Rollins, Inc. (ROL) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

Rollins, Inc.

Ticker

ROL (NYSE)

Upcoming Earnings Date

July 23, 2026 (Q2 2026)

Preparation Date

July 21, 2026

Last Reported Period

Q1 2026 (reported April 22, 2026)

Sector ETF Benchmark

XLI (Industrials Select Sector SPDR)

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: Setup is mixed — consensus sits at a manageable bar on revenue (~$1.09B, +7.0% organic implied) but the single biggest swing factor is whether peak-season volume in June/July is enough to offset the April–May choppiness management flagged, and whether incremental margins show meaningful sequential improvement after a muted Q1.

Heading into Q2 2026, Rollins faces a quarter where the bar is achievable but not low: consensus expects revenue of ~$1.09B (implying ~7.0% organic growth) and operating EPS of ~$0.34, both within the company's reaffirmed full-year 7–8% organic growth guidance. Management explicitly acknowledged continued choppiness in April and into May at the June Baird conference, attributing softness to one-time/ancillary services (exclusion, insulation) facing consumer pressure, while the ~75% recurring base remains resilient — a distinction that is critical to the Q2 read. Guidance tone has been consistently reaffirmed across the May Investor Day and June conferences, with incoming CFO Will Harkins explicitly stating "no reason to come off 7–8% guidance," though the CFO transition itself (Ken Krause departed June 15) has weighed on sentiment and triggered a Bernstein downgrade. Estimate revisions have been modestly negative since Q1 earnings — Q2 organic growth consensus slipped from ~7.1% to ~7.0% — suggesting the street has partially de-risked but not fully priced in a miss. The stock has dramatically underperformed since Q1 earnings, falling ~20% vs. XLI +4.5% and SPY +5.2%, trading near 52-week lows at ~$44 and implying the market has already discounted meaningful execution risk on the margin improvement thesis. The key wildcard is the June/July peak-season exit rate: if management can show organic growth accelerating back toward 8%+ (as it did in March), the stock could re-rate sharply given how much bad news is already in the price; conversely, a second consecutive quarter of sub-7% organic growth would validate the bear case on structural demand softness.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus sets a manageable but not easy bar — ~7.0% organic growth and ~$0.34 operating EPS for Q2 2026. The bigger swing factor is incremental margin, where the street expects ~23.4% EBITDA margin vs. a muted 19.8% in Q1; any shortfall here will be punished given the CFO transition overhang.

Table 1 — Q2 2026 Current Quarter Snapshot

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year)

Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate

YoY Change (implied)

FY 2026 Guidance

Consensus vs. Guidance

Revenue ($M)

$906.4M

$999.5M

$1,092.7M

+9.3% YoY

7–8% organic + 2–3% M&A

Within range

Organic Revenue Growth (%)

6.6%

7.3%

7.0%

-0.3 pp YoY

7–8% full year

At low end of range

Commercial Organic Growth (%)

7.7%

8.4%

7.7%

-0.7 pp YoY

Double-digit recurring

Below recurring target

Residential Organic Growth (%)

4.2%

4.9%

5.4%

+0.5 pp YoY

N/A (segment)

N/A

Termite & Ancillary Organic Growth (%)

9.8%

10.3%

10.1%

-0.2 pp YoY

N/A (segment)

N/A

Adj. Operating EPS ($)

$0.24

$0.30

$0.34

+13.3% YoY

N/A (no quarterly EPS guide)

N/A

Adj. EBITDA ($M)

$179.5M

$231.2M

$255.6M

+10.5% YoY

N/A (no quarterly EBITDA guide)

N/A

Adj. EBITDA Margin (%)

19.8%

23.1%

23.4%

+0.3 pp YoY

25–30% incremental margins

Tracking toward target

Gross Margin (%)

50.8%

53.8%

53.9%

+0.1 pp YoY

N/A

N/A

Free Cash Flow ($M)

$111.2M

$168.0M

$224.6M

+33.7% YoY

>100% conversion

Above guidance

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. All consensus figures as of July 21, 2026. Q1 2026 actuals are last reported. Q2 2025 actuals are prior year period comparisons.

Table 2 — Beat/Miss History (Last 8 Quarters, Top 2 KPIs)

KPI 1: Revenue | KPI 2: Adj. Operating EPS

Quarter

KPI

Reported

Consensus

Surprise %

Result

Q1 2026

Revenue

$906.4M

$896.1M

+1.1%

Beat

Q1 2026

Adj. EPS

$0.24

$0.24

0.0%

In Line

Q4 2025

Revenue

$912.9M

$927.7M

-1.6%

Miss

Q4 2025

Adj. EPS

$0.25

$0.27

-7.4%

Miss

Q3 2025

Revenue

$1,026.1M

$1,022.1M

+0.4%

Beat

Q3 2025

Adj. EPS

$0.35

$0.33

+6.1%

Beat

Q2 2025

Revenue

$999.5M

$988.9M

+1.1%

Beat

Q2 2025

Adj. EPS

$0.30

$0.30

0.0%

In Line

Q1 2025

Revenue

$822.5M

$820.0M

+0.3%

Beat

Q1 2025

Adj. EPS

$0.22

$0.22

0.0%

In Line

Q4 2024

Revenue

$832.2M

$819.3M

+1.6%

Beat

Q4 2024

Adj. EPS

$0.23

$0.23

0.0%

In Line

Q3 2024

Revenue

$916.3M

$912.0M

+0.5%

Beat

Q3 2024

Adj. EPS

$0.29

$0.30

-3.3%

Miss

Q2 2024

Revenue

$891.9M

$897.4M

-0.6%

Miss

Q2 2024

Adj. EPS

$0.27

$0.27

0.0%

In Line

Pattern: ROL consistently beats or meets on revenue (6 beats, 1 miss, 1 in-line over 8 quarters) but EPS surprises are rare — the stock tends to trade on organic growth trajectory and incremental margin rather than headline EPS beats. The Q4 2025 double-miss was the notable outlier that reset expectations and drove the stock lower.

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates have been modestly trimmed since Q1 earnings — Q2 organic growth consensus slipped ~10 bps and FY2026 revenue is essentially flat — suggesting the street has partially de-risked but not aggressively cut. The gap between consensus and guidance is narrow, meaning any miss on organic growth would require further downward revision.

KPI (Period)

Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (Apr 27, 2026)

Current Consensus (Jul 21, 2026)

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Earnings Call)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Consensus vs. Guidance

Revenue — Q2 2026

$1,093.7M

$1,092.7M

-0.1%

7–8% organic + 2–3% M&A

Unchanged

At low end of organic range

Revenue — FY 2026

$4,124.5M

$4,123.3M

-0.0%

7–8% organic + 2–3% M&A

Unchanged

Within range

Organic Growth % — Q2 2026

7.12%

7.02%

-10 bps

7–8% full year

Unchanged

At low end of range

Organic Growth % — FY 2026

7.15%

7.16%

+1 bp

7–8% full year

Unchanged

At low end of range

Adj. EPS — Q2 2026

$0.340

$0.339

-0.3%

N/A (no quarterly EPS guide)

N/A

N/A

Adj. EPS — FY 2026

$1.243

$1.243

0.0%

N/A (no annual EPS guide)

N/A

N/A

Adj. EBITDA — Q2 2026

$256.9M

$255.6M

-0.5%

25–30% incremental margins

Unchanged

Tracking toward target

Adj. EBITDA — FY 2026

$941.9M

$939.9M

-0.2%

25–30% incremental margins

Unchanged

Tracking toward target

Estimates have been remarkably stable since Q1 earnings — the street has not aggressively cut despite management's acknowledgment of April–May choppiness. This creates a two-sided risk: if peak-season volumes disappoint, there is meaningful downside to current consensus; if June/July accelerate as management expects, estimates could move higher and the stock could re-rate from deeply depressed levels.

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. As-of date for baseline: April 27, 2026 (5 trading days post Q1 2026 earnings).

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: ROL has dramatically underperformed since Q1 earnings — down ~20% vs. XLI +4.5% and SPY +5.2% — driven almost entirely by multiple compression and sentiment deterioration following the CFO departure and Bernstein downgrade, not by estimate cuts. At ~$44, the stock trades near 52-week lows and implies the market is pricing in meaningful execution risk on the margin improvement thesis.

ROL vs. XLI (Industrials ETF) vs. S&P 500 — Indexed to 100 at Q1 2026 Earnings (Apr 22, 2026). Source: Yahoo Finance / Stock Price Data.

Sector ETF: XLI (Industrials Select Sector SPDR ETF) used as the sector benchmark. ROL is classified in the Commercial & Professional Services sub-sector within Industrials. XLI is the most widely used benchmark for this sector.

Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance).

6. Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The CFO departure is the single most important development since Q1 earnings — it triggered a Bernstein downgrade and drove the stock to 52-week lows, creating an overhang that will only clear if Q2 results demonstrate the margin improvement thesis is intact under new leadership.

8. Peer Commentaries — Read-Through for Q2 2026

Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from Cintas (CTAS, reported July 15) and ABM Industries (ABM, reported June 5) provides broadly constructive read-throughs for ROL's Q2 2026 — commercial services demand remains healthy, pricing is holding at CPI-plus levels, and the macro environment is resilient for essential/recurring services. The key divergence is that CTAS and ABM are not seeing the one-time/ancillary consumer softness that ROL flagged, which is specific to ROL's higher-ticket discretionary services.

Cintas Corporation (CTAS) — Q4 FY2026 Earnings Call (July 15, 2026)

Relevance: CTAS is the closest large-cap peer in commercial services (uniform rental, facility services, fire protection). Its Q4 FY2026 covers the April–May 2026 calendar period, directly overlapping with ROL's Q2 2026. CTAS reports before ROL and is a strong read-through on commercial services demand, pricing, and labor cost trends.

ABM Industries (ABM) — Q2 FY2026 Earnings Call (June 5, 2026)

Relevance: ABM is a commercial facility services company with significant exposure to commercial real estate, aviation, manufacturing, and technical solutions. Its Q2 FY2026 (March–May 2026) overlaps with the early portion of ROL's Q2 2026. ABM provides read-through on commercial services demand, labor costs, and the macro environment for essential B2B services.

Summary Read-Through Table

Theme

CTAS Signal

ABM Signal

ROL Read-Through

Commercial Services Demand

Strong (8.4% organic)

Strong (6.1% organic, best since Q3 2022)

Positive — supports ROL commercial double-digit recurring target

Pricing Environment

At/slightly above historical levels

Escalations gaining traction

Positive — CPI-plus model intact

Incremental Margins

38% in Q4 (5-quarter high)

Sequential improvement expected H2

Positive — industry can sustain high incrementals through peak season

Macro / Consumer Demand

Resilient; uncertainty = opportunity

Constructive; end markets largely intact

Positive for recurring base; one-time services remain ROL-specific risk

Labor / Energy Costs

Energy +20 bps; manageable

Labor flexibility via AI tools

Neutral — ROL's insurance/claims cost is company-specific

Data Center / AI Vertical

Not directly applicable

Major new vertical (Nexus); $645B+ investment pipeline

Positive — validates ROL's data center commercial pest control opportunity

Guidance Credibility

FY2027 guide maintained; 10% EPS growth midpoint

Full-year EPS guide maintained

Positive — peers maintaining guidance supports ROL's 7-8% reaffirmation credibility

Key Divergence: Neither CTAS nor ABM flagged the one-time/ancillary consumer softness that ROL management explicitly acknowledged at the June conferences. This suggests the choppiness in ROL's higher-ticket discretionary services (exclusion, insulation) is company-specific and consumer-driven, not a broad commercial services sector issue. The recurring pest control base (~75% of ROL revenue) should benefit from the same constructive demand environment peers are describing.

Sources: CTAS Q4 FY2026 Earnings Call Transcript (July 15, 2026); ABM Q2 FY2026 Earnings Call Transcript (June 5, 2026); ROL William Blair Growth Stock Conference Transcript (June 3, 2026); ROL Baird Global Consumer, Tech & Services Conference Transcript (June 4, 2026); ROL Investor and Analyst Conference Transcript (May 14, 2026).