bybit, Coinbase, OKX, Kraken, Bitget, and Gate, amongst others. Despite the current listing of CHZ on numerous exchanges, The Chiliz Group Limited has sought the admission to trading of CHZ in the European Union on MiCA-compliant trading platforms. On May 10, 2023, Chiliz launched the public mainnet of Chiliz Chain, with CHZ as its native token. Initial PoSA validators, including Jump Crypto, Paribu, and Meria, were onboarded to secure the network. At the start of 2024, Chiliz implemented Tokenomics 2.0, introducing a gradually decreasing inflation rate starting at 8.80% in year 1 and stabilizing at 1.88% from year 14. The tokenomics also included an EIP-1559-style gas fee burn and allocation of newly minted tokens: 65% to validators/delegators, 10% to community and liquidity incentives, and 25% to ecosystem and operational funding. Chiliz also launched Chiliz Labs, a $50M accelerator to incubate early-stage sports-focused blockchain projects. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| D.8 | Plans for the token |
Chiliz plans to expand the PoSA validator set to further decentralize governance and strengthen network security. The ecosystem will continue to develop with new decentralized exchanges, liquidity pools, staking mechanisms, and other Web3 applications to increase community participation and token utility. Upcoming initiatives include hackathons, NFT ticketing programs, metaverse-based sports projects, and AI-driven content platforms. Long-term incentives and ecosystem funding will continue according to Tokenomics 2.0, and if gas fee burns surpass annual inflation, the $CHZ supply may enter a deflationary phase, further supporting economic sustainability. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| D.9 | Resource allocation |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| D.10 | Planned use of Collected funds or crypto-Assets |
|
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| E.1 | Public offering or admission to trading | |
| E.2 | Reasons for public offer or admission to trading |
|
| E.3 | Fundraising target | N/A |
| E.4 | Minimum subscription goals | N/A |
| E.5 | Maximum subscription goals | N/A |
| E.6 | Oversubscription acceptance | N/A |
| E.7 | Oversubscription allocation | N/A |
| E.8 | Issue price | N/A |
| E.9 | Official currency or any other crypto-assets determining the issue price | N/A |
| E.10 | Subscription fee | N/A |
| E.11 | Offer price determination method | N/A |
| E.12 | Total number of offered/traded crypto-assets |
|
| E.13 | Targeted holders | |
| E.14 | Holder restrictions |
|
| E.15 | Reimbursement notice | N/A |
| E.16 | Refund mechanism | N/A |
| E.17 | Refund timeline | N/A |
| E.18 | Offer phases | N/A |
| E.19 | Early purchase discount | N/A |
| E.20 | Time-limited offer | N/A |
| E.21 | Subscription period beginning | N/A |
| E.22 | Subscription period end | N/A |
| E.23 | Safeguarding arrangements for offered funds/crypto-Assets | N/A |
| E.24 | Payment methods for crypto-asset purchase | N/A |
| E.25 | Value transfer methods for reimbursement | N/A |
| E.26 | Right of withdrawal | N/A |
| E.27 | Transfer of purchased crypto-assets | N/A |
| E.28 | Transfer time schedule | N/A |
| E.29 | Purchaser's technical requirements | N/A |
| E.30 | Crypto-asset service provider (CASP) name | N/A |
| E.31 | CASP identifier | N/A |
| E.32 | Placement form | N/A |
| E.33 | Trading platforms name |
Bitstamp Europe S.A. (Bitstamp) |
| E.34 | Trading platforms market identifier code (MIC) |
|
| E.35 | Trading platforms access |
Failure to comply with these procedures will prevent access to trading platforms, the purchase or transfer of tokens, or result in regulatory measures such as freezing of funds, mandatory cancellation or redemption of tokens, or other actions deemed necessary by the issuer to ensure compliance with applicable laws. Prospective tokenholders must create a trading account on platforms. Prospective tokenholders need a wallet compatible with the token standards to facilitate deposits and withdrawals. |
| E.36 | Involved costs |
|
| E.37 | Offer expenses |
|
| E.38 | Conflicts of interest |
|
| E.39 | Applicable law |
|
| E.40 | Competent court |
|
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| F.1 | Crypto-asset type |
|
| F.2 | Crypto-asset functionality |
|
| F.3 | Planned application of functionalities |
|
| F.4 | Type of crypto-asset white paper | |
| F.5 | The type of submission | |
| F.6 | Crypto-asset characteristics |
The initial token supply was 8,888,888,888 CHZ and was entirely minted in 2018. The initial sale of CHZ took place through a private placement process in 2018. However, the CHZ total token supply is subject to an inflationary model and is indefinite in accordance with the inflationary mechanism governed by the protocol. The current circulating supply is around 10,030,000,000 CHZ. CHZ tokens are CAP-20 tokens, and all tokens are fungible. As the native token of the Chiliz Chain, CHZ can be used to:
|
| F.7 | Commercial name or trading name | N/A as DTI is provided in F.13 |
| F.8 | Website of the issuer |
|
| F.9 | Starting date of offer to the public or admission to trading |
|
| F.10 | Publication date |
|
| F.11 | Any other services provided by the issuer |
|
| F.12 | Language or languages of the crypto-asset white paper |
|
| F.13 | Digital token identifier code used to uniquely identify the crypto-asset or each of the several crypto assets to which the white paper relates, where available |
|
| F.14 | Functionally fungible group digital token identifier, where available |
|
| F.15 | Voluntary data flag |
|
| F.16 | Personal data flag |
|
| F.17 | LEI eligibility |
|
| F.18 | Home Member State | |
| F.19 | Host Member States |
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| G.1 | Purchaser rights and obligations |
|
| G.2 | Exercise of rights and obligations |
By holding CHZ, Token holders confirm and guarantee that:
|
| G.3 | Conditions for modifications of rights and obligations |
|
| G.4 | Future public offers |
|
| G.5 | Issuer retained crypto-assets | N/A |
| G.6 | Utility Token Classification |
|
| G.7 | Key features of goods/services of utility tokens | N/A |
| G.8 | Utility tokens redemption | N/A |
| G.9 | Non-trading request |
|
| G.10 | Crypto-assets purchase or sale modalities | N/A |
| G.11 | Crypto-assets transfer restrictions |
|
| G.12 | Supply adjustment protocols |
|
| G.13 | Supply adjustment mechanisms |
Implementation of an inflationary model with an initial annual base inflation of 8.80% in year 1, dynamically decreasing over time until stabilizing at 1.88% (inflation floor) after 14 years. Implementation of a perpetual burning mechanism to balance the token supply. This mechanism was inspired by the introduction of the EIP-1559 on the Ethereum blockchain, following which the vast majority of accrued gas fees are burned at a protocol level. Please refer to the “Tokenomics 2.0’ section of the Preamble and additional details provided under H.5. |
| G.14 | Token value protection schemes |
|
| G.15 | Token value protection schemes description | N/A |
| G.16 | Compensation schemes |
|
| G.17 | Compensation schemes description | N/A |
| G.18 | Applicable law |
|
| G.19 | Competent court |
|
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| H.1 | Distributed ledger technology (DTL) | N/A as DTI is provided in F.13 |
| H.2 | Protocols and technical standards |
Execution environment and base chain At the protocol and execution layer, Chiliz Chain is an EVM-compatible Layer-1 blockchain, a fork of BNB Smart Chain (BSC), which is itself a go-Ethereum fork. The Chiliz Chain design inherits most of the EVM mechanisms, concepts and binaries from this lineage. Chiliz Chain runs an EVM execution environment, allowing developers to deploy Solidity smart contracts and interact with them through standard Web3 libraries and EVM-compatible wallets. CHZ is the native token of Chiliz Chain, which serves as the gas token for on-chain transactions and is also used for staking and on-chain governance: validators must stake CHZ and can submit and vote on governance proposals, while delegators stake CHZ to support validators and share in protocol rewards. CHZ balances and transfers are recorded directly on the Chiliz Chain ledger in the same account-based state as other assets and smart contracts, so all protocol-level state relevant to CHZ is maintained within the EVM execution environment. Alongside the JSON-RPC interfaces exposed by nodes, Chiliz operates a dedicated REST service known as the Chiliz Chain API. Token standards and client interfaces For fungible assets, Chiliz defines a family of CAP token standards that mirror familiar Ethereum token interfaces. The CAP-20 standard is Chiliz Chain’s ERC-20-style fungible-token standard: it follows the usual ERC-20 semantics including balance queries, transfer and approval flows, however, it is adapted for the Chiliz environment. Fan Tokens issued on Chiliz Chain, are implemented as CAP-20 tokens. Block explorers such as Chiliscan and the Blockscout-based Chiliz Chain Explorer expose blocks, transactions, token contracts and account balances via web dashboards and, where available, programmatic APIs. |
| H.3 | Technology used |
Smart contracts on Chiliz Chain are written in Solidity 0.8.24 and compiled for the Shanghai-equivalent EVM introduced with the Dragon8 upgrade. Dragon8 implemented modern Ethereum proposals such as EIP-1559 and EIP-2718, aligning Chiliz Chain’s fee mechanics and transaction format with Ethereum. All transactions on Chiliz Chain are metered using the EVM gas schedule and settled in CHZ, the network’s native token. The deterministic EVM runtime ensures that, given the same inputs and state, contract execution produces identical results across all validator nodes. Transfer and interoperability technology CHZ exists both as the native gas and governance token on Chiliz Chain and as an ERC-20 token on Ethereum. To move value between these environments, the ecosystem relies on smart-contract-based bridges. One major path is the integration with ChainPort, which allows users to lock CHZ on one chain and mint a corresponding representation on the other via audited bridge contracts and off-chain relayers. In parallel, the official Chiliz Bridge and “Wrapped CHZ” tooling manage CHZ and wCHZ representations on Chiliz Chain and Ethereum, ensuring that bridged tokens remain economically equivalent to native CHZ. From a holder’s perspective, moving CHZ between Ethereum and Chiliz Chain involves interacting with these bridge contracts through a web application or wallet interface: tokens are locked or burned on the source chain and minted or released on the target chain once the bridge confirms the transfer. On Chiliz Chain, bridged CHZ (including wrapped representations) ultimately resolves into balances recorded in the native CHZ ledger, which can then be used to pay gas, participate in staking and governance, or be further transferred on-chain. |
| H.4 | Consensus Mechanism |
|
| H.5 | Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees |
|
| H.6 | Use of distributed ledger technology |
|
| H.7 | DLT functionality description | N/A |
| H.8 | Audit |
|
| H.9 | Audit outcome |
Object: Core Chiliz Chain smart contracts used at mainnet launch, including the staking contract, governance contract and bridge contract. Findings: Minor risks were identified in these contracts, with no indication of unresolved high-severity issues at launch. Remediation: The necessary fixes were implemented before the 2023 mainnet launch, and the contracts remain subject to further audits when they are upgraded. CertiK’s Governance and Core Contracts Object: Smart contracts underpinning Chiliz governance and core V2 contracts, including the V2 Genesis Contracts and related upgradeable components, as well as the on-chain vote token implementation reviewed under the Chiliz project on CertiK Skynet. Findings: No critical issues, several major centralisation-type findings, plus medium, minor and informational issues, all marked as acknowledged. Remediation: The identified issues have been addressed. Halborn’s Chiliz Bridge Smart-Contract Audit Object: Smart-contract infrastructure for the Chiliz Bridge that connects CHZ between Ethereum and the Chiliz Chain. Findings: No critical, unaddressed issues. Remediation: Subsequent updates to bridge logic are tracked via blockchain code-change logs and outage reports. |
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| I.1 | Offer-related risks |
|
| I.2 | Issuer-related risks |
Operational Risks: These include risks related to the Issuer's internal processes, personnel, and technologies, which can affect their ability to manage crypto-asset operations effectively. Failures in operational integrity might lead to disruptions, financial losses, or reputational damage. Legal Risks: Legal uncertainties, potential lawsuits, or adverse legal rulings can pose significant risks to issuers. Legal challenges may affect the legality, usability, or value of a crypto-asset. Reputational Risks: Negative publicity, whether due to operational failures, security breaches, or association with illicit activities, can damage an Issuer's reputation and, by extension, the value and acceptance of the crypto-asset. Dependency on Key Individuals: The success of some crypto projects can be highly dependent on the expertise and leadership of key individuals. Loss or changes in the project’s leadership can lead to disruptions, loss of trust, or project failure. Counterparty Risks: Risks associated with the Issuer's partners, suppliers, or collaborators, including the potential for non-fulfillment of obligations that can affect the Issuer’s operations. |
| I.3 | Crypto-assets-related risks |
Liquidity Challenges: Some crypto-assets may suffer from limited liquidity, which can present difficulties when executing large trades without significantly impacting market prices. This lack of liquidity can lead to substantial financial losses, particularly during periods of rapid market movements when selling assets may become challenging or require accepting unfavorable prices. Asset Security: Crypto-assets face unique security threats, including the risk of theft from exchanges or digital wallets, loss of private keys, and potential failures of custodial services. Since crypto-asset transactions are generally irreversible, any security breach or mismanagement can result in the permanent loss of assets, emphasizing the importance of strong security measures and practices. Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Many crypto-assets, including CHZ, rely on smart contracts to automate processes. Even when relevant audits have been completed and remedies have been implemented, these contracts are not immune to risks. Bugs, coding errors, or vulnerabilities within the smart contract code can be exploited by malicious actors, potentially leading to asset loss, unauthorized data access, or unintended operational consequences. Privacy Concerns: All transaction details on the Chiliz Chain are permanently recorded and publicly accessible, which can potentially expose user activities. Although addresses are pseudonymous, the transparent and immutable nature of the Chiliz Chain allows for advanced forensic analysis and intelligence gathering. This level of transparency can make it possible to link blockchain addresses to real-world identities over time, compromising user privacy. Regulatory Uncertainty: The regulatory environment surrounding crypto-assets is constantly evolving, which can directly impact their usage, valuation, and legal status. Changes in regulatory frameworks may introduce new requirements related to consumer protection, taxation, and anti-money laundering compliance, creating uncertainty and potential challenges for token holders and businesses operating in the crypto space. Counterparty Risk: Engaging in agreements or storing crypto-assets on exchanges introduces counterparty risks, including the failure of the other party to fulfill their obligations. Token holders may face potential losses due to factors such as insolvency, regulatory non-compliance, or fraudulent activities by counterparties, highlighting the need for careful due diligence when engaging with third parties. Reputational Concerns: Crypto-assets are often subject to reputational risks stemming from associations with illegal activities, high-profile security breaches, and technological failures. Such incidents can undermine trust in the broader crypto ecosystem or specific project, negatively affecting investor confidence and market value, thereby hindering widespread adoption and acceptance. |
| I.4 | Project implementation-related risks |
pre-established rules. As per I.1, in relation to the admission to trading of CHZ on trading platforms, the main potential risk is based on trading platforms opting not to list CHZ or to delist CHZ. |
| I.5 | Technology-related risks |
Transaction Finality: Transactions on the Chiliz Chain achieve finality probabilistically, meaning their security increases as more blocks are confirmed. However, theoretical risks of transaction reversals exist, particularly in cases of blockchain reorganizations or consensus attacks. Furthermore, transactions sent to incorrect or unintended addresses are typically irreversible, making it crucial for users to double-check addresses and transaction details before execution. Scalability Issues: As blockchain networks experience increased adoption and usage, scalability challenges can arise. A higher number of transactions on the Chiliz Chain might lead to network congestion, resulting in increased transaction fees, slower confirmation times, and reduced usability. Network Sustainability: For a blockchain network to remain sustainable, it must maintain sufficient transaction volume to ensure economic viability. This volume is necessary to incentivize validators, support network security, and sustain overall operations. If transaction activity on the Chiliz Chain declines significantly, the chain may face economic challenges, leading to protocol changes or, in extreme cases, network obsolescence due to a lack of participants and security contributors. Cybersecurity Threats: Blockchain networks are vulnerable to various cybersecurity threats that can compromise their operations and data integrity. Potential attacks include 51% attacks, where a single entity gains majority control over the network, Sybil attacks, where attackers create multiple fake identities to manipulate the network, and DDoS attacks, which can overwhelm nodes and disrupt network functionality. Mitigating these threats requires robust security protocols and decentralized network structures. Consensus Failures: Issues with a blockchain’s consensus mechanism can lead to serious disruptions such as network forks, operational halts, and a loss of trust among participants. Forks can result in duplicate transactions or diverging ledger states, causing confusion and potential financial losses. Protocol Vulnerabilities: Undetected bugs and flaws within a blockchain’s core protocol code pose significant risks, including network disruption, balance manipulation, and potential exploits by malicious actors. Continuous code audits, rigorous testing, and the implementation of bug bounty programs help identify and mitigate such vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. Smart Contract Risks: Smart contracts, while offering automation and efficiency, introduce risks stemming from coding flaws, misconfigurations, and unintended logic vulnerabilities. Exploitable weaknesses in smart contracts can lead to asset loss, unauthorized access to sensitive data, and broader network vulnerabilities. Thorough audits and security best practices are essential to minimize these risks. Infrastructure Dependencies: Blockchain networks depend on various underlying infrastructures such as internet connectivity, cloud services, and hardware systems, which may themselves be susceptible to attacks, outages, or external interference. Any disruption in these critical dependencies can compromise the accessibility and reliability of blockchain services, emphasizing the need for decentralized and resilient infrastructure solutions. Technological Obsolescence: As technology evolves, blockchain networks face the risk of becoming obsolete. Emerging innovations, such as quantum computing, could potentially break current cryptographic encryption standards, rendering blockchain networks insecure. To remain resilient, continuous advancements in cryptographic techniques and blockchain protocols must be pursued to address evolving threats. Governance Challenges: The decentralized nature of the Chiliz Chain can present governance challenges, particularly when it comes to decision-making and issue resolution. Ineffective governance models may result in delays in addressing critical network concerns, instability, and even the centralization of power among a small group of stakeholders. Transparent, inclusive, and well-structured governance frameworks are necessary to support long-term sustainability. Data Integrity: Maintaining the integrity of blockchain data is critical to its reliability and trustworthiness. Bugs, errors, or malicious tampering with transaction data can undermine the accuracy and consistency of the ledger, potentially leading to financial and operational risks. Mechanisms such as data verification, redundancy, and integrity checks are essential to safeguarding the blockchain against corruption. Third-Party Risks: The reliance on external service providers, such as centralized exchanges, wallet providers, and custodial services, introduces additional layers of risk. These third parties may be susceptible to security breaches, operational failures, and regulatory non-compliance, which could impact users' assets and overall market stability. Due diligence and choosing reputable service prviders are essential to mitigating such risks. |
| I.6 | Mitigation measures |
Regulatory Uncertainty: The Issuer stays abreast with all legal and regulatory updates, and continuously works to ensure compliance of CHZ with any applicable laws and regulations. Blockchain Related Risks: While all blockchain networks face risks, including software errors, network connectivity disruptions, hardware failures, security threats from hacking or unauthorized access, and changes in consensus rules, the Chiliz Chain’s validator set continues to grow and diversify, enhancing resilience against potential centralization or targeted attacks. Risks Related to Project Implementation and Admission to Trading: While the Issuer cannot guarantee the listing of CHZ on particular platforms, it will ensure that all necessary actions are taken to ensure listing on targeted platforms within the EU, while maintaining the highest level of integrity and professionalism. |
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| S.1 | Name |
|
| S.2 | Relevant legal entity identifier |
|
| S.3 | Name of the crypto-asset |
|
| S.4 | Consensus Mechanism |
|
| S.5 | Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees |
Delegators, who may not run validator nodes themselves, can participate by delegating CHZ to chosen validators, which also allows them to earn a share of the validators' rewards proportionally to the amount of CHZ tokens delegated, thereby promoting broader community involvement and greater security. Transaction fees are low and encourage widespread participation and high volume of transactions. Additionally, the network has implemented a transaction fee burning mechanism inspired by the EIP-1559 governance proposal, where a significant portion of the gas fees is burned at the protocol level, introducing a deflationary mechanism to CHZ token supply. |
| S.6 | Beginning of period to which disclosed information relates |
|
| S.7 | End of period to which disclosed information relates |
|
| S.8 | Energy consumption |
|
| S.9 | Energy consumption sources and methodologies |
For the calculation of energy consumption of the network, the so-called 'bottom-up' approach is being used. The nodes are considered to be the central factor for the energy consumption of the network. These assumptions are made on the basis of empirical findings through the use of public information sites, open-source crawlers, and crawlers developed in-house. The main determinants for estimating the hardware used within the network are the requirements for operating the client software. The energy consumption of the hardware devices was measured in certified test laboratories. When calculating the energy consumption, the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) is used to determine all implementations of the asset in scope. The mappings are updated regularly, based on data from the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. The information regarding the hardware used and the number of participants in the network is based on assumptions that are verified with best effort using empirical data. In general, participants are assumed to be largely economically rational. As a precautionary principle, assumptions are made on the conservative side when in doubt, i.e., making higher estimates for the adverse impacts. To determine the energy consumption of CHZ, the energy consumption of the Chiliz Chain is calculated first. For the energy consumption of the token, the energy consumption of the network is attributed to the token, depending on the activity of the crypto-asset within the network. When calculating the energy consumption, the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) is used - if available - to determine all implementations of the asset in scope. The mappings are updated regularly, based on data from the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. The information regarding the hardware used and the number of participants in the network is based on assumptions that are verified with best effort using empirical data. In general, participants are assumed to be largely economically rational. As a precautionary principle, assumptions are made on the conservative side when in doubt, i.e., making higher estimates for the adverse impacts. |
| S.10 | Renewable energy consumption | N/A |
| S.11 | Energy intensity | N/A |
| S.12 | Scope 1 DLT GHG emissions - controlled |
|
| S.13 | Scope 2 DLT GHG emissions - purchased | N/A |
| S.14 | GHG intensity | N/A |
| S.15 | Key energy sources and methodologies |
|
| S.16 | Key GHG sources and methodologies |
|
| S.17 | Energy mix | N/A |
| S.18 | Energy use reduction | N/A |
| S.19 | Carbon intensity | N/A |
| S.20 | Scope 3 DLT GHG emissions – Value chain | N/A |
| S.21 | GHG emissions reduction targets or commitments | N/A |
| S.22 | Generation of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) | N/A |
| S.23 | Non-recycled WEEE ratio | N/A |
| S.24 | Generation of hazardous waste | N/A |
| S.25 | Generation of waste (all types) | N/A |
| S.26 | Non-recycled waste ratio (all types) | N/A |
| S.27 | Waste intensity (all types) | N/A |
| S.28 | Waste reduction targets or commitments (all types) | N/A |
| S.29 | Impact of the use of equipment on natural resources | N/A |
| S.30 | Natural resources use reduction targets or commitments | N/A |
| S.31 | Water use | N/A |
| S.32 | Non recycled water ratio | N/A |
| S.33 | Other energy sources and methodologies | N/A |
| S.34 | Other GHG sources and methodologies | N/A |
| S.35 | Waste sources and methodologies | N/A |
| S.36 | Natural resources sources and methodologies | N/A |