Company | Equity Residential |
Ticker | EQR |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (2QFY-2026, quarter ending June 30, 2026) |
Expected Earnings Date | Late July 2026 (exact date TBC) |
Last Earnings Date | April 28, 2026 (Q1 2026) |
Prepared Date | July 21, 2026 |
Sector / Sub-Sector | REIT — Residential (Apartment) |
Primary Valuation KPI | Normalized FFO per Share (Diluted) |
Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 2026 is modestly constructive — consensus is a manageable bar and the peak leasing season tailwinds (record-low turnover, declining supply, strong renewal pricing) are the primary swing factor, but macro uncertainty and D.C./Seattle softness keep the outcome binary.
Heading into Q2 2026, EQR enters the print with a favorable supply backdrop — deliveries across its markets are down ~35% year-over-year — and record-low resident turnover that has supported occupancy firmly above 96%, giving management confidence in renewal pricing of ~5% through peak season. Consensus Normalized FFO of $1.01 per share and same-store revenue growth of ~2.2% YoY represent a modest bar that management’s own Q1 commentary — “we love the setup heading into the peak leasing season” — suggests is achievable, though guidance was deliberately left unchanged given early-season uncertainty. Estimate revisions since the Q1 print have been essentially flat on FFO (moving from $1.007 to $1.012) while same-store revenue estimates have drifted slightly lower (~2.35% to ~2.17%), reflecting lingering caution on new lease change trajectory in D.C. and Seattle. The stock has rallied ~10% since the Q1 print (vs. ~5% for the S&P 500 and ~11% for the residential REIT ETF REZ), suggesting the market has partially priced in a solid leasing season but has not yet fully re-rated the stock to reflect the 2026–2027 supply tailwind thesis. The key wildcard is new lease change momentum: management guided Q2 new lease change to build sequentially toward flat from the negative-1% Q1 level — any upside surprise there (particularly in San Francisco and New York) could drive a meaningful beat and positive guidance revision, while a stall in momentum (driven by macro softness or D.C. consumer confidence) would pressure the stock.
Key Takeaway: Consensus is a manageable bar on FFO (~$1.01/share) and same-store revenue growth (~2.2% YoY); the bigger swing factor is blended lease rate growth (~3.0% consensus), where any upside from peak-season new lease acceleration could drive a beat, while D.C./Seattle softness is the primary downside risk.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change (Est. vs. PY) | Guidance (Q1 2026 Call) | Consensus vs. Guidance Midpoint |
Normalized FFO per Share — Diluted ($) | $0.99 | $0.99 | $1.01 | +2.2% | No explicit Q2 guidance provided; FY 2026 guidance maintained | N/A (no Q2 point guidance) |
Same-Store Revenue Growth YoY (%) | 2.2% | 2.9% | 2.2% | -0.7 pp | Sequential build expected; full-year 1.5%–3.0% blended rate growth maintained | In line with guidance range |
Same-Store NOI Growth YoY (%) | 1.4% | 2.3% | 1.4% | -0.9 pp | No explicit Q2 guidance; full-year guidance maintained | N/A |
Effective Blended Lease Rate — Same Store (%) | 1.5% | 3.0% | 3.0% | 0.0 pp | Full-year 1.5%–3.0%; new lease change building toward flat; renewals ~5% | At top of guidance range |
Same-Store Occupancy Rate (%) | 96.5% | 96.6% | 96.5% | -0.1 pp | Mid-96% range; “more than 96% occupied” entering Q2 | In line with guidance |
Same-Store Revenue ($M) | $746.5M | $738.0M | $755.4M | +2.4% | No explicit Q2 dollar guidance | N/A |
Same-Store NOI ($M) | $497.9M | $504.0M | $511.7M | +1.5% | No explicit Q2 dollar guidance | N/A |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Q1 2026 Actual for occupancy taken from company’s reported earnings release. All consensus figures as of July 21, 2026.
Quarter | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q2 2024 | $0.97 | $0.958 | +1.3% | Beat |
Q3 2024 | $0.98 | $0.980 | 0.0% | In Line |
Q4 2024 | $1.00 | $1.005 | -0.5% | Miss |
Q1 2025 | $0.95 | $0.935 | +1.6% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | $0.99 | $0.982 | +0.8% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $1.02 | $1.010 | +1.0% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $1.03 | $1.035 | -0.5% | Miss |
Q1 2026 | $0.99 | $0.970 | +2.1% | Beat |
Pattern: EQR has beaten Normalized FFO consensus in 6 of the last 8 quarters, with misses confined to Q4 2024 and Q4 2025 (both by ~$0.005/share). The beat rate is consistent and the magnitude of beats has been modest (typically 1–2%), suggesting consensus is generally well-calibrated but tends to be set slightly conservatively. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Quarter | Reported | Consensus | Surprise (pp) | Result |
Q2 2024 | 2.9% | 3.24% | -0.34 pp | Miss |
Q3 2024 | 2.5% | 2.89% | -0.39 pp | Miss |
Q4 2024 | 2.4% | 2.77% | -0.37 pp | Miss |
Q1 2025 | 2.2% | 2.16% | +0.04 pp | Beat |
Q2 2025 | 2.9% | 2.68% | +0.22 pp | Beat |
Q3 2025 | 3.0% | 3.10% | -0.10 pp | Miss |
Q4 2025 | 2.4% | 2.83% | -0.43 pp | Miss |
Q1 2026 | 2.2% | 2.03% | +0.17 pp | Beat |
Pattern: Same-store revenue growth has been a more mixed KPI — EQR missed consensus in 5 of the last 8 quarters, with the misses concentrated in the 2024 period when supply pressure was building. The trend has improved recently (beats in Q1 2025, Q2 2025, and Q1 2026), suggesting consensus has recalibrated to a more realistic level. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: Management maintained full-year guidance unchanged at the Q1 2026 print, citing early-season uncertainty, but tone was constructively bullish — “we love the setup heading into the peak leasing season” — with no post-earnings guidance revisions filed. The key watch item is whether Q2 results prompt a guidance raise on blended rates or FFO.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 28, 2026) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus (Jul 21, 2026) | Note |
Full-Year Blended Lease Rate Growth | 1.5%–3.0% (midpoint ~2.25%) | — | 2.42% (FY 2026) | Guidance maintained unchanged; renewals tracking slightly better than expected (~5%), new lease change slightly lighter; management declined to revise given early-season timing |
Q2 2026 Blended Lease Rate | Sequential build from Q1 1.5%; new lease change building toward flat; renewals ~5% | — | 3.0% (Q2 2026 consensus) | April blended rate approximately doubled from Q1 level per management; consensus at top of implied range |
Same-Store Occupancy | Mid-96% range; “more than 96% occupied” entering Q2 | — | 96.5% | Occupancy stable; management expressed confidence in maintaining position through peak season |
Concession Use (Full Year) | ~20% reduction vs. 2025 full year; elevated in expansion markets and D.C./Seattle in Q2; material decline expected in H2 | — | N/A — not tracked in VA consensus | Q2 concession reduction expected to be less than full-year 20% target; H2 expected to see material decline vs. 2025 |
FY 2026 Normalized FFO per Share | No explicit FY FFO guidance provided on Q1 call; full-year guidance maintained | — | $4.09 (FY 2026) | No post-earnings guidance revision filed; consensus stable since Q1 print |
Capital Allocation (Buybacks) | Prioritizing buybacks over acquisitions; stock “greatly undervalued”; ~$500M repurchased since Aug 2025 | — | N/A | Shareholders approved all proposals at Annual Meeting (Jun 22, 2026 8-K); buyback program ongoing |
Key Takeaway: FFO estimates for Q2 2026 have been essentially flat since the Q1 print (+0.6%), while same-store revenue growth estimates have drifted modestly lower (-0.7 pp), suggesting the market is cautiously waiting for peak-season data before revising up. The gap between current consensus and the top of management’s blended rate guidance range represents potential upside if leasing season executes.
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Print (May 5, 2026) | Current Consensus (Jul 21, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance Midpoint |
Normalized FFO/Share — Diluted (Q2 2026) | $1.007 | $1.012 | +0.6% | No explicit Q2 guidance | Unchanged | — | N/A |
Normalized FFO/Share — Diluted (FY 2026) | $4.094 | $4.086 | -0.2% | Full-year guidance maintained; no explicit FY FFO range given | Unchanged | — | N/A |
Same-Store Revenue Growth YoY (Q2 2026) | 2.35% | 2.17% | -0.18 pp | Sequential build; full-year blended rate 1.5%–3.0% | Unchanged | — | Below midpoint of blended rate guidance range |
Same-Store Revenue Growth YoY (FY 2026) | 2.42% | 2.31% | -0.11 pp | Full-year blended rate 1.5%–3.0% | Unchanged | — | Below midpoint of guidance range; upside if peak season delivers |
Same-Store NOI Growth YoY (Q2 2026) | 1.58% | 1.40% | -0.18 pp | No explicit Q2 guidance | Unchanged | — | N/A |
Effective Blended Lease Rate (Q2 2026) | 2.71% | 3.00% | +0.29 pp | 1.5%–3.0% full year; Q2 building toward top of range | Unchanged | — | At top of full-year guidance range; implies strong Q2 execution |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Post-Q1 baseline as of May 5, 2026 (5 trading days after April 28, 2026 print). Current consensus as of July 21, 2026.
The revision picture is nuanced: FFO estimates are essentially unchanged (a slight positive given the macro uncertainty backdrop), while same-store revenue growth estimates have drifted ~18 bps lower for Q2 and ~11 bps lower for FY 2026 since the Q1 print. Notably, blended lease rate consensus has risen 29 bps since the Q1 print to 3.0% — at the top of management’s full-year guidance range — suggesting the market is pricing in a strong peak leasing season. If blended rates come in at or above 3%, a guidance raise on the full-year blended rate range becomes likely.
Key Takeaway: EQR has rallied ~10% since the Q1 2026 print (vs. ~5% for the S&P 500 and ~11% for the residential REIT ETF REZ), driven primarily by sector re-rating on the supply tailwind thesis rather than estimate revisions (which have been flat). The stock has largely tracked the residential REIT sector, suggesting the move is macro/sector-driven rather than EQR-specific alpha.
EQR vs. REZ (Residential REIT ETF) vs. S&P 500 (SPY) — Indexed to 100 at April 28, 2026 (Q1 2026 Earnings Date). Source: Yahoo Finance / Stock Price Data.
Since the Q1 2026 earnings print on April 28, 2026, EQR has gained approximately +9.6% (from $62.32 to $68.29 as of July 21, 2026), modestly underperforming the residential REIT ETF REZ (+11.0%) but significantly outperforming the S&P 500 (+4.6%). The sector-wide re-rating reflects growing investor conviction in the 2026–2027 supply tailwind thesis across apartment REITs. EQR’s slight underperformance vs. REZ likely reflects the D.C. and expansion market overhangs that weigh on EQR specifically relative to pure coastal peers. The stock currently trades at approximately 17x NTM FFO, still at a discount to the sector average of mid-20x, consistent with management’s own characterization of the stock as “greatly undervalued.” Source: Yahoo Finance / Stock Price Data.
Key Takeaway: No material negative developments since the Q1 print; the most important development is the ongoing share buyback program (now ~$500M repurchased since Aug 2025) and the emerging rent control legislative risk in Massachusetts and D.C., which management is actively monitoring and opposing.
Key Takeaway: All four apartment REIT peers (AVB, ESS, UDR, CPT/MAA) reported Q1 2026 results in late April/early May and provided Q2 2026 forward commentary. The read-through is broadly constructive for EQR: coastal markets (SF, NY) are universally strong, supply is declining sharply, and renewal pricing is holding at ~5% across the sector. The key divergence is new lease change trajectory — peers confirm it is building sequentially but remains negative in weaker markets (L.A., Boston, Seattle, Sunbelt), consistent with EQR’s own guidance.
Note: All peer commentary below is from Q1 2026 earnings calls (reported late April / early May 2026), providing forward-looking color on Q2 2026 and the 2026 leasing season. This is the relevant read-through period for EQR’s upcoming Q2 2026 print.
Relevance to EQR: AVB is EQR’s closest peer — both are large-cap coastal apartment REITs with significant exposure to New York, Northern California, Boston, Seattle, and Mid-Atlantic. AVB’s commentary is the highest-quality read-through for EQR’s coastal portfolio performance.
Relevance to EQR: ESS is a pure West Coast apartment REIT (California + Seattle), making it the best read-through for EQR’s Northern California, Southern California, and Seattle markets specifically. ESS’s commentary on SF, L.A., and Seattle is highly relevant.
Relevance to EQR: UDR has a mixed coastal/Sunbelt portfolio with significant exposure to San Francisco, New York, and Boston. Its commentary on coastal market dynamics and the coastal vs. Sunbelt performance divergence is a useful read-through for EQR’s portfolio mix.
Relevance to EQR: CPT is a Sunbelt-focused apartment REIT (Dallas, Houston, Atlanta, Austin, Phoenix, Denver). Its commentary is most relevant for EQR’s expansion markets (Atlanta, Dallas, Denver, Austin) and provides a read-through on Sunbelt supply absorption dynamics.
Relevance to EQR: MAA is a pure Sunbelt apartment REIT. Its commentary is most relevant for EQR’s expansion markets (Atlanta, Dallas, Denver, Austin) and provides a read-through on Sunbelt supply absorption and demand dynamics.
Theme | Peer Signal | EQR Implication | Direction |
San Francisco / AI demand | UDR: ~10% blended rate, 97%+ occ; ESS: best-performing region, above pre-COVID migration | Strong positive for EQR’s largest NOI contributor | Positive |
New York Metro | UDR: ~7% blended, 98%+ occ; AVB: revenue slightly ahead of budget | Validates EQR’s NY strength; ~14% of portfolio | Positive |
Renewal pricing (~5%) | AVB: 5%–5.5% offers for May/June; UDR: 5%–5.5% through July; ESS: ~5% renewals | Sector-wide confirmation of EQR’s ~5% renewal guidance | Positive |
New lease change trajectory | AVB: building toward 0% for year; ESS: -90 bps in April; UDR: coastal at 3.1% blended in April | Sequential improvement confirmed; EQR’s Q2 consensus of 3.0% blended is achievable | Neutral/Positive |
Los Angeles | ESS: “progressing at glacial pace”; AVB: “no near-term catalyst”; UDR: challenging | Confirms EQR’s cautious L.A. stance; no upside surprise expected | Neutral/Negative |
Boston / Seattle | AVB: “basically no job growth”; ESS: Seattle lease rates flipped positive in March | Mixed; Seattle showing early recovery signs (Bellevue/Redmond), Boston still lagging | Mixed |
Supply decline (sector-wide) | CPT: deliveries cut in half; MAA: down 40% YoY; ESS: CA permitting at historical lows | Multi-year tailwind confirmed; H2 2026 and 2027 setup increasingly favorable | Positive |
Atlanta / Dallas (expansion markets) | CPT: “green shoots”; MAA: expected to outperform portfolio; concessions declining | Positive for EQR’s Atlanta/Dallas portfolios; recovery on track | Positive |
Guidance posture (sector-wide) | AVB, ESS, UDR, MAA all reaffirmed full-year guidance at Q1; waiting for peak-season data | Q2 prints likely to be the catalyst for sector-wide guidance raises if leasing season delivers | Positive |
MA rent control ballot measure | UDR: contributing ~$0.5M to oppose; industry mobilized | Confirms EQR’s risk; industry opposition organized but outcome uncertain | Watch |
Key Takeaway: No open-market buys or sells by executives or directors since the Q1 2026 print. All transactions in the window are routine equity compensation grants (Form 4 code “A” — Acquisitions via award/grant) to directors at the June 18, 2026 annual meeting, plus a small compensation-related acquisition by the Chief Accounting Officer. No discretionary insider buying or selling signals to flag.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Shares | Date | Note |
Angela M. Aman | Director | Equity Award Grant (Restricted Units) | 3,561 | Jun 18, 2026 | Routine annual director compensation grant; 10b5-1 plan |
Chris Carr | Director | Equity Award Grant (Restricted Units) | 3,561 | Jun 18, 2026 | Routine annual director compensation grant; 10b5-1 plan |
Mary Kay Haben | Director | Equity Award Grant (Common Shares) | 3,276 | Jun 18, 2026 | Routine annual director compensation grant; not under 10b5-1 plan |
Ann Hoff | Director | Equity Award Grant (Common Shares) | 3,276 | Jun 18, 2026 | Routine annual director compensation grant; not under 10b5-1 plan |
Tahsinul Zia Huque | Director | Equity Award Grant (Restricted Units) | 3,561 | Jun 18, 2026 | Routine annual director compensation grant; 10b5-1 plan |
Nina P. Jones | Director | Equity Award Grant (Common Shares) | 3,276 | Jun 18, 2026 | Routine annual director compensation grant; not under 10b5-1 plan |
David J. Neithercut | Chairman of the Board, Director | Equity Award Grant (Stock Options) | 50,997 | Jun 18, 2026 | Non-qualified stock option grant; routine annual director compensation; not under 10b5-1 plan |
Mark S. Shapiro | Director | Equity Award Grant (Restricted Units) | 3,561 | Jun 18, 2026 | Routine annual director compensation grant; 10b5-1 plan |
Stephen E. Sterrett | Director | Equity Award Grant (Common Shares) | 3,276 | Jun 18, 2026 | Routine annual director compensation grant; not under 10b5-1 plan |
Ian Kaufman | Chief Accounting Officer | Equity Award Grant (Common Shares) | 32 | May 14, 2026 | Small compensation-related acquisition; not under 10b5-1 plan |
Source: SEC Form 4 Filings / Insider Transaction Data. All transactions shown are Form 4 code “A” (Acquisition via award/grant) — none are open-market purchases (code “P”) or open-market sales (code “S”). The absence of discretionary open-market buying or selling by executives is notable but not unusual for a REIT in a quiet period ahead of earnings. No 10b5-1 plan initiations or terminations were filed in the window.