Contingent contracts, also known as conditional contracts, are agreements that depend on the occurrence or non-occurrence of a future event. The validity of such contracts is a complex issue that varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances. In this article, we will delve into the intricacies of contingent contracts, exploring their validity, the conditions that must be met, and the legal implications.

Contingent contracts are ubiquitous in various aspects of life, from real estate transactions to employment contracts. For instance, a property sale might be contingent upon the buyer securing financing, or an employment contract might be contingent upon the employee passing a background check. Understanding the validity of these contracts is crucial for both parties involved.

Understanding Contingent Contracts
At their core, contingent contracts are agreements that are subject to the happening or not happening of a future event. The event in question could be an action, a condition, or a circumstance. The contract becomes binding only if the specified event occurs or does not occur, as the case may be.

To illustrate, consider a contract for the sale of a house. The contract might be contingent upon the buyer obtaining a mortgage within a specified timeframe. If the buyer fails to secure the mortgage, the contract becomes void, and neither party is legally bound to fulfill their obligations.
Contingency Must Be Possible

For a contingent contract to be valid, the event upon which it is contingent must be possible. If the event is impossible, the contract is void ab initio, meaning it is not a valid contract from the outset. For example, a contract contingent upon the buyer finding a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow would not be valid because finding a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow is impossible.
However, the event does not have to be certain or even probable. It only needs to be possible. So, a contract contingent upon the buyer winning the lottery, for instance, could be valid despite the low probability of winning.
Contingency Must Be Clear and Certain

For a contingent contract to be valid, the contingency must be clearly and certainly stated in the contract. The event upon which the contract depends must be unambiguous and capable of verification. If the contingency is uncertain or vague, the contract may not be enforceable.
For example, a contract contingent upon "good weather" might not be valid if "good weather" is not clearly defined. What constitutes "good weather" could be subjective and difficult to verify, making the contract unenforceable.
Conditions for Validity in Different Jurisdictions

The specific conditions for the validity of contingent contracts can vary depending on the jurisdiction. In some jurisdictions, such as the United States, the general rule is that a contract is enforceable if the contingency is possible and the contract is otherwise complete. However, there are exceptions to this rule.
In other jurisdictions, such as England and Wales, the law requires that the contingency be certain and capable of happening. The event must also be within the control of the party upon whom the contingency is dependent.




















Contingency Within Control
In some jurisdictions, the event upon which the contract is contingent must be within the control of the party upon whom the contingency is dependent. This means that the party must have the power to cause the event to happen or not happen.
For instance, in a contract contingent upon the buyer obtaining a mortgage, the buyer has the power to apply for a mortgage and influence the lender's decision. Therefore, the contingency is within the buyer's control.
Contingency Not Against Public Policy
In some jurisdictions, a contingent contract may be void if it is against public policy. For example, a contract contingent upon the commission of an illegal act would likely be void on public policy grounds.
Similarly, a contract contingent upon an immoral or unethical act might also be void. The specific contours of what is considered against public policy can vary depending on the jurisdiction.
In conclusion, the validity of contingent contracts depends on a variety of factors, including the possibility of the contingency, the clarity of the contingency, the control the party has over the contingency, and whether the contingency is against public policy. Understanding these factors is crucial for drafting and enforcing contingent contracts. If you are considering a contingent contract, it is advisable to consult with a legal professional to ensure that your contract is valid and enforceable.