RTX Corporation (RTX) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

RTX Corporation

Earnings Date

July 23, 2026 (BMO, 7:30 AM ET)

Ticker

RTX (NYSE)

Reporting Period

Q2 2026 (fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2026)

Sector

Aerospace & Defense

Prepared

July 22, 2026

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: Setup leans toward another beat — consensus is a manageable bar after Q1's massive upside surprise, and the single biggest swing factor is whether Raytheon's munitions ramp and defense mix can again drive segment operating profit above Street expectations.

Heading into Q2 2026, the bar for RTX looks achievable but not easy: consensus sits at $1.67 adjusted EPS and ~$22.9B in revenue, both representing modest step-ups from Q1 actuals, and the Street has been gradually nudging estimates higher since the April 21 print. Management's posture has remained confidently constructive — at the May Bernstein conference, RTX reiterated no change in commercial aftermarket buying patterns entering Q2, confirmed GTF AOGs continue to decline, and reinforced that Raytheon framework agreement volumes represent 2–4× current production rates, signaling sustained defense upside. Estimate revisions have tracked guidance directionally, with the FY 2026 EPS consensus now at ~$6.95 vs. RTX's raised guidance range of $6.70–$6.90, suggesting the Street is already pricing in a guidance raise — which compresses the upside surprise potential. The stock has underperformed the S&P 500 since the Q1 print (+4.1% vs. +6.2% for SPY), suggesting the market has not fully re-rated RTX despite the strong fundamental backdrop, leaving room for a positive re-rating if Q2 delivers. The key wildcard is commercial aftermarket resilience: TDG and GE Aerospace both flagged a step-back in air travel activity in March–April due to the Middle East conflict, and any softness in Collins or Pratt aftermarket channels could offset Raytheon's defense strength and disappoint on the margin side.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus is a moderate bar — RTX has beaten on both EPS and revenue in each of the last 8 quarters, and the Street's Q2 estimates imply only modest sequential improvement. Adjusted EPS is the bigger swing factor given Raytheon's defense mix leverage; revenue is more predictable given backlog visibility.

Table 1 — Q2 2026 Current Quarter Snapshot

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year)

Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate

YoY Change

FY 2026 Guidance (last call)

Consensus vs. Guidance Midpoint

Net Sales ($B)

$22.08B

$21.58B

$22.94B

+6.3% YoY

$94.0–96.0B (FY)

~+0.2% vs. midpoint

Adj. EPS — Diluted Operating ($)

$1.78

$1.56

$1.67

+7.1% YoY

$6.70–$6.90 (FY)

~+1.1% vs. midpoint

Free Cash Flow ($B)

$1.31B

-$0.07B

$1.52B

N/M (prior year negative)

~$8.0–$9.0B (FY)

~+0.7% vs. midpoint

Sales — Collins Aerospace ($B)

$7.60B

$7.62B

$7.85B

+3.0% YoY

N/A — segment not separately guided

N/A

Sales — Pratt & Whitney ($B)

$8.17B

$7.63B

$8.21B

+7.6% YoY

N/A — segment not separately guided

N/A

Sales — Raytheon ($B)

$6.95B

$7.00B

$7.59B

+8.4% YoY

N/A — segment not separately guided

N/A

Collins Op. Profit — Adj. ($B)

$1.30B

$1.25B

$1.32B

+5.8% YoY

N/A

N/A

Pratt & Whitney Op. Profit — Adj. ($B)

$0.71B

$0.61B

$0.70B

+14.8% YoY

N/A

N/A

Raytheon Op. Profit — Adj. ($B)

$0.85B

$0.81B

$0.89B

+10.0% YoY

N/A

N/A

Backlog ($B)

$271B

$236B

$279.5B

+18.4% YoY

N/A

N/A

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. All consensus figures as of July 22, 2026. FY 2026 guidance as stated on Q1 2026 earnings call (April 21, 2026). Segment guidance not separately provided by management.

Table 2 — Beat/Miss History (Last 8 Quarters)

Top KPI #1: Adjusted EPS — Diluted Operating

Quarter

Reported

Consensus

Surprise %

Result

Q1 2026

$1.78

$1.53

+16.3%

Beat

Q4 2025

$1.55

$1.46

+6.2%

Beat

Q3 2025

$1.70

$1.41

+20.3%

Beat

Q2 2025

$1.56

$1.46

+6.8%

Beat

Q1 2025

$1.47

$1.38

+6.5%

Beat

Q4 2024

$1.54

$1.39

+10.8%

Beat

Q3 2024

$1.45

$1.33

+9.0%

Beat

Q2 2024

$1.41

$1.30

+8.5%

Beat

Pattern: RTX has beaten adjusted EPS consensus in each of the last 8 consecutive quarters, with an average surprise of approximately +10.6% — the bar has consistently been set too low, and the Street has not fully caught up despite repeated upside.

Top KPI #2: Net Sales

Quarter

Reported ($B)

Consensus ($B)

Surprise %

Result

Q1 2026

$22.08B

$21.50B

+2.7%

Beat

Q4 2025

$24.24B

$22.60B

+7.2%

Beat

Q3 2025

$22.48B

$21.38B

+5.1%

Beat

Q2 2025

$21.58B

$20.65B

+4.5%

Beat

Q1 2025

$20.31B

$19.96B

+1.7%

Beat

Q4 2024

$21.62B

$20.44B

+5.8%

Beat

Q3 2024

$20.09B

$19.89B

+1.0%

Beat

Q2 2024

$19.72B

$19.33B

+2.0%

Beat

Pattern: RTX has beaten revenue consensus in each of the last 8 quarters, with an average surprise of approximately +3.8%. Revenue beats have been consistent but smaller in magnitude than EPS beats, reflecting the company's strong operating leverage and favorable mix.

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.

3. Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: RTX raised full-year 2026 guidance on both sales and EPS at the Q1 print; no formal revision has been issued since, but management commentary at the May Bernstein conference was incrementally positive on defense demand and neutral-to-constructive on commercial aftermarket.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr. 21)

Revised Guidance

Current Consensus

Note

Adjusted Net Sales (FY 2026)

$94.0B – $96.0B

$94.3B

Raised at Q1 print from prior range; no post-earnings revision. Consensus near low end of range.

Adjusted EPS — Diluted Operating (FY 2026)

$6.70 – $6.90

$6.95

Raised both ends at Q1 print. Consensus now above top of guidance range, implying Street expects another raise.

Free Cash Flow (FY 2026)

~$8.0B – $9.0B (maintained)

$8.60B

FCF guidance held flat at Q1 despite EPS raise; management cited powder metal compensation declining as key driver of H2 ramp.

Raytheon Operating Profit (FY 2026)

Raised range (both ends) at Q1 print; favorable program mix and higher volume cited

$3.62B

Raised at Q1 print. Management tone at May Bernstein conference remained confident on framework agreement ramp and international mix.

GTF Fleet Management / AOG Trajectory

AOGs declining meaningfully; MRO output up strongly YoY; GTF Advantage on track for 2026 EIS

N/A — operational metric

At May Bernstein: AOGs down meaningfully since end of 2025; turnaround time down on heavier work scopes; financial and technical outlook intact.

Tariff Impact (FY 2026)

No change to full-year tariff impact outlook; court ruling reversals and new tariff structures roughly offset each other

N/A — embedded in guidance

Potential refunds on previously paid tariffs identified but not yet included in guidance; represents modest upside optionality.

Commercial Aftermarket Outlook

No change to full-year commercial OE or aftermarket channel outlooks; no demand impact observed

N/A — embedded in guidance

At May Bernstein: no change in buying patterns entering Q2; airlines reluctant to defer shop visits given COVID lesson learned.

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates have moved higher since the Q1 print across all key metrics, with FY 2026 EPS consensus now above the top of RTX's guidance range — the Street is effectively pricing in a guidance raise at Q2, which sets a higher implicit bar.

KPI (Period)

Estimate ~Apr. 26, 2026 (Post-Q1 Baseline)

Current Consensus (Jul. 22, 2026)

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Call)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Consensus vs. Guidance (%)

Net Sales — Q2 2026

$22.93B

$22.94B

+0.1%

N/A (quarterly not guided)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Adj. EPS — Q2 2026

$1.67

$1.67

Flat

N/A (quarterly not guided)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Net Sales — FY 2026

$94.05B

$94.28B

+0.2%

$94.0B – $96.0B

$94.0B – $96.0B (unchanged)

Unchanged

-0.7% vs. midpoint

Adj. EPS — FY 2026

$6.90

$6.95

+0.7%

$6.70 – $6.90

$6.70 – $6.90 (unchanged)

Unchanged

+1.1% above top of range

Free Cash Flow — FY 2026

$8.48B

$8.60B

+1.4%

~$8.0B – $9.0B

~$8.0B – $9.0B (unchanged)

Unchanged

+1.2% vs. midpoint

Adj. EPS — FY 2027

$7.60

$7.65

+0.7%

N/A (not guided)

N/A

N/A

N/A

The most notable signal is that FY 2026 EPS consensus ($6.95) has moved above the top of RTX's guidance range ($6.90), meaning the Street is effectively pricing in a guidance raise at Q2. If RTX raises the midpoint but keeps the top end unchanged, the reaction may be muted. A raise of the full range — particularly the top end — would be the catalyst for a more meaningful re-rating. FCF estimates have also drifted higher, suggesting the Street sees upside to the maintained FCF outlook.

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Post-Q1 baseline as of approximately April 26, 2026 (5 trading days post-print).

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: RTX has lagged the S&P 500 since the Q1 print (+4.1% vs. +6.2% for SPY and +3.6% for ITA), suggesting the strong fundamental backdrop has not yet driven a full re-rating — performance has been multiple-driven rather than revision-driven, with the stock recovering from an initial post-earnings selloff.

RTX vs. ITA (Aerospace & Defense ETF) vs. S&P 500 — Indexed to 100 at Q1 2026 Earnings (April 21, 2026). Source: Stock Price Data.

RTX opened the post-Q1 period with a sharp selloff — declining from $187.17 on earnings day to a trough near $172–$173 in late April/early May — as the market concluded the large EPS beat was largely anticipated given the elevated defense demand backdrop and prior run-up. The stock then staged a gradual recovery through May and June, aided by the Bernstein conference (May 27) where management reinforced the GTF and Raytheon narratives, and by a sharp acceleration in early July (reaching ~$201 on July 6–7) likely driven by defense budget news and the $1.1B AIM-9X Navy contract announcement. The stock has since pulled back modestly to ~$194–$195, consolidating ahead of the Q2 print. ITA (the sector ETF) has tracked RTX closely but with slightly less volatility, while SPY has outperformed both on the back of broader market strength. The underperformance vs. SPY suggests RTX's valuation has not expanded materially despite strong fundamentals, leaving room for a positive re-rating if Q2 delivers another beat-and-raise.

Sector ETF used: ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) — appropriate for RTX's Aerospace & Defense sub-sector.

Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance).

6. Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the acceleration of Raytheon munitions demand driven by Operation Epic Fury and the $1.1B AIM-9X Navy contract, which directly validates the framework agreement thesis and supports a Raytheon guidance raise at Q2.

7. Peer Commentaries — Q2 2026 Read-Throughs (Last 60 Days)

Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from GE Aerospace (Q2 earnings), TransDigm (Q2 earnings), Northrop Grumman (Q2 earnings), Howmet Aerospace (Q1 earnings + Bernstein), and Lockheed Martin (Bernstein) collectively paint a constructive picture for RTX's Q2 — commercial aftermarket demand has been resilient despite Middle East disruption, defense spending is accelerating, and engine MRO slots remain oversubscribed.

GE Aerospace — Q2 2026 Earnings (July 16, 2026)

Read-through relevance: High. GE Aerospace is RTX's closest commercial engine peer (CFM56/LEAP vs. GTF/V2500) and a direct read-through for Pratt & Whitney's aftermarket and MRO trajectory.

TransDigm (TDG) — Q2 FY2026 Earnings (May 5, 2026)

Read-through relevance: High. TDG is a leading commercial aerospace aftermarket supplier and a direct read-through for Collins Aerospace's aftermarket channels.

Northrop Grumman (NOC) — Q2 2026 Earnings (July 21, 2026)

Read-through relevance: High for defense. NOC is a direct peer on defense spending, munitions demand, and backlog dynamics.

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) — Q1 2026 Earnings (May 7, 2026) + Bernstein Conference (May 27, 2026)

Read-through relevance: Moderate-to-high. HWM is a key supplier to both Pratt & Whitney (GTF/F135 turbine airfoils) and Collins Aerospace (structural castings), making its commentary a direct read-through for RTX's supply chain and MRO output.

Lockheed Martin (LMT) — Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference (May 27, 2026)

Read-through relevance: Moderate. LMT is a key defense peer and a direct partner on Patriot/PAC-3 and F-35 programs, making its commentary relevant for Raytheon's munitions and F135 sustainment narratives.

8. Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: No open-market buys or discretionary sells by executives since the Q1 print — the only transactions are routine equity award grants (RSUs to the Raytheon President) and phantom stock unit accruals to non-employee directors, which carry no informational signal.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Security

Shares

Date

Note

Philip J. Jasper

President, Raytheon

Equity Award Grant (A)

Restricted Stock Units

20,860

Jul. 1, 2026

Routine RSU grant; not an open-market purchase. No informational signal.

Tracy A. Atkinson

Director

Phantom Stock Unit Accrual (A)

Phantom Stock Units

1,295

Apr. 30, 2026

Routine director compensation accrual; not an open-market transaction.

Leanne G. Caret

Director

Phantom Stock Unit Accrual (A)

Phantom Stock Units

1,312

Apr. 30, 2026

Routine director compensation accrual; not an open-market transaction.

Bernard A. Harris Jr.

Director

Phantom Stock Unit Accrual (A)

Phantom Stock Units

1,176

Apr. 30, 2026

Routine director compensation accrual; not an open-market transaction.

George Oliver

Director

Phantom Stock Unit Accrual (A)

Phantom Stock Units

1,261

Apr. 30, 2026

Routine director compensation accrual; not an open-market transaction.

Ellen M. Pawlikowski

Director

Phantom Stock Unit Accrual (A)

Phantom Stock Units

1,261

Apr. 30, 2026

Routine director compensation accrual; not an open-market transaction.

Denise L. Ramos

Director

Phantom Stock Unit Accrual (A)

Phantom Stock Units

1,959

Apr. 30, 2026

Routine director compensation accrual; not an open-market transaction.

Fredric Reynolds

Director

Phantom Stock Unit Accrual (A)

Phantom Stock Units

1,346

Apr. 30, 2026

Routine director compensation accrual; not an open-market transaction.

Brian C. Rogers

Director

Phantom Stock Unit Accrual (A)

Phantom Stock Units

2,101

Apr. 30, 2026

Routine director compensation accrual; not an open-market transaction.

Robert O. Work

Director

Phantom Stock Unit Accrual (A)

Phantom Stock Units

1,176

Apr. 30, 2026

Routine director compensation accrual; not an open-market transaction.

Assessment: No open-market buys or discretionary sells by any executive or director since the Q1 2026 earnings print. All transactions are either routine RSU grants (compensation) or phantom stock unit accruals (non-employee director deferred compensation). The absence of any discretionary selling ahead of the Q2 print is a mild positive signal — no insider is reducing exposure. The absence of open-market buying is not unusual for a large-cap defense company where executives hold substantial equity through compensation programs.

Source: SEC Form 4 Filings Database (Insider Transaction Data).