| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| 00 | Table of contents |
Part A: Information about the offeror or the person seeking admission to trading Part B: Information about the issuer, if different from the offeror or person seeking admission to trading Part C: Information about the operator of the trading platform in cases where it draws up the crypto-asset white paper and information about other persons drawing the crypto-asset white paper pursuant to Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 Part D: Information about the crypto-asset project Part E: Information about the offer to the public of crypto-assets or their admission to trading Part F: Information about the crypto-assets Part G: Information on the rights and obligations attached to the crypto-assets Part H: Information on the underlying technology Part I: Information on the risks Part J: Information on the sustainability indicators in relation to adverse impact on the climate and other environment-related adverse impacts |
| 01 | Date of notification |
|
| 02 | Statement in accordance with Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
The operator of the trading platform of the crypto-asset is solely responsible for the content of this crypto-asset white paper. |
| 03 | Compliance statement in accordance with Article 6(6) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
|
| 04 | Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), points (a), (b), (c), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
|
| 05 | Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), point (d), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
|
| 06 | Statement in accordance with Article 6(5), points (e) and (f), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
|
| 07 | Warning in accordance with Article 6(7), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
This summary should be read as an introduction to the crypto-asset white paper. The prospective holder should base any decision to purchase this crypto-asset on the content of the crypto-asset white paper as a whole and not on the summary alone. The offer to the public of this crypto-asset does not constitute an offer or solicitation to purchase financial instruments and any such offer or solicitation can be made only by means of a prospectus or other documents pursuant to the applicable national law. This crypto-asset white paper does not constitute a prospectus as referred to in Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of the European Parliament and of the Council or any other offer document pursuant to Union or national law. |
| 08 | Characteristics of the crypto-asset |
SKY primarily functions as a governance crypto-asset. Holders of SKY may participate in governance processes relating to the operation, parameters and evolution of the Sky Protocol. Governance participation is typically exercised through voting mechanisms in accordance with the rules and procedures defined by the protocol. Participation in governance may require holders to stake or otherwise commit their SKY holdings in line with the applicable governance framework. In addition to governance participation, SKY may be used within ecosystem mechanisms, including staking, incentive programmes and other protocol modules made available through the Sky Protocol. The availability and conditions of such mechanisms are determined by the protocol rules and may change over time. Holding SKY does not confer ownership, profit participation, repayment or redemption rights against a central issuer. SKY does not represent a claim on assets or revenues and does not provide holders with a guaranteed right to compensation or value protection. The value of SKY is determined by market conditions and may fluctuate. |
| 09 | Further information about utility tokens |
|
| 10 | Key information about the offer to the public or admission to trading |
|
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| A.1 | Name | N/A |
| A.2 | Legal form | N/A |
| A.3 | Registered address | N/A |
| A.4 | Head office | N/A |
| A.5 | Registration date | N/A |
| A.6 | Legal entity identifier | N/A |
| A.7 | Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law | N/A |
| A.8 | Contact telephone number | N/A |
| A.9 | E-mail address | N/A |
| A.10 | Response time (Days) | N/A |
| A.11 | Parent company | N/A |
| A.12 | Members of the management body | N/A |
| A.13 | Business activity | N/A |
| A.14 | Parent company business activity | N/A |
| A.15 | Newly established | N/A |
| A.16 | Financial condition for the past three years | N/A |
| A.17 | Financial condition since registration | N/A |
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| B.1 | Issuer different from offerror or person seeking admission to trading |
|
| B.2 | Name | N/A |
| B.3 | Legal form | N/A |
| B.4 | Registered address | N/A |
| B.5 | Head office | N/A |
| B.6 | Registration date | N/A |
| B.7 | Legal entity identifier | N/A |
| B.8 | Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law | N/A |
| B.9 | Parent company | N/A |
| B.10 | Members of the management body | N/A |
| B.11 | Business activity | N/A |
| B.12 | Parent company business activity | N/A |
| N | Field | Content | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.1 | Name |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C.2 | Legal form |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C.3 | Registered address | 40, avenue Monterey, Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, LU-LU | ||||||||||||||||||
| C.4 | Head office | N/A as LEI is provided in C.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
| C.5 | Registration date |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C.6 | Legal entity identifier |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C.7 | Another identifier required pursuant to applicable national law |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C.8 | Parent company |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C.9 | Reason for crypto-asset white paper Preparation |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C.10 | Members of the management body |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C.11 | Operator business activity |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C.12 | Parent company business activity |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C.13 | Other persons drawing up the crypto-asset white paper according to Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C.14 | Reason for drawing the white paper by persons referred to in Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
|
| N | Field | Content | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D.1 | Crypto-asset project name |
|
||||||||
| D.2 | Crypto-asset name |
|
||||||||
| D.3 | Abbreviation |
|
||||||||
| D.4 | Crypto-asset project description |
The Sky Protocol hosts multiple assets including USDS, DAI, sUSDS, stUSDS, SKY, and MKR as well as core components such as the Sky Savings Rate, Sky Token Rewards, the Staking Engine, specialised Expert Modules, and other supporting infrastructure. At its core, the protocol uses overcollateralised vaults to back stablecoins such as USDS (the upgraded stablecoin successor to DAI) and DAI itself. Users deposit approved collateral into these vaults to generate stablecoins, with the system maintaining an over-collateralisation requirement to support stability and solvency. Sky was one of the early DeFi protocols to introduce RWAs into a stablecoin system, allowing tokenised real-world financial instruments such as bonds, real estate linked tokens, and other off-chain assets to be used as backing for stablecoin issuance and generate yield. These RWA Vaults differ from traditional on-chain crypto vaults in that they require legal frameworks, off-chain valuation mechanisms, and governance oversight to tokenise and manage such assets. USDS is an ERC-20 stablecoin token in the Sky ecosystem, and the protocol provides a DAI–USDS converter that facilitates 1:1 conversions between DAI and USDS via supported interfaces. SKY, the governance token of the Sky Protocol, to which MKR may be upgraded at a fixed ratio of 1 MKR to 24 thousand SKY (subject to the Delayed Upgrade Penalty as applicable. It implements an on-chain governance framework through which token holders can vote on protocol decisions and implement changes through smart-contract execution, and ecosystem applications and interfaces, including Sky.money as a non-custodial interface for upgrades and for access to protocol features such as the Sky Savings Rate (SSR) and Sky Token Rewards. |
||||||||
| D.5 | Details of all natural or legal persons involved in implementation of crypto-asset project |
|
||||||||
| D.6 | Utility Token Classification |
|
||||||||
| D.7 | Key Features of Goods/Services for Utility Token Projects |
|
||||||||
| D.8 | Description of past milestones |
From 2017 to 2023, MakerDAO launches and operates as a decentralised protocol governing the DAI stablecoin. MKR functions as the governance crypto-asset for protocol decisions, risk parameters and system upgrades. Over this period, MakerDAO developed large-scale on-chain financial infrastructure and decentralised governance mechanisms. From 2022 to 2023, MakerDAO governance discussions introduce the long-term “Endgame” framework, outlining a future transition to a new protocol structure, governance model and token architecture. Governance proposals begin laying the groundwork for a protocol rebrand and token evolution. August 2024, the Sky Protocol is formally introduced as the successor framework to MakerDAO. SKY is introduced as the new governance crypto-asset, replacing MKR. A protocol-level upgrade mechanism is made available allowing MKR holders to convert MKR into SKY at a predefined ratio. Governance transitions to the Sky Protocol framework, while maintaining continuity of on-chain financial infrastructure. Late 2024, governance processes continue under the Sky Protocol structure. SKY holders participate in protocol governance, parameter adjustments and ecosystem decisions. Stablecoin-related functionality (USDS), savings mechanisms and incentive modules remain operational within the new protocol framework. The migration announcement was completed on 2 May 2025, when an official post detailing the SKY migration was published on the Atlas forum and the migration was publicly announced in detail. The governance poll was completed on 12 May 2025, enabling all MKR holders to participate in the governance poll. Communications was completed on 13 May 2025, with the launch of a community-wide marketing campaign for the Sky Ecosystem. Spell Publication was completed on 15 May 2025, when the governance upgrade spell was published for community review. Migration Go-Live took place on 19 May 2025 when the governance upgrade spell was executed. Staking Rewards Activation was completed on 29 May 2025, with the publication of the spell activating USDS rewards for the Staking Engine. Delayed Upgrade Penalty Kick-Off was scheduled for 18 September 2025. From that date, a Delayed Upgrade Penalty applied to all MKR not upgraded to SKY before 18 September. As soon as the penalty took effect, a 1% penalty was applied to MKR-to-SKY upgrades, increasing by an additional 1% every three months thereafter. Penalty Ramp-Up commenced in December 2025 and continues on an ongoing basis, with the delayed upgrade penalty increasing by a further 1% every three months unless Sky Governance determines otherwise. |
||||||||
| D.8 | Description of future milestones |
Future developments are expected to occur through governance-driven upgrades. Potential areas of evolution include governance refinement, incentive mechanisms, protocol modules and infrastructure integrations. |
||||||||
| D.9 | Resource allocation |
The Sky Ecosystem allocates protocol surplus as part of its resource management strategy through an on-chain buyback mechanism powered by the Smart Burn Engine. These buyback activities constitute a governance-directed allocation of protocol surplus resources and are subject to change by Sky Governance. All figures are variable, model-based, and not guaranteed. As of the date of this white paper, the protocol has utilised approximately 112.28 million USDS in surplus revenues to repurchase approximately 1.79 billion SKY, representing around 6.95% of the circulating supply of USDS. Supply allocation data indicates that approximately 67.43% of total SKY (15.82 billion) is staked (circulating but locked), 19.95% (4.68 billion) is circulating and otherwise classified, 9.91% (2.32 billion) remains circulating but not migrated, 1.8% (422.43 million) is held in treasury as non-circulating supply, and approximately 0.91% (213.51 million) falls within other categories. |
||||||||
| D.10 | Planned use of Collected funds or crypto-Assets |
No other funds are planned to be raised or implemented in connection with this crypto-asset, as no offer to the public is intended. |
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| E.1 | Public offering or admission to trading | |
| E.2 | Reasons for public offer or admission to trading |
|
| E.3 | Target expressed in currency | N/A |
| E.3 | Target expressed in units | N/A |
| E.3 | Target expressed in digital token identifier | N/A |
| E.4 | Minimum subscription goals | N/A |
| E.5 | Maximum subscription goals | N/A |
| E.6 | Oversubscription acceptance | N/A |
| E.7 | Oversubscription allocation | N/A |
| E.8 | Issue price | N/A |
| E.9 | Official currency or any other crypto-assets determining the issue price | N/A |
| E.9 | Official currency or any other crypto-assets determining the issue price | N/A |
| E.10 | Fee expressed in currency | N/A |
| E.10 | Fee expressed in units | N/A |
| E.10 | Fee expressed in digital token identifier | N/A |
| E.11 | Offer price determination method | N/A |
| E.12 | Total number of offered/traded crypto-assets |
The number of SKY admitted to trading may vary over time due to changes in circulating supply resulting from governance controlled mechanisms, including staking, treasury holdings, token migration status, and protocol directed buybacks executed through the Smart Burn Engine. As of the date of this white paper, the circulating supply is approximately 23 billion SKY, with the remaining tokens not in circulation in accordance with the Sky Protocol’s supply and governance framework. |
| E.13 | Targeted holders | |
| E.14 | Holder restrictions | N/A |
| E.15 | Reimbursement notice | N/A |
| E.16 | Refund mechanism | N/A |
| E.17 | Refund timeline | N/A |
| E.18 | Offer phases | N/A |
| E.19 | Early purchase discount | N/A |
| E.20 | Time-limited offer | N/A |
| E.21 | Subscription period beginning | N/A |
| E.22 | Subscription period end | N/A |
| E.23 | Safeguarding arrangements for offered funds/crypto-Assets | N/A |
| E.24 | Payment methods for crypto-asset purchase |
|
| E.25 | Value transfer methods for reimbursement | N/A |
| E.26 | Right of withdrawal | N/A |
| E.27 | Transfer of purchased crypto-assets |
|
| E.28 | Transfer time schedule | N/A |
| E.29 | Purchaser's technical requirements |
|
| E.30 | Crypto-asset service provider (CASP) name |
|
| E.31 | CASP identifier | N/A |
| E.32 | Placement form | N/A |
| E.33 | Trading platforms name |
|
| E.34 | Trading platforms Market identifier code (MIC) |
|
| E.35 | Trading platforms access |
|
| E.36 | Involved costs |
|
| E.37 | Offer expenses |
|
| E.38 | Conflicts of interest |
In accordance with the Code of Conduct all officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives, contractors and consultants (and other persons, regardless of job or position), are required to report any situation where there is the potential for conflict of interest between their interests and interests of Bitstamp. The Trading Policy that is in place within the Bitstamp Group prohibits all forms of market manipulation and has been designed to prevent insider trading. |
| E.39 | Applicable law |
|
| E.40 | Competent court |
|
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| F.1 | Crypto-asset type |
|
| F.2 | Crypto-asset functionality |
SKY is also used within protocol-level economic and incentive mechanisms, including staking-based participation and reward structures made available through the Sky Protocol. These mechanisms are designed to support protocol operation and governance participation rather than to provide access to a discrete good or service supplied by a central issuer. The Sky Protocol incorporates mechanisms for managing both surplus and deficit within its stablecoin system. Excess stablecoin proceeds including net revenue and stability fees may accumulate in the protocol’s internal buffer. When the buffer exceeds a governance determined threshold, surplus stablecoins are put into surplus auctions, where they are exchanged for SKY governance tokens that are subsequently removed from circulation, thereby helping to balance overall economic conditions within the protocol. Conversely, if the protocol incurs uncovered debt that cannot be covered by available surplus, debt auctions may be triggered, in which newly minted governance tokens are sold for stablecoins to recapitalise the system. These auction-based mechanisms surplus auctions to retire governance tokens and debt auctions to address shortfalls form core elements of the protocol’s financial stability framework, directly supporting the integrity of the stablecoin and broader ecosystem operations. USDS is the native stablecoin of the Sky Protocol., and governance decisions taken by SKY holders may influence parameters and mechanisms relating to stablecoin operation, savings modules and other on-chain financial components of the ecosystem. |
| F.3 | Planned application of functionalities |
|
| F.4 | Type of crypto-asset white paper | |
| F.5 | The type of submission | |
| F.6 | Crypto-asset characteristics |
The primary characteristic of SKY is its governance function. Holders of SKY may participate in governance processes relating to the operation, parameters and evolution of the Sky Protocol, subject to the applicable governance rules and procedures. Governance participation may require delegation, staking or other procedural steps defined by the protocol at the relevant time. MakerDAO rebranded to Sky in 2024 and introduced SKY as the new native governance token. MKR and SKY coexist, with conversion available from MKR to SKY. Sky Ecosystem governance has been transitioning governance from MKR to SKY, with SKY becoming the governance token for on-chain voting on the new governance system. The protocol conversion rate is 1 MKR to 24 thousand SKY. However, governance can apply a Delayed Upgrade Penalty over time that reduces the net SKY received for later upgrades. |
| F.7 | Commercial name or trading name | N/A as DTI is provided in F.13 |
| F.8 | Website of the issuer |
|
| F.9 | Starting date of offer to the public or admission to trading |
|
| F.10 | Publication date |
|
| F.11 | Any other services provided by the issuer |
|
| F.12 | Language or languages of the crypto-asset white paper |
|
| F.13 | Digital token identifier code used to uniquely identify the crypto-asset or each of the several crypto assets to which the white paper relates, where available |
|
| F.14 | Functionally fungible group digital token identifier, where available |
|
| F.15 | Voluntary data flag |
|
| F.16 | Personal data flag |
|
| F.17 | LEI eligibility |
|
| F.18 | Home Member State | |
| F.19 | Host Member States |
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| G.1 | Purchaser rights and obligations |
As reflected in the governance documentation available on the Sky.money website (https://vote.sky.money/), at the time of this white paper, SKY holders are granted only limited functional rights within the ecosystem,which are further described as crypto-asset functionalities in F.2. |
| G.2 | Exercise of rights and obligations |
|
| G.3 | Conditions for modifications of rights and obligations |
|
| G.4 | Future public offers |
|
| G.5 | Issuer retained crypto-assets |
|
| G.6 | Utility Token Classification |
|
| G.7 | Key features of goods/services of utility tokens |
|
| G.8 | Utility tokens redemption |
|
| G.9 | Non-trading request |
|
| G.10 | Crypto-assets purchase or sale modalities | N/A |
| G.11 | Crypto-assets transfer restrictions |
|
| G.12 | Supply adjustment protocols |
|
| G.13 | Supply adjustment mechanisms |
|
| G.14 | Token value protection schemes |
|
| G.15 | Token value protection schemes description |
|
| G.16 | Compensation schemes |
|
| G.17 | Compensation schemes description |
|
| G.18 | Applicable law |
|
| G.19 | Competent court |
|
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| H.1 | Distributed ledger technology | N/A as DTI is provided in F.13 |
| H.2 | Protocols and technical standards |
Ethereum operates a permissionless peer-to-peer network using DevP2P protocol suite for node communication. Nodes discover peers through discv5 (discovery version 5), implementing Kademlia-based distributed hash table for decentralised peer location without central coordination. Full nodes maintain connections to approximately 50-100 peers, propagating transactions and blocks through gossip protocols ensuring network-wide distribution within seconds. Transaction Propagation User-signed SKY transactions broadcast from wallet software reach connected Ethereum nodes entering local mempools (pending transaction pools). Nodes validate transaction signatures, nonce sequencing, and gas parameters before relaying to peers. Gossip propagation ensures transaction distribution across the network, reaching validator mempools where they await inclusion in proposed blocks. Transaction replacement follows EIP-1559 priority fee mechanics, with higher-fee transactions displacing lower-fee equivalents in resource-constrained mempools. Interface Layer Non-custodial interfaces such as sky.money serve as transaction construction interfaces, submitting signed transactions to the Ethereum network without holding user funds or operating intermediary infrastructure. SkyLink components facilitate asset bridging between Ethereum mainnet and layer-2 networks including Base, Arbitrum, Optimism and Unichain, maintaining canonical state records on mainnet while enabling cross-chain interoperability. Application layer The application layer implements protocol functionality through interconnected smart contract modules:
|
| H.3 | Technology used |
SKY operates within the Ethereum Virtual Machine executing Solidity-compiled bytecode at contract address 0x56072C95FAA701256059aa122697B133aDEd9279. Transaction validation occurs through Ethereum validator clients (Geth, Nethermind, Besu, Erigon) with gas metering constraining computational resources. Core software components The protocol employs modular smart contract architecture. Vat contract provides central accounting, tracking collateralised positions through normalised debt (art) and collateral units (ink) with 18-decimal precision. Fee accrual operates via rate accumulation variables, calculating stability fees as time-weighted obligations. Collateral handling coordinates across Vat (accounting), Spot (collateralisation enforcement), and Clipper (auction execution) modules. Chief aggregates voting weight through SKY token deposits, implementing continuous approval voting. Pause enforces mandatory time delays on governance actions. Spell contracts execute parameter changes as atomic bundles. Smart Burn Engine coordinates surplus auctions with automated token destruction. Wallet technologies SKY requires standard Ethereum wallets supporting ERC-20 interactions and contract calls. Non-custodial implementations (MetaMask, Ledger, Trezor) enable direct protocol access. SKY implements EIP-2612 permit for gasless approvals via off-chain signatures and EIP-1271 for smart contract wallet authorisation. Protocol interactions (Lockstake staking, VoteDelegate delegation, farming rewards) execute through wallet-initiated contract calls creating non-custodial positions owned by user addresses. Key management Users maintain exclusive private key control with no issuer-managed keys or custodial solutions. Private keys generate Ethereum addresses via ECDSA (secp256k1) public key derivation and Keccak-256 hashing. Hardware wallets isolate keys in security chips requiring physical confirmation. Software wallets encrypt key material using passwords or biometrics. BIP-39 seed phrases enable cross-wallet recovery. Multi-signature and account abstraction (ERC-4337) support distributed control and programmable authorisation while maintaining non-custodial architecture. Oracle infrastructure Price feed oracles supply collateral valuations with Oracle Security Module enforcing one-hour delay before activation, mitigating flash crashes and manipulation. Governance-selected providers push updates to OSM storage. Emergency oracles can freeze compromised feeds and initiate global settlement. Keeper infrastructure Independent economic actors monitor vault ratios triggering liquidations when undercollateralised, and surplus levels initiating auctions when reserves exceed buffers. Keepers operate without protocol infrastructure, incentivised through liquidation penalties and auction participation. Supporting systems Protocol interfaces with Ethereum's peer-to-peer network for transaction propagation. IPFS hosts governance documentation via content-addressing. SkyLink bridges coordinate cross-chain transfers to Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Unichain through lock-and-mint mechanisms. |
| H.4 | Consensus Mechanism |
Validators deterministically order transactions within proposed blocks based on priority fee bidding and position within mempool queues. This ordering mechanism ensures consistent execution sequence for interdependent SKY operations, preventing front-running of governance votes. This is achieved through transaction reordering and maintaining fairness in liquidation auctions where multiple keepers compete for collateral. Block proposals occur every 12 seconds, with validators randomly selected via RANDAO, distributing proposal opportunities across the validator set and preventing predictable censorship windows. SKY transfers, Chief voting weight updates, and vault state modifications execute in their included block's sequence, with finalisation guaranteeing irreversible ordering after checkpoint epochs. Finality derives from checkpoint-based voting: when two checkpoint epochs form a supermajority link (votes representing ≥66.67% of total staked ETH), all transactions in the finalised epoch become irreversible. Reverting finalised blocks requires destroying substantial validator stake through slashing mechanisms, creating economic barriers to chain reorganisation attacks. SKY transfers, mint/burn operations and governance executions inherit Ethereum's finality guarantees. Once transactions settle in finalised blocks, state changes become economically irreversible, backed by the aggregate value of staked ETH securing the network. |
| H.5 | Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees |
All Ethereum transactions incur gas fees denominated in ETH, calculated as gas_used × gas_price. Users pay gas fees for SKY transfers, MKR-to-SKY conversions, vault operations and governance votes. These fees compensate validators for block inclusion and execution, flowing entirely to Ethereum network participants rather than Sky Protocol. SkyLink bridging operations between the Ethereum mainnet and layer-2 networks (Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Unichain) involve separate fee structures depending on the target network's gas model and bridge architecture. Protocol-level fees
|
| H.6 | Use of distributed ledger technology |
|
| H.7 | DLT functionality description | N/A |
| H.8 | Audit |
|
| H.9 | Audit outcome |
|
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| I.1 | Offer-related risks |
SKY may experience material price volatility, including abrupt price changes that are not correlated with protocol fundamentals. This risk is amplified during the MKR-to-SKY transition, as liquidity and price discovery shift across venues and routes. Liquidity and conversion-route concentration risk Secondary-market liquidity for the SKY token may be limited or fragmented across various platforms and venues. During transition from MKR to SKY, the Converter contract could be viewed as the most reliable route for converting MKR to SKY. This preference may lead to effective liquidity concentrating in this single on-chain contract, potentially amplifying certain market dynamics or execution risks for users. Trading and access restriction risk SKY token trading and liquidity access rely on external platforms, including decentralised exchanges, centralised exchanges, DEX aggregators, and web-based front-end interfaces who implement their own operational policies and jurisdictional restrictions, policy changes, or delisting decisions. Lack of Intrinsic Value The token does not possess inherent utility, functioning solely as a speculative asset. Its valuation is predominantly influenced by community engagement, speculative activities, and overall market sentiment, which presents considerable challenges to sustaining long-term value stability. Delisting Risks Bitstamp Europe S.A. might remove the token from trading in line with Bitstamp Markets Trading Rules. |
| I.2 | Issuer-related risks |
|
| I.3 | Crypto-assets-related risks |
The SKY token contract is controlled by “wards” with privileged access, including the ability to add/remove wards and mint SKY. Compromise or misuse of privileged access could affect supply and holder interests. Transaction finality and execution risk SKY transfers and interactions occur on Ethereum and are therefore subject to congestion, fee volatility, execution delays/failures, and other network conditions. Converter mechanics and rounding risk The bidirectional conversion path uses a fixed rate, and the SKY-to-MKR path rounds down when the SKY amount is not a multiple of the rate, which can result in small conversion losses. Allowance/signature validation risk SKY supports permit-based approvals and EIP-1271 contract signature validation. User error or integration mistakes in approval/signature flows can lead to unintended approvals or failed transactions. Transfer restriction edge-case risk The audited design of SKY includes restrictions such as disallowing transfers to the zero address or to the token contract itself, which may cause unexpected transfer failures for some operational workflows. Scams Due to the irreversible execution of blockchain transactions and the limited ability to identify counterparties in decentralised environments, crypto-asset markets are particularly exposed to fraudulent activity. Once assets are transferred, recovery is typically not possible. Investors should therefore exercise heightened caution when acquiring or transferring crypto-assets. Fraudulent schemes may include, among others, the issuance of counterfeit tokens bearing similar names, phishing attempts via email or social media, fake promotions or airdrops, and impersonation or identity theft. Market Abuse Crypto-asset markets may be particularly vulnerable to market abuse due to the characteristics of the underlying blockchain infrastructure and the fragmented nature of trading across platforms and jurisdictions. Practices such as front-running, spoofing, pump-and-dump schemes, wash trading, and other forms of manipulation may occur across different systems, trading venues, or geographic locations. These risks may be amplified for crypto-assets with low market capitalisation, limited liquidity, or a small number of trading venues. Such conditions can increase price volatility and susceptibility to manipulation, potentially resulting in significant losses, including the total loss of the invested funds |
| I.4 | Project implementation-related risks |
Integrators are required to support both MKR and SKY during transition, highlighting operational steps and timelines. Failures or delays by integrators (wallets, DEXes, exchanges, lending protocols) may cause user disruption and liquidity issues. Dependency and third-party service provider risk Availability depends on third-party service providers and vendors; outages or failures can degrade or interrupt access to protocol interactions through the official interface. Third-party subdomain / ecosystem site risk Certain sky.money subdomains accessible through the interface are controlled by independent third parties and may have different governing terms. This can create user confusion and inconsistent risk controls. |
| I.5 | Technology-related risks |
Sky’s codebases have undergone multiple audits, but both the audit summary and the audit report emphasise that audits are time-boxed and cannot uncover all vulnerabilities; exploitation could cause loss of assets or protocol malfunction. Governance-module technical risk The Pause design relies on scheduled plans, delegatecall via proxy, and constraints (plot/exec/drop); flaws in these invariants or misconfiguration could enable harmful governance actions or prevent corrective action. Oracle and external data risk Oracle failures, including price data manipulation, incorrect valuations, delayed updates, or complete feed downtime, may directly compromise vault safety calculations and liquidation trigger thresholds. Malfunctioning oracles can cause premature liquidations during flash crashes, delayed liquidations allowing protocol undercollateralisation, or incorrect collateral ratio calculations enabling unauthorised USDS generation against insufficient backing. Front-end integrity / phishing and signing risk Interface compromises may attempt to trick users into signing malicious transactions or display incorrect information; users remain responsible for wallet security and signing decisions. Bug bounty scope limitation risk The bug bounty is managed by Immunefi and is subject to its scope and rules; exclusions or scope gaps may leave some issues undiscovered by the programme. |
| I.6 | Mitigation measures |
|
| N | Field | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Mandatory information on principal adverse impacts on the climate and other environment-related adverse impacts of the consensus mechanism | ||
| General information about adverse impacts | ||
| S.1 | Name |
|
| S.2 | Relevant legal entity identifier |
|
| S.3 | Name of the crypto-asset |
|
| S.4 | Consensus Mechanism |
Finality derives from checkpoint-based voting: when two checkpoint epochs form a supermajority link (votes representing ≥66.67% of total staked ETH), all transactions in the finalised epoch become irreversible. Reverting finalised blocks requires destroying substantial validator stake through slashing mechanisms, creating economic barriers to chain reorganisation attacks. SKY transfers, mint/burn operations and governance executions inherit Ethereum's finality guarantees. Once transactions settle in finalised blocks, state changes become economically irreversible, backed by the aggregate value of staked ETH securing the network. |
| S.5 | Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees |
|
| S.6 | Beginning of the period to which the disclosed information relates |
|
| S.7 | End of period to which disclosed information relates |
|
| Mandatory key indicator | ||
| S.8 | Energy consumption |
|
| Sources and methodologies | ||
| S.9 | Energy consumption sources and methodologies |
Full methodology available at : www.micacryptoalliance.com/methodology |
| Supplementary information on principal adverse impacts on climate and other environment-related adverse impacts of the consensus mechanism | ||
| Supplementary key indicators | ||
| S.10 | Renewable energy consumption |
|
| S.11 | Energy intensity |
|
| S.12 | Scope 1 DLT GHG emissions – Controlled |
|
| S.13 | Scope 2 DLT GHG emissions – Purchased |
|
| S.14 | GHG intensity |
|
| Sources and methodologies | ||
| S.15 | Key energy sources and methodologies |
Full methodology available at: www.micacryptoalliance.com/methodologies |
| S.16 | Key GHG sources and methodologies |
Full methodology available at: www.micacryptoalliance.com/methodologies |
| Optional information on principal adverse impacts on the climate and on other environment-related adverse impacts of the consensus mechanism | ||
| Optional indicators | ||
| S.17 | Energy mix | |
| S.18 | Energy use reduction | N/A |
| S.19 | Carbon intensity |
|
| S.20 | Scope 3 DLT GHG emissions – Value chain | N/A |
| S.21 | GHG emissions reduction targets or commitments | N/A |
| S.22 | Generation of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) |
|
| S.23 | Non-recycled WEEE ratio |
|
| S.24 | Generation of hazardous waste |
|
| S.25 | Generation of waste (all types) |
|
| S.26 | Non-recycled waste ratio (all types) |
|
| S.27 | Waste intensity (all types) |
|
| S.28 | Waste reduction targets or commitments (all types) | N/A |
| S.29 | Impact of the use of equipment on natural resources |
|
| S.30 | Natural resources use reduction targets or commitments | N/A |
| S.31 | Water use |
|
| S.32 | Non recycled water ratio |
|
| Sources and and methodologies | ||
| S.33 | Other energy sources and methodologies |
Full methodology available at: www.micacryptoalliance.com/methodologies |
| S.34 | Other GHG sources and methodologies |
Full methodology available at: www.micacryptoalliance.com/methodologies |
| S.35 | Waste sources and methodologies |
Full methodology available at: www.micacryptoalliance.com/methodologies |
| S.36 | Natural resources sources and methodologies |
|