Company | GE Vernova Inc. |
Ticker | GEV (NYSE) |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (quarter ending June 30, 2026) |
Estimated Earnings Date | ~July 23, 2026 (based on prior-year Q2 reporting date) |
Last Earnings Date | April 22, 2026 (Q1 2026) |
Prepared | July 21, 2026 |
Key Takeaway: Setup leans toward a beat on revenue and EBITDA — the bar is achievable given explicit Q2 guidance, April order momentum that already matched all of Q1 in value, and a rapidly expanding electrification backlog — but the stock's premium multiple leaves little room for any execution shortfall, making order quality and FCF the real swing factors.
Bar & Guidance: Management provided explicit Q2 2026 segment guidance on the April 22 earnings call: Power revenue growth of 15–17% YoY with EBITDA margins of 17–18%, Electrification revenue of $3.3–3.5B with margins modestly above Q1's ~9.6%, and Wind revenue down mid-teens with EBITDA losses of $200–300M. Consensus for Q2 2026 total revenue sits at ~$10.8B and operating EBITDA at ~$1.28B (11.8% margin), both broadly in line with the guided ranges, suggesting the bar is calibrated rather than stretched.
Estimate Trajectory & Tone: Estimates have moved modestly higher since the Q1 print — Q2 revenue consensus is up ~$0.5B vs. the post-Q1 baseline, and FY2026 revenue consensus of ~$45.5B sits at the top of the raised $44.5–45.5B guidance range, implying the Street has already absorbed the guidance raise with little incremental cushion. Management tone has been unambiguously confident: April quarter-to-date power equipment orders in value already exceeded all of Q1, the $200B backlog target was pulled forward to 2027 from 2028, and the full-year FCF guide was raised to $6.5–7.5B from $5.0–5.5B — a dramatic acceleration driven by down payments on slot reservation agreements.
Stock Setup: GEV has underperformed both the S&P 500 (+5.2%) and XLI (+4.5%) since the Q1 print, declining ~4.3% on an indexed basis through July 21, 2026, despite the fundamental beat and guidance raise. This relative weakness likely reflects the stock's elevated entry multiple and some rotation out of high-multiple industrials, but it also means the stock is not pricing in incremental upside — a clean beat with strong orders could re-rate the stock higher from a less-stretched starting point.
Wildcard: The single biggest swing factor is gas power order momentum and slot reservation agreement (SRA) pricing — management guided to 10–15 GW of Q2 gas contracts and stated SRAs are running 10–20 points above current backlog on a $/kW basis. Any upside surprise here (e.g., framework agreements converting to signed contracts with one or more of the ~30–35 counterparties in discussion) would be a material positive catalyst, while a shortfall vs. the 10–15 GW guide would raise questions about whether the 110 GW year-end target is achievable.
Key Takeaway: Consensus is a calibrated, achievable bar — management provided explicit Q2 segment guidance that brackets current estimates. Electrification revenue and total orders are the bigger swing factors, as both have been running well ahead of prior expectations and any further acceleration would drive meaningful upside to the FY guide.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change | Q2 2026 Guidance (Mgmt) | Consensus vs. Guidance |
Total Revenue ($B) | $9.34B | $9.11B | $10.80B | +18.5% YoY | ~$10.5–11.0B (implied by segment guides) | ~+3% above midpoint |
Revenue — Power ($B) | $4.97B | $4.78B | $5.59B | +16.9% YoY | +15% to +17% YoY | ~+1% above midpoint |
Revenue — Electrification ($B) | $2.96B | $2.16B | $3.45B | +59.5% YoY | $3.3B–$3.5B | ~+2% above midpoint |
Revenue — Wind ($B) | $1.43B | $2.25B | $1.85B | -17.6% YoY | Down mid-teens YoY | ~In line with guide |
Adj. EBITDA — Operating ($B) | $0.896B | $0.770B | $1.278B | +65.9% YoY | Margin expansion YoY (Power 17–18%, Elec. above Q1) | ~In line |
Adj. EBITDA Margin — Operating (%) | 9.6% | 8.5% | 11.8% | +330 bps YoY | Expansion YoY across company | ~In line |
Adj. EPS — Diluted Operating ($) | $0.86 | $1.74 | $2.88 | +65.3% YoY | No specific EPS guide provided | N/A |
Free Cash Flow ($B) | $4.791B | $0.194B | $0.807B | N/M (Q1 FCF was exceptional) | Positive FCF in Q2 | ~In line |
Total Orders ($B) | $18.28B | $12.36B | $19.90B | +60.9% YoY | 10–15 GW gas contracts; solid Elec. orders | ~In line / slight upside risk |
Total Backlog ($B) | $163.3B | $128.8B | $172.6B | +34.0% YoY | $200B target by 2027 | ~In line |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data; GEV Q1 2026 Earnings Call (April 22, 2026). Q2 2026 consensus estimates as of July 21, 2026. Q1 2026 actuals are the most recently reported figures. Note: Q1 2026 FCF of $4.791B was exceptionally elevated due to large down payments on slot reservation agreements; Q2 FCF consensus of $0.807B reflects normalization.
Quarter | KPI | Reported | Consensus Est. | Surprise % | Result |
Q1 2026 | Revenue | $9.34B | $9.26B | +0.8% | Beat |
Q1 2026 | Adj. EBITDA | $0.896B | $0.773B | +15.9% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | Revenue | $10.96B | $10.29B | +6.5% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | Adj. EBITDA | $1.159B | $1.274B | -9.0% | Miss |
Q3 2025 | Revenue | $9.97B | $9.15B | +8.9% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | Adj. EBITDA | $0.812B | $0.795B | +2.1% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | Revenue | $9.11B | $8.81B | +3.4% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | Adj. EBITDA | $0.770B | $0.725B | +6.2% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | Revenue | $8.03B | $7.55B | +6.4% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | Adj. EBITDA | $0.457B | $0.348B | +31.4% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | Revenue | $10.56B | $10.75B | -1.8% | Miss |
Q4 2024 | Adj. EBITDA | $1.079B | $1.079B | 0.0% | In Line |
Q3 2024 | Revenue | $8.91B | $8.92B | -0.1% | In Line |
Q3 2024 | Adj. EBITDA | $0.243B | $0.320B | -24.1% | Miss |
Q2 2024 | Revenue | $8.20B | $8.24B | -0.4% | In Line |
Q2 2024 | Adj. EBITDA | $0.524B | $0.427B | +22.8% | Beat |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Pattern: GEV has beaten revenue consensus in 6 of the last 8 quarters, with the misses concentrated in Q3–4 2024 when the business was earlier in its margin ramp; EBITDA beats have been more variable, with the Q4 2025 miss driven by offshore wind charges, but the trend since Q1 2025 has been consistent outperformance as Power and Electrification margins accelerate.
Key Takeaway: Management raised guidance across all three key metrics (revenue, EBITDA margin, FCF) at the Q1 2026 print and has not issued any subsequent formal revisions — the tone remains highly confident, with April order momentum described as exceeding all of Q1 in value, and the $200B backlog target pulled forward by a full year.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 22) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
FY2026 Revenue | $44.5B–$45.5B | — | $45.5B | Raised from $44–45B at Q4 2025 earnings; consensus at top of range, reflecting strong Electrification momentum |
FY2026 Adj. EBITDA Margin | 12%–14% | — | 13.7% | Raised 1 pt at both ends from 11%–13%; consensus near midpoint; Power and Electrification driving upside |
FY2026 Free Cash Flow | $6.5B–$7.5B | — | $6.91B | Dramatically raised from $5.0–5.5B; Q1 alone delivered $4.8B; consensus below midpoint, suggesting upside risk |
Power Organic Revenue Growth (FY2026) | +16% to +18% | — | ~+17% (implied) | Unchanged; Gas Power driving; 20 GW annualized capacity by mid-2026; higher H2 weighting |
Power EBITDA Margin (FY2026) | 17%–19% | — | ~18% (implied) | Raised from 16%–18%; productivity gains and pricing strength driving upside |
Electrification Revenue (FY2026) | $14.0B–$14.5B | — | $14.4B | Raised from $13.5–14.0B; Prolec ~$3B contribution; data center orders in Q1 alone exceeded all of 2025 |
Electrification EBITDA Margin (FY2026) | 18%–20% | — | ~19% (implied) | Raised from 17%–19%; higher volume and favorable pricing; expected to increase sequentially through year |
Wind Organic Revenue (FY2026) | Down low double digits | — | ~-12% (implied) | Unchanged; onshore equipment soft; offshore losses wrapping through 2027; H2 improvement expected |
Wind EBITDA Loss (FY2026) | ~$(400)M EBIT loss | — | ~$(400)M (in line) | Unchanged; H1 losses partially offset by H2 profitability; tariff headwinds on pre-tariff onshore orders |
Gas Power GW Under Contract (YE 2026) | At least 110 GW | — | N/A — not in VA | New target set at Q1 print; was 100 GW at Q1 end; April orders already exceeded all of Q1 in value |
Tariff Impact (FY2026) | $250M–$350M headwind | — | N/A — not in VA | Consistent with prior guidance despite tariff landscape shifts; Prolec slightly higher impact but within range |
Source: GEV Q1 2026 Earnings Call transcript (April 22, 2026); Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. No post-earnings formal guidance revisions have been issued via 8-K or investor conference since April 22, 2026.
Key Takeaway: Estimates have moved modestly higher since the Q1 print, broadly tracking the raised guidance — Q2 revenue consensus is up ~$0.5B and FY2026 revenue is at the top of the guided range. FCF is the clearest area of potential upside, with consensus at $6.91B sitting below the $7.0B midpoint of the $6.5–7.5B guide, and Q1 alone already delivered $4.8B.
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (Apr 28, 2026) | Current Consensus (Jul 21, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Earnings Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance (%) |
Revenue — Q2 2026 | $10.75B | $10.80B | +0.5% | ~$10.5–11.0B (implied) | Unchanged | — | ~+3% above midpoint |
Revenue — FY2026 | $45.54B | $45.49B | -0.1% | $44.5B–$45.5B | Unchanged | — | ~+0.0% (at top of range) |
Revenue — FY2027 | $51.88B | $51.85B | -0.1% | At least $56B (2028 target) | Unchanged | — | N/A (2027 vs. 2028 target) |
Adj. EBITDA — Q2 2026 | $1.267B | $1.278B | +0.9% | Margin expansion YoY; Power 17–18% | Unchanged | — | ~In line |
Adj. EBITDA — FY2026 | $6.226B | $6.227B | +0.0% | 12%–14% margin ($5.3–6.4B) | Unchanged | — | ~+3% above midpoint |
Adj. EBITDA — FY2027 | $9.281B | $9.286B | +0.1% | ~22% EBITDA margin by 2028 (Elec. target) | Unchanged | — | N/A (2027 vs. 2028 target) |
Adj. EPS — Q2 2026 | $2.851 | $2.878 | +0.9% | No specific EPS guide | Unchanged | — | N/A |
Adj. EPS — FY2026 | $13.72 | $14.61 | +6.5% | No specific EPS guide | Unchanged | — | N/A |
Free Cash Flow — FY2026 | $7.138B | $6.914B | -3.1% | $6.5B–$7.5B | Unchanged | — | -1.2% below midpoint; upside risk given Q1 alone = $4.8B |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data (as-of date April 28, 2026 for baseline; current as of July 21, 2026). Estimates have been remarkably stable since the Q1 print, with the Street largely absorbing the guidance raise without adding incremental cushion. The most notable divergence is FCF, where consensus at $6.91B sits below the $7.0B midpoint despite Q1 alone delivering $4.8B — suggesting the Street is modeling a significant H2 working capital reversal that may prove conservative if order momentum and down payments remain elevated.
Key Takeaway: GEV has underperformed both the S&P 500 and XLI (Industrials ETF) since the Q1 2026 earnings print, declining ~4.3% on an indexed basis vs. +5.2% for SPY and +4.5% for XLI through July 21, 2026 — the relative weakness appears multiple-driven rather than fundamental, as the stock entered the period at a significant premium and has seen some rotation out of high-multiple industrials, creating a potentially more attractive entry point heading into Q2 results.
GEV vs. XLI vs. S&P 500 — Indexed Performance Since Q1 2026 Earnings (April 22, 2026 = 100). Source: Yahoo Finance.
GEV opened the post-Q1 period near its prior close (~$1,128) and initially rallied to ~$1,150 in the days following the print, reflecting the strong beat and guidance raise. However, the stock subsequently gave back those gains and trended lower through May–June, reaching a trough near ~$1,036 in mid-July before partially recovering to ~$1,079 by July 21. The underperformance vs. XLI (+4.5%) and SPY (+5.2%) over the same period is notable given the fundamental strength of the Q1 print and the magnitude of the guidance raise. The most likely explanation is multiple compression from an elevated starting point — GEV trades at a significant premium to industrial peers, and the broader market rotation toward more cyclical/value names weighed on the stock. Importantly, the stock's underperformance has not been accompanied by any negative fundamental news, suggesting the setup into Q2 results is cleaner than the price action implies.
Key Takeaway: Peer commentary since GEV's Q1 2026 earnings (April 22, 2026) is uniformly bullish on GEV's end markets — data center power demand is accelerating faster than expected, grid infrastructure investment is entering a multi-year upcycle, and EPC/construction capacity (not equipment supply) remains the binding constraint on gas turbine deployment. The read-through from Eaton, ABB, Quanta, Hubbell, NextEra, Vistra, NRG, Emerson, and Honeywell is broadly positive for GEV's Power and Electrification segments heading into Q2.
Read-Through: Strongly positive for GEV Electrification.
Read-Through: Positive for GEV Power and Electrification; confirms supply bottleneck narrative.
Read-Through: Positive for GEV Power; confirms EPC bottleneck as the binding constraint on gas turbine deployment.
Read-Through: Positive for GEV Electrification; confirms transmission and substation upcycle is accelerating.
Read-Through: Positive for GEV Power; confirms massive new gas generation demand and turbine supply adequacy.
Read-Through: Positive for GEV Power; confirms load growth is real and gas generation is the preferred bridge solution.
Read-Through: Directly positive for GEV — NRG explicitly cited its GEV partnership as a competitive advantage.
Read-Through: Positive for GEV Power; confirms broad-based power sector investment acceleration.
Read-Through: Positive for GEV Power and Electrification; confirms LNG and grid infrastructure as multi-year secular growth vectors.
Overall Peer Read-Through Summary: The collective commentary from 7 peers across the energy infrastructure and industrial electrification ecosystem is unambiguously positive for GEV’s Q2 2026 setup. Data center power demand is accelerating faster than expected (Eaton, ABB, Hubbell, NextEra), gas generation demand is robust with EPC/labor — not equipment — as the binding constraint (Quanta, NextEra, Vistra), grid infrastructure investment is entering a multi-year upcycle with utility CapEx budgets growing at 20%+ (Quanta, Hubbell), and NRG explicitly named GEV as a strategic partner with equipment access advantage. The only area of caution is the competitive dynamic in medium-voltage UPS and solid-state transformers, where both ABB and Eaton are investing aggressively in products that overlap with GEV’s Electrification roadmap.
Key Takeaway: The most important development since the Q1 print is the U.S.–Japan government announcement of up to $40B for GE Vernova Hitachi SMRs and the continued acceleration of gas power order momentum into April — both validate the long-term demand thesis and support the 110 GW year-end target.