{
  "report_rows": [
    {
      "kpi": "Diluted EPS (2Q26)",
      "prediction": "BEAT",
      "answer": "pred ~$1.16 vs. cons $1.14",
      "confidence": "MEDIUM"
    },
    {
      "kpi": "Operating revenue (2Q26)",
      "prediction": "BEAT",
      "answer": "pred ~$1.98B vs. cons $1.95B",
      "confidence": "LOW"
    },
    {
      "kpi": "Missouri signed energy-services agreements",
      "prediction": "BEAT",
      "answer": "pred ~2.6 GW vs. cons 2.5 GW",
      "confidence": "MEDIUM"
    }
  ],
  "guide_rows": [
    {
      "kpi": "2026 diluted EPS guidance",
      "prediction": "UNCHANGED",
      "answer": "guide ~$5.25-$5.45 vs. cons $5.35 (FY2026)",
      "confidence": "HIGH"
    },
    {
      "kpi": "Missouri large-load sales assumption",
      "prediction": "UNCHANGED",
      "answer": "guide ~1.2 GW vs. cons 1.2 GW (by 2030)",
      "confidence": "MEDIUM"
    },
    {
      "kpi": "Five-year capital plan",
      "prediction": "UNCHANGED",
      "answer": "guide ~$32B vs. cons ~$32B (2026-2030)",
      "confidence": "MEDIUM"
    }
  ],
  "day1_residual_pct": 1.2,
  "day1_confidence": "MEDIUM",
  "day5_residual_pct": 0.4,
  "day5_path": "FADE",
  "day5_rationale": "A modest EPS/ESA beat should initially support the premium growth narrative, but unchanged FY2026 EPS guidance (~$5.35 midpoint versus ~$5.35 consensus) and unchanged embedded load-growth assumptions (~1.2 GW versus ~1.2 GW) leave limited basis for out-period estimate increases before the September IRP.",
  "day5_confidence": "MEDIUM"
}