Company | Align Technology, Inc. |
Ticker | ALGN (NASDAQ) |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026) |
Earnings Date | July 29, 2026 (after market close, 4:30 PM ET) |
Prepared | July 28, 2026 |
Primary Analyst KPIs | Clear Aligner Case Volume (#); Non-GAAP Operating EPS (Diluted) |
Primary Valuation Metric | NTM P/E (currently ~14.1×) |
Key Takeaway: The setup is modestly constructive — consensus sits just inside guidance, management deliberately set a low bar citing Middle East uncertainty, and the real question is whether international momentum and DSO strength can offset continued North American retail softness to drive a beat-and-raise on volume.
Bar: Consensus Q2 revenue of ~$1.051B sits at the upper half of the $1.040–$1.060B guidance range, implying the Street is already pricing in a modest beat on the top line; Clear Aligner volume consensus of ~683K cases is essentially in line with the guidance midpoint, leaving limited room for a volume-driven upside surprise unless international markets outperform again. Guidance/Tone: Management's posture has been deliberately conservative — the CFO explicitly flagged at the Goldman Sachs Healthcare Conference (June 8) that the typical Q1-to-Q2 sequential step-up is 3%+ but guidance was set at ~1% at the midpoint, citing Middle East uncertainty and oil/logistics cost volatility; as of early June, no deterioration in underlying demand was observed, suggesting the bar is intentionally low. Estimate Trajectory: Non-GAAP EPS estimates for Q2 have drifted slightly lower since the Q1 print (from ~$2.00 post-earnings to ~$1.97 currently), while revenue estimates are essentially flat, consistent with management's conservative framing rather than any fundamental deterioration. Stock Setup: ALGN trades at ~14.1× NTM P/E — a multi-year trough multiple that has compressed ~24% over the past 12 months even as EPS estimates have held relatively stable, suggesting the stock is pricing in continued execution risk rather than a fundamental deterioration; a clean beat-and-reaffirm could catalyze multiple re-rating. Wildcard: The single biggest swing factor is whether management raises the back half of FY2026 guidance — the full-year 3–4% revenue growth target implies H2 acceleration, and any signal of confidence (or lack thereof) on that ramp, particularly around North America retail returning to growth and the no-AA product rollout gaining traction, will drive the stock more than the Q2 print itself.
Key Takeaway: Consensus sits inside guidance on both revenue and volume, making the bar achievable but not easy — Clear Aligner case volume is the bigger swing factor given management's deliberate conservatism on the sequential step-up; ASP is expected flat YoY, so volume is the primary lever for a top-line beat.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change | Q2 2026 Guidance | Consensus vs. Guidance Midpoint |
Total Revenue ($M) | $1,040.1M | $1,012.5M | $1,051.3M | +3.8% YoY | $1,040–$1,060M | +0.1% vs. $1,050M mid |
Clear Aligner Revenue ($M) | $856.0M | $804.6M | $854.5M | +6.2% YoY | Up YoY (no $ range) | N/A — no $ guidance |
Clear Aligner Case Volume (#) | 685,650 | 644,370 | 683,201 | +6.0% YoY | Up seq. & YoY | N/A — directional only |
Clear Aligner ASP ($/case) | $1,174.88 | $1,152.48 | $1,157.30 | +0.4% YoY | Flat seq. & YoY | ~−0.4% vs. flat guidance |
Systems & Services Revenue ($M) | $184.1M | $207.8M | $196.8M | −5.3% YoY | Up sequentially | N/A — directional only |
Non-GAAP Operating Income ($M) | $223.8M | $215.9M | $228.3M | +5.7% YoY | Non-GAAP op. margin ~21.5% | ~+0.1% vs. implied $225.8M mid |
Non-GAAP Diluted EPS ($) | $2.58 | $2.49 | $2.59 | +4.0% YoY | Non-GAAP op. margin ~21.5% | N/A — EPS not guided directly |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data
Quarter | KPI | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q3 2024 | Clear Aligner Volume (#) | 617,220 | 621,155 | −0.6% | MISS |
Q3 2024 | Non-GAAP Diluted EPS ($) | $2.35 | $2.30 | +2.1% | BEAT |
Q4 2024 | Clear Aligner Volume (#) | 628,730 | 612,146 | +2.7% | BEAT |
Q4 2024 | Non-GAAP Diluted EPS ($) | $2.44 | $2.43 | +0.4% | BEAT |
Q1 2025 | Clear Aligner Volume (#) | 642,305 | 620,866 | +3.5% | BEAT |
Q1 2025 | Non-GAAP Diluted EPS ($) | $2.13 | $1.98 | +7.3% | BEAT |
Q2 2025 | Clear Aligner Volume (#) | 644,370 | 660,788 | −2.5% | MISS |
Q2 2025 | Non-GAAP Diluted EPS ($) | $2.49 | $2.57 | −3.1% | MISS |
Q3 2025 | Clear Aligner Volume (#) | 647,750 | 616,446 | +5.1% | BEAT |
Q3 2025 | Non-GAAP Diluted EPS ($) | $2.61 | $2.39 | +9.2% | BEAT |
Q4 2025 | Clear Aligner Volume (#) | 676,855 | 651,301 | +3.9% | BEAT |
Q4 2025 | Non-GAAP Diluted EPS ($) | $3.29 | $2.99 | +10.0% | BEAT |
Q1 2026 | Clear Aligner Volume (#) | 685,650 | 662,731 | +3.5% | BEAT |
Q1 2026 | Non-GAAP Diluted EPS ($) | $2.58 | $2.26 | +14.2% | BEAT |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Pattern: ALGN has beaten Clear Aligner volume consensus in 6 of the last 8 quarters (missing only Q3 2024 and Q2 2025, the latter being the most significant miss at −2.5%); EPS beats have been consistent and often large, suggesting management guides conservatively on margins — a pattern that supports a constructive setup into Q2 2026.
Key Takeaway: No formal guidance revision has been issued since the Q1 2026 earnings call (April 29, 2026); however, management's conference circuit commentary (May–June 2026) has been consistently constructive on underlying demand while reiterating that the Q2 guidance midpoint embeds deliberate conservatism around Middle East uncertainty — a tone that is net positive for the print.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 29) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
Q2 2026 Revenue | $1,040–$1,060M (+3–5% YoY) | — | $1,051.3M | Unchanged. CFO reiterated at Goldman Sachs (Jun 8) that ~1% sequential growth at midpoint reflects deliberate conservatism on Middle East/oil uncertainty, not demand deterioration. |
Q2 2026 Clear Aligner Volume | Up sequentially & YoY (directional) | — | 683,201 cases | Unchanged. Stifel (May 28): CFO noted guidance implies ~1% sequential volume growth at midpoint vs. typical 3–4%. |
Q2 2026 Clear Aligner ASP | Flat sequentially & YoY | — | $1,157.30/case | Unchanged. FY ASP expected −1–2% YoY; H1 expected flattish aided by FX. |
Q2 2026 Non-GAAP Op. Margin | ~21.5% | — | ~21.5% (implied) | Unchanged. Goldman Sachs (Jun 8): CFO guided flat QoQ non-GAAP op. margin due to oil/logistics uncertainty; typical seasonal improvement was not assumed. |
FY 2026 Revenue Growth | +3–4% YoY | — | +3.5% YoY (implied by $4.180B cons.) | Reaffirmed. Macro uncertainty cited as reason for not raising despite Q1 beat. |
FY 2026 Clear Aligner Volume | Up mid-single digits YoY | — | ~2.722M cases (+5.5% YoY implied) | Reaffirmed. Consensus tracking in line with guidance midpoint. |
FY 2026 Non-GAAP Op. Margin | ~23.7% (~+100 bps YoY) | — | ~23.7% (implied by $989M cons. op. income) | Reaffirmed. Restructuring benefits flowing through; direct-fab dilution offset by other productivity initiatives. |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data; ALGN Q1 2026 Earnings Release (Apr 29, 2026); ALGN Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript; Stifel Jaws & Paws Conference Transcript (May 28, 2026); Goldman Sachs Global Healthcare Conference Transcript (Jun 8, 2026).
Key Takeaway: Estimates have been largely stable since the Q1 print, with a modest downward drift in Q2 EPS (−1.4%) and essentially flat revenue — consistent with management's conservative framing rather than any fundamental deterioration; the gap between current consensus and guidance midpoint is narrow, leaving the setup balanced with a slight upside skew if international momentum continues.
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (as of May 6, 2026) | Current Consensus (Jul 28, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Earnings Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance (%) |
Total Revenue — Q2 2026 | $1,053.9M | $1,051.3M | −0.2% | $1,040–$1,060M | Unchanged | — | +0.1% vs. $1,050M mid |
Clear Aligner Volume — Q2 2026 | 682,539 | 683,201 | +0.1% | Up seq. & YoY (directional) | Unchanged | — | N/A — directional only |
Non-GAAP Diluted EPS — Q2 2026 | $2.578 | $2.592 | +0.5% | Non-GAAP op. margin ~21.5% | Unchanged | — | N/A — EPS not guided directly |
Total Revenue — FY 2026 | $4,184.7M | $4,180.3M | −0.1% | +3–4% YoY | Unchanged | — | +0.1% vs. ~$4,170M mid |
Clear Aligner Volume — FY 2026 | 2,717,820 | 2,722,240 | +0.2% | Mid-single digits YoY | Unchanged | — | N/A — directional only |
Non-GAAP Diluted EPS — FY 2026 | $11.335 | $11.342 | +0.1% | Non-GAAP op. margin ~23.7% | Unchanged | — | N/A — EPS not guided directly |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data (as-of date May 6, 2026 for baseline; latest as of Jul 28, 2026 for current). Estimates have been remarkably stable since the Q1 print, with essentially zero revision in either direction across all key metrics — this is consistent with management's conservative framing and suggests the Street is waiting for the Q2 print to reset expectations rather than pre-positioning. The narrow gap between consensus and guidance midpoint means a beat is achievable but not guaranteed; the key variable is whether international volume outperformance (as seen in Q1) repeats.
Key Takeaway: ALGN has underperformed both XLV and the S&P 500 since the Q1 earnings print, driven almost entirely by multiple compression (−27.5% NTM EV/EBITDA over 12 months) rather than estimate cuts — suggesting the stock is pricing in execution risk that a clean Q2 beat could begin to unwind.
Since the Q1 2026 earnings date (April 29, 2026), ALGN closed at $178.40 and as of July 28, 2026 trades at ~$168.05, a decline of approximately −5.8% vs. XLV (Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) which gained approximately +14.3% over the same period, and the S&P 500 (SPY) which gained approximately +3.9%. ALGN's underperformance is notable given that Q1 results beat consensus on all key metrics. The stock initially rallied to ~$188 in early July before pulling back, with the July 8 CLO departure announcement (8-K) coinciding with a sharp −5.7% single-day decline. Multiple compression remains the dominant driver of 12-month underperformance: NTM P/E has contracted from ~18.7× to ~14.1× (−24.3%), while NTM EPS estimates have been broadly stable. The stock now trades at a trough multiple, creating asymmetric upside if management delivers on its FY2026 margin expansion commitment.
Note: Sector ETF used is XLV (Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF), which is the standard benchmark for large-cap U.S. medical device and healthcare companies. ALGN is classified under Health Care Equipment & Supplies (GICS sub-industry). Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance).
Indexed Performance Table (Base = 100 at April 29, 2026 close):
Date | ALGN (indexed) | XLV (indexed) | SPY (indexed) |
Apr 29, 2026 (Q1 Earnings) | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
May 15, 2026 | 88.1 | 101.6 | 103.9 |
May 28, 2026 (Stifel Conference) | 97.1 | 105.6 | 106.0 |
Jun 8, 2026 (Goldman Sachs Conference) | 96.4 | 106.9 | 103.9 |
Jun 18, 2026 (Board Chair Transition 8-K) | 102.1 | 104.6 | 104.9 |
Jul 7, 2026 (Recent High) | 103.8 | 115.1 | 105.1 |
Jul 8, 2026 (CLO Departure 8-K) | 97.9 | 113.6 | 104.8 |
Jul 28, 2026 (Prepared Date) | 94.2 | 114.3 | 103.9 |
Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance). Indexed to 100 at April 29, 2026 close ($178.40 for ALGN, $142.84 for XLV, $711.58 for SPY).
Screening Methodology & Inclusion Criteria: This section includes ONLY commentary that (a) was made within the last 60 days (on or after May 28, 2026), AND (b) pertains to current Q2 2026 conditions, forward-looking demand, or post-Q1 2026 business updates. Commentary from peers discussing their own prior-quarter results (e.g., Q1 2025 or Q4 2025 results) without forward-looking read-through has been explicitly excluded. Peers are categorized as (i) Direct Dental Peers and (ii) Adjacent Healthcare Read-Throughs, with limitations noted for each.
Date: June 17–19, 2026 | Event: Profitability Outlook Raise (Press Release / WSJ Coverage)
Qualifying Criteria: This is a forward-looking profitability update reflecting current 2026 business conditions, not a retrospective prior-quarter result. Straumann raised its full-year 2026 core EBIT margin expansion guidance from 30–60 bps to 140–170 bps (ex-currency), citing lower-than-expected tariffs, a more favorable pricing environment in China, and supply chain/manufacturing efficiency gains progressing faster than anticipated.
Key Read-Through Points for ALGN:
Read-Through Limitations: Straumann is primarily a dental implant company; its demand drivers (implant volumes, restorative procedures) differ from ALGN's clear aligner market. Straumann's commentary does not address orthodontic patient traffic, clear aligner adoption rates, or consumer sentiment for elective orthodontic treatment. The China pricing improvement may reflect implant-specific dynamics (e.g., VBP normalization for implants) that do not directly translate to clear aligners. Weight: Moderate positive — macro/tariff/China read-through is valid; demand read-through is limited.
Qualifying Criteria: The following companies reported Q1 2026 results in late April / May 2026 and provided forward-looking commentary on Q2 2026 and full-year 2026 conditions. Their Q1 results themselves are NOT the read-through; rather, their forward-looking guidance and demand commentary about Q2 2026 and beyond qualifies for inclusion. These are adjacent medical device / healthcare companies, not direct dental peers — read-through applicability is explicitly noted for each.
Peer | Report Date | Qualifying Forward-Looking Commentary (Q2 2026 / FY 2026) | ALGN Read-Through | Limitation |
Stryker (SYK) | Apr 30, 2026 | Confirmed "healthy procedural volumes" and "surgery schedules still full" for Q2 2026; hospital CapEx environment described as "steady" with an "elevated" capital order book going into Q2. | Positive: Healthy elective procedure volumes and stable provider capital spending suggest a supportive environment for elective dental procedures and iTero scanner demand. | Surgical volumes ≠ orthodontic patient traffic. Hospital CapEx ≠ dental practice investment. Indirect read-through only. |
GE HealthCare (GEHC) | Apr 29, 2026 | Confirmed "resilient procedure growth" globally and "healthy customer demand globally" for Q2 2026; flagged ~$250M in oil/memory/freight cost inflation for the full year. | Mixed: Global procedure resilience is a mild positive for elective dental demand; freight/oil cost inflation corroborates ALGN's own Q2 guidance conservatism on logistics costs. | Imaging/diagnostics demand ≠ clear aligner demand. Cost inflation read-through is more direct than demand read-through. |
Medtronic (MDT) | May 20, 2026 | Hugo robotic procedure volume growing "2x to 3x the market" — confirms robotic/digital surgery adoption is accelerating broadly into Q2 2026. | Mild positive: Accelerating adoption of digital/robotic medical technology is thematically consistent with ALGN's digital dentistry platform narrative, though not a direct demand signal. | Robotic surgery adoption ≠ clear aligner adoption. Thematic read-through only; no direct demand linkage. |
Boston Scientific (BSX) | Apr 22, 2026 | Called Q2 2026 "our toughest quarter of the year" and cut full-year guidance. | Negative on macro sentiment, but BSX's issues are EP/WATCHMAN-specific product headwinds, not broad procedure volume weakness. Not a direct read-through for ALGN. | BSX's Q2 weakness is product-specific (EP/WATCHMAN), not a macro demand signal applicable to orthodontics. |
Note: While not a peer read-through, ALGN management's own conference circuit commentary from May–June 2026 provides the most direct current-quarter signal and is summarized here for completeness.
Conference | Date | Key Q2 2026 Commentary |
Stifel Jaws & Paws Conference | May 28, 2026 | CFO Morici: Q2 guidance midpoint implies ~1% sequential revenue growth vs. typical 3–4%; reflects geopolitical uncertainty and higher inflation, not demand deterioration. North America "becoming less negative." International double-digit growth continuing across APAC, EMEA, LatAm. No-AA products showing "good utilization" and building momentum. Down-trading from aligners to wires/brackets "much more stable" vs. 6–12 months ago. |
William Blair Growth Stock Conference | Jun 3, 2026 | CEO Hogan & CFO Morici: Acknowledged "financial friction at the potential patient level" in the U.S. and globally; emphasized active conversion strategies (DSOs, HFD financing, smile video with 50% higher close rate). DSOs "nurturing patients through" and driving incremental volume. No explicit Q2 guidance update. |
Jefferies Global Healthcare Conference | Jun 4, 2026 | CFO Morici: Reiterated "prudent guidance" of ~1% sequential growth at Q2 midpoint. Pressure on "U.S. and North America retail side" acknowledged. International growth "strong" across APAC, EMEA, LatAm. No-AA product rolling out in North America, Europe, and APAC. Lab pilot program showing "really, really high conversion" and generating volume ALGN "never had before." 6,000+ offices enrolled in HFD financing program. |
Goldman Sachs Global Healthcare Conference | Jun 8, 2026 | CFO Morici: Confirmed typical Q1-to-Q2 sequential step-up is "3-plus percent"; Q2 guidance at 1% midpoint reflects deliberate conservatism on Middle East/oil uncertainty. Even in challenging Q2 2025, sequential growth was 3%. Consumer sentiment in North America "mid-40s to low-50s" for multiple quarters — management views this as the operating baseline. China double-digit growth for "a number of quarters." Down-trading "much more stable." No Q2 guidance update provided; will update after quarter end. |
Sources: ALGN Stifel Jaws & Paws Conference Transcript (May 28, 2026); ALGN William Blair Growth Stock Conference Transcript (Jun 3, 2026); ALGN Jefferies Global Healthcare Conference Transcript (Jun 4, 2026); ALGN Goldman Sachs Global Healthcare Conference Transcript (Jun 8, 2026); Straumann (STMN) press release / WSJ coverage (Jun 17–19, 2026); ISRG Q2 2026 Earnings Preview (internal research, Jul 18, 2026).
Excluded Commentary (and Reason): Peer Q1 2025 and Q4 2025 earnings call transcripts discussing prior-quarter results without forward-looking Q2 2026 commentary were excluded per the screening criteria. Any peer commentary that discussed only historical results without a forward-looking component was not included.
Key Takeaway: The most material development since Q1 earnings is the dual leadership transition (CLO departure + Chairman retirement/succession) — neither is operationally disruptive, but the CLO departure to a competitor (Illumina) introduces modest headline risk; the $200M buyback launch (May 2026) is the most constructive capital allocation signal.
Key Takeaway: No open-market insider purchases or discretionary sales were identified in the SEC Form 4 database for ALGN in the period since the Q1 2026 earnings date (April 29, 2026 through July 28, 2026). The absence of insider buying at current trough multiples is notable but not alarming given the company's active $200M buyback program and management's stated confidence in the business trajectory.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Value | Date | Note |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No open-market buys or discretionary sales identified in SEC Form 4 database for the period Apr 29 – Jul 28, 2026. |
Source: SEC Form 4 Filings Database (transaction codes P/S, filing date April 29 – July 28, 2026). No qualifying open-market transactions were returned. The company's active $200M share repurchase program (commenced May 1, 2026) represents the primary capital return signal from management.
Key Takeaway: The primary risk is that management does not raise the back half of FY2026 guidance despite a Q2 beat, leaving the stock range-bound at trough multiples; the primary upside catalyst is a signal that North America retail is inflecting toward growth and that the no-AA product rollout is gaining measurable traction.
ALGN NTM Valuation Multiples (as of July 28, 2026):
Metric | Current (NTM) | 1M Ago | 3M Ago | 12M Ago | 12M Multiple Change |
EV / EBITDA (NTM) | 9.2× | 9.9× | 10.8× | 12.7× | −27.5% |
P / E (NTM) | 14.1× | 14.9× | 16.5× | 18.7× | −24.3% |
EV / Sales (NTM) | 2.6× | 2.7× | 3.0× | 3.2× | −20.3% |
P / FCF (NTM) | 14.7× | 15.2× | 16.2× | 20.0× | −26.5% |
Source: Stock Performance Decomposition Data (Implied Platform). All multiples are NTM (next twelve months) consensus-based. The primary valuation metric for ALGN is NTM P/E given the company's profitability profile and the market's focus on non-GAAP EPS as the key earnings metric. The current 14.1× NTM P/E represents a significant discount to the company's 3–5 year historical average of approximately 30–40×, reflecting the market's skepticism about near-term growth acceleration and the execution risk around the direct fabrication transition. A re-rating toward 18–20× (still well below historical averages) would imply ~30–40% upside from current levels if management delivers on its FY2026 margin expansion and volume growth commitments.
Disclosures: This document is prepared for informational purposes only. All consensus estimates sourced from Visible Alpha. Stock price data sourced from Yahoo Finance via the Implied Platform. All figures are as of July 28, 2026 unless otherwise noted. Past performance is not indicative of future results.