Ticker: LVS Upcoming Earnings Date: July 22, 2026 (After Market Close) Prepared: July 21, 2026
Key Takeaway: The Q2 2026 setup is mixed — Singapore remains a structural earnings engine but Macao faces a meaningful headwind from the FIFA World Cup-driven June GGR collapse (-12.1% YoY), making this a quarter where the bar is lower than Q1 but the narrative around Macao recovery trajectory will dominate the call.
Heading into Q2 2026, LVS faces a bifurcated setup: Marina Bay Sands (MBS) is expected to deliver another strong quarter anchored by mass gaming and slots, while Macao EBITDA consensus has been revised down materially post-Q1 earnings, reflecting the well-documented June GGR weakness driven by the expanded 48-team FIFA World Cup diverting Chinese consumer spending away from casino floors. Q2 Macao industry GGR came in essentially flat YoY (down ~0.1%), with April +5.5% and May +6.7% offset by a sharp June decline of -12.1% — the weakest month of 2026. Consensus for Q2 2026 Operating EBITDA sits at ~$1.21B, down from the $1.26B baseline right after Q1 earnings, suggesting the Street has already de-risked the Macao print. The stock has underperformed significantly since Q1 earnings — down ~20% vs. SPY +5.2% — meaning the bar is low and the setup is more about what management says about Q3 and the Macao recovery trajectory post-World Cup than the Q2 number itself. The wildcard is Singapore rolling chip volume: Q1's $18B was described as "extraordinary" and management cautioned on quarter-to-quarter volatility, so any normalization in MBS VIP could be the incremental negative surprise.
Key Takeaway: Consensus is a low bar for Macao EBITDA given the FIFA World Cup headwind in June, but Singapore EBITDA expectations (~$728M) remain elevated relative to history — any MBS VIP normalization is the bigger swing factor.
Table 1 — Current Quarter Snapshot (Q2 2026)
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus | YoY Change | Guidance | Consensus vs. Guidance |
Total Revenue | $3,585M | $3,175M | $3,331M | +4.9% | No explicit guidance | N/A |
Macao Operations EBITDA | $633M | $566M | $559M | -1.2% | $700M+ quarterly (long-term target) | -20.1% vs. LT target |
Marina Bay Sands EBITDA | $788M | $768M | $728M | -5.2% | No explicit quarterly guidance | N/A |
Operating EBITDA | $1,338M | $1,265M | $1,209M | -4.4% | No explicit guidance | N/A |
Adj. EPS (Diluted Operating) | $0.91 | $0.79 | $0.75 | -5.1% | No explicit guidance | N/A |
Source: Visible Alpha consensus as of July 21, 2026. Q2 2026 Macao EBITDA consensus of $559M is below Q2 2025 actual of $566M, reflecting the FIFA World Cup June GGR headwind. MBS EBITDA consensus of $728M remains well above the prior year but below Q1 2026’s record $788M, consistent with management’s own caution that Q2 is “typically our softest” quarter and that Q1 benefited from extraordinary rolling chip volume.
Table 2 — Beat/Miss History (Last 8 Quarters)
Macao Operations EBITDA
Quarter | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q2 2024 | $561M | $609M | -7.9% | Miss |
Q3 2024 | $585M | $565M | +3.5% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | $571M | $598M | -4.5% | Miss |
Q1 2025 | $535M | $586M | -8.7% | Miss |
Q2 2025 | $566M | $561M | +0.9% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $601M | $597M | +0.7% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $608M | $628M | -3.2% | Miss |
Q1 2026 | $633M | $601M | +5.3% | Beat |
Marina Bay Sands EBITDA
Quarter | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q2 2024 | $512M | $491M | +4.3% | Beat |
Q3 2024 | $406M | $496M | -18.1% | Miss |
Q4 2024 | $537M | $499M | +7.6% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | $605M | $527M | +14.8% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | $768M | $533M | +44.1% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $743M | $607M | +22.4% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $806M | $692M | +16.5% | Beat |
Q1 2026 | $788M | $715M | +10.2% | Beat |
Pattern: MBS has beaten consensus in 7 of the last 8 quarters by an average of ~12%, reflecting the Street’s persistent underestimation of Singapore’s earnings power. Macao has been more volatile — 4 beats and 4 misses — with misses concentrated in periods of competitive reinvestment pressure.
Key Takeaway: No formal numerical guidance was revised post-Q1 earnings; the key evolution is management’s explicit acknowledgment that Q2 is seasonally soft and that Macao margins will continue to face near-term pressure from service investment spending.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 22) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
Macao Quarterly EBITDA Target | $700M+ (long-term goal) | Unchanged | $559M (Q2 2026E) | Long-term target; not a near-term quarterly guide. Management noted Q2 is “typically our softest” quarter |
Macao EBITDA Margin | ~29.6% hold-adjusted in Q1; near-term pressure expected | Unchanged | ~28–29% implied | Investments in service/training will “continue to negatively impact margins” near-term; improvement expected over time |
MBS EBITDA | No explicit quarterly guidance; internal forecast raised to potentially $2.9B+ annually | Unchanged | $728M (Q2 2026E) | Bernstein Conference (May 27): no measurable impact from jet fuel shortages on Singapore demand |
Maintenance CapEx | ~$500M annually (raised on Q1 call); viewed as non-discretionary | Unchanged | N/A | Increase reflects commitment to maintaining asset quality; SCL-level CapEx also moved up |
Share Repurchases | Continued buybacks; $740M repurchased in Q1 2026 | Unchanged | N/A | 14.3% of shares repurchased over last 10 quarters; company views additional repurchases as meaningfully accretive |
Venetian Renovation | Room refresh begins Q3 2026; full completion by end of 2027/early 2028 | Unchanged | N/A | No meaningful disruption expected; demand to be redistributed across portfolio |
Key Takeaway: Estimates for Q2 2026 have been revised DOWN ~4–7% since the Q1 earnings baseline, driven by the FIFA World Cup June GGR collapse in Macao; FY 2026 estimates are also modestly lower, suggesting the Street has partially de-risked the year but not fully.
KPI / Period | Estimate (Apr 28, 2026 — 5 Days Post Q1 Earnings) | Current Consensus (Jul 21, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance |
Total Revenue — Q2 2026 | $3,406M | $3,331M | -2.2% | No explicit guide | No change | N/A | N/A |
Total Revenue — FY 2026 | $14,195M | $14,066M | -0.9% | No explicit guide | No change | N/A | N/A |
Macao EBITDA — Q2 2026 | $599M | $559M | -6.7% | No explicit guide | No change | N/A | -20.1% vs. $700M LT target |
Macao EBITDA — FY 2026 | $2,516M | $2,457M | -2.3% | No explicit guide | No change | N/A | N/A |
MBS EBITDA — Q2 2026 | $732M | $728M | -0.5% | No explicit guide | No change | N/A | N/A |
MBS EBITDA — FY 2026 | $3,006M | $3,004M | -0.1% | No explicit guide | No change | N/A | N/A |
Operating EBITDA — Q2 2026 | $1,260M | $1,209M | -4.0% | No explicit guide | No change | N/A | N/A |
Adj. EPS — Q2 2026 | $0.796 | $0.751 | -5.7% | No explicit guide | No change | N/A | N/A |
The revision pattern is clear — Macao EBITDA estimates for Q2 have been cut the most (-6.7%), consistent with the June GGR data showing a -12.1% YoY decline driven by the FIFA World Cup. MBS estimates have been remarkably stable (-0.5%), reflecting confidence in Singapore’s structural earnings power. FY 2026 estimates are down modestly (-0.9% revenue, -2.3% Macao EBITDA), suggesting the Street views the World Cup impact as a one-quarter phenomenon rather than a structural deterioration.
Key Takeaway: LVS has underperformed sharply since Q1 earnings — down ~20% vs. SPY +5.2% — driven by multiple compression on Macao GGR concerns (FIFA World Cup) and sector-wide de-rating, not earnings revisions; the stock now trades at a significant discount to consensus price targets (~$65–67), implying ~43–47% upside.
LVS vs. WYNN, MLCO & S&P 500 (SPY) — Indexed to 100 at April 22, 2026 (Q1 2026 Earnings Date). Source: Stock Price Data.
Name | Apr 22, 2026 Close | Jul 21, 2026 Close | Return Since Q1 Earnings |
LVS | $56.85 | $45.47 | -20.0% |
WYNN | $106.64 | $94.63 | -11.3% |
MLCO | $5.99 | $5.43 | -9.3% |
S&P 500 (SPY) | $711.21 | $748.28 | +5.2% |
Analyst Sentiment: 18 analysts cover LVS — 11 Buy/Strong Buy, 7 Hold, 0 Sell. Average price target ~$65–67, implying ~43–47% upside from current levels (~$45.47). Recent PT changes: Barclays cut PT $65→$63 (Jul 9, maintained Overweight); JPMorgan cut PT $71→$68 (Apr 23, maintained Overweight); Mizuho raised PT $65→$67 (Apr 23, Outperform); Jefferies raised PT $61→$63 (Apr 23, Hold); Seaport cut PT $72→$69 (Apr 21, Buy). LVS’s underperformance relative to peers (WYNN -11.3%, MLCO -9.3%) suggests company-specific concerns around Macao competitive positioning and the magnitude of the World Cup impact, rather than pure sector headwinds.
Key Takeaway: Peer Q1 2026 earnings calls (reported April 29 – May 7) provide forward-looking commentary directly relevant to LVS’s Q2 2026 setup — the key read-throughs are: (1) Macao mass market momentum carried into Q2 per WYNN, (2) the FIFA World Cup June headwind was broadly anticipated, (3) premium/VIP demand remains healthy, and (4) all operators are investing in product upgrades to compete for the premium segment.
Relevance to LVS Q2 2026: HIGH — Direct Macao/premium mass competitor
Relevance to LVS Q2 2026: HIGH — Direct Macao competitor; provides Singapore-adjacent demand color
Relevance to LVS Q2 2026: MODERATE — MGM China is a Macao competitor; US operations not relevant to LVS
Key Takeaway: The most material post-Q1 development is the FIFA World Cup-driven June GGR collapse in Macao (-12.1% YoY), which has already been partially priced in via estimate cuts; the $1B senior notes refinancing is balance-sheet-neutral and the Bernstein Conference confirmed no demand disruption in Singapore.
Key Takeaway: No open-market buys or discretionary sells of significance since Q1 earnings; all transactions are either RSU grants (compensation-related) or estate/trust restructuring by the Adelson family — no meaningful signal for the upcoming print.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Value / Size | Transaction Date | Filing Date | Note |
Patrick Dumont | Chairman & CEO | RSU Grant (Compensation) | 167,081 units | Apr 27, 2026 | Apr 29, 2026 | Annual equity compensation grant; not a market signal |
D. Zachary Hudson | EVP & General Counsel | RSU Grant (Compensation) | 62,684 units | Apr 27, 2026 | Apr 29, 2026 | Annual equity compensation grant |
Randy Hyzak | EVP & CFO | RSU Grant (Compensation) | 31,111 units | Apr 27, 2026 | Apr 29, 2026 | Annual equity compensation grant |
Charles D. Forman | Director | Open Market Sale | 11,400 shares (~$600K) | Apr 27, 2026 | Apr 29, 2026 | Discretionary sale; relatively small size; no 10b5-1 plan noted |
Multiple Directors (6) | Directors | RSU Grant (Compensation) | 3,948 units each | May 14, 2026 | May 18, 2026 | Annual director equity compensation grants |
Miriam Adelson | 10% Owner | Estate/Trust Restructuring (Gift) | ~175.4M shares (transfers) | Jun 16, 2026 | Jun 18, 2026 | Internal trust restructuring between Adelson family trusts; no economic change in beneficial ownership; not a market signal |
The only open-market sale was Director Charles Forman’s 11,400-share sale on April 27, 2026 — a relatively small, discretionary transaction with no 10b5-1 plan noted. The Adelson family trust restructuring (June 16) involved large share counts but represents internal estate planning with no change in economic exposure. No insider buying has occurred since Q1 earnings, which is notable given the ~20% stock decline — the absence of buying is not alarming given the Adelson family’s dominant ownership structure, but it is worth monitoring.