{
  "report_rows": [
    {
      "kpi": "Non-GAAP diluted EPS",
      "prediction": "BEAT",
      "answer": "pred ~$1.00 vs. cons $0.97",
      "confidence": "MEDIUM"
    },
    {
      "kpi": "Net revenue",
      "prediction": "BEAT",
      "answer": "pred ~$1.46B vs. cons $1.43B",
      "confidence": "MEDIUM"
    },
    {
      "kpi": "Financial Technology revenue",
      "prediction": "BEAT",
      "answer": "pred ~$548M vs. cons $538M",
      "confidence": "MEDIUM"
    }
  ],
  "guide_rows": [
    {
      "kpi": "FY26 non-GAAP operating-expense guidance",
      "prediction": "UNCHANGED",
      "answer": "guide ~$2.515B midpoint vs. cons $2.515B midpoint (FY26)",
      "confidence": "HIGH"
    },
    {
      "kpi": "FY26 non-GAAP tax-rate guidance",
      "prediction": "UNCHANGED",
      "answer": "guide ~23.5% midpoint vs. cons 23.5% (FY26)",
      "confidence": "HIGH"
    },
    {
      "kpi": "Financial Technology organic growth commentary",
      "prediction": "BETTER",
      "answer": "guide ~16% organic growth vs. cons 15% (2H26)",
      "confidence": "MEDIUM"
    }
  ],
  "day1_residual_pct": 3.5,
  "day1_confidence": "MEDIUM",
  "day5_residual_pct": 5.5,
  "day5_path": "FOLLOW-THROUGH",
  "day5_rationale": "Day-1 residual ~3.5% vs. a modeled 0.0% benchmark; 5-day residual ~5.5% vs. the same 0.0% benchmark. A revenue/EPS beat led by Financial Technology, plus sustained mid-teens organic-growth commentary and unchanged FY26 expense guidance, should lift 2026-27 revenue and EPS estimates rather than create a one-quarter, market-services-driven beat.",
  "day5_confidence": "MEDIUM"
}