Company | Tractor Supply Company |
Ticker | TSCO (NASDAQ) |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (Fiscal Quarter Ending June 30, 2026) |
Earnings Date | July 23, 2026 — Before Market Open |
Preparation Date | July 22, 2026 |
Last Earnings | April 21, 2026 (Q1 2026 — Miss on EPS and Revenue; Guidance Reaffirmed) |
Key Takeaway: The setup is cautiously bearish — consensus sits at the low end of management’s own 1–3% comp guidance range, yet the stock has already de-rated sharply (down ~26% since Q1 earnings), suggesting the bar is low but not necessarily easy to clear given the structural companion animal headwind and a cautious consumer.
Heading into Q2 2026, the bar for TSCO is technically low: consensus comp growth of ~0.03% sits well below management’s guided 1–3% range, and EPS consensus of $0.82 implies only modest year-over-year growth off a weak prior-year base. Management reaffirmed full-year guidance on the Q1 call and explicitly flagged that pet over-indexes in Q1 by nearly 5 points and under-indexes in Q2, which should mechanically reduce the companion animal drag in the current quarter — a meaningful tailwind relative to Q1’s 100+ bps headwind. Tone on the Q1 call was measured but action-oriented: management is aggressively scaling fresh/frozen pet (targeting 700 stores by year-end), upgrading the dog food assortment chain-wide in Q2, and expanding cat space in Fusion stores, all of which could show early traction in the print. Estimate revisions have moved modestly lower since the Q1 print (Q2 comp consensus slipped from 1.6% to 0.03%), suggesting the Street has already baked in continued softness, but the gap between consensus and the guidance midpoint (2%) represents meaningful upside if pet stabilizes even slightly. The stock has massively underperformed — down 25.8% since Q1 earnings vs. XRT +1.8% and SPY +6.2% — pricing in a structurally impaired business, which means any evidence of pet category stabilization or comp inflection could drive a sharp relief rally. The key wildcard is whether the Q2 chain-wide dog food upgrade and fresh/frozen pet rollout show measurable early traction in comp data — if management can point to improving pet trends in June/July, the stock could re-rate meaningfully despite a still-below-algorithm comp.
Theme | Assessment |
Bar | Low — consensus comp of ~0.03% is well below the 1–3% guidance range; EPS consensus of $0.82 implies modest growth off a weak base |
Guidance / Tone | Unchanged — full-year guidance reaffirmed on Q1 call; management expects stronger EPS growth in Q2 and Q4 given prior-year compares; tone is action-oriented on pet recovery |
Estimate Trajectory | Drifting lower — Q2 comp consensus fell from 1.6% (post-Q1 baseline) to 0.03% currently; EPS slipped from $0.86 to $0.82; gap vs. guidance midpoint represents potential upside cushion |
Stock Setup | Deeply discounted — stock down 25.8% since Q1 earnings, massively underperforming XRT (+1.8%) and SPY (+6.2%); multiple compression reflects structural concern, not just a miss |
Wildcard | Pet category traction — Q2 chain-wide dog food upgrade and fresh/frozen pet rollout (targeting 250+ stores by end of May, 700 by year-end); any measurable improvement in pet comp trend could be the catalyst for a re-rating |
Key Takeaway: Consensus is a low bar on comp sales (0.03% vs. 1–3% guidance range) but a more reasonable bar on EPS ($0.82 vs. prior-year $0.81). Comp store sales growth is the bigger swing factor — any upside here flows directly to operating leverage and could drive a meaningful beat on EPS.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual (Last Quarter) | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change | Guidance | Consensus vs. Guidance Midpoint |
Net Sales ($B) | $3.592B | $4.440B | $4.592B | +3.4% | ~$4.5–4.7B (implied by 1–3% comp + ~100 new stores) | ~Midpoint |
Comp Store Sales Growth (%) | +0.5% | +1.5% | +0.03% | -147 bps YoY | 1–3% (each remaining quarter) | -197 bps below midpoint (2%) |
EPS — Diluted ($) | $0.31 | $0.81 | $0.82 | +$0.01 / +1.2% | FY 2026: $2.13–$2.23 (mgmt); Q2 not separately guided | N/A (no Q2-specific EPS guidance) |
Gross Profit ($B) | $1.301B | $1.640B | $1.696B | +3.4% | FY gross margin expansion expected; H2 stronger | N/A (no Q2-specific gross margin guidance) |
SG&A ($B) | $0.941B | $0.940B | $0.993B | +5.6% | Deleverage expected below breakeven comp; strategic investment ongoing | N/A |
Operating Income ($M) | $233M | $578M | $574M | -0.7% | FY operating margin 9.3–9.6% | N/A (no Q2-specific op. income guidance) |
EBITDA ($M) | $360M | $700M | $704M | +0.6% | N/A (no Q2-specific EBITDA guidance) | N/A |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. All consensus figures as of July 22, 2026. Q2 2026 = fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2026.
Top 2 KPIs: (1) Comp Store Sales Growth | (2) EPS — Diluted
Quarter | KPI | Reported | Consensus | Surprise | Result |
Q1 2026 | Comp Sales Growth | +0.5% | +1.57% | -107 bps | MISS |
Q1 2026 | EPS — Diluted | $0.31 | $0.34 | -$0.03 / -8.8% | MISS |
Q4 2025 | Comp Sales Growth | +0.3% | +2.28% | -198 bps | MISS |
Q4 2025 | EPS — Diluted | $0.43 | $0.46 | -$0.03 / -6.5% | MISS |
Q3 2025 | Comp Sales Growth | +3.9% | +3.22% | +68 bps | BEAT |
Q3 2025 | EPS — Diluted | $0.49 | $0.48 | +$0.01 / +2.1% | BEAT |
Q2 2025 | Comp Sales Growth | +1.5% | +0.60% | +90 bps | BEAT |
Q2 2025 | EPS — Diluted | $0.81 | $0.80 | +$0.01 / +1.2% | BEAT |
Q1 2025 | Comp Sales Growth | -0.9% | +0.86% | -176 bps | MISS |
Q1 2025 | EPS — Diluted | $0.34 | $0.37 | -$0.03 / -8.1% | MISS |
Q4 2024 | Comp Sales Growth | +0.6% | +1.54% | -94 bps | MISS |
Q4 2024 | EPS — Diluted | $0.44 | $0.45 | -$0.01 / -2.2% | MISS |
Q3 2024 | Comp Sales Growth | -0.2% | +0.23% | -43 bps | MISS |
Q3 2024 | EPS — Diluted | $0.45 | $0.45 | Flat / 0.0% | IN LINE |
Q2 2024 | Comp Sales Growth | -0.5% | +0.47% | -97 bps | MISS |
Q2 2024 | EPS — Diluted | $0.79 | $0.79 | Flat / 0.0% | IN LINE |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Pattern: TSCO has missed on comp sales in 6 of the last 8 quarters, with the only beats coming in Q2 and Q3 2025 when the consumer environment briefly improved; the recent miss cadence (Q4 2025, Q1 2026) reflects the structural companion animal headwind and below-algorithm comp trajectory, making a clean beat on comp the exception rather than the rule.
Key Takeaway: Guidance is unchanged since the Q1 2026 earnings call — management reaffirmed all full-year metrics and reiterated 1–3% comp for each remaining quarter. No post-earnings revisions or 8-K updates have been filed; the only corporate actions since Q1 were a $0.24 quarterly dividend declaration (May 14) and routine annual meeting items (May 15).
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call — Apr 21, 2026) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
Comp Store Sales Growth (FY 2026) | 1–3% for each remaining quarter (Q2–Q4) | — | +0.45% (FY); +0.03% (Q2) | Unchanged; consensus sits well below guidance midpoint of 2% |
Net Sales (FY 2026) | ~4–6% total sales growth; ~100 new stores | — | $16.07B | Unchanged; consensus broadly in line with guidance |
EPS — Diluted (FY 2026) | $2.13–$2.23 (midpoint $2.18) | — | $2.05 | Unchanged; consensus $0.13 below guidance midpoint; Street more skeptical than management |
Operating Margin (FY 2026) | 9.3–9.6% | — | ~9.0% (implied by consensus) | Unchanged; consensus slightly below guidance floor |
Gross Margin (FY 2026) | Modest expansion; H2 stronger as DC benefits flow through; tariff impact contained | — | ~36.5% (FY implied) | Unchanged; fuel cost headwind flagged for Q2–Q3; management updated internal models for higher fuel |
New Store Openings (FY 2026) | ~100 new TSCO stores; record 40 opened in Q1 | — | N/A | Unchanged; new store productivity at high end of 65–70% range |
Companion Animal Comp (FY 2026) | Flat to slight negative comp for full year; Q2 under-indexes vs. Q1 seasonally | — | N/A (not separately tracked by consensus) | Unchanged; Q2 seasonally less pet-heavy than Q1 (pet under-indexes in Q2 by ~5 pts) |
Dividend | N/A (not guided on Q1 call) | $0.24/share quarterly dividend declared May 14, 2026 | N/A | 8-K filed May 14, 2026; routine capital return; no change to payout policy |
Key Takeaway: Estimates have drifted meaningfully lower since the Q1 print — Q2 comp consensus fell from 1.6% to 0.03% and FY EPS slipped from $2.13 to $2.05 — creating a widening gap between where the Street sits and where management guides. This gap is either a cushion (if management is right) or a sign the Street has lost confidence in the guidance (if structural headwinds persist).
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (Apr 26, 2026) | Current Consensus (Jul 22, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance (%) |
Comp Sales Growth — Q2 2026 | +1.62% | +0.03% | -98.1% | 1–3% (midpoint 2%) | 1–3% (unchanged) | Unchanged | -197 bps below midpoint |
Comp Sales Growth — FY 2026 | +1.44% | +0.45% | -68.5% | 1–3% per quarter | 1–3% per quarter (unchanged) | Unchanged | ~155 bps below midpoint |
Net Sales — Q2 2026 ($B) | $4.661B | $4.592B | -1.5% | ~4–6% total sales growth (FY) | Unchanged | Unchanged | Broadly in line |
Net Sales — FY 2026 ($B) | $16.23B | $16.07B | -1.0% | 4–6% total sales growth | Unchanged | Unchanged | Slightly below guidance midpoint |
EPS — Diluted, Q2 2026 | $0.86 | $0.82 | -4.7% | Not separately guided (FY: $2.13–$2.23) | Unchanged | Unchanged | N/A (no Q2 EPS guidance) |
EPS — Diluted, FY 2026 | $2.13 | $2.05 | -3.8% | $2.13–$2.23 (midpoint $2.18) | Unchanged | Unchanged | -6.0% below guidance midpoint |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Post-Q1 baseline = consensus as of April 26, 2026 (5 trading days after April 21 earnings).
Estimates have moved consistently lower across all KPIs since the Q1 print, with the comp sales revision being the most dramatic (Q2 consensus fell from 1.62% to 0.03%). The widening gap between Street estimates and management guidance midpoints suggests the market has lost confidence in the 1–3% comp framework — if management delivers even at the low end of guidance (1% comp), it would represent a meaningful beat vs. current consensus.
Key Takeaway: TSCO’s 25.8% decline since Q1 earnings is driven almost entirely by multiple compression and loss of confidence in the comp algorithm — not macro or sector headwinds (XRT +1.8%, SPY +6.2% over the same period). The stock is pricing in a structurally impaired business, which sets a low bar for a relief rally on any positive comp surprise.
TSCO vs. XRT (Retail ETF) vs. S&P 500 (SPY) — Indexed to 100 at Q1 2026 Earnings (April 21, 2026). TSCO: -25.8% | XRT: +1.8% | SPY: +6.2%. Source: Stock Price Data.
Metric | TSCO | XRT (Retail ETF) | SPY (S&P 500) |
Price at Q1 Earnings (Apr 21, 2026) | $39.57 | $87.20 | $704.08 |
Price as of Jul 22, 2026 | $29.36 | $88.74 | $747.41 |
Return Since Q1 Earnings | -25.8% | +1.8% | +6.2% |
Relative to XRT | -27.6 ppts | — | — |
Relative to SPY | -32.0 ppts | — | — |
Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance). Sector ETF used: XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) — appropriate for TSCO’s specialty retail sub-sector.
Key events since Q1 earnings: The stock declined sharply in the days immediately following the Q1 miss (April 21–22), then continued to drift lower through May as the Street digested the structural companion animal narrative. A brief stabilization in late May/early June was followed by renewed weakness in June–July as broader consumer sentiment remained cautious. The underperformance is idiosyncratic — XRT and SPY both recovered and made new highs while TSCO continued to slide, confirming the de-rating is company-specific (structural pet headwind + below-algorithm comp trajectory) rather than macro-driven.
Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from Q1 2026 earnings calls (reported April–June 2026) paints a cautious but stable consumer backdrop — value-focused spending, gas price sensitivity, and trip consolidation are consistent themes. Importantly, peers with exposure to outdoor/sporting goods and seasonal categories (ASO, DKS) saw solid Q2 trends, which is a mild positive read-through for TSCO’s big-ticket and seasonal categories. The pet category read-through is limited (no direct pet specialty peers reported), but the broader consumer caution theme is consistent with TSCO’s own Q1 narrative.
Note: All peer commentary below is from Q1 2026 earnings calls (reported after TSCO’s Q1 print on April 21, 2026) and reflects forward-looking commentary about Q2 2026 and the current operating environment. Prior-quarter results commentary has been excluded.
Relevance to TSCO: ASO serves a similar rural/outdoor customer base and has meaningful overlap in sporting goods, apparel, and outdoor lifestyle categories. ASO’s Q2 consumer commentary is the most direct read-through for TSCO’s big-ticket and seasonal categories.
Relevance to TSCO: DKS serves the sporting goods and outdoor lifestyle customer with meaningful overlap in big-ticket categories (fitness, outdoor, team sports). DKS’s consumer commentary and category trends are a useful read-through for TSCO’s big-ticket and seasonal performance.
Relevance to TSCO: ORLY serves a rural and suburban customer base with significant overlap in the DIY/needs-based spending profile. ORLY’s commentary on fuel prices, consumer caution, and the rural consumer is a useful macro read-through for TSCO.
Relevance to TSCO: FIVE serves a value-oriented consumer with significant exposure to lower-income households. FIVE’s commentary on consumer sentiment, tax refund dynamics, and the macro environment is a useful read-through for TSCO’s lower-income customer cohort.
Relevance to TSCO: CASY operates convenience stores in rural and small-town markets — the same geographic footprint as TSCO. CASY’s commentary on the rural consumer, fuel price behavior, and spending patterns is the most geographically relevant read-through for TSCO.
Relevance to TSCO: ULTA’s commentary on the pet/beauty consumer and loyalty program dynamics is a limited but relevant read-through for TSCO’s companion animal and Neighbor’s Club strategy.
Peer | Report Date | Key Q2 / Forward Theme | TSCO Read-Through | Signal |
ASO | Jun 9, 2026 | Q2 consumer slowing (gas prices); flat comp through Memorial Day; outdoor/western lifestyle strong; raised FY guidance | Cautious on TSCO Q2 comp; positive on big-ticket/seasonal; fuel headwind for rural customer confirmed | Mixed |
DKS | May 27, 2026 | Healthy consumer, no trading down; sport is “hotttest category”; World Cup tailwind; raised comp guidance to 2.5–4% | Positive for TSCO’s big-ticket/seasonal; outdoor lifestyle consumer engaged; mild positive for Q2 setup | Positive |
ORLY | Apr 30, 2026 | Cautious consumer outlook; fuel price sensitivity flagged; no demand pullback as of April; maintained 3–5% comp guidance | Rural consumer holding up in April; fuel headwind real but not yet demand-destructive; consistent with TSCO’s own narrative | Neutral |
FIVE | Jun 3, 2026 | Cautious macro; tax refund tailwind in Q1 may not repeat in Q2; no trade-down evidence; raised Q2 comp to 7–9% | Mild negative: Q1 tax refund tailwind may not repeat; but no trade-down is positive for TSCO’s needs-based model | Mixed |
CASY | Jun 10 / Jun 24, 2026 | Rural consumer “hanging in there”; May trends on track; fuel at ~$4.20/gal (below demand-destruction threshold); FY EBITDA +8–10% | Most geographically relevant peer; rural consumer stable in May; positive read-through for TSCO’s Q2 start | Positive |
ULTA | Jun 2, 2026 | Beauty/wellness healthy; value increasingly important; maintained 2.5–3.5% comp guidance | Consumers still spending on pet/wellness; value positioning (4health, Retriever) should benefit; mild positive for pet recovery thesis | Mild Positive |
Overall peer read-through: The consumer backdrop for Q2 2026 is cautious but not deteriorating — rural consumers are spending on needs-based categories, fuel prices are elevated but below demand-destruction thresholds, and outdoor/lifestyle categories remain healthy. The most relevant peers (CASY, ASO) confirm the rural consumer held up through May. The key TSCO-specific risk (companion animal structural headwind) has no direct peer read-through, making the Q2 pet category data the critical swing factor that peers cannot inform.
Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the chain-wide Q2 dog food upgrade and aggressive fresh/frozen pet rollout — these are the primary catalysts management is executing against to stabilize the companion animal category, and Q2 results will be the first real test of whether these initiatives are gaining traction.
Key Takeaway: All insider transactions since Q1 earnings are non-discretionary equity awards to directors — no open-market buys or sells by executives or directors. The absence of any open-market buying by insiders at a 52-week low is notable but not alarming given the award-only nature of all filings. No 10b5-1 plan initiations or discretionary sales have been filed.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Shares / Value | Transaction Date | Note |
Brown, Joy | Director | Equity Award (Non-Discretionary) | 5,712 shares | May 14, 2026 | Annual director equity grant; non-discretionary; not an open-market purchase |
Cardenas, Ricardo | Director | Equity Award (Non-Discretionary) | 5,712 shares | May 14, 2026 | Annual director equity grant; non-discretionary |
Ham, Margaret M. | Director | Equity Award (Non-Discretionary) | 5,712 shares | May 14, 2026 | Annual director equity grant; non-discretionary |
Hawaux, Andre J. | Director | Equity Award (Non-Discretionary) | 5,712 shares | May 14, 2026 | Annual director equity grant; non-discretionary |
Jackson, Denise L. | Director | Equity Award (Non-Discretionary) | 5,712 shares | May 14, 2026 | Annual director equity grant; non-discretionary |
Krishnan, Ramkumar | Director | Equity Award (Non-Discretionary) | 5,712 shares | May 14, 2026 | Annual director equity grant; non-discretionary |
Morris, Edna | Director | Equity Award (Non-Discretionary) | 9,174 shares | May 14, 2026 | Annual director equity grant; non-discretionary; larger grant size may reflect committee role |
Syngal, Sonia | Director | Equity Award (Non-Discretionary) | 5,712 shares | May 14, 2026 | Annual director equity grant; non-discretionary; newly appointed to Governance Committee |
Weikel, Mark J. | Director | Equity Award (Non-Discretionary) | 5,712 shares | May 14, 2026 | Annual director equity grant; non-discretionary |
Ham, Margaret M. | Director | Equity Award (Non-Discretionary) | 97.8 shares (dividend equivalent) | Jun 8, 2026 | Dividend equivalent units; non-discretionary; automatic accrual on unvested RSUs |
Ham, Margaret M. | Director | Equity Award (Non-Discretionary) | 415.2 shares | Jul 1, 2026 | Non-discretionary equity award; automatic grant |
Krishnan, Ramkumar | Director | Equity Award (Non-Discretionary) | 830.4 shares | Jul 1, 2026 | Non-discretionary equity award; automatic grant |
Source: Insider Transaction Data (SEC Form 4 filings).
Assessment: All 12 transactions since Q1 earnings are non-discretionary equity awards to directors — annual grants, dividend equivalents, and automatic accruals. There are zero open-market purchases or sales by any insider (directors or executives) since the Q1 print. The absence of open-market buying at a stock price near multi-year lows (~$29–30) is notable but not a red flag given the award-only nature of all filings. No 10b5-1 plan initiations or discretionary sales have been filed, which means there is no insider selling signal heading into Q2 earnings. The insider picture is neutral — no signal in either direction.