Company | Rollins, Inc. | Ticker | ROL (NYSE) |
Upcoming Earnings Date | July 23, 2026 (Q2 2026) | Preparation Date | July 21, 2026 |
Last Reported Period | Q1 2026 (reported April 22, 2026) | Sector ETF Benchmark | XLI (Industrials Select Sector SPDR) |
Key Takeaway: Setup is mixed — consensus sits at a manageable bar on revenue (~$1.09B, +7.0% organic implied) but the single biggest swing factor is whether peak-season volume in June/July is enough to offset the April–May choppiness management flagged, and whether incremental margins show meaningful sequential improvement after a muted Q1.
Heading into Q2 2026, Rollins faces a quarter where the bar is achievable but not low: consensus expects revenue of ~$1.09B (implying ~7.0% organic growth) and operating EPS of ~$0.34, both within the company's reaffirmed full-year 7–8% organic growth guidance. Management explicitly acknowledged continued choppiness in April and into May at the June Baird conference, attributing softness to one-time/ancillary services (exclusion, insulation) facing consumer pressure, while the ~75% recurring base remains resilient — a distinction that is critical to the Q2 read. Guidance tone has been consistently reaffirmed across the May Investor Day and June conferences, with incoming CFO Will Harkins explicitly stating "no reason to come off 7–8% guidance," though the CFO transition itself (Ken Krause departed June 15) has weighed on sentiment and triggered a Bernstein downgrade. Estimate revisions have been modestly negative since Q1 earnings — Q2 organic growth consensus slipped from ~7.1% to ~7.0% — suggesting the street has partially de-risked but not fully priced in a miss. The stock has dramatically underperformed since Q1 earnings, falling ~20% vs. XLI +4.5% and SPY +5.2%, trading near 52-week lows at ~$44 and implying the market has already discounted meaningful execution risk on the margin improvement thesis. The key wildcard is the June/July peak-season exit rate: if management can show organic growth accelerating back toward 8%+ (as it did in March), the stock could re-rate sharply given how much bad news is already in the price; conversely, a second consecutive quarter of sub-7% organic growth would validate the bear case on structural demand softness.
Key Takeaway: Consensus sets a manageable but not easy bar — ~7.0% organic growth and ~$0.34 operating EPS for Q2 2026. The bigger swing factor is incremental margin, where the street expects ~23.4% EBITDA margin vs. a muted 19.8% in Q1; any shortfall here will be punished given the CFO transition overhang.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change (implied) | FY 2026 Guidance | Consensus vs. Guidance |
Revenue ($M) | $906.4M | $999.5M | $1,092.7M | +9.3% YoY | 7–8% organic + 2–3% M&A | Within range |
Organic Revenue Growth (%) | 6.6% | 7.3% | 7.0% | -0.3 pp YoY | 7–8% full year | At low end of range |
Commercial Organic Growth (%) | 7.7% | 8.4% | 7.7% | -0.7 pp YoY | Double-digit recurring | Below recurring target |
Residential Organic Growth (%) | 4.2% | 4.9% | 5.4% | +0.5 pp YoY | N/A (segment) | N/A |
Termite & Ancillary Organic Growth (%) | 9.8% | 10.3% | 10.1% | -0.2 pp YoY | N/A (segment) | N/A |
Adj. Operating EPS ($) | $0.24 | $0.30 | $0.34 | +13.3% YoY | N/A (no quarterly EPS guide) | N/A |
Adj. EBITDA ($M) | $179.5M | $231.2M | $255.6M | +10.5% YoY | N/A (no quarterly EBITDA guide) | N/A |
Adj. EBITDA Margin (%) | 19.8% | 23.1% | 23.4% | +0.3 pp YoY | 25–30% incremental margins | Tracking toward target |
Gross Margin (%) | 50.8% | 53.8% | 53.9% | +0.1 pp YoY | N/A | N/A |
Free Cash Flow ($M) | $111.2M | $168.0M | $224.6M | +33.7% YoY | >100% conversion | Above guidance |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. All consensus figures as of July 21, 2026. Q1 2026 actuals are last reported. Q2 2025 actuals are prior year period comparisons.
KPI 1: Revenue | KPI 2: Adj. Operating EPS
Quarter | KPI | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q1 2026 | Revenue | $906.4M | $896.1M | +1.1% | Beat |
Q1 2026 | Adj. EPS | $0.24 | $0.24 | 0.0% | In Line |
Q4 2025 | Revenue | $912.9M | $927.7M | -1.6% | Miss |
Q4 2025 | Adj. EPS | $0.25 | $0.27 | -7.4% | Miss |
Q3 2025 | Revenue | $1,026.1M | $1,022.1M | +0.4% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | Adj. EPS | $0.35 | $0.33 | +6.1% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | Revenue | $999.5M | $988.9M | +1.1% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | Adj. EPS | $0.30 | $0.30 | 0.0% | In Line |
Q1 2025 | Revenue | $822.5M | $820.0M | +0.3% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | Adj. EPS | $0.22 | $0.22 | 0.0% | In Line |
Q4 2024 | Revenue | $832.2M | $819.3M | +1.6% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | Adj. EPS | $0.23 | $0.23 | 0.0% | In Line |
Q3 2024 | Revenue | $916.3M | $912.0M | +0.5% | Beat |
Q3 2024 | Adj. EPS | $0.29 | $0.30 | -3.3% | Miss |
Q2 2024 | Revenue | $891.9M | $897.4M | -0.6% | Miss |
Q2 2024 | Adj. EPS | $0.27 | $0.27 | 0.0% | In Line |
Pattern: ROL consistently beats or meets on revenue (6 beats, 1 miss, 1 in-line over 8 quarters) but EPS surprises are rare — the stock tends to trade on organic growth trajectory and incremental margin rather than headline EPS beats. The Q4 2025 double-miss was the notable outlier that reset expectations and drove the stock lower.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: Estimates have been modestly trimmed since Q1 earnings — Q2 organic growth consensus slipped ~10 bps and FY2026 revenue is essentially flat — suggesting the street has partially de-risked but not aggressively cut. The gap between consensus and guidance is narrow, meaning any miss on organic growth would require further downward revision.
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (Apr 27, 2026) | Current Consensus (Jul 21, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Earnings Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance |
Revenue — Q2 2026 | $1,093.7M | $1,092.7M | -0.1% | 7–8% organic + 2–3% M&A | Unchanged | — | At low end of organic range |
Revenue — FY 2026 | $4,124.5M | $4,123.3M | -0.0% | 7–8% organic + 2–3% M&A | Unchanged | — | Within range |
Organic Growth % — Q2 2026 | 7.12% | 7.02% | -10 bps | 7–8% full year | Unchanged | — | At low end of range |
Organic Growth % — FY 2026 | 7.15% | 7.16% | +1 bp | 7–8% full year | Unchanged | — | At low end of range |
Adj. EPS — Q2 2026 | $0.340 | $0.339 | -0.3% | N/A (no quarterly EPS guide) | N/A | — | N/A |
Adj. EPS — FY 2026 | $1.243 | $1.243 | 0.0% | N/A (no annual EPS guide) | N/A | — | N/A |
Adj. EBITDA — Q2 2026 | $256.9M | $255.6M | -0.5% | 25–30% incremental margins | Unchanged | — | Tracking toward target |
Adj. EBITDA — FY 2026 | $941.9M | $939.9M | -0.2% | 25–30% incremental margins | Unchanged | — | Tracking toward target |
Estimates have been remarkably stable since Q1 earnings — the street has not aggressively cut despite management's acknowledgment of April–May choppiness. This creates a two-sided risk: if peak-season volumes disappoint, there is meaningful downside to current consensus; if June/July accelerate as management expects, estimates could move higher and the stock could re-rate from deeply depressed levels.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. As-of date for baseline: April 27, 2026 (5 trading days post Q1 2026 earnings).
Key Takeaway: ROL has dramatically underperformed since Q1 earnings — down ~20% vs. XLI +4.5% and SPY +5.2% — driven almost entirely by multiple compression and sentiment deterioration following the CFO departure and Bernstein downgrade, not by estimate cuts. At ~$44, the stock trades near 52-week lows and implies the market is pricing in meaningful execution risk on the margin improvement thesis.
ROL vs. XLI (Industrials ETF) vs. S&P 500 — Indexed to 100 at Q1 2026 Earnings (Apr 22, 2026). Source: Yahoo Finance / Stock Price Data.
Sector ETF: XLI (Industrials Select Sector SPDR ETF) used as the sector benchmark. ROL is classified in the Commercial & Professional Services sub-sector within Industrials. XLI is the most widely used benchmark for this sector.
Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance).
Key Takeaway: The CFO departure is the single most important development since Q1 earnings — it triggered a Bernstein downgrade and drove the stock to 52-week lows, creating an overhang that will only clear if Q2 results demonstrate the margin improvement thesis is intact under new leadership.
Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from Cintas (CTAS, reported July 15) and ABM Industries (ABM, reported June 5) provides broadly constructive read-throughs for ROL's Q2 2026 — commercial services demand remains healthy, pricing is holding at CPI-plus levels, and the macro environment is resilient for essential/recurring services. The key divergence is that CTAS and ABM are not seeing the one-time/ancillary consumer softness that ROL flagged, which is specific to ROL's higher-ticket discretionary services.
Relevance: CTAS is the closest large-cap peer in commercial services (uniform rental, facility services, fire protection). Its Q4 FY2026 covers the April–May 2026 calendar period, directly overlapping with ROL's Q2 2026. CTAS reports before ROL and is a strong read-through on commercial services demand, pricing, and labor cost trends.
Relevance: ABM is a commercial facility services company with significant exposure to commercial real estate, aviation, manufacturing, and technical solutions. Its Q2 FY2026 (March–May 2026) overlaps with the early portion of ROL's Q2 2026. ABM provides read-through on commercial services demand, labor costs, and the macro environment for essential B2B services.
Theme | CTAS Signal | ABM Signal | ROL Read-Through |
Commercial Services Demand | Strong (8.4% organic) | Strong (6.1% organic, best since Q3 2022) | Positive — supports ROL commercial double-digit recurring target |
Pricing Environment | At/slightly above historical levels | Escalations gaining traction | Positive — CPI-plus model intact |
Incremental Margins | 38% in Q4 (5-quarter high) | Sequential improvement expected H2 | Positive — industry can sustain high incrementals through peak season |
Macro / Consumer Demand | Resilient; uncertainty = opportunity | Constructive; end markets largely intact | Positive for recurring base; one-time services remain ROL-specific risk |
Labor / Energy Costs | Energy +20 bps; manageable | Labor flexibility via AI tools | Neutral — ROL's insurance/claims cost is company-specific |
Data Center / AI Vertical | Not directly applicable | Major new vertical (Nexus); $645B+ investment pipeline | Positive — validates ROL's data center commercial pest control opportunity |
Guidance Credibility | FY2027 guide maintained; 10% EPS growth midpoint | Full-year EPS guide maintained | Positive — peers maintaining guidance supports ROL's 7-8% reaffirmation credibility |
Key Divergence: Neither CTAS nor ABM flagged the one-time/ancillary consumer softness that ROL management explicitly acknowledged at the June conferences. This suggests the choppiness in ROL's higher-ticket discretionary services (exclusion, insulation) is company-specific and consumer-driven, not a broad commercial services sector issue. The recurring pest control base (~75% of ROL revenue) should benefit from the same constructive demand environment peers are describing.
Sources: CTAS Q4 FY2026 Earnings Call Transcript (July 15, 2026); ABM Q2 FY2026 Earnings Call Transcript (June 5, 2026); ROL William Blair Growth Stock Conference Transcript (June 3, 2026); ROL Baird Global Consumer, Tech & Services Conference Transcript (June 4, 2026); ROL Investor and Analyst Conference Transcript (May 14, 2026).