{
  "report_rows": [
    {
      "kpi": "Adjusted EPS",
      "prediction": "MISS",
      "answer": "pred ~$2.14 vs. cons $2.18",
      "confidence": "MEDIUM"
    },
    {
      "kpi": "Attributable gold production",
      "prediction": "MISS",
      "answer": "pred ~1.19 Moz vs. cons 1.21 Moz",
      "confidence": "MEDIUM"
    },
    {
      "kpi": "Gold by-product AISC",
      "prediction": "MISS",
      "answer": "pred ~$1,790/oz vs. cons $1,725/oz",
      "confidence": "MEDIUM"
    }
  ],
  "guide_rows": [
    {
      "kpi": "Attributable gold production guidance",
      "prediction": "UNCHANGED",
      "answer": "guide ~5.26 Moz vs. cons 5.26 Moz (FY2026)",
      "confidence": "MEDIUM"
    },
    {
      "kpi": "Gold by-product AISC guidance",
      "prediction": "UNCHANGED",
      "answer": "guide ~$1,680/oz vs. cons $1,680/oz (FY2026)",
      "confidence": "MEDIUM"
    },
    {
      "kpi": "Sustaining capital guidance",
      "prediction": "UNCHANGED",
      "answer": "guide ~$1.95B vs. cons $1.95B (FY2026)",
      "confidence": "HIGH"
    }
  ],
  "day1_residual_pct": -3.2,
  "day1_confidence": "MEDIUM",
  "day5_residual_pct": -4.5,
  "day5_path": "FOLLOW-THROUGH",
  "day5_rationale": "Higher Q2 AISC (~$1,790/oz vs. $1,725/oz) and lower production (~1.19 Moz vs. 1.21 Moz) should reduce FY2026-FY2027 estimates despite unchanged headline guidance; the heavier H2 production requirement also raises execution risk and sustains negative revisions.",
  "day5_confidence": "MEDIUM"
}