Las Vegas Sands Corp (LVS) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Ticker: LVS Upcoming Earnings Date: July 22, 2026 (After Market Close) Prepared: July 21, 2026

Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: The Q2 2026 setup is mixed — Singapore remains a structural earnings engine but Macao faces a meaningful headwind from the FIFA World Cup-driven June GGR collapse (-12.1% YoY), making this a quarter where the bar is lower than Q1 but the narrative around Macao recovery trajectory will dominate the call.

Heading into Q2 2026, LVS faces a bifurcated setup: Marina Bay Sands (MBS) is expected to deliver another strong quarter anchored by mass gaming and slots, while Macao EBITDA consensus has been revised down materially post-Q1 earnings, reflecting the well-documented June GGR weakness driven by the expanded 48-team FIFA World Cup diverting Chinese consumer spending away from casino floors. Q2 Macao industry GGR came in essentially flat YoY (down ~0.1%), with April +5.5% and May +6.7% offset by a sharp June decline of -12.1% — the weakest month of 2026. Consensus for Q2 2026 Operating EBITDA sits at ~$1.21B, down from the $1.26B baseline right after Q1 earnings, suggesting the Street has already de-risked the Macao print. The stock has underperformed significantly since Q1 earnings — down ~20% vs. SPY +5.2% — meaning the bar is low and the setup is more about what management says about Q3 and the Macao recovery trajectory post-World Cup than the Q2 number itself. The wildcard is Singapore rolling chip volume: Q1's $18B was described as "extraordinary" and management cautioned on quarter-to-quarter volatility, so any normalization in MBS VIP could be the incremental negative surprise.

KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus is a low bar for Macao EBITDA given the FIFA World Cup headwind in June, but Singapore EBITDA expectations (~$728M) remain elevated relative to history — any MBS VIP normalization is the bigger swing factor.

Table 1 — Current Quarter Snapshot (Q2 2026)

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year)

Q2 2026 Consensus

YoY Change

Guidance

Consensus vs. Guidance

Total Revenue

$3,585M

$3,175M

$3,331M

+4.9%

No explicit guidance

N/A

Macao Operations EBITDA

$633M

$566M

$559M

-1.2%

$700M+ quarterly (long-term target)

-20.1% vs. LT target

Marina Bay Sands EBITDA

$788M

$768M

$728M

-5.2%

No explicit quarterly guidance

N/A

Operating EBITDA

$1,338M

$1,265M

$1,209M

-4.4%

No explicit guidance

N/A

Adj. EPS (Diluted Operating)

$0.91

$0.79

$0.75

-5.1%

No explicit guidance

N/A

Source: Visible Alpha consensus as of July 21, 2026. Q2 2026 Macao EBITDA consensus of $559M is below Q2 2025 actual of $566M, reflecting the FIFA World Cup June GGR headwind. MBS EBITDA consensus of $728M remains well above the prior year but below Q1 2026’s record $788M, consistent with management’s own caution that Q2 is “typically our softest” quarter and that Q1 benefited from extraordinary rolling chip volume.

Table 2 — Beat/Miss History (Last 8 Quarters)

Macao Operations EBITDA

Quarter

Reported

Consensus

Surprise %

Result

Q2 2024

$561M

$609M

-7.9%

Miss

Q3 2024

$585M

$565M

+3.5%

Beat

Q4 2024

$571M

$598M

-4.5%

Miss

Q1 2025

$535M

$586M

-8.7%

Miss

Q2 2025

$566M

$561M

+0.9%

Beat

Q3 2025

$601M

$597M

+0.7%

Beat

Q4 2025

$608M

$628M

-3.2%

Miss

Q1 2026

$633M

$601M

+5.3%

Beat

Marina Bay Sands EBITDA

Quarter

Reported

Consensus

Surprise %

Result

Q2 2024

$512M

$491M

+4.3%

Beat

Q3 2024

$406M

$496M

-18.1%

Miss

Q4 2024

$537M

$499M

+7.6%

Beat

Q1 2025

$605M

$527M

+14.8%

Beat

Q2 2025

$768M

$533M

+44.1%

Beat

Q3 2025

$743M

$607M

+22.4%

Beat

Q4 2025

$806M

$692M

+16.5%

Beat

Q1 2026

$788M

$715M

+10.2%

Beat

Pattern: MBS has beaten consensus in 7 of the last 8 quarters by an average of ~12%, reflecting the Street’s persistent underestimation of Singapore’s earnings power. Macao has been more volatile — 4 beats and 4 misses — with misses concentrated in periods of competitive reinvestment pressure.

Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: No formal numerical guidance was revised post-Q1 earnings; the key evolution is management’s explicit acknowledgment that Q2 is seasonally soft and that Macao margins will continue to face near-term pressure from service investment spending.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 22)

Revised Guidance

Current Consensus

Note

Macao Quarterly EBITDA Target

$700M+ (long-term goal)

Unchanged

$559M (Q2 2026E)

Long-term target; not a near-term quarterly guide. Management noted Q2 is “typically our softest” quarter

Macao EBITDA Margin

~29.6% hold-adjusted in Q1; near-term pressure expected

Unchanged

~28–29% implied

Investments in service/training will “continue to negatively impact margins” near-term; improvement expected over time

MBS EBITDA

No explicit quarterly guidance; internal forecast raised to potentially $2.9B+ annually

Unchanged

$728M (Q2 2026E)

Bernstein Conference (May 27): no measurable impact from jet fuel shortages on Singapore demand

Maintenance CapEx

~$500M annually (raised on Q1 call); viewed as non-discretionary

Unchanged

N/A

Increase reflects commitment to maintaining asset quality; SCL-level CapEx also moved up

Share Repurchases

Continued buybacks; $740M repurchased in Q1 2026

Unchanged

N/A

14.3% of shares repurchased over last 10 quarters; company views additional repurchases as meaningfully accretive

Venetian Renovation

Room refresh begins Q3 2026; full completion by end of 2027/early 2028

Unchanged

N/A

No meaningful disruption expected; demand to be redistributed across portfolio

Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates for Q2 2026 have been revised DOWN ~4–7% since the Q1 earnings baseline, driven by the FIFA World Cup June GGR collapse in Macao; FY 2026 estimates are also modestly lower, suggesting the Street has partially de-risked the year but not fully.

KPI / Period

Estimate (Apr 28, 2026 — 5 Days Post Q1 Earnings)

Current Consensus (Jul 21, 2026)

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Call)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Consensus vs. Guidance

Total Revenue — Q2 2026

$3,406M

$3,331M

-2.2%

No explicit guide

No change

N/A

N/A

Total Revenue — FY 2026

$14,195M

$14,066M

-0.9%

No explicit guide

No change

N/A

N/A

Macao EBITDA — Q2 2026

$599M

$559M

-6.7%

No explicit guide

No change

N/A

-20.1% vs. $700M LT target

Macao EBITDA — FY 2026

$2,516M

$2,457M

-2.3%

No explicit guide

No change

N/A

N/A

MBS EBITDA — Q2 2026

$732M

$728M

-0.5%

No explicit guide

No change

N/A

N/A

MBS EBITDA — FY 2026

$3,006M

$3,004M

-0.1%

No explicit guide

No change

N/A

N/A

Operating EBITDA — Q2 2026

$1,260M

$1,209M

-4.0%

No explicit guide

No change

N/A

N/A

Adj. EPS — Q2 2026

$0.796

$0.751

-5.7%

No explicit guide

No change

N/A

N/A

The revision pattern is clear — Macao EBITDA estimates for Q2 have been cut the most (-6.7%), consistent with the June GGR data showing a -12.1% YoY decline driven by the FIFA World Cup. MBS estimates have been remarkably stable (-0.5%), reflecting confidence in Singapore’s structural earnings power. FY 2026 estimates are down modestly (-0.9% revenue, -2.3% Macao EBITDA), suggesting the Street views the World Cup impact as a one-quarter phenomenon rather than a structural deterioration.

Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: LVS has underperformed sharply since Q1 earnings — down ~20% vs. SPY +5.2% — driven by multiple compression on Macao GGR concerns (FIFA World Cup) and sector-wide de-rating, not earnings revisions; the stock now trades at a significant discount to consensus price targets (~$65–67), implying ~43–47% upside.

LVS vs. WYNN, MLCO & S&P 500 (SPY) — Indexed to 100 at April 22, 2026 (Q1 2026 Earnings Date). Source: Stock Price Data.

Name

Apr 22, 2026 Close

Jul 21, 2026 Close

Return Since Q1 Earnings

LVS

$56.85

$45.47

-20.0%

WYNN

$106.64

$94.63

-11.3%

MLCO

$5.99

$5.43

-9.3%

S&P 500 (SPY)

$711.21

$748.28

+5.2%

Analyst Sentiment: 18 analysts cover LVS — 11 Buy/Strong Buy, 7 Hold, 0 Sell. Average price target ~$65–67, implying ~43–47% upside from current levels (~$45.47). Recent PT changes: Barclays cut PT $65→$63 (Jul 9, maintained Overweight); JPMorgan cut PT $71→$68 (Apr 23, maintained Overweight); Mizuho raised PT $65→$67 (Apr 23, Outperform); Jefferies raised PT $61→$63 (Apr 23, Hold); Seaport cut PT $72→$69 (Apr 21, Buy). LVS’s underperformance relative to peers (WYNN -11.3%, MLCO -9.3%) suggests company-specific concerns around Macao competitive positioning and the magnitude of the World Cup impact, rather than pure sector headwinds.

Peer Commentaries — Q2 2026 Read-Throughs (Last 60 Days)

Key Takeaway: Peer Q1 2026 earnings calls (reported April 29 – May 7) provide forward-looking commentary directly relevant to LVS’s Q2 2026 setup — the key read-throughs are: (1) Macao mass market momentum carried into Q2 per WYNN, (2) the FIFA World Cup June headwind was broadly anticipated, (3) premium/VIP demand remains healthy, and (4) all operators are investing in product upgrades to compete for the premium segment.

WYNN Resorts — Q1 2026 Earnings (May 7, 2026)

Relevance to LVS Q2 2026: HIGH — Direct Macao/premium mass competitor

Melco Resorts (MLCO) — Q1 2026 Earnings (April 30, 2026)

Relevance to LVS Q2 2026: HIGH — Direct Macao competitor; provides Singapore-adjacent demand color

MGM Resorts (MGM China) — Q1 2026 Earnings (April 29, 2026)

Relevance to LVS Q2 2026: MODERATE — MGM China is a Macao competitor; US operations not relevant to LVS

Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The most material post-Q1 development is the FIFA World Cup-driven June GGR collapse in Macao (-12.1% YoY), which has already been partially priced in via estimate cuts; the $1B senior notes refinancing is balance-sheet-neutral and the Bernstein Conference confirmed no demand disruption in Singapore.

Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: No open-market buys or discretionary sells of significance since Q1 earnings; all transactions are either RSU grants (compensation-related) or estate/trust restructuring by the Adelson family — no meaningful signal for the upcoming print.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Value / Size

Transaction Date

Filing Date

Note

Patrick Dumont

Chairman & CEO

RSU Grant (Compensation)

167,081 units

Apr 27, 2026

Apr 29, 2026

Annual equity compensation grant; not a market signal

D. Zachary Hudson

EVP & General Counsel

RSU Grant (Compensation)

62,684 units

Apr 27, 2026

Apr 29, 2026

Annual equity compensation grant

Randy Hyzak

EVP & CFO

RSU Grant (Compensation)

31,111 units

Apr 27, 2026

Apr 29, 2026

Annual equity compensation grant

Charles D. Forman

Director

Open Market Sale

11,400 shares (~$600K)

Apr 27, 2026

Apr 29, 2026

Discretionary sale; relatively small size; no 10b5-1 plan noted

Multiple Directors (6)

Directors

RSU Grant (Compensation)

3,948 units each

May 14, 2026

May 18, 2026

Annual director equity compensation grants

Miriam Adelson

10% Owner

Estate/Trust Restructuring (Gift)

~175.4M shares (transfers)

Jun 16, 2026

Jun 18, 2026

Internal trust restructuring between Adelson family trusts; no economic change in beneficial ownership; not a market signal

The only open-market sale was Director Charles Forman’s 11,400-share sale on April 27, 2026 — a relatively small, discretionary transaction with no 10b5-1 plan noted. The Adelson family trust restructuring (June 16) involved large share counts but represents internal estate planning with no change in economic exposure. No insider buying has occurred since Q1 earnings, which is notable given the ~20% stock decline — the absence of buying is not alarming given the Adelson family’s dominant ownership structure, but it is worth monitoring.