SLB (SLB) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

SLB (Schlumberger Limited)

Ticker

SLB US

Reporting Period

Q2 2026 (quarter ending June 30, 2026)

Earnings Date

July 24, 2026 — 9:30 AM ET

Prepared

July 23, 2026

Last Earnings

April 24, 2026 (Q1 2026)

Sector ETF Benchmark

XLE (Energy Select Sector SPDR)

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: The setup is mixed-to-cautiously-constructive — consensus has been cut sharply since the Q1 print and the bar is now low, but the single biggest swing factor is the pace of Middle East recovery, which remained fluid through June and could surprise in either direction.

Heading into SLB’s Q2 2026 print, the bar has been meaningfully reset lower: the Street has cut Q2 adjusted EPS from ~$0.58 immediately post-Q1 earnings to ~$0.51 today, and revenue consensus has drifted down to ~$8.68B from ~$8.77B, reflecting the scenario management laid out on April 24 — that Middle East disruptions would persist through mid-quarter before gradually easing. Peer read-throughs from Halliburton (reported July 21) and Weatherford (reported July 22) confirm that Middle East activity suspensions and logistical disruptions carried through much of Q2, with freight costs peaking in May before moderating, and that a recovery is underway but incomplete — a pattern that is directionally consistent with SLB’s own scenario guidance. Management’s posture has been deliberately cautious since April, declining to provide full-year guidance and framing Q2 as scenario-dependent; the June 17 Digital Investor Day reinforced the long-term digital growth narrative (10–15% CAGR to 2030, ARR doubling to ~$2B) but offered no incremental near-term financial guidance. Estimate revisions have tracked guidance lower in a disciplined fashion, suggesting the Street is not materially offside, though the risk of a negative surprise on Middle East collections and logistics costs remains real. The stock has underperformed XLE by roughly 20 percentage points since the Q1 print (SLB −16% vs. XLE −4%), suggesting the market has already priced in significant pain — the multiple has compressed to ~9.2x NTM EV/EBITDA, near the low end of its recent range — which means a “in-line” print with any constructive Middle East recovery commentary could be enough to catalyze a relief rally. The wildcard is the trajectory of the Middle East ceasefire/recovery: any acceleration in Saudi, UAE, or Iraq resumptions above the mid-quarter assumption would be a meaningful upside surprise on both revenue and EPS.

Setup Element

Assessment

Bar (Consensus)

Low — EPS cut ~12% since Q1 print; revenue cut ~$90M. Consensus now at $0.506 adj. EPS and $8.68B revenue.

Guidance / Tone

Cautious — no full-year guidance; Q2 framed as scenario-dependent. Digital Investor Day (June 17) constructive on long-term but silent on near-term.

Estimate Trajectory

Revisions tracking guidance lower in orderly fashion; no divergence. Gap represents cushion, not risk, if Middle East recovers faster than assumed.

Stock Setup

SLB -16% vs. XLE -4% since Q1 print. NTM EV/EBITDA ~9.2x — near low end of range. Stock has priced in significant pain; relief rally possible on in-line print.

Wildcard

Pace of Middle East recovery (Saudi, UAE, Iraq). Any acceleration above mid-quarter assumption = upside surprise on revenue and EPS.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus is a low bar heading into the print — estimates have been cut ~12% on EPS and ~1% on revenue since the Q1 print.

Table 1 — Current Quarter Snapshot (Q2 2026)

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual (Last Quarter)

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year)

Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate

YoY Change

Guidance (Q1 Earnings Call)

Consensus vs. Guidance

Total Revenue ($B)

$8.721B

$9.398B

$8.681B

-7.6%

Flat to Q1 (scenario-dependent; ME offset by intl growth)

~-0.5% vs. Q1 midpoint

Adj. EPS — Diluted ($)

$0.52

$0.718

$0.506

-29.5%

ME to drag Q2 EPS by incremental $0.06–0.08 vs. Q1; offset by intl growth

~-2.7% vs. Q1 midpoint scenario

EBITDA ($B)

$1.773B

$1.978B

$1.784B

-9.8%

No explicit EBITDA guidance; implied flat-to-slightly-up vs. Q1 under recovery scenario

+0.6% vs. Q1 actual

Free Cash Flow ($B)

-$0.023B

$0.622B

$0.373B

-40.0%

FCF to follow historical pattern; majority in H2; gradual improvement through year

N/A — no specific Q2 FCF guidance

Revenue — International ($B)

$6.471B

$6.847B

$6.518B

-4.8%

Mid-to-high single-digit growth in non-ME intl markets; ME drag persists through mid-Q2

+0.7% vs. Q1 actual

Revenue — North America ($B)

$2.167B

$1.655B

$2.157B

+30.3%

Flat sequentially (guided explicitly on Q1 call)

-0.5% vs. Q1 actual; in-line with flat guidance

Sources: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. All consensus figures as of July 23, 2026.

Table 2 — Beat / Miss History (Last 8 Quarters — Top 2 KPIs: Total Revenue & Adj. EPS)

Quarter

KPI

Reported

Consensus

Surprise %

Result

Q3 2024

Total Revenue

$10.01B

$9.26B

+8.2%

Beat

Q3 2024

Adj. EPS

$0.844

$0.888

-5.0%

Miss

Q4 2024

Total Revenue

$10.14B

$9.22B

+10.1%

Beat

Q4 2024

Adj. EPS

$0.897

$0.899

-0.3%

In-Line

Q1 2025

Total Revenue

$9.303B

$8.598B

+8.2%

Beat

Q1 2025

Adj. EPS

$0.700

$0.738

-5.2%

Miss

Q2 2025

Total Revenue

$9.398B

$8.475B

+10.9%

Beat

Q2 2025

Adj. EPS

$0.718

$0.720

-0.3%

In-Line

Q3 2025

Total Revenue

$8.928B

$8.880B

+0.5%

Beat

Q3 2025

Adj. EPS

$0.690

$0.656

+5.2%

Beat

Q4 2025

Total Revenue

$9.745B

$9.564B

+1.9%

Beat

Q4 2025

Adj. EPS

$0.780

$0.745

+4.7%

Beat

Q1 2026

Total Revenue

$8.721B

$8.634B

+1.0%

Beat

Q1 2026

Adj. EPS

$0.520

$0.505

+3.0%

Beat

Pattern: SLB has beaten revenue consensus in all 8 of the last 8 quarters, often by a wide margin when consensus was set conservatively; EPS has been more mixed (4 beats, 2 misses, 2 in-line), with misses concentrated in periods of elevated disruption (Q3 2024, Q1 2025). With consensus now reset to a low bar, the revenue beat streak is likely to continue, but EPS is the swing factor given Middle East cost headwinds. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.

3. Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: Management’s posture has remained deliberately cautious since the Q1 print — no full-year guidance was provided, and the Q2 outlook was framed as scenario-dependent. The June 17 Digital Investor Day introduced constructive long-term digital targets but offered no revision to near-term financial guidance.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call — Apr 24, 2026)

Revised Guidance (Post-Earnings)

Current Consensus

Note

Q2 2026 Revenue

Flat to Q1 (~$8.72B) under base scenario: ME disruption persists through mid-Q2, then gradually eases; offset by mid-to-high single-digit growth in other intl markets

$8.681B

No post-earnings revision; consensus tracking slightly below Q1 actual, consistent with guidance scenario

Q2 2026 Adj. EPS

ME to drag Q2 EPS by incremental $0.06–0.08 vs. Q1 ($0.52); implies Q2 EPS ~$0.44–0.46 under pure ME headwind, offset by intl growth to land near Q1 levels

$0.506

Consensus slightly above the low end of the implied scenario range; reflects partial offset from intl growth

Q2 2026 Free Cash Flow

FCF to follow historical pattern; gradual improvement through year; majority in H2

$0.373B

No specific Q2 FCF guidance; consensus implies meaningful sequential improvement from -$23M in Q1

North America Revenue

Flat sequentially vs. Q1 ($2.167B)

$2.157B

Consensus in-line with flat guidance; no revision

Digital & Production Systems

Both divisions expected to grow globally in Q2 under base scenario

N/A — not separately tracked in VA consensus

Digital Investor Day (Jun 17) reaffirmed 10–15% CAGR target through 2030; Data Center Solutions targeting $1B run rate by year-end

FY 2026 Guidance

Withheld — management declined to provide full-year guidance due to geopolitical uncertainty

$36.46B revenue; $2.51 adj. EPS; $7.98B EBITDA

No formal guidance anchor; consensus is the market’s own estimate. Watch for any FY guidance reinstatement on Q2 call.

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates have been cut sharply and consistently since the Q1 print — Q2 EPS is down ~13% and FY 2026 EPS is down ~6% from the post-Q1 baseline — tracking guidance lower in an orderly fashion. The gap between current consensus and the initial post-Q1 baseline represents cushion, not risk, if the Middle East recovery accelerates.

KPI & Period

Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (Apr 29, 2026)

Current Consensus (Jul 23, 2026)

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Call)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Consensus vs. Guidance (%)

Total Revenue — Q2 2026

$8.686B

$8.681B

-0.1%

~Flat to Q1 (~$8.72B)

Unchanged

-0.5% vs. Q1 actual

Total Revenue — FY 2026

$36.487B

$36.461B

-0.1%

No FY guidance provided

N/A

N/A

Adj. EPS — Q2 2026

$0.581

$0.506

-12.9%

ME drag of $0.06–0.08 vs. Q1; net ~flat to Q1 ($0.52) under offset scenario

Unchanged

~-2.7% vs. Q1 midpoint

Adj. EPS — FY 2026

$2.686

$2.515

-6.4%

No FY guidance provided

N/A

N/A

EBITDA — Q2 2026

$1.809B

$1.784B

-1.4%

No explicit EBITDA guidance

N/A

N/A

EBITDA — FY 2026

$8.181B

$7.976B

-2.5%

No FY guidance provided

N/A

N/A

The sharpest revision has been to Q2 EPS (-12.9% from the post-Q1 baseline), driven by the market pricing in the full Middle East EPS drag of $0.06–0.08 with limited offset. Revenue estimates have been remarkably stable (-0.1%), consistent with management’s scenario that ME revenue losses would be offset by other international markets. The absence of FY guidance means there is no formal anchor for full-year estimates, creating potential for a wide range of outcomes if the Middle East recovery trajectory becomes clearer on the Q2 call. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: SLB has dramatically underperformed both XLE and the S&P 500 since the Q1 print — down ~16% vs. XLE -4% and SPY +3% — driven almost entirely by multiple compression and Middle East sentiment, not estimate revisions. At ~9.2x NTM EV/EBITDA, the stock is pricing in a prolonged disruption scenario.

Metric

SLB

XLE

S&P 500 (SPY)

Price at Q1 Earnings (Apr 24, 2026)

$56.15

$56.87

$713.94

Price as of Jul 22, 2026

$47.67

$59.20

$747.41

Return Since Q1 Earnings

-15.1%

+4.1%

+4.7%

SLB vs. XLE (Relative)

-19.2 ppts

NTM EV/EBITDA (Current)

9.2x

NTM P/E (Current)

16.0x

NTM P/FCF (Current)

15.5x

Key Events Since Q1 Earnings (Apr 24, 2026):

Note: Indexed performance chart (SLB vs. XLE vs. SPY, base = 100 at Apr 24, 2026) is based on daily closing prices. Source: Yahoo Finance / Stock Price Data.

Indexed Price Performance: SLB vs. XLE vs. S&P 500 — Since Q1 2026 Earnings (Apr 24, 2026)

Date

SLB (Indexed)

XLE (Indexed)

SPY (Indexed)

Apr 24 (Base)

100.0

100.0

100.0

May 1

101.4

103.5

100.9

May 22

102.0

104.6

104.4

Jun 4 (Peak)

103.3

103.3

106.0

Jun 17 (Digital Day)

89.6

96.1

103.8

Jun 30

82.8

93.4

104.6

Jul 10

85.1

96.9

105.7

Jul 22

84.9

104.1

104.7

6. Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the June 17 Digital Investor Day, which set ambitious 2030 targets but disappointed the market by offering no near-term guidance relief — the stock sold off ~5.5% on the day. The $2B debt issuance and ongoing Middle East conflict trajectory are the other key items to monitor.

7. Peer Read-Throughs (Last 60 Days — Q2 2026 Relevant Only)

Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from the last 60 days is broadly constructive for SLB’s Q2 print — HAL’s Q2 results (reported July 21) are the most direct read-through, confirming international recovery and North America momentum, while WFRD’s Q2 results (July 22) validate the Middle East disruption narrative and confirm logistics costs peaked in May. FTI and BKR conference commentary from May–June reinforces the structural offshore upcycle thesis.

Methodology: Only commentary from the last 60 days (May 23 – July 23, 2026) that speaks to Q2 2026 activity, trends, or outlook is included. Retrospective commentary about prior-quarter results is excluded. Each item is tagged as Direct (highly comparable business/geography), Indirect (same sector, different mix), or Not Actionable (company-specific, not transferable).

7A. Halliburton (HAL) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 21, 2026)

Read-Through Type: DIRECT — HAL is SLB’s closest global peer with highly comparable international and North America oilfield services exposure.

Theme

HAL Commentary (Q2 2026)

SLB Read-Through

Direction

International Revenue

International revenue +6% YoY and +5% sequentially to $3.4B. Expects international ex-ME to “grow low double digits this year.”

Validates SLB’s scenario that non-ME international markets offset ME drag. Positive for SLB’s international segment.

↑ Positive

Middle East Recovery

“Activity is recovering from the conflict lows, but the pace of recovery is still dependent on the day to day events.” Land well construction largely steady; offshore “increased in the quarter, though not yet back to pre-conflict levels.”

Confirms ME recovery is underway but incomplete — consistent with SLB’s mid-quarter recovery scenario. Offshore still lagging.

↔ Mixed

North America

“White space is filled. We’ve seen rig adds, we’re seeing white space filled. We are seeing price increases. It’s a steady march.” 30+ rigs added. Expects trajectory to continue into Q3.

Strong positive for SLB’s North America segment. Pricing gains and rig adds support SLB’s flat-to-up NA guidance.

↑ Positive

Europe / Africa

Revenue +19% sequentially, driven by North Sea, Namibia, Egypt, East Med, Angola. “Really busy markets.”

Strong positive for SLB’s Europe/Africa exposure. Namibia and East Med are incremental growth areas for SLB.

↑ Positive

Latin America

Revenue +3% sequentially, driven by Argentina and Mexico stimulation activity.

Positive for SLB’s Latin America segment; consistent with SLB’s own constructive LatAm narrative.

↑ Positive

Pricing / Margins

Modest pricing gains in NA; international market tight (“nobody’s really overbuilt”). Expects C&P margin +125–175bps and D&E margin +25–75bps in Q3.

Supports SLB’s ability to maintain or expand margins as ME recovers. Tight international capacity is a pricing tailwind.

↑ Positive

Offshore / Deepwater

“Big markets around the world — deepwater Gulf of America, Brazil, West Africa, Norway, East Med — are really busy.” Rig tightening observed. FPSO inflection seen as “more of a 2027 event.”

Positive for SLB’s offshore and OneSubsea businesses. FPSO timing is a 2027 catalyst, not Q2.

↑ Positive

7B. Weatherford International (WFRD) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 22, 2026)

Read-Through Type: INDIRECT — WFRD is a smaller, more production-focused OFS peer with significant ME exposure; useful for regional color but not directly comparable on scale or mix.

Theme

WFRD Commentary (Q2 2026)

SLB Read-Through

Direction

Middle East — Disruption Detail

“Activity suspensions, project deferrals and logistical disruptions that began in March carried through much of the quarter, and freight and logistics costs remain elevated, peaking in May before beginning to moderate.” Most disruption in Bahrain, Qatar, Iraq, Kuwait. Saudi and UAE showed recovery.

Validates SLB’s Q1 scenario. Freight cost peak in May is a positive signal — Q2 exit rate should be better than Q2 average. SLB’s ME exposure (Qatar force majeure, Iraq shutdowns) maps directly.

↔ Mixed / Improving

Middle East — Recovery Signs

“The quarter ended with signs of recovery.” Saudi resuming offshore operations. UAE “increased in a few areas.” Oman “fairly consistent.” Recovery expected to continue but “will take time to fully normalize.”

Confirms gradual, country-by-country recovery — exactly the scenario SLB guided to. Not a V-shaped recovery; pace of normalization is the key variable.

↔ Mixed

Offshore Deepwater Awards

“Encouraged by the number and quality of Deep Water awards this quarter in Brazil, West Africa, Nigeria, and Australia.” “The offshore cycle is strengthening.”

Positive for SLB’s offshore and OneSubsea segments. Deepwater award momentum is a leading indicator for SLB’s backlog.

↑ Positive

North America

US land had a “positive sequential quarter.” Rig count “going up albeit slightly.” Canada spring break-up seasonal drag.

Consistent with SLB’s flat NA guidance. Modest improvement in US land is a slight positive.

↑ Slight Positive

Pricing Headwinds

“Pockets of pricing headwinds leading to volume declines” in Indonesia. WFRD walked away from Saudi SDK contract due to pricing levels.

Suggests pricing pressure exists in pockets, particularly in ME and Asia. SLB’s scale and technology differentiation provide more insulation, but worth monitoring.

↓ Slight Negative

Venezuela

“Pleasantly surprised with the progress in Venezuela” — expects tangible contribution to revenue and margins in 2027.

Positive read-through for SLB’s Venezuela opportunity, which management has described as an “exciting growth opportunity.”

↑ Positive

Customer Spending Drivers

NOCs and governments “explicitly anchoring investment programs in security of supply.” Gas-focused programs in Eastern Med and SE Asia; deepwater expansion in India and South America; domestic production emphasis in NA.

Macro tailwind for SLB’s international business. Energy security theme is a multi-year structural driver.

↑ Positive

7C. TechnipFMC (FTI) — JP Morgan Natural Resources Conference (June 24, 2026) & Bernstein Conference (May 27, 2026)

Read-Through Type: INDIRECT — FTI is a subsea/offshore specialist; highly relevant for SLB’s OneSubsea and offshore segments, less so for Well Construction and Reservoir Performance.

Theme

FTI Commentary (May–June 2026)

SLB Read-Through

Direction

Offshore Market Structure

“We are in the midst of a structural change, and the thought of it being a cycle is becoming less and less obvious.” Subsea Opportunity List at record $30B, up 30% over 2 years, growing quarter-on-quarter.

Strong positive for SLB’s OneSubsea bookings and offshore backlog. Structural (not cyclical) framing supports multi-year revenue visibility.

↑ Positive

Offshore Project Economics

“The economics offshore have improved dramatically, while the economics in the U.S. unconventionals continue to be quite challenged.” Cycle time reductions of up to 1 year on 3-year projects.

Improved offshore economics drive more FIDs, expanding SLB’s addressable market. Negative read for NA unconventional.

↑ Positive (offshore) / ↓ Negative (NA)

Deepwater FID Activity

“A lot of deepwater FID activity across the US Gulf, Brazil, West Africa.” Suriname (TotalEnergies), Namibia (potential FID this year), Guyana (ExxonMobil pathway to 2M bbl/day), Mozambique, Indonesia all active.

Broad-based deepwater FID momentum is a leading indicator for SLB’s Well Construction and Reservoir Performance segments in these basins.

↑ Positive

Geopolitical Impact on Offshore

Clients “looking at ways to accelerate their production, particularly in regions that are more less impacted” by conflict. Portfolio diversification away from ME conflict zones.

ME disruption is accelerating investment in other offshore regions — a net positive for SLB’s non-ME international business.

↑ Positive (ex-ME)

North America Onshore

“We have not seen” the anticipated short-term NA upcycle. “If we see that, it will be cyclical, and it will be very short cycle.” US unconventionals “continue to be quite challenged.”

Negative read for SLB’s NA onshore segment. Consistent with SLB’s own flat NA guidance.

↓ Slight Negative

Industry Capacity / Pricing

Competitors facing capacity constraints, rising capital costs, and quality challenges. Potential for “significant oil service inflation” in a structural offshore upcycle.

Supports SLB’s pricing power in offshore markets. Tight capacity is a tailwind for margin expansion.

↑ Positive

7D. Baker Hughes (BKR) — Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference (May 27, 2026)

Read-Through Type: INDIRECT — BKR is 75% international and 50% offshore but more production-focused and less upstream-cyclical than SLB; useful for macro and regional color.

Theme

BKR Commentary (May 27, 2026)

SLB Read-Through

Direction

Middle East Activity (Q2)

“Activity is ongoing, and we’re working very well with our customers to ensure the safety as well as business continuity.” (May 27 — mid-Q2 color)

Direct positive read-through for SLB’s ME operations. Confirms activity did not fully halt in Q2, supporting the partial-offset scenario.

↑ Positive

International Upstream Outlook

“International upstream is going to continue to increase.” Activity increasing in Nigeria, other Africa locations. “First movers will be shorter-cycle barrels in North America.”

Positive for SLB’s Africa and international upstream exposure. Shorter-cycle NA comment is consistent with SLB’s flat NA guidance.

↑ Positive

Middle East Infrastructure Build

Pipelines to bypass Strait of Hormuz, new LNG plants, Master Gas System in Saudi Arabia, NEOM hydrogen project — all cited as incremental opportunities from the conflict.

Positive for SLB’s medium-term ME outlook. Infrastructure build-out is a multi-year tailwind for Well Construction and Production Systems.

↑ Positive (medium-term)

Supply Chain Constraints

“Supply chain is constrained when you need something today on a facility that’s potentially been impacted from the conflict.” LNG facility repair timelines of 3–5 years cited.

Confirms industry-wide supply chain pressure in ME — consistent with SLB’s Q1 commentary on elevated logistics and raw material costs.

↓ Slight Negative (near-term)

Energy Security Theme

“The world needs more energy. Energy security is what we’re hearing a lot about.” Expects “an increase in investments across multiple areas” as aftermath of geopolitical events.

Macro tailwind for SLB’s entire international portfolio. Energy security is a structural driver for upstream investment.

↑ Positive

Overall Peer Read-Through Summary: The weight of peer evidence is constructive for SLB’s Q2 print. HAL’s direct Q2 results confirm the international recovery thesis and North America momentum. WFRD validates the Middle East disruption narrative and confirms logistics costs peaked in May — a positive exit-rate signal. FTI and BKR conference commentary reinforces the structural offshore upcycle and energy security investment theme. The one consistent negative across peers is North America onshore, where activity is improving but not inflecting, consistent with SLB’s flat guidance. The key risk is that the Middle East recovery pace was slower than the HAL/WFRD commentary implies for SLB specifically, given SLB’s higher ME concentration (Qatar force majeure, Iraq shutdowns were SLB-specific events).

8. Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: All insider activity since Q1 earnings has been sales — no open-market buys. The CEO’s two sales are under a 10b5-1 plan (pre-scheduled, not discretionary), which limits their signal value. The EVP Geographies sale is discretionary and notable in size (~53K shares), though it occurred immediately post-Q1 earnings and may reflect personal liquidity needs rather than a negative view on the stock.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Shares

Approx. Value

Date

Note

Le Peuch, Olivier

CEO & Director

10b5-1 Planned Sale

25,000

~$1.4M

May 27, 2026

Pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan; not discretionary. Retains 1,366,328 shares post-sale.

de La Chevardiere, Patrick

Director

Open Market Sale

2,000

~$111K

May 7, 2026

Discretionary sale; small size relative to holdings (16,953 shares post-sale). Limited signal value.

Gassen, Steve Matthew

EVP, Geographies

Open Market Sale

53,379

~$2.9M

May 1, 2026

Discretionary sale; largest in dollar terms. Sold ~53% of pre-sale position. Occurred 1 week post-Q1 earnings. No 10b5-1 plan indicated.

Le Peuch, Olivier

CEO & Director

10b5-1 Planned Sale

25,000

~$1.4M

Apr 29, 2026

Pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan; not discretionary. Retains 1,391,328 shares post-sale.

Assessment: No open-market buys from any insider since Q1 earnings. The CEO’s sales are routine 10b5-1 plan transactions and carry no negative signal. The EVP Geographies’ discretionary sale of ~53K shares (~53% of his position) at ~$54/share is the most notable transaction — it occurred one week after Q1 earnings and could reflect personal liquidity needs or a view that the stock was fairly valued at that level. The absence of any insider buying despite a ~16% stock decline since Q1 earnings is worth noting, though not alarming given the 10b5-1 plan context for the CEO. Source: SEC Form 4 Filings Database.

9. Key Risks & Questions for the Call

Key Takeaway: The Q2 call is primarily a Middle East recovery update — the pace, breadth, and trajectory of resumption will drive the stock more than the reported Q2 numbers. Any reinstatement of FY guidance would be a significant positive catalyst.

Key Risks

Key Questions for Management

  1. Middle East Recovery Trajectory: Can you provide a country-by-country update on the pace of resumption in Qatar, Iraq, Bahrain, and Kuwait? Are you now back to pre-conflict activity levels in any of these markets, and what is the timeline for full normalization?
  2. FY 2026 Guidance: Given the improving visibility on Middle East recovery, are you now in a position to reinstate full-year revenue and EPS guidance? What are the key assumptions?
  3. Logistics & Cost Recovery: You flagged elevated logistics and raw material costs in Q1. Did these costs moderate in Q2 as freight rates suggest? How much of the incremental cost has been recovered through inflation pass-through clauses?
  4. Free Cash Flow & Collections: What was the status of Middle East collections in Q2? Are you on track to deliver the majority of FCF in H2, and what is the updated full-year FCF target?
  5. Digital ARR & Data Center Solutions: What is the current Digital ARR run rate, and are you on track to reach the $1B Data Center Solutions run rate by year-end? Can you provide any Q2 revenue figures for the digital segment?
  6. ChampionX Synergies: What is the current synergy realization run rate from ChampionX, and are you on track to meet the full-year synergy target?
  7. S&P Global Energy Software Acquisition: What is the expected closing timeline for the S&P Global Energy software acquisition, and what is the expected ARR contribution upon closing?
  8. Venezuela: Can you provide an update on the Venezuela opportunity? WFRD flagged “pleasant surprise” progress — is SLB seeing similar momentum?