Dow Inc. (DOW) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

Dow Inc.

Ticker

DOW

Upcoming Earnings

~July 24, 2026 (est.)

Prepared

July 22, 2026

Reporting Period

Q2 2026 (2QFY-2026)

Last Earnings

April 23, 2026 (Q1 2026)

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 2026 is constructive — DOW guided to ~$2.2B Operating EBITDA (above prior guidance and consensus), driven by conflict-related polyethylene pricing tailwinds and II&I upside, but the stock has sold off sharply since earnings as the market questions whether pricing momentum is durable. The biggest swing factor is whether the June $0.20/lb polyethylene price increase — not embedded in guidance — was realized.

Heading into Q2 2026 results, the bar is set at approximately $2.20B in Operating EBITDA — a figure management itself raised at the Wells Fargo Industrials & Materials Conference on June 9, roughly 10% above the original $2.0B guide and above consensus at the time. The upside was driven by stronger-than-expected polyethylene pricing (April settled at +$0.30/lb vs. consultant forecasts of +$0.20/lb) and tightness in polyols and MDI within the Industrial Intermediates & Infrastructure segment. Management's tone has been notably more confident since the Q1 print, with CFO Jeffrey Tate explicitly framing a multi-year EBITDA bridge of $3.3B (2025 base) + $3B self-help + $1B Alberta = $7B+ — a structural bull case independent of macro recovery. Estimate revisions have moved sharply higher since the April 23 earnings call, with Q2 2026 Operating EBITDA consensus rising from ~$2.12B to ~$2.20B, tracking management's raised guidance. The stock, however, has dramatically underperformed — down ~19% since last earnings vs. XLB flat and SPY +5.5% — as investors weigh the sustainability of conflict-driven pricing against the ongoing loss environment and dividend cut overhang. The key wildcard is the June $0.20/lb polyethylene price increase: management confirmed it was announced and supported by industry dynamics but explicitly excluded it from guidance, meaning any realization represents pure upside to the $2.2B guide.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus Operating EBITDA of ~$2.20B represents a ~3× sequential improvement from Q2 2025 and is above management's original $2.0B guide — a high bar that requires pricing momentum to have held through June. Operating EPS is the bigger swing factor given the loss environment; any upside on PE pricing flows directly to the bottom line.

Table 1 — Q2 2026 Current Quarter Snapshot

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year)

Q2 2026 Consensus Est.

YoY Change

Guidance

Cons. vs. Guidance

Total Revenue ($B)

$9.79B

$10.10B

$11.98B

+18.6%

N/A (no explicit rev. guide)

N/A

Operating EBITDA ($B)

$0.873B

$0.703B

$2.204B

+213%

~$2.2B (raised Jun 9)

+0.2%

Operating EPS (Diluted)

-$0.136

-$0.420

$1.278

N/M (loss to profit)

N/A (no explicit EPS guide)

N/A

P&SP Revenue ($B)

$4.919B

$5.025B

$6.727B

+33.9%

N/A

N/A

II&I Revenue ($B)

$2.626B

$2.786B

$2.928B

+5.1%

N/A

N/A

PM&C Revenue ($B)

$2.080B

$2.129B

$2.155B

+1.2%

N/A

N/A

CapEx ($B)

$0.503B

$0.662B

$0.639B

-3.5%

~$2.5B FY avg.

N/A

Free Cash Flow ($B)

$0.621B

-$1.132B

$0.367B

N/M (neg. to pos.)

FCF build in H2 2026

N/A

Sources: Visible Alpha consensus and actuals data. P&SP = Packaging & Specialty Plastics; II&I = Industrial Intermediates & Infrastructure; PM&C = Performance Materials & Coatings. Q2 2026 consensus as of July 22, 2026. Operating EBITDA guidance of ~$2.2B raised at Wells Fargo Industrials & Materials Conference, June 9, 2026.

Table 2 — Beat/Miss History (Last 8 Quarters, Top 2 KPIs)

Top 2 KPIs: Operating EBITDA and Operating EPS (Diluted)

Quarter

KPI

Reported

Consensus

Surprise %

Result

Q1 2026

Op. EBITDA

$873M

$784M

+11.3%

BEAT

Q1 2026

Op. EPS

-$0.136

-$0.296

+54.1%

BEAT

Q4 2025

Op. EBITDA

$741M

$659M

+12.4%

BEAT

Q4 2025

Op. EPS

-$0.340

-$0.450

+24.4%

BEAT

Q3 2025

Op. EBITDA

$868M

$759M

+14.4%

BEAT

Q3 2025

Op. EPS

-$0.190

-$0.309

+38.5%

BEAT

Q2 2025

Op. EBITDA

$703M

$767M

-8.3%

MISS

Q2 2025

Op. EPS

-$0.420

-$0.183

-129%

MISS

Q1 2025

Op. EBITDA

$944M

$913M

+3.4%

BEAT

Q1 2025

Op. EPS

$0.020

-$0.020

N/M

BEAT

Q4 2024

Op. EBITDA

$1,205M

$1,158M

+4.1%

BEAT

Q4 2024

Op. EPS

$0.003

$0.220

-98.6%

MISS

Q3 2024

Op. EBITDA

$1,382M

$1,307M

+5.7%

BEAT

Q3 2024

Op. EPS

$0.470

$0.451

+4.2%

BEAT

Q2 2024

Op. EBITDA

$1,501M

$1,559M

-3.7%

MISS

Q2 2024

Op. EPS

$0.680

$0.715

-4.9%

MISS

Pattern: DOW has beaten Operating EBITDA consensus in 6 of the last 8 quarters, with the two misses (Q2 2024 and Q2 2025) both occurring in the seasonally important Q2 period — a cautionary note heading into this print. However, the magnitude of recent beats has been large (11–14%), suggesting management guides conservatively. The Q2 2025 miss was driven by a sharp deterioration in integrated margins; the current setup is the inverse, with conflict-driven pricing providing a strong tailwind.

Source: Visible Alpha consensus and actuals data.

3. Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: Management raised Q2 EBITDA guidance ~10% above the original $2.0B guide at the June 9 Wells Fargo conference, driven by stronger polyethylene pricing and II&I upside. Tone has shifted from cautious to constructively confident, with the June $0.20/lb PE price increase representing additional upside not embedded in guidance.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings, Apr 23)

Revised Guidance

Current Consensus

Note

Q2 2026 Operating EBITDA

~$2.0B

~$2.2B

$2.204B

↑ Raised at Wells Fargo Conference Jun 9, 2026; driven by stronger PE pricing (+$0.30/lb April vs. $0.20 forecast) and polyols/MDI tightness in II&I; June $0.20/lb PE increase not embedded — additional upside

Q2 2026 Polyethylene Pricing

April +$0.30/lb (above $0.20 consultant forecast); June +$0.20/lb announced

June $0.20/lb increase confirmed supported by industry dynamics

N/A (not a consensus KPI)

↑ More confident; June increase not in guide = upside optionality; April ACC data showed 94.4% operating rates, inventories down 23M lbs

2025 Cost Savings Program

~$500M remaining; materially complete by end of Q2 2026

On track; confirmed complete by end of Q2 at Wells Fargo

N/A

Unchanged; $1B total program ($500M captured in 2025, $500M in 2026)

Transform to Outperform (T2O)

~$500M in 2026; ~$400M in H2 2026; $2B+ total over next few years

Confirmed; sharp H2 ramp; first site identified ~$80M run-rate EBITDA improvement

N/A

Unchanged; tone more confident with early tangible results; ~25% of large sites assessed

FY 2026 CapEx

~$2.5B

~$2.5B avg. 2026–2028 (confirmed at Wells Fargo)

$2.468B

Unchanged; ~$1.5B of $2.5B allocated to Alberta project

Sadara / Balance Sheet

~$14B total liquidity; no substantive debt maturities until 2029; incremental cash to deleveraging

Confirmed at Wells Fargo; Sadara restructuring update expected at mid-year earnings

N/A

Unchanged; Sadara equity loss recognition suspended under GAAP; ~$100M/yr cash commitment through 2038

CEO Succession

Karen Carter to assume CEO July 1, 2026; Fitterling to Executive Chair

Effective July 1, 2026 (confirmed); compensation package disclosed via 8-K/A Jul 6

N/A

No change in strategic direction; first earnings call under new CEO

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Q2 2026 estimates have moved up ~4% since the Q1 earnings print, tracking management's raised guidance — a healthy alignment. However, FY 2026 estimates have moved down ~7% from the post-Q1 baseline, signaling the market is skeptical that H2 pricing holds at Q2 levels. This divergence is the key tension: if DOW can demonstrate pricing durability into Q3, FY estimates have significant upside.

KPI (Period)

Est. ~Apr 28, 2026 (Post-Q1 Baseline)

Current Consensus

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Call)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Cons. vs. Guidance

Op. EBITDA — Q2 2026

$2.116B

$2.204B

+4.2%

~$2.0B

~$2.2B

+10%

+0.2%

Op. EBITDA — FY 2026

$6.922B

$6.416B

-7.3%

N/A (no FY guide)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total Revenue — Q2 2026

$12.059B

$11.980B

-0.7%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total Revenue — FY 2026

$45.445B

$44.340B

-2.4%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Op. EPS — Q2 2026

$1.191

$1.278

+7.3%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Op. EPS — FY 2026

$3.125

$2.597

-16.9%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Free Cash Flow — FY 2026

$2.374B

$2.302B

-3.0%

H2 FCF build expected

H2 FCF build expected

Unchanged

N/A

The Q2 estimate revision story is clean: consensus has moved up ~4% on EBITDA and ~7% on EPS since the post-Q1 baseline, tracking management's raised guidance. The FY 2026 story is more cautious — EBITDA estimates are down ~7% and EPS down ~17% from the post-Q1 baseline, reflecting market skepticism that H2 pricing holds at Q2 conflict-driven levels. The gap between Q2 (tracking guidance) and FY (below prior consensus) implies the market is pricing in a meaningful H2 pricing fade. If DOW can demonstrate on the call that pricing momentum is durable into Q3, FY estimates have significant upside.

Source: Visible Alpha consensus data. Post-Q1 baseline = consensus as of April 28, 2026 (approximately 5 trading days after April 23 earnings).

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: DOW has dramatically underperformed since Q1 earnings — down ~19% vs. XLB -2% and SPY +5.5% — driven by multiple compression as the market questions the durability of conflict-driven pricing. The stock is not pricing in a beat; any positive surprise on pricing or H2 guidance could drive a sharp re-rating from deeply depressed levels.

DOW vs. XLB (Materials ETF) vs. S&P 500 — Indexed to 100 at April 23, 2026 (Q1 2026 Earnings Date). Source: Yahoo Finance.

Performance Summary (April 23 – July 22, 2026):

Security

Apr 23 Price

Jul 22 Price

Return

DOW

$38.53

$31.25

-18.9%

XLB (Materials ETF)

$51.81

$50.82

-1.9%

S&P 500 (SPY)

$708.45

$747.41

+5.5%

Key Events Since Q1 Earnings:

Source: Yahoo Finance stock price data.

6. Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the Wells Fargo guidance raise to ~$2.2B EBITDA on June 9, confirming that conflict-driven pricing tailwinds are real and above initial expectations. The CEO transition to Karen Carter on July 1 adds a new variable — this will be her first earnings call, and the market will be listening closely for any tone shift on strategy or capital allocation.

7. Peer Commentaries — Q2 2026 Read-Throughs

Key Takeaway: All major chemical peers reporting Q1 2026 results provided strong forward commentary on Q2 2026 conditions directly relevant to DOW's core product lines. The read-through is broadly positive: polyethylene running at full rates, MDI at near-capacity globally, polyols/PO tightness, and PVC pricing momentum — all validating DOW's $2.2B Q2 EBITDA guide. The key risk flagged by peers is H2 demand sustainability as inflationary pressures build.

Note: Only commentary from Q1 2026 earnings calls (reported April–May 2026) and post-Q1 conferences (through July 2026) is included below, as these reflect forward-looking views on Q2 2026 — the current reporting quarter for DOW.

Westlake Chemical (WLK) — Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 5, 2026)

Relevance to DOW: WLK is a direct polyethylene and PVC peer with a similar North American gas-based feedstock advantage. WLK's commentary on PE pricing, operating rates, and demand is the closest read-through for DOW's Packaging & Specialty Plastics segment.

LyondellBasell (LYB) — Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 1, 2026)

Relevance to DOW: LYB is the closest global polyethylene and polypropylene peer. LYB's O&P-Americas segment is the most direct read-through for DOW's P&SP segment. LYB's I&D segment (oxyfuels, acetyls, PO) is relevant to DOW's II&I segment.

Huntsman Corporation (HUN) — Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 1, 2026)

Relevance to DOW: HUN is the most direct read-through for DOW's Industrial Intermediates & Infrastructure segment, specifically MDI and polyurethanes. HUN's Polyurethanes division is the global MDI market leader.

Eastman Chemical (EMN) — Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 1, 2026) & Deutsche Bank Conference (Jun 3, 2026)

Relevance to DOW: EMN is a specialty chemicals peer with exposure to similar end markets (packaging, automotive, building & construction, consumer). EMN's Chemical Intermediates segment (olefins, acetyls) provides a read-through for DOW's P&SP and II&I segments. EMN's June 3 Deutsche Bank conference commentary is particularly relevant as it reflects conditions closer to DOW's Q2 reporting period.

Celanese (CE) — Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 6, 2026)

Relevance to DOW: CE's acetyl chain (acetic acid, VAM, vinyl emulsions) is relevant to DOW's II&I segment. CE's Engineered Materials segment provides a read-through for specialty polymer demand trends.

Huntsman-Olin Merger Call (Jun 16, 2026) — Industry Structure Read-Through

Relevance to DOW: The Huntsman-Olin merger creates a vertically integrated MDI producer by 2031, with $400M+ in synergies. The call's commentary on industry conditions is directly relevant to DOW's II&I segment.

Peer Read-Through Summary Table

Peer

DOW Segment

Key Q2 2026 Signal

Read-Through

WLK (Q1 Earnings, May 5)

P&SP (PE, PVC)

PE running at full rates; $0.30/lb April increase achieved; supply disruptions to persist through 2026

POSITIVE

LYB (Q1 Earnings, May 1)

P&SP (PE, PP); II&I (PO/polyols)

PE orders 20% above pre-war; mid-cycle margins in Q2; disruption is multi-quarter; LYB PO outage tightens polyols market

STRONGLY POSITIVE

HUN (Q1 Earnings, May 1)

II&I (MDI, polyurethanes)

MDI at 90% global capacity; U.S. sold out; pricing exceeding raw material increases; pre-buying limited (2–3 days)

POSITIVE

EMN (Q1 Earnings, May 1; DB Conference, Jun 3)

P&SP; II&I (olefins)

Q2 tracking guidance; CI margins above normalized; no demand destruction yet; June is wildcard; naphtha shortage structural

POSITIVE (with H2 caution)

CE (Q1 Earnings, May 6)

II&I (acetyls, vinyls)

April likely pricing peak for acetyls; H2 assumes supply chain unwind by end of Q2; demand destruction concern

MIXED (Q2 ok, H2 cautious)

HUN-OLN Merger (Jun 16)

II&I (MDI, polyurethanes)

Industry in 'trough'; MDI consolidation positive for pricing discipline long-term

POSITIVE (long-term)