Korematsu v. United States: Iconic Photos from the Landmark Case

In the annals of American history, the case of Korematsu v. United States stands out as a pivotal moment that challenged the constitutional rights of individuals during a time of crisis. This landmark Supreme Court case, decided in 1944, centered around the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, a dark chapter in U.S. history that has left an indelible mark, both on the nation's legal landscape and its collective consciousness.

One Really Good Thing in the Supreme Court’s Travel-Ban Ruling: Korematsu Is Gone

Fred Korematsu, a Japanese-American man living in California, refused to comply with Executive Order 9066, which authorized the exclusion of people of Japanese ancestry from designated military areas. His defiance led to his arrest and subsequent conviction, setting the stage for the Supreme Court's decision. The case, and the photographs that document it, offer a stark reminder of the importance of individual rights and the dangers of wartime hysteria.

Weekend Read: The Supreme Court just replaced one injustice with another

The Internment of Japanese Americans

Following the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, a wave of anti-Japanese sentiment swept across the United States. Despite the fact that the vast majority of Japanese Americans were loyal citizens, the U.S. government, driven by fears of espionage and sabotage, began to implement policies that would ultimately lead to their internment. Executive Order 9066, signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1942, authorized the Secretary of War to designate military areas from which "any or all persons may be excluded."

Korematsu vs United States Explained : US History Review

This order paved the way for the forced relocation and internment of over 120,000 Japanese Americans, the majority of whom were U.S. citizens. They were sent to remote, makeshift camps across the country, where they would spend the next several years under harsh conditions, their lives upended by a decision based on fear and prejudice.

Fred Korematsu's Resistance

Korematsu v. United States: 80 Years Later

Fred Korematsu, a 23-year-old man living in Oakland, California, was one of the many Japanese Americans affected by Executive Order 9066. When he was ordered to report to a relocation center, he refused, choosing instead to go into hiding. He was eventually arrested and convicted for violating the order, setting the stage for his legal challenge to the constitutionality of the internment.

Korematsu's case was significant because it was one of the few that challenged the internment orders on constitutional grounds. His lawyers argued that the order violated his Fifth Amendment rights, which guarantee that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The case would ultimately make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, where the justices would have to grapple with the complex legal and moral questions raised by the internment.

Photographic Evidence of Internment

an old man wearing glasses looking off into the distance

Photographs from this period provide a powerful visual record of the internment, capturing the human impact of the policy. Images of families being forced to leave their homes, of crowded trains carrying them to remote camps, and of the barbed wire and guard towers that surrounded the camps serve as a stark reminder of the injustice suffered by Japanese Americans.

One particularly poignant image is that of a young girl, Florence Okumoto, standing in front of her family's home in San Francisco's Japantown. The photograph, taken just before her family was forced to leave, shows Okumoto holding a small American flag, a symbol of her family's loyalty and patriotism. This image, and others like it, underscore the irony of the internment: that it was carried out against a group of people who were, by and large, fiercely loyal to their country.

The Supreme Court's Decision

The Supreme Court . Law, Power & Personality . Famous Dissents . Korematsu v. United States (1944)

The Supreme Court's decision in Korematsu v. United States is often cited as one of the most notorious in the Court's history. In a 6-3 decision, the Court upheld the constitutionality of the exclusion order, arguing that the government's interest in national security outweighed the individual liberties of Japanese Americans.

The Court's decision was based, in part, on the government's assertion that Japanese Americans posed a threat to national security. This assertion was later proven to be unfounded, as there was no evidence of disloyalty or espionage among Japanese Americans during the war.

an old black and white photo of many people with suitcases on the street in front of parked cars

Japanese American internment - Life in the camps, the Korematsu decision & compensation

two men in suits walking next to each other

First Colors Officially Raised in Korea, 24 August 1950

[PHOTO] Marking 76th anniversary of Korean War

US-ROK forces commence bilateral exercise Freedom Shield 23

Number 9 Korea Football, Gue-sung Cho Football, South Korea World Cup 2022, Sung Cho Football, South Korea Soccer Team, Park Ji Sung, Editorial News, Lee Young, Football Match

Japanese American internment | Definition, Camps, Locations, Conditions, & Facts

two women in blue and white uniforms standing next to each other on a basketball court

two people holding up large blocks with the flag of usa and japan on them - stock image

South korea united states flag alliance partnership cooperation diplomacy international relations trade agreement Stock Illustration | Adobe Stock

Japan Volleyball Jerseys, Japanese Volleyball Jersey, Japan National Volleyball Team Jersey, Volleyball Jersey Japan, Libero Jerseys, Red Volleyball Jersey, Libero Jersey, Volleyball Jersey Women, Japanese Volleyball Uniform

a group of baseball players standing next to each other on top of a field in front of an american flag

a group of men and women standing on top of each other in front of a crowd

Dissenting Opinions

While the majority of the Court upheld the exclusion order, three justices dissented. Justice Robert H. Jackson, in his dissent, wrote that the Court was "dealing with the case of the present exclusion order as of last week, and not as of last year." He argued that the Court should not rubber-stamp the government's actions, but rather should scrutinize them closely to ensure that they do not violate constitutional rights.

Justice Frank Murphy, in his dissent, wrote that the exclusion order was "based on race prejudice, the worst form of discrimination." He argued that the Court had a duty to protect the rights of all citizens, regardless of their race or national origin.

The Legacy of Korematsu

The decision in Korematsu v. United States has had a lasting impact on American law and society. While the internment camps were eventually closed, the decision stood as a legal precedent until 1988, when Congress passed the Civil Liberties Act, which formally apologized for the internment and provided reparations to surviving internees.

The case also serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of wartime hysteria and the importance of protecting individual rights, even in times of crisis. As Justice Jackson warned in his dissent, "A military order, however unpopular it may be, may probably stand unchallenged even if it offends every canon of constitutional law." The internment of Japanese Americans, and the Court's decision in Korematsu, are a testament to the truth of these words.

Today, the photographs that document the internment serve as a powerful reminder of this dark chapter in American history. They are a testament to the strength and resilience of the Japanese American community, and a call to action for all Americans to stand up for the rights of all citizens, regardless of their race or national origin. As we look to the future, we must learn from the past, and ensure that we never again allow fear and prejudice to override our commitment to justice and equality.