Company | Universal Health Services, Inc. |
Ticker | UHS (NYSE) |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026) |
Expected Earnings Date | Late July 2026 (announced July 6, 2026) |
Prepared Date | July 26, 2026 |
Last Earnings | Q1 2026 — April 28, 2026 (Beat on revenue and EPS) |
Sector ETF Used | IHF (iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF) |
Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 2026 is constructive but not without risk — the single biggest swing factor is the size of the Florida Medicaid supplemental payment (FY2025 program, ~$100M incremental benefit expected in Q2), which alone could drive a meaningful beat if recorded as guided, while the steepening exchange subsidy headwind and Palm Beach Gardens startup drag are the primary offsets.
Heading into Q2 2026, the bar for UHS is moderately elevated but achievable: consensus sits at $5.96 diluted operating EPS and ~$4.59B in revenue, both implying solid year-over-year growth off a strong Q2 2025 base. Management reiterated full-year guidance on the Q1 call and at both the BofA (May 12) and Goldman Sachs (June 9) healthcare conferences, projecting a back-half-weighted earnings ramp to achieve 5% core growth — a posture that is confident but explicitly dependent on Cedar Hill improvement, new acute capacity ramping in Las Vegas, West Coast Florida, and Riverside County, and continued behavioral volume recovery toward the 2%–3% target. Estimate revisions have been modestly positive since the Q1 print, with the FY2026 operating EPS consensus ticking up from $23.46 to $23.52, suggesting the Street is incrementally constructive but not aggressively chasing the stock. The stock has underperformed sharply since Q1 earnings — down ~4% vs. IHF +18.5% and SPY +3.8% — reflecting investor concern about exchange subsidy headwinds, Medicaid policy risk, and the Talkspace acquisition overhang, leaving the multiple compressed and the setup asymmetric to the upside if Q2 execution is clean. The key wildcard is the Florida FY2025 Medicaid supplemental payment: management guided to ~$100M incremental benefit to be recorded in Q2, but the exact timing and sizing remain subject to state approval mechanics — any upside surprise here (as occurred with Nevada/Ohio in Q1) could drive a meaningful beat, while any delay would be a headwind.
Key Takeaway: Consensus is a moderate bar — the Florida Medicaid supplemental payment (~$100M) is the biggest swing factor for the quarter, while behavioral same-store adjusted patient day growth (consensus ~1.66% vs. management’s 2%–3% target) is the key operational KPI to watch for evidence of the volume recovery thesis.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change (vs. Q2 2025) | Guidance | Consensus vs. Guidance |
Net Revenues ($B) | $4.495B | $4.284B | $4.587B | +7.1% | FY2026: ~$18.55B (implied) | ~+0.4% vs. FY implied run-rate |
Diluted Operating EPS ($) | $5.619 | $5.353 | $5.958 | +11.3% | FY2026: ~$23.52 consensus | N/A — no quarterly EPS guidance |
Operating EBITDA ($M) | $658.3M | $652.3M | $691.4M | +6.0% | FY2026: ~$2.72B consensus | N/A — no quarterly EBITDA guidance |
Acute SS Revenue Growth (%) | 8.2% | 7.9% | ~7.9% | ~flat vs. prior year | FY2026: ~6.7% (consensus) | In line |
Behavioral SS Revenue Growth (%) | 7.3% | 8.9% | ~3.5% | -540 bps YoY | FY2026: ~4.9% (consensus) | Below prior year; Cedar Hill entering SS group |
Acute SS Adj. Admissions Growth (%) | 0.0% | 2.0% | ~1.9% | -10 bps YoY | FY2026: ~1.8% (consensus) | Modest improvement expected as new capacity ramps |
Behavioral SS Adj. Patient Day Growth (%) | 1.6% | 1.2% | ~1.66% | +46 bps YoY | 2%–3% FY2026 target | ~34 bps below low end of target |
Net Rev. per Adj. Admission — Acute ($) | $17,705 | $16,321 | $17,379 | +6.5% | ~3% core pricing + supplemental benefit | Consensus slightly below Q1 actual; Florida DPP upside risk |
Net Rev. per Adj. Patient Day — Behavioral ($) | $14,621 | $14,387 | $14,603 | +1.5% | 3.5%–4.5% sustainable pricing | Consensus below management’s sustainable range; mix shift risk |
Sources: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data (Net revenues, Diluted EPS – operating, EBITDA – operating, Revenue – Acute care – SS%, Revenue – Behavioral Health – SS%, Adjusted Admissions – Acute care – SS%, Adjusted patient days – Behavioral health – SS%, Net rev. per adj. admission – Acute care, Net rev. per adj. admission – Behavioral Health); UHS Q1 2026 Earnings Call (April 28, 2026); BofA Healthcare Conference (May 12, 2026).
Quarter | KPI | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q2 2024 | Diluted Op. EPS | $4.31 | $3.28 | +31.5% | Beat |
Q2 2024 | BH SS Adj. Pt. Day Growth | 1.4% | 2.18% | -36 bps | Miss |
Q3 2024 | Diluted Op. EPS | $3.71 | $3.68 | +0.8% | Slight Beat |
Q3 2024 | BH SS Adj. Pt. Day Growth | 1.8% | 1.62% | +18 bps | Beat |
Q4 2024 | Diluted Op. EPS | $4.92 | $4.15 | +18.5% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | BH SS Adj. Pt. Day Growth | 1.6% | 1.73% | -13 bps | Miss |
Q1 2025 | Diluted Op. EPS | $4.84 | $4.36 | +11.0% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | BH SS Adj. Pt. Day Growth | -0.3% | 2.65% | -295 bps | Significant Miss |
Q2 2025 | Diluted Op. EPS | $5.35 | $4.90 | +9.2% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | BH SS Adj. Pt. Day Growth | 1.2% | 1.90% | -70 bps | Miss |
Q3 2025 | Diluted Op. EPS | $5.69 | $4.92 | +15.6% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | BH SS Adj. Pt. Day Growth | 1.3% | 1.27% | +3 bps | In Line |
Q4 2025 | Diluted Op. EPS | $5.88 | $5.92 | -0.7% | Slight Miss |
Q4 2025 | BH SS Adj. Pt. Day Growth | 1.5% | 1.43% | +7 bps | In Line |
Q1 2026 | Diluted Op. EPS | $5.62 | $5.28 | +6.4% | Beat |
Q1 2026 | BH SS Adj. Pt. Day Growth | 1.6% | 1.79% | -19 bps | Slight Miss |
Pattern: UHS has beaten on operating EPS in 7 of the last 8 quarters — a remarkably consistent track record — while behavioral same-store adjusted patient day growth has missed or come in at the low end of consensus in 6 of 8 quarters, underscoring that volume execution in behavioral health remains the persistent soft spot even as EPS beats are driven by pricing, supplemental payments, and expense discipline.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: Management’s tone has been consistent and confident since the Q1 print — full-year guidance was reiterated at both the BofA and Goldman Sachs conferences — but the Florida FY2025 Medicaid supplemental payment (~$100M incremental benefit) is the one material item that has been formally disclosed post-Q1 and will be recorded in Q2, representing the most significant guidance-adjacent development since last earnings.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 28) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
FY2026 Core EPS Growth | ~5% core growth (full year); back-half weighted ramp | — | FY2026 Op. EPS: $23.52 | Reiterated at BofA (May 12) and GS (June 9) conferences; tone unchanged |
Behavioral SS Adj. Patient Day Growth | 2%–3% FY2026 target; Q1 at low end (~1.6%) due to weather | — | ~1.66% Q2 consensus; ~2.0% FY2026 | Reiterated 2%–3% framework at GS conference; headcount growth moderating to ~2% in 2026 from 4% in 2025 |
Florida FY2025 Medicaid Supplemental Payment | ~$50M estimated benefit (Q1 call); noted could be “measurably higher” upon final approval | ~$100M incremental benefit to be recorded in Q2 2026 (disclosed in Q1 10-Q and confirmed at BofA conference) | Embedded in Q2 consensus | ↑ Raised post-Q1 via 10-Q disclosure; FY2025 Florida program formally approved; incremental benefit materially above initial $50M estimate |
Exchange Subsidy Headwind (FY2026) | $75M pre-tax full-year impact; Q1 impact ~$15M; steepening through year | — | Embedded in consensus | Reiterated at both conferences; Q2 expected to show steeper impact as grace periods expire; management views as payer mix shift, not volume loss |
Cedar Hill (Washington D.C.) De Novo | $50M improvement vs. prior year; targeting full-year breakeven; enters same-store group in Q2 | — | Embedded in SS revenue growth consensus | Improvement “more back-end loaded than originally contemplated” (Q1 call); GS conference confirmed volumes/earnings weighted to H2 |
Palm Beach Gardens (Florida) De Novo | Opened May 2026; operating loss expected for the year; largely offset by Cedar Hill improvement | — | Embedded in guidance | GS conference: “a bit of a drag” in 2026; expected to approach divisional performance by end of 2027; Q2 will include first full quarter of startup losses |
New Acute Capacity (178 beds, 3 projects) | Lakewood Ranch tower, Henderson floor, Riverside County replacement — all online in Q2; ~2% new capacity growth | — | Embedded in H2 volume ramp | GS conference confirmed all 3 projects online in Q2; at existing hospitals so expected to ramp faster than de novos; positive H2 impact |
Talkspace Acquisition | Expected to close Q3 2026; ~$800M; slightly accretive in first 12 months post-close | — | Not in FY2026 consensus (pre-close) | On track per GS conference; leverage to remain in low 2x range post-close; no Q2 P&L impact expected |
Florida FY2026 Medicaid Supplemental Program | Not yet approved; not in guidance; expected to be similar in size to FY2025 program | — | Not in consensus | GS conference: still waiting for approval; management expects approval “at some point”; potential upside catalyst for H2 2026 |
Nevada Health Plan (4-Star Upgrade) | ~$25M tailwind for FY2026; upgrade from 3.5 to 4 stars | — | Embedded in guidance | Reiterated at BofA conference; meaningful improvement from slight loss in prior year |
Sources: UHS Q1 2026 Earnings Call (April 28, 2026); UHS Q1 2026 10-Q; BofA Global Healthcare Conference (May 12, 2026); Goldman Sachs 47th Annual Global Healthcare Conference (June 9, 2026).
Key Takeaway: Estimates have been modestly revised upward since the Q1 print — Q2 2026 operating EPS consensus moved from $5.77 to $5.96 (+3.3%) and FY2026 from $23.46 to $23.52 (+0.3%) — reflecting the Florida DPP disclosure and continued operational confidence, while behavioral volume estimates remain below management’s 2%–3% target, suggesting the Street is not yet fully pricing in the volume recovery thesis.
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (as of May 5, 2026) | Current Consensus (July 26, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Earnings Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance (%) |
Diluted Op. EPS — Q2 2026 | $5.77 | $5.96 | +3.3% | No quarterly EPS guidance | No quarterly EPS guidance | N/A | N/A |
Diluted Op. EPS — FY2026 | $23.46 | $23.52 | +0.3% | ~5% core growth (FY2026 vs. FY2025) | Reiterated; no change | Unchanged | In line with guidance framework |
Net Revenues — Q2 2026 | $4.551B | $4.587B | +0.8% | No quarterly revenue guidance | No quarterly revenue guidance | N/A | N/A |
Net Revenues — FY2026 | $18.532B | $18.551B | +0.1% | No explicit FY revenue guidance | No explicit FY revenue guidance | N/A | N/A |
Operating EBITDA — Q2 2026 | $675.5M | $691.4M | +2.4% | No quarterly EBITDA guidance | No quarterly EBITDA guidance | N/A | N/A |
Operating EBITDA — FY2026 | $2.717B | $2.719B | +0.1% | No explicit FY EBITDA guidance | No explicit FY EBITDA guidance | N/A | N/A |
BH SS Adj. Pt. Day Growth — Q2 2026 | 1.66% | 1.66% | 0.0% | 2%–3% FY2026 target | Reiterated; no change | Unchanged | -34 bps below low end of target |
BH SS Adj. Pt. Day Growth — FY2026 | 2.03% | 2.03% | 0.0% | 2%–3% FY2026 target | Reiterated; no change | Unchanged | At low end of target; Street not pricing in upside |
Acute SS Revenue Growth — Q2 2026 | 6.37% | 7.91% | +24.3% | No quarterly segment guidance | No quarterly segment guidance | N/A | Florida DPP benefit driving upward revision |
The upward revision in Q2 operating EPS (+3.3% since the Q1 print) is primarily attributable to the Florida FY2025 Medicaid supplemental payment disclosure (~$100M incremental benefit), which was not fully embedded in consensus at the time of the Q1 call. FY2026 estimates are essentially flat, suggesting the Street is treating the Florida DPP as a timing item rather than a structural upgrade. Behavioral volume estimates remain anchored at the low end of management’s 2%–3% target, representing a potential upside catalyst if Q2 execution shows acceleration.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data; UHS Q1 2026 Earnings Call (April 28, 2026); BofA Global Healthcare Conference (May 12, 2026); Goldman Sachs 47th Annual Global Healthcare Conference (June 9, 2026).
Key Takeaway: UHS has dramatically underperformed since Q1 earnings — down ~4.2% vs. IHF +18.5% and SPY +3.8% — driven almost entirely by multiple compression and sentiment deterioration on Medicaid policy risk and exchange subsidy headwinds, not by estimate cuts; the stock’s compressed valuation (~7–8x EBITDA vs. 13–15x private market comps) creates an asymmetric setup if Q2 execution is clean.
UHS vs. IHF (iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF) vs. S&P 500 (SPY) — Indexed to 100 at Q1 2026 Earnings Date (April 28, 2026). Source: Yahoo Finance / Stock Price Data.
Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance); UHS BofA Global Healthcare Conference (May 12, 2026); Goldman Sachs 47th Annual Global Healthcare Conference (June 9, 2026); UHS 8-K (July 21, 2026).
Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the formal disclosure of the ~$100M incremental Florida FY2025 Medicaid supplemental payment to be recorded in Q2 — a material upside vs. the ~$50M initially guided — while the Laurel Ridge facility termination and Talkspace acquisition progress are the other key items to monitor.
Sources: UHS 8-K (July 21, 2026); UHS Q1 2026 10-Q; UHS Q1 2026 Earnings Call (April 28, 2026); BofA Global Healthcare Conference (May 12, 2026); Goldman Sachs 47th Annual Global Healthcare Conference (June 9, 2026); UHS press releases.
Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from HCA (Q2 2026 results, July 24) and THC (Q2 2026 results, July 24) provides the most direct read-through for UHS’s Q2 print: both confirmed that exchange subsidy headwinds steepened materially in Q2 (HCA: -$400M EBITDA impact; THC: exchange revenues -17%), but both also reported strong underlying demand and raised full-year guidance on fundamental outperformance — a constructive read-through for UHS’s acute segment, while ACHC’s behavioral volume acceleration (+6.5% same-store admissions) is a positive signal for UHS’s behavioral segment.
Note: Only commentary from the current reporting period (Q2 2026) is included below. Q1 2026 earnings calls from peers (which reported on Q1 results) are included only where they provided explicit forward commentary about Q2 2026 trends.
Read-Through Relevance: HCA is the largest U.S. acute care hospital operator and the most direct read-through for UHS’s acute segment. HCA’s Q2 2026 results are the most timely and relevant peer data point available.
Source: HCA Healthcare Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 24, 2026).
Read-Through Relevance: THC is a major acute care hospital operator with significant overlap in UHS’s key markets (Florida, Texas, California). THC’s Q2 2026 results provide a direct read-through for acute hospital operating trends.
Source: Tenet Healthcare Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 24, 2026).
Read-Through Relevance: ACHC is the most direct behavioral health peer to UHS. ACHC’s Q1 2026 results and Q2 2026 guidance provide the most relevant read-through for UHS’s behavioral segment.
Source: Acadia Healthcare Q1 2026 Earnings Call (April 30, 2026).
Read-Through Relevance: EHC is an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) operator — a different sub-sector from UHS’s acute/behavioral model, but relevant for read-throughs on Medicare Advantage dynamics, labor trends, and overall healthcare demand.
Source: Encompass Health Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 1, 2026); Encompass Health BofA Global Healthcare Conference (May 12, 2026).
Read-Through Relevance: THC’s Q1 2026 earnings call provided explicit Q2 2026 guidance and forward commentary on exchange subsidy trends, Medicaid supplemental payments, and demand — all directly relevant to UHS’s Q2 setup.
Source: Tenet Healthcare Q1 2026 Earnings Call (April 30, 2026); Tenet Healthcare BofA Global Healthcare Conference (May 13, 2026).
Key Takeaway: No open-market buys or discretionary sells were filed in the period since Q1 earnings — the only Form 4 activity consists of routine director equity award grants (transaction code ‘A’) and a large non-cash transfer by Executive Chairman Alan Miller (transaction code ‘J’, a gift or estate planning transfer, not a market sale). There is no insider signal — positive or negative — from the Form 4 data.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Shares | Date | Note |
Miller, Alan B. | Executive Chairman, 10% Owner, Director | Non-Cash Transfer (Code J) | 75,288 shares (Class B) | May 27, 2026 | Gift or estate planning transfer — NOT an open-market sale; no market signal |
Chen-Langenmayr, Nina | Director | Equity Award Grant (Code A) | 1,217 shares (Class B) | May 20, 2026 | Routine annual director equity grant; not a discretionary transaction |
McDonnell, Eileen C. | Director | Equity Award Grant (Code A) | 1,217 shares (Class B) | May 20, 2026 | Routine annual director equity grant; not a discretionary transaction |
Nimetz, Warren J. | Director | Equity Award Grant (Code A) | 1,217 shares (Class B) | May 20, 2026 | Routine annual director equity grant; not a discretionary transaction |
Singer, Maria Ruderman | Director | Equity Award Grant (Code A) | 1,217 shares (Class B) | May 20, 2026 | Routine annual director equity grant; not a discretionary transaction |
Sussman, Elliot J. MD MBA | Director | Equity Award Grant (Code A) | 1,217 shares (Class B) | May 20, 2026 | Routine annual director equity grant; not a discretionary transaction |
No open-market buys (Form 4 code P) or open-market sells (Form 4 code S) were filed by UHS insiders in the period since Q1 2026 earnings (April 28, 2026 through July 26, 2026). The absence of discretionary insider selling is a mild positive signal given the stock’s ~4% decline since earnings, though the absence of open-market buying is notable given management’s public statements about the stock’s “compelling value.” The company’s capital return activity has been expressed through corporate share repurchases rather than individual insider purchases.
Source: SEC Form 4 filings (Insider Transaction Data).