Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

Netflix, Inc.

Upcoming Earnings

Q2 2026 (Expected Mid-July 2026)

Ticker

NFLX

Prepared Date

July 15, 2026

Last Reported Period

Q1 2026 (April 16, 2026)

Reporting Period

Q2 2026 (June 30, 2026 Quarter End)

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 2026 is a low bar with meaningful downside risk — the stock has de-rated sharply since Q1 earnings, consensus has been revised down, and the single biggest swing factor is whether advertising revenue is tracking toward the $3B full-year target.

Heading into Q2 2026, Netflix faces a consensus bar that has been reset lower following the Q1 print, where EPS guidance for Q2 came in below Street expectations and triggered a sharp post-earnings selloff. Revenue consensus sits at ~$12.57B (vs. $12.58B immediately post-Q1 earnings), implying ~13.5% YoY growth — squarely within management's maintained 12–14% full-year guidance range, leaving little room for a meaningful upside surprise on the top line. Management's tone has been steady and confident on the organic growth algorithm, reaffirming the $3B advertising revenue target and 31.5% operating margin for the full year despite the Warner Bros. deal costs and Reed Hastings' board departure; however, the Q2 EPS guide below consensus introduced a credibility gap on near-term profitability that the market has not forgiven. Estimate revisions have drifted modestly lower since the April print — Q2 operating EPS consensus moved from ~$0.78 to ~$0.80, a slight uptick, but the full-year operating EPS consensus of ~$3.55 remains well below the $3.57 post-Q1 baseline, suggesting the Street is not yet fully buying the margin recovery story. The stock has declined ~32% from its Q1 earnings-day close of $107.79 to $73.68 as of July 15, dramatically underperforming the S&P 500 (+7.6%) and XLC (−4.6%) over the same period, pricing in a cautious outcome but not yet a disaster. The wildcard is advertising revenue trajectory: any signal that the $3B full-year ad target is at risk — or conversely, that programmatic monetization is accelerating ahead of plan — will be the single most market-moving data point in the print.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus is a manageable but not low bar on revenue (~$12.57B, +13.5% YoY), while advertising revenue and operating margin are the bigger swing factors — any miss on ad monetization or margin compression relative to the 32.8% Q2 consensus would likely re-accelerate the stock's de-rating.

Table 1 — Q2 2026 Current Quarter Snapshot (All Key KPIs)

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual (Last Quarter)

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year)

Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate

YoY Change

Management Guidance

Cons. vs. Guidance

Total Revenue ($B)

$12.25B

$11.08B

$12.57B

+13.5%

FY26: +12–14% YoY

In line

Operating Income ($B)

$3.96B

$3.77B

$4.12B

+9.4%

FY26: 31.5% op. margin

~+4% above implied

Operating Margin (%)

32.3%

34.1%

32.8%

-130 bps YoY

FY26: 31.5%

+130 bps above FY guide

EPS — Diluted Operating ($)

$1.145

$0.737

$0.798

+8.3%

No specific Q2 EPS guide

N/A

Global Streaming Net Adds (M)

4.68M

5.98M

3.90M

-34.8%

No specific guidance

N/A

Global Streaming Ending Subs (M)

332.1M

311.7M

336.1M

+7.8%

No specific guidance

N/A

Global ARPU ($/month)

$12.40

$11.99

$12.55

+4.7%

No specific guidance

N/A

Advertising Revenue ($M)

$552M

$344M

$666M

+93.6%

FY26: ~$3.0B total

Tracking; ~$1.9B run-rate needed in H2

Free Cash Flow ($B)

$5.09B

$2.27B

$2.45B

+8.1%

FY26: ~$8B+ (raised post WBD fee)

N/A — Q1 inflated by WBD fee

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Q1 2026 FCF of $5.09B was materially inflated by the Warner Bros. Discovery termination fee recognized in Q1; normalized FCF is more comparable to the $2.45B Q2 2026 consensus. Note: NFLX no longer provides specific subscriber guidance; net adds and ending subs consensus reflect Street estimates only.

Table 2 — Beat/Miss History (Last 8 Quarters, Top 2 KPIs)

Top 2 KPIs: Total Revenue and Global Streaming Net Adds (the two metrics most frequently questioned by analysts and most directly tied to management's forward outlook).

Quarter

KPI

Reported

Consensus

Surprise %

Result

Q1 2026

Revenue ($B)

$12.25B

$12.19B

+0.5%

Beat

Q1 2026

Net Adds (M)

4.68M

4.74M

-1.3%

Miss

Q4 2025

Revenue ($B)

$12.05B

$11.97B

+0.7%

Beat

Q4 2025

Net Adds (M)

9.65M

10.26M

-5.9%

Miss

Q3 2025

Revenue ($B)

$11.51B

$11.53B

-0.1%

Slight Miss

Q3 2025

Net Adds (M)

6.19M

5.83M

+6.2%

Beat

Q2 2025

Revenue ($B)

$11.08B

$11.08B

0.0%

In Line

Q2 2025

Net Adds (M)

5.98M

4.99M

+19.9%

Beat

Q1 2025

Revenue ($B)

$10.54B

$10.50B

+0.4%

Beat

Q1 2025

Net Adds (M)

4.17M

3.47M

+20.2%

Beat

Q4 2024

Revenue ($B)

$10.25B

$10.13B

+1.1%

Beat

Q4 2024

Net Adds (M)

18.91M

9.57M

+97.6%

Massive Beat

Q3 2024

Revenue ($B)

$9.82B

$9.77B

+0.5%

Beat

Q3 2024

Net Adds (M)

5.07M

4.56M

+11.2%

Beat

Q2 2024

Revenue ($B)

$9.56B

$9.51B

+0.5%

Beat

Q2 2024

Net Adds (M)

8.05M

5.07M

+58.8%

Beat

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.

Pattern: Netflix has beaten revenue consensus in 7 of the last 8 quarters, typically by a narrow 0.5–1.1% margin — a consistent but modest beat cadence. Net adds are far more volatile: NFLX has beaten 6 of 8 quarters on subs, but the magnitude swings wildly (from a near-miss to a 98% beat in Q4 2024). The Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 net adds misses are notable as the first back-to-back subscriber disappointments in the dataset, suggesting the password-sharing tailwind is fully absorbed and organic growth is normalizing.

3. Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: Management has held its full-year 2026 guidance unchanged since the Q1 print — revenue growth of 12–14%, operating margin of 31.5%, and advertising revenue of ~$3B — but the Q2 EPS guide below consensus introduced a near-term credibility gap that the stock has not recovered from.

Metric

Q1 2026 Earnings Guidance (Baseline)

Current Status / Revision

Direction

FY26 Revenue Growth

12–14% YoY

Maintained; no revision

Unchanged →

FY26 Operating Margin

31.5%

Maintained; WBD deal costs not material to margin

Unchanged →

FY26 Advertising Revenue

~$3.0B

Maintained; target not adjusted post-Q1

Unchanged →

FY26 Free Cash Flow

~$8B+ (raised from prior due to WBD termination fee after-tax)

Raised post-Q1 due to WBD breakup fee; Q1 FCF of $5.09B was inflated

Raised ↑ (one-time)

Q2 2026 Revenue

Roughly in line with consensus (~$12.5B implied)

No formal Q2 revenue guidance provided; Street at $12.57B

N/A

Q2 2026 EPS

Below consensus (key negative surprise from Q1 call)

No formal EPS guidance; Street at $0.798 operating EPS

Risk ↓

Subscriber Guidance

No specific guidance provided (policy change)

No change; Street modeling 3.90M net adds for Q2

N/A

M&A Posture

Disciplined; walked away from WBD on price; Interpositive AI acquisition completed

No new M&A signals; focus on organic growth

Unchanged →

Management Tone Assessment: Management's tone on the Q1 2026 call was confident on the long-term algorithm — reiterating that 12–14% revenue growth is a "multiyear" trajectory extending beyond 2026 — but the Q2 EPS guide below consensus was a notable stumble that undermined near-term credibility. The Warner Bros. deal termination was framed as a demonstration of financial discipline (Netflix received a breakup fee), and management emphasized the exercise "built M&A muscle." The Reed Hastings board departure was characterized as planned succession, unrelated to the WBD deal. The $25B share repurchase authorization announced April 22 signals management's confidence in the balance sheet and long-term value, but the market has focused more on the EPS guidance miss than the buyback signal.

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Post-Q1 baseline as of April 23, 2026; current consensus as of July 15, 2026.

Interpretation: The revision picture is remarkably stable — revenue and margin estimates have barely moved since the Q1 print, suggesting the Street has largely accepted management's full-year framework. The slight uptick in Q2 operating EPS consensus (from $0.780 to $0.798) may reflect modest model refinements rather than a directional view change. The small FY26 operating EPS decline (-0.7%) is the only meaningful negative revision and likely reflects the Street incorporating slightly higher content spend or FX headwinds. Overall, the lack of significant downward revision is a mild positive — it suggests the Q2 EPS guidance miss was already absorbed into models rather than triggering a fresh round of cuts.

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: NFLX has been a significant underperformer since Q1 earnings, declining ~32% from its April 16 close of $107.79 to $73.68 as of July 15 — a stark contrast to the S&P 500 (+7.6%) and XLC (-4.6%) over the same period, suggesting the stock is pricing in a cautious but not catastrophic Q2 outcome.

NFLX vs. S&P 500 (SPY) and XLC — Indexed Performance Since Q1 2026 Earnings (April 16, 2026 = 100). Source: Stock Price Data.

Metric

Value

NFLX Price (Q1 Earnings Day Close, Apr 16)

$107.79

NFLX Price (Post-Earnings Day, Apr 17 — first full session after AH selloff)

$97.31 (-9.7%)

NFLX Price (July 15, 2026)

$73.68

NFLX Return Since Q1 Earnings Close

-31.6%

SPY Return (Same Period)

+7.6%

XLC Return (Same Period)

-4.6%

NFLX Relative to SPY

-39.2 percentage points

NFLX Relative to XLC

-27.0 percentage points

Source: Stock Price Data.

The stock's sharp de-rating since Q1 earnings reflects three compounding negatives: (1) the Q2 EPS guidance miss, (2) the Reed Hastings board departure creating governance uncertainty, and (3) broader sector rotation away from growth/streaming names. At $73.68, NFLX trades at a significant discount to its recent highs and has underperformed even the broader communication services sector (XLC) by 27 percentage points. The magnitude of the selloff suggests the market has already priced in a cautious Q2 print — creating an asymmetric setup where a clean beat on revenue and advertising could drive a meaningful relief rally, while a miss would likely accelerate the de-rating further.

6. Material News & Developments (Since Q1 2026 Earnings)

Key Takeaway: The two most market-relevant post-earnings developments are the $25B share repurchase authorization (a strong capital return signal) and Reed Hastings' board departure (a governance transition that the market has not yet fully digested).

7. Peer Commentaries — Q2 2026 Read-Throughs (Last 60 Days)

Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from Q1 2026 earnings calls (reported April–May 2026) offers several relevant read-throughs for Netflix's Q2 2026 print: live sports content is driving strong engagement and subscriber acquisition across platforms; advertising demand on streaming remains robust; and Disney's streaming profitability trajectory provides a useful benchmark for Netflix's own margin expansion story. Only commentary about Q2 2026 or forward-looking statements made after Q1 2026 earnings are included below.

Note: All peer commentary below is sourced from Q1 2026 earnings calls (reported April–May 2026), which contain forward-looking commentary about Q2 2026 and the remainder of 2026. Prior-quarter results commentary (i.e., peers discussing their own Q4 2025 or Q1 2026 results without forward-looking read-through) has been excluded.

TKO Group Holdings (TKO) — Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 6, 2026)

Read-Through Relevance: HIGH — TKO directly confirmed Netflix's WWE archive deal and provided forward-looking commentary on live sports engagement, streaming partnerships, and content monetization that is directly applicable to Netflix's Q2 2026 setup.

Walt Disney Company (DIS) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (May 6, 2026)

Read-Through Relevance: HIGH — Disney is Netflix's most direct streaming peer. Disney's Q2 2026 commentary on streaming subscriber trends, advertising monetization, and content engagement provides the most comparable benchmark for Netflix's own Q2 2026 setup.

Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) — Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 6, 2026)

Read-Through Relevance: MEDIUM — WBD is a direct streaming competitor (Max) and the company Netflix walked away from acquiring. WBD's Q1 2026 commentary on streaming subscriber trends, advertising, and content strategy provides a competitive benchmark, with the added context of the Paramount/WBD combination discussions.

Fox Corporation (FOX) — Q3 FY2026 Earnings Call (May 11, 2026)

Read-Through Relevance: MEDIUM — Fox's commentary on advertising market conditions, live sports rights, and digital/streaming trends provides a read on the broader media advertising environment that is relevant to Netflix's advertising revenue trajectory.

Live Nation Entertainment (LYV) — Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 5, 2026)

Read-Through Relevance: LOW-MEDIUM — Live Nation's commentary on live event demand, consumer spending on entertainment, and global touring trends provides a macro read on consumer willingness to pay for premium entertainment experiences, which is indirectly relevant to Netflix's pricing power and subscriber retention.

Peer Read-Through Summary Table

Peer

Report Date

Relevance

Key NFLX Read-Through Theme

Signal Direction

TKO Group (TKO)

May 6, 2026

HIGH

WWE archive deal confirmed; live sports drives engagement & younger demographics for ad monetization

Positive ↑

Walt Disney (DIS)

May 6, 2026

HIGH

Streaming profitability, ad-supported tier demand, subscriber trends, pricing power

Directional benchmark

Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD)

May 6, 2026

MEDIUM

Max subscriber trends, ad market, content cost discipline, Paramount/WBD combination

Competitive read

Fox Corporation (FOX)

May 11, 2026

MEDIUM

Ad market conditions, live sports rights, Tubi AVOD trends

Ad market read

Live Nation (LYV)

May 5, 2026

LOW-MEDIUM

Consumer entertainment spending, international demand, brand advertising budgets

Macro consumer read

8. Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: All insider transactions since Q1 earnings have been dispositions (sales) — no insider purchases have been recorded despite the stock's ~32% decline from Q1 earnings levels, which is a notable absence of a positive signal. The majority of sales appear to be under pre-planned 10b5-1 programs, reducing their informational value, but the volume of selling by Co-CEOs and the CFO immediately post-earnings is worth monitoring.

Insider

Role

Transaction Date

Type

Shares

10b5-1 Plan?

Shares Owned After

Bradford L. Smith

Director

Jun 17, 2026

Sale

35,990

Yes

79,690

Reed Hastings

Director (departing)

Jun 1, 2026

Sale

386,700

Yes

3,940

Spencer Adam Neumann

CFO

May 7, 2026

Sale

9,253

No

73,787

Gregory K. Peters

Co-CEO, Director

May 7, 2026

Sale

27,312

No

120,931

David A. Hyman

Chief Legal Officer

May 5, 2026

Sale

5,722

No

316,100

Theodore A. Sarandos

Co-CEO, Director

May 5, 2026

Sale

27,312

No

284,804

Reed Hastings

Director (departing)

May 1, 2026

Sale

407,550

Yes

3,940

Source: Insider Transaction Data (SEC Form 4 Filings).

Analysis: The insider transaction picture is uniformly negative in direction (all sales, no purchases), though context matters significantly. Reed Hastings' two large sales (794,250 shares combined in May–June) are under pre-planned 10b5-1 programs and are consistent with his announced board departure — these are likely estate/liquidity-driven rather than a view on the stock. The May 5–7 cluster of sales by Co-CEOs Sarandos and Peters, CFO Neumann, and CLO Hyman are more notable as they were NOT under 10b5-1 plans, occurring just 2–3 weeks after Q1 earnings. However, these are relatively modest in size relative to each insider's remaining holdings (Peters retains 120,931 shares; Sarandos retains 284,804 shares), suggesting routine compensation-related selling rather than a directional view. The complete absence of any insider purchases despite the stock's ~32% decline from Q1 earnings levels is the most notable data point — it does not provide a positive contrarian signal that management views the stock as materially undervalued at current levels.

Appendix: Key Risks & Considerations