Ameriprise Financial (AMP) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

Ticker

AMP (NYSE)

Reporting Period

Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026)

Earnings Date

July 23, 2026 — Earnings Call 8:30 AM ET

Prepared

July 22, 2026

Primary Valuation KPI

Adjusted Operating EPS (P/E basis)

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: The setup is modestly constructive — consensus EPS of $10.75 is a beatable bar given AMP's track record of double-digit beats, but the single biggest swing factor is whether Comerica-driven flow headwinds are worse than feared and whether management can credibly signal a Q4 Huntington inflection.

Heading into Q2 2026, the consensus bar for Ameriprise looks achievable but not easy. Adjusted operating EPS consensus of $10.75 (Visible Alpha) represents a modest step-up from Q1's record $11.26, though the sequential decline reflects the absence of the one-time $25M Comerica make-whole payment that boosted Q1 AWM earnings. The more important question is client flows: management explicitly guided for Comerica-related outflows to "accelerate" in Q2 and Q3 (total $18B in assets exiting by end of Q3), meaning reported net flows will again be depressed relative to the underlying organic run-rate. Estimate revisions have been modestly positive since the Q1 print — Q2 EPS consensus has drifted from $10.63 to $10.75 over the past 13 weeks, suggesting the Street has incrementally raised the bar on the back of strong market performance and peer read-throughs. The stock has rallied approximately +14.6% since the Q1 earnings date (April 23 to July 22), outperforming XLF (+8.2%) and SPY (+5.5%), which means some beat is already priced in. The key wildcard is adviser recruiting momentum: management flagged a "pickup in activity" for Q2 at the last call, and any acceleration above the 61 advisers recruited in Q1 — combined with early Huntington onboarding signals — could be the catalyst that re-rates the stock toward its 52-week high.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus EPS of $10.75 is a low-to-moderate bar given AMP's consistent beat history, but client flows are the bigger swing factor — the market will look through a modest EPS beat if Comerica outflows are worse than the ~$4–5B net flow consensus implies.

Table 1 — Q2 2026 Current Quarter Snapshot (All Key KPIs)

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual

Q2 2025 Actual

Q2 2026 Consensus Est.

YoY Change

Guidance

Cons. vs. Guidance

Adj. Operating EPS ($)

$11.26

$9.11

$10.75

+18.0%

No specific Q2 guidance provided

N/A

Total Operating Revenues ($B)

$4.85B

$4.45B

$4.88B

+9.7%

No specific Q2 guidance provided

N/A

Total Client Assets — Ending ($T)

$1.149T

$1.084T

$1.221T

+12.6%

No specific Q2 guidance provided

N/A

Total Client Net Flows ($B)

$4.2B

$4.3B

$3.7B

-14.0%

Comerica outflows to accelerate in Q2/Q3; Huntington onboarding in Q4

N/A — no numeric guidance

Total Branded Advisers (#)

10,523

10,483

10,593

+1.0%

Recruiting pickup expected in Q2; disciplined TA spend

N/A — no numeric guidance

AWM Pretax Margin (%)

30.0%

~28%

N/A — not in VA

~+200 bps YoY

Maintain strong margins; expense discipline

N/A

Asset Mgmt Pretax Margin (%)

44%

~40%

N/A — not in VA

~+400 bps YoY

Target range 35–39%; above range in Q1

N/A

Adj. Operating ROE ex-AOCI (%)

54.3%

~50%

N/A — not in VA

~+400 bps YoY

Best-in-class; no specific target

N/A

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data; AMP Q1 2026 Earnings Release and Transcript. Actuals for Q1 2026 and Q2 2025 are reported figures. Q2 2026 consensus estimates as of July 22, 2026.

Table 2 — Beat/Miss History (Last 8 Quarters, Top 2 KPIs)

KPI 1: Adjusted Operating EPS

Quarter

Reported ($)

Consensus ($)

Surprise (%)

Result

Q1 2026

$11.26

$10.19

+10.5%

Beat

Q4 2025

$10.83

$10.29

+5.2%

Beat

Q3 2025

$9.87

$9.76

+1.1%

Beat

Q2 2025

$9.11

$8.97

+1.6%

Beat

Q1 2025

$9.50

$9.05

+5.0%

Beat

Q4 2024

$9.36

$9.03

+3.7%

Beat

Q3 2024

$8.10

$8.91

-9.1%

Miss

Q2 2024

N/A — not in VA

N/A

N/A

N/A

KPI 2: Total Client Net Flows ($B)

Quarter

Reported ($B)

Consensus ($B)

Surprise (%)

Result

Q1 2026

$4.2B

$9.1B

-53.8%

Miss (Comerica)

Q4 2025

$13.3B

$7.4B

+80.5%

Beat

Q3 2025

$3.4B

$8.4B

-59.0%

Miss

Q2 2025

$4.3B

$8.7B

-50.7%

Miss

Q1 2025

$10.3B

$9.9B

+3.5%

Beat

Q4 2024

$11.3B

$10.1B

+11.7%

Beat

Q3 2024

$8.6B

$10.2B

-15.7%

Miss

Q2 2024

N/A — not in VA

N/A

N/A

N/A

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Consensus figures represent the latest available consensus at the time of each print.

Pattern: AMP has beaten adjusted operating EPS in 6 of the last 7 reported quarters, with an average beat of ~+4% excluding the Q3 2024 miss. Client flows are structurally noisy due to bank partnership transitions (Comerica drag in Q1 2026, Q2 2025, Q3 2025) and lumpy recruiting; the Street has consistently over-estimated flows, making the consensus bar on this KPI less meaningful as a standalone signal.

3. Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: No formal guidance revisions have been issued since the April 23 Q1 2026 earnings call. Management tone remains constructive on EPS and margins but explicitly cautious on near-term flows, with the Comerica wind-down and Huntington onboarding creating a well-telegraphed H1/H2 asymmetry.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 23)

Revised Guidance

Current Consensus

Note

Adj. Operating EPS — FY2026

No explicit FY EPS guidance; implied by segment guidance

$45.22

No post-earnings revision; consensus has drifted +2.4% since Q1 print

Client Net Flows — Q2/Q3 2026

Comerica outflows to "accelerate" in Q2 and Q3; all $18B out by end of Q3

$3.7B Q2 consensus

Unchanged; Street has already lowered flow bar to reflect Comerica drag

Huntington Bank Onboarding

~260 advisers + ~$28B assets; onboarding begins Q4 2026

N/A — not modeled separately

Unchanged; Q4 catalyst remains intact

AWM Pretax Margin

"Excellent" at 30%; targeting continued strength

N/A — not in VA

No change; management expects to maintain 29–30% range

Asset Mgmt Margin

44% in Q1; target range 35–39%; back-office transformation ongoing

N/A — not in VA

No change; above-target margin expected to normalize toward range over time

Capital Return — FY2026

85–90% of operating earnings; opportunistic buybacks at current P/E

N/A

No change; management signaled willingness to exceed 90% if stock remains at current valuation

Operating Tax Rate — FY2026

20–22%

N/A

Unchanged; only explicit FY guidance provided

Adviser Recruiting

61 in Q1; "pickup in activity" expected in Q2; disciplined TA spend

10,593 total advisers (consensus)

No change; management explicitly restraining TA packages vs. competitors

Retirement & Protection Earnings

~$800M per year over time

N/A

Unchanged

Source: AMP Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript (April 23, 2026); Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates have drifted modestly higher since the Q1 print, with Q2 EPS consensus up ~+1.1% and FY2026 EPS up ~+2.4% from the post-earnings baseline — a sign the Street is incrementally more constructive, likely driven by strong market performance and peer read-throughs. Estimates are tracking above the post-Q1 baseline, suggesting the bar has risen slightly.

KPI (Period)

Est. ~Apr 28 (Post-Q1 Baseline)

Current Consensus (Jul 22)

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Call)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Cons. vs. Guidance

Adj. Operating EPS — Q2 2026

$10.63

$10.75

+1.1%

No explicit Q2 guidance

No explicit Q2 guidance

N/A

N/A

Adj. Operating EPS — FY2026

$44.16

$45.22

+2.4%

No explicit FY EPS guidance

No explicit FY EPS guidance

N/A

N/A

Total Operating Revenues — Q2 2026 ($B)

$4.80B

$4.88B

+1.7%

No explicit Q2 guidance

No explicit Q2 guidance

N/A

N/A

Total Operating Revenues — FY2026 ($B)

$19.56B

$19.91B

+1.8%

No explicit FY revenue guidance

No explicit FY revenue guidance

N/A

N/A

Total Client Flows — Q2 2026 ($B)

$3.87B

$3.71B

-4.1%

Comerica outflows to accelerate in Q2/Q3

Unchanged

N/A

N/A

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Post-Q1 baseline uses consensus as of approximately April 28, 2026 (5 trading days post-print). Current consensus as of July 22, 2026.

The revision trajectory is constructive: EPS and revenue estimates have moved higher since the Q1 print, driven by strong equity market performance (S&P 500 +5.5% since April 23) and positive peer read-throughs from BlackRock, Schwab, and Raymond James. The flow estimate has ticked slightly lower, consistent with management's explicit Comerica acceleration guidance. The gap between EPS revision momentum (+2.4% on FY) and flow revision momentum (-4.1% on Q2) reflects the market's view that AMP can deliver earnings growth even through the flow headwind period.

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: AMP's +14.6% rally since Q1 earnings has been driven by a combination of multiple re-rating and earnings revision momentum, with the stock outperforming both XLF (+8.2%) and SPY (+5.5%) over the same period. The NTM P/E has expanded from ~10.2x to ~11.1x, suggesting the market is pricing in continued execution rather than just market beta.

Indexed Performance: AMP vs. XLF vs. SPY — Since April 23, 2026 (Q1 Earnings Date)

Date

AMP (Indexed)

XLF (Indexed)

SPY (Indexed)

Apr 23 (Base)

100.0

100.0

100.0

Apr 30

103.3

100.6

101.4

May 15

102.3

98.7

104.3

May 29

96.9

99.6

106.8

Jun 12

99.9

102.9

104.7

Jun 30

99.8

103.5

105.4

Jul 10

110.3

107.6

106.5

Jul 16

116.0

109.6

105.9

Jul 22 (Latest)

114.6

108.2

105.5

Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance). Base = 100 at April 23, 2026 close. XLF = Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (appropriate sector benchmark for diversified financial services / wealth management). SPY = S&P 500 ETF.

Performance narrative: AMP lagged the market through late May as investors digested the Comerica flow headwind disclosed on the Q1 call. The stock then traded sideways through June while XLF and SPY continued to grind higher. The sharp re-rating began in early July, coinciding with strong bank earnings season read-throughs (JPM, GS, BAC, MS all beat) and the broader financial sector rally. AMP's NTM P/E has expanded from ~10.2x to ~11.1x over the period, with the 12-month P/E multiple down ~19% year-over-year, suggesting the stock still trades at a meaningful discount to its historical peak despite record operating performance. The stock performance decomposition shows that the 1-month and 3-month gains are predominantly multiple-driven (+11.3% and +13.4% P/B expansion, respectively), while the 6-month and 12-month windows show multiple contraction, indicating the recent rally is a recovery from an oversold condition rather than a new valuation regime.

6. Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the Huntington Bank partnership confirmation (announced during Q1 call), which provides a clear Q4 catalyst to offset the Comerica drag. The broader financial sector earnings season has been uniformly strong, creating a favorable read-through backdrop for AMP's Q2 print.

7. Peer Commentary — Current-Quarter Read-Through (Q2 2026)

Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from Q2 2026 reporting is uniformly positive for AMP's setup — strong market-driven AUM growth, robust wealth management flows, and healthy adviser engagement all point to a favorable quarter. The primary limitation is that AMP's flow story is idiosyncratic (Comerica drag) and not captured in peer results.

Methodology Note: Only commentary explicitly about Q2 2026 (the quarter ending June 30, 2026) or forward-looking statements made after each peer's last earnings call is included below. Prior-quarter earnings commentary about prior-quarter results is excluded.

BlackRock (BLK) — Q2 2026 Earnings (July 15, 2026)

Relevance: High (Asset Management read-through for Columbia Threadneedle). Limitation: BLK is a pure asset manager at $15.3T scale; AMP's Columbia Threadneedle is ~$706B and more active-equity focused.

Charles Schwab (SCHW) — Q2 2026 Earnings (July 21, 2026)

Relevance: High (Wealth management, cash sweep, and client engagement read-through). Limitation: SCHW is primarily a self-directed brokerage/custodian; AMP is adviser-led. Cash sweep dynamics differ (SCHW has $58.8B vs. AMP's $29.4B).

Raymond James Financial (RJF) — Fiscal Q3 2026 Earnings (July 22, 2026)

Relevance: Very High (closest direct peer — adviser-led wealth management, fee-based assets, cash sweep, recruiting). Limitation: RJF's fiscal Q3 ends June 30, 2026 (same calendar quarter as AMP's Q2); RJF is more independent-contractor focused vs. AMP's employee/franchisee model.

Invesco (IVZ) — Bernstein Conference (May 27) & Morgan Stanley Conference (June 10, 2026)

Relevance: Moderate (Asset management flows and product demand read-through for Columbia Threadneedle). Limitation: IVZ is a pure-play asset manager; AMP's AM segment is a minority of total earnings. IVZ's QQQ franchise is unique.

Victory Capital (VCTR) — Q2 2026 AUM Update (July 13, 2026)

Relevance: Moderate (Asset management flows and AUM growth read-through). Limitation: VCTR is a smaller, more niche asset manager; limited overlap with AMP's product mix.

Principal Financial (PFG) — Q2 2026 AUM Disclosure (July 20, 2026)

Relevance: Low-to-Moderate (AUM market performance read-through). Limitation: PFG's AUM disclosure is high-level and does not include flow detail or margin commentary.

8. Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: No open-market buys or discretionary sales were identified in the review period. All recent Form 4 filings reflect routine phantom stock conversions and associated tax withholding transactions — nothing that signals unusual insider conviction or concern heading into the print.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Value

Date

Note

William J. Williams

Pres., Wealth Mgmt Advisor Group

Phantom Stock Conversion + Tax Withholding (Code M/F)

~$12,000 (tax withholding only)

Jul 9, 2026

Routine deferred compensation plan conversion; not an open-market transaction

Kelli A. Hunter Petruzillo

EVP, Human Resources

Phantom Stock Conversion + Tax Withholding (Code M/F)

~$49,000 (tax withholding only)

Jul 9, 2026

Routine deferred compensation plan conversion; not an open-market transaction

William F. Truscott

CEO, Global Asset Management

Phantom Stock Conversion + Tax Withholding (Code M/F)

~$90,000 (tax withholding only)

Jul 9, 2026

Routine deferred compensation plan conversion; not an open-market transaction

Dawn M. Brockman

SVP & Controller

Phantom Stock Conversion + Tax Withholding (Code M/F)

~$4,500 (tax withholding only)

Jul 9, 2026

Routine deferred compensation plan conversion; not an open-market transaction

Source: SEC Form 4 filings (EDGAR). All transactions on July 9, 2026 are Code M (phantom stock conversion per Ameriprise Financial Deferred Compensation Plan) and Code F (tax withholding). No open-market buys (Code P) or discretionary sales (Code S) were identified in the review period. The absence of open-market activity is neither bullish nor bearish — it is consistent with the pre-earnings quiet period.

9. Key Risks & Questions for the Call

Key Takeaway: The three most important questions for the call are: (1) How bad were Comerica outflows in Q2 and what is the exit rate heading into Q3? (2) Is the recruiting pipeline actually accelerating, and what does the TA environment look like? (3) Can management provide any early Huntington onboarding signals for Q4?

Key Risks

Key Questions for Management

  1. Comerica Exit Rate: How much of the $18B in Comerica assets exited in Q2, and what is the expected pace in Q3? Is the conversion still on track to complete by end of September?
  2. Recruiting Pipeline: You flagged a "pickup in activity" for Q2 at the last call. How many advisers were recruited in Q2, and how does the pipeline look for H2? Has the TA environment in the market changed at all?
  3. Huntington Onboarding: Can you provide any early signals on Huntington onboarding timing and asset conversion pace? Is Q4 still the right expectation for the bulk of the $28B?
  4. Cash Sweep Dynamics: Did cash sweep balances recover seasonally in Q2 as expected after the Q1 tax-related dip? What is the current trajectory of cash migration from third-party money market funds back to the platform?
  5. Asset Management Margin: The 44% AM margin in Q1 was well above target. Is this level sustainable in Q2, or should we expect normalization toward the 35–39% range as transformation costs flow through?
  6. Capital Return: You repurchased 1.6M shares in Q1 at an average price of ~$470. With the stock now at ~$527, has the pace of buybacks moderated, or are you still finding the valuation attractive at current levels?
  7. AI & Technology: Peers like Raymond James have quantified AI adoption (6,500 users, 99.5% satisfaction). Can you provide any metrics on adviser adoption of your integrated AI tools and early productivity impacts?
  8. Organic Growth Target: You maintained the 4–5% annualized organic growth target despite Q1 flows coming in well below that rate. With Comerica headwinds persisting through Q3, is the full-year target still achievable, or should we think about it as a 2027 run-rate goal?