Company | Las Vegas Sands Corp. | Earnings Date | July 22, 2026 (After Close) |
Ticker | LVS (NYSE) | Prepared | July 21, 2026 |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (Quarter ended June 30, 2026) | Sector ETF | BJK (VanEck Gaming ETF) |
Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 2026 is mixed-to-cautious — consensus has been revised down sharply in the final weeks before the print, creating a potentially beatable bar, but the single biggest swing factor is whether Macao EBITDA can sustain the Q1 momentum or reverts given Q2's seasonally softer profile and ongoing competitive reinvestment pressure.
Heading into Q2 2026, the bar for LVS has been meaningfully lowered: consensus operating EPS has declined from $0.80 in early July to $0.75 today, and Macao EBITDA estimates have been cut from ~$599M to ~$559M over the same window, suggesting the Street is pricing in a sequential step-down from Q1's $633M print. Management's tone at the May 27 Bernstein conference remained constructive — reiterating the $2.7–2.8B annual Macao EBITDA ambition, confirming no measurable demand impact from jet fuel/flight disruptions in Singapore, and signaling continued aggressive buybacks — but the Q1 call itself flagged that Q2 is "typically our softest" quarter and that service-investment-driven OpEx headwinds will persist. Singapore's Marina Bay Sands remains the earnings anchor, with consensus at ~$728M EBITDA for Q2, essentially flat with Q1's $788M beat, and the VIP rolling segment's inherent volatility (Q1 saw an extraordinary $18B in rolling volume) is the key wildcard that could swing the print materially in either direction. The stock has declined ~20% since Q1 earnings on multiple compression (EV/EBITDA contracted from ~9.75x to ~8.26x), leaving valuation at a meaningful discount to history and suggesting the market has already priced in considerable disappointment; a clean beat on Macao margins or any upside surprise in Singapore rolling volume could catalyze a sharp re-rating. The primary wildcard is Singapore VIP hold percentage: management's smart-table program has structurally raised hold rates above 4%, and any quarter where this normalizes lower could mask underlying volume strength and disappoint on EBITDA even with solid mass market trends.
Key Takeaway: Consensus represents a low-to-moderate bar after recent downward revisions, particularly for Macao EBITDA. Singapore MBS EBITDA is the bigger swing factor given VIP rolling volatility; Macao margin trajectory is the key debate.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change | Guidance / Target | Consensus vs. Guidance |
Total Revenue | $3,585M | $3,175M | $3,331M | +4.9% YoY | No specific quarterly guidance | N/A |
Consolidated EBITDA (Operating) | $1,338M | $1,265M | $1,209M | -4.4% YoY | No specific quarterly guidance | N/A |
Macao Operations EBITDA | $633M | $566M | $559M | -1.2% YoY | $700M+ quarterly (long-term target) | -20% below LT target |
Marina Bay Sands EBITDA | $788M | $768M | $728M | -5.2% YoY | ~$2.9B+ annually (~$725M/qtr implied) | +0.4% above implied quarterly run-rate |
EPS — Diluted Operating | $0.91 | $0.79 | $0.75 | -5.1% YoY | No specific quarterly guidance | N/A |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Note: Q2 2026 consensus estimates as of July 21, 2026. YoY change compares Q2 2026 consensus vs. Q2 2025 actual. Macao EBITDA long-term target of $700M+ per quarter stated on Q1 2026 earnings call. MBS annual run-rate target of $2.9B+ per year stated at Bernstein conference (May 27, 2026).
KPI 1: Macao Operations EBITDA
Quarter | Reported ($M) | Consensus ($M) | Surprise % | Result |
Q3 2024 | $585M | $565M | +3.5% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | $571M | $598M | -4.5% | Miss |
Q1 2025 | $535M | $586M | -8.7% | Miss |
Q2 2025 | $566M | $561M | +0.9% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $601M | $597M | +0.7% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $608M | $628M | -3.2% | Miss |
Q1 2026 | $633M | $601M | +5.3% | Beat |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Macao EBITDA beat/miss pattern is mixed — 4 beats and 3 misses over the last 7 reported quarters, with the two largest misses (Q1 2025 at -8.7% and Q4 2024 at -4.5%) occurring when competitive reinvestment pressure was most acute; the Q1 2026 beat of +5.3% was the strongest in the window.
KPI 2: Marina Bay Sands EBITDA
Quarter | Reported ($M) | Consensus ($M) | Surprise % | Result |
Q3 2024 | $406M | $496M | -18.1% | Miss |
Q4 2024 | $537M | $499M | +7.6% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | $605M | $527M | +14.8% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | $768M | $533M | +44.1% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $743M | $607M | +22.4% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $806M | $692M | +16.5% | Beat |
Q1 2026 | $788M | $715M | +10.2% | Beat |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. MBS EBITDA has beaten consensus in 6 of the last 7 reported quarters, often by wide margins, driven by VIP rolling volume that consistently surprises to the upside; the sole miss (Q3 2024, -18.1%) was a hold-rate anomaly. The Street has been structurally underestimating Singapore, though the gap has narrowed as estimates have been revised higher.
Key Takeaway: No formal guidance revision has been issued since the Q1 2026 earnings call (April 22, 2026). Management tone at the May 27 Bernstein conference was constructive and consistent with Q1 messaging — no incremental caution on either market, and the Macao EBITDA ambition of $2.7–2.8B annually was reiterated.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 22) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
Macao EBITDA (Quarterly LT Target) | $700M+ per quarter (long-term goal) | Unchanged | $559M (Q2 2026E) | Target reiterated at Bernstein conference May 27, 2026; consensus remains well below target, reflecting market skepticism on timeline |
Macao Annual EBITDA Ambition | $2.7B–2.8B annually | Unchanged | $2.46B (FY2026E) | Reiterated at Bernstein May 27, 2026; consensus ~12% below midpoint of management ambition |
Singapore MBS Annual Run-Rate | ~$2.9B+ annually (management internal forecast raised) | Unchanged | $3.00B (FY2026E) | Consensus slightly above management's stated $2.9B+ run-rate; reflects continued MBS outperformance trend |
Maintenance CapEx | Increased forecast for both portfolios (non-discretionary ~$500M); raised on Q1 call | Unchanged | N/A — not separately tracked in VA | Reiterated at Bernstein May 27, 2026 as a long-term commitment; management views as non-optional |
Share Repurchases | $740M repurchased in Q1 2026; program ongoing | Unchanged — management stated "buying aggressively" at Bernstein | N/A | Bernstein May 27, 2026: "We've been buying back stock aggressively, and we'll continue to do that" |
Q2 Seasonality Warning | "Q2 is typically our softest" quarter; sequential comparisons vs. Q1 (Chinese New Year) "always tough" | N/A | N/A | Stated on Q1 2026 earnings call; key context for interpreting any sequential EBITDA decline in Q2 |
Key Takeaway: Estimates for Q2 2026 and FY2026 have been revised down since the Q1 earnings print, with the sharpest cuts coming in the final two weeks before the Q2 report. Macao EBITDA estimates have been cut ~6% from the post-Q1 baseline, while MBS estimates are down ~1% — the divergence reflects growing skepticism on Macao's near-term recovery pace while Singapore remains a relative anchor.
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (Apr 29, 2026) | Current Estimate (Jul 21, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance (%) |
EPS — Diluted Operating (Q2 2026) | $0.796 | $0.751 | -5.7% | No quarterly guidance | No quarterly guidance | N/A | N/A |
EPS — Diluted Operating (FY2026) | $3.368 | $3.315 | -1.6% | No annual EPS guidance | No annual EPS guidance | N/A | N/A |
Macao Operations EBITDA (Q2 2026) | $599M | $559M | -6.7% | $700M+ quarterly (LT target) | Unchanged | No change | -20.2% below LT target |
Macao Operations EBITDA (FY2026) | $2,516M | $2,457M | -2.3% | $2,700–2,800M (annual ambition) | Unchanged | No change | -10.3% below midpoint |
Marina Bay Sands EBITDA (Q2 2026) | $732M | $728M | -0.5% | ~$2.9B+ annually (~$725M/qtr implied) | Unchanged | No change | +0.4% above implied quarterly run-rate |
Marina Bay Sands EBITDA (FY2026) | $3,006M | $3,004M | -0.1% | $2.9B+ annually | Unchanged | No change | +3.6% above stated target |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. The most notable revision dynamic is the sharp acceleration of Macao EBITDA cuts in the final two weeks before the print (from ~$595M on July 3 to ~$559M on July 21), suggesting either negative read-throughs from Macao GGR data or broader macro concerns about Chinese consumer spending. MBS estimates have been remarkably stable, consistent with the asset's track record of consistent outperformance. The gap between Macao consensus and management's stated ambition ($2.7–2.8B annually) remains wide at ~10%, representing either a significant execution risk or a meaningful upside opportunity if the investment program gains traction.
Key Takeaway: LVS has underperformed both the gaming sector ETF (BJK) and the S&P 500 since Q1 earnings, with the decline driven almost entirely by multiple compression rather than estimate cuts — EV/EBITDA contracted from ~9.75x to ~8.26x over three months, suggesting sentiment deterioration beyond what fundamentals alone justify.
Since the Q1 2026 earnings release on April 22, 2026, LVS has declined approximately -20.1% (from $56.85 to $45.47 as of July 21, 2026), significantly underperforming the S&P 500 (SPY: +5.2% over the same period, from $711.21 to $748.28) and the VanEck Gaming ETF (BJK: +3.2%, from $37.24 to $38.43). The stock's underperformance is attributable primarily to multiple compression: EV/EBITDA contracted from approximately 9.75x (3 months ago) to 8.26x currently, while NTM EPS estimates declined only modestly (~1.6% for FY2026). Key events during the period include the May 13 completion of the $1B senior notes refinancing (balance sheet management, neutral to slightly positive), the May 27 Bernstein conference (constructive tone, no new guidance), and the broader de-rating of Macao-exposed names amid China macro concerns and a weakening consumer spending backdrop. The stock is now trading at its lowest EV/EBITDA multiple in over a year, which historically has represented an attractive entry point if Macao execution improves.
Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance). Indexed performance: LVS = 100 at April 22, 2026 close ($56.85); BJK = 100 at $37.24; SPY = 100 at $711.21. As of July 21, 2026: LVS = 79.9, BJK = 103.2, SPY = 105.2.
Metric | Current | 3 Months Ago | 6 Months Ago | 12 Months Ago |
EV / EBITDA (NTM) | 8.26x | 9.75x | 10.57x | 10.18x |
P/E (NTM) | 13.78x | 17.68x | 18.95x | 19.27x |
P / FCF (NTM) | 11.09x | 13.04x | 15.29x | 17.95x |
EV / Sales (NTM) | 3.00x | 3.61x | 4.01x | 3.77x |
Source: Stock Performance Decomposition Data (Implied). EV/EBITDA is the primary valuation metric for LVS given its capital-intensive integrated resort model. The current 8.26x NTM EV/EBITDA represents a ~22% discount to the 6-month-ago level and a ~19% discount to the 12-month-ago level, driven almost entirely by multiple compression rather than estimate cuts.
Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the $1B senior notes refinancing (May 13), which extends the debt maturity profile but at higher rates, and management's confirmation at Bernstein (May 27) that Singapore demand remains unaffected by jet fuel/flight disruptions — a key risk that the market had been pricing in.
Key Takeaway: No direct Macao or Singapore peer operating commentary about Q2 2026 (the current reporting quarter) was identified within the qualifying window. The only available peer read-through is an indirect positive signal from Richemont's strong Asia Pacific luxury spending data for calendar Q2 2026. Strict filter applied: only commentary about the current Q2 2026 reporting period is included; prior-quarter results and historical earnings commentary are excluded.
The peer read-through section applies a strict May 22 – July 21, 2026 window and includes only commentary that speaks to conditions during Q2 2026 (April–June 2026). Excluded: (1) Q1 2026 earnings results from peers (those are prior-quarter results, not current-quarter commentary); (2) any commentary about periods prior to Q2 2026; (3) any commentary that does not have a direct read-through to Macao or Singapore gaming/hospitality demand. The primary peers for LVS are Wynn Resorts (WYNN), MGM Resorts (MGM), Melco Resorts (MLCO), Galaxy Entertainment, Sands China, and Wynn Macau — none of which had reported Q2 2026 results or provided Q2 2026 operating updates within the qualifying window as of July 21, 2026 (most are scheduled to report in late July or early August 2026).
As of July 21, 2026, no direct Macao or Singapore gaming peer had reported Q2 2026 results or provided Q2 2026 operating updates within the May 22 – July 21, 2026 window. Specifically:
Conclusion: The Richemont data point is the most actionable read-through available, suggesting the high-end Asian consumer remained robust in Q2 2026. Investors should watch for any Wynn Resorts or MGM Resorts Q2 2026 commentary (both reporting in late July) as the most direct peer read-throughs for LVS's Macao and Singapore performance.
Key Takeaway: Only one insider transaction was identified in the post-Q1 earnings window — a discretionary open-market sale by Director Charles Forman on April 27, 2026. The sale is notable as it occurred immediately after the Q1 earnings beat, but the size (11,400 shares, ~$620K) is modest relative to his remaining holdings (176,428 shares). No open-market buys were identified; the absence of insider buying at a 52-week low is a mild negative signal.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Value (Est.) | Date | Note |
Charles D. Forman | Director | Open Market Sale | ~$620K (11,400 shares) | April 27, 2026 | Discretionary sale (no 10b5-1 plan indicated); occurred 5 days after Q1 2026 earnings beat; 176,428 shares remain post-sale (~6% of holdings sold) |
Source: SEC Form 4 Filings Database (Insider Transaction Data). Window: April 22 – July 21, 2026. Only open-market buys (code P) and open-market sales (code S) included. No 10b5-1 plan initiations were identified for LVS insiders in this window. The company's aggressive share repurchase program ($740M in Q1 2026 alone) represents the most significant capital return signal, though this is a corporate rather than individual insider action.
Key Takeaway: The call will be dominated by three debates: (1) whether Macao's Q1 momentum was sustained or reversed in Q2; (2) whether Singapore's extraordinary Q1 rolling volume was a one-time event or a new baseline; and (3) the pace and confidence of the Macao EBITDA recovery toward the $700M quarterly target.
Disclaimer: This earnings preview is prepared for informational purposes only and is based on publicly available data and consensus estimates as of July 21, 2026. All consensus figures are sourced from Visible Alpha. Actual results may differ materially from estimates. This document does not constitute investment advice.