In D'Nealian, the "humps" of uppercase M and N touch the headline. In Zaner-Bloser, the "humps" of uppercase M and N don't touch the headline. Conclusion In this article, you learned to spot the differences between D'Nealian and Zaner.
We often get asked about the differences between Zaner Bloser and D'Nealian. Basically there are two differences: slant and shape. The Zaner-Bloser and D'Nealian methods do differ when it comes to how they handle manuscript and cursive lettering.
Zaner-Bloser teaches students two distinct styles of creating letters by hand - a simple, straight up and down manuscript style and a traditional, slanted cursive one. The differences between these scripts are all fairly small, since each was developed from the last. Are there any arguments for really favoring one over another? In my case, handwriting isn't a huge hobby of mine, I'm just looking for a script that can be written at speed and looks decent.
Clear distinctions between Zaner Bloser's structured manuscript approach and D'Nealian's semi. The muscles in the eyes of young children are still developing and they have great difficulty distinguishing the "hooks and tails" on many of the D'Nealian letters; for example, the difference between lowercase j and lowercase i as well as the difference between the K and the uppercase R. I'm aware that Zaner, Bloser, Palmer, and Spencer all had methods of teaching cursive handwriting.
But I can't understand what makes one type of handwriting a certain style versus another style. I guess I assume that each style is a font. Therefore you will have distinctive Qs or Zs with Zaner.
I'm trying to decide between these two curriculums for handwriting. I love the look of the Zaner-Bloser books, but I am very comfortable with D'Nealian, as that is the way I was taught. I would normally lean towards the D'Nealian but Im such a WTM junky, I have to explore Z.
What is Zaner Bloser method? The Zaner-Bloser method has helped generations of students master manuscript (print) and cursive handwriting skills. Considered the gold standard in instruction, Zaner. The new alphabet was designed to facilitate transition from manuscript to cursive handwriting.
This study compared cursive handwriting samples from 112 first graders who had received instruction using the new alphabet and 134 first.