Company | Franklin Resources, Inc. (Franklin Templeton) |
Ticker | BEN US |
Reporting Period | Fiscal Q3 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026) |
Earnings Date / Call | July 31, 2026 — 10:00 AM ET |
Prepared | July 30, 2026 |
Top 2 KPIs | Operating EPS (Diluted) | Total Net Flows |
Primary Valuation Metric | P/E (NTM) — currently ~10.6x |
Key Takeaway: The setup is modestly constructive — consensus is a beatable bar on EPS and flows, but the single biggest swing factor is whether private markets fundraising commentary confirms the firm is tracking above its already-raised $30B+ annual target heading into the fiscal year-end quarter.
Heading into BEN’s fiscal Q3 2026 print, the bar looks achievable: consensus Operating EPS of $0.66 sits below the $0.70–$0.71 actuals of the prior two quarters, and total net flow consensus of ~$11.5B is well below the $26.8B and $28.3B delivered in Q1 and Q2 respectively, though management guided for a sequential step-down in flows given the record pace of prior quarters. Management’s tone on the April 28 call was notably confident — reiterating Q4 margin guidance of “high 29s” and full-year fiscal 2027 target of 30%+, both described as “ahead of plan” — and there has been no subsequent guidance revision or cautionary signal. Estimate revisions have drifted higher since the Q2 print, with the 3Q26 Operating EPS consensus rising from $0.61 to $0.66 and revenue estimates moving up ~$44M, suggesting the Street has been gradually upgrading its view rather than fading the momentum. The stock has rallied ~13% since the April 28 earnings date (vs. XLF +10%, S&P 500 +4%), meaning some beat is already priced in, though the NTM P/E of ~10.6x remains well below the asset management peer group average, leaving room for further re-rating if the alternatives fundraising narrative holds. The key wildcard is the Lexington flagship fund update — management flagged on the Q2 call that a formal filing would come “probably towards the end of ’26” (fiscal year-end September), and any early color on fund size relative to the prior vintage could be a meaningful positive or negative catalyst.
Key Takeaway: Consensus is a low bar on both EPS ($0.66 vs. $0.70–$0.71 in the prior two quarters) and net flows (~$11.5B vs. $26.8B–$28.3B prior). The bigger swing factor is the effective fee rate and whether elevated G&A from fundraising-related expenses compresses the margin more than guided.
KPI | Last Quarter Actual (2Q26) | Prior Year Period Actual (3Q25) | 3Q26 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change (vs. 3Q25) | Guidance (from Q2 call) | Consensus vs. Guidance |
Operating EPS — Diluted ($) | $0.71 | $0.49 | $0.66 | +34.7% YoY | No explicit EPS guide; implied by expense/revenue guidance | N/A (no explicit EPS guide) |
Total Operating Revenue — Operating ($B) | $1.753B | $1.593B | $1.783B | +11.9% YoY | Effective fee rate mid-to-high 37s bps; inv. mgmt. fee revenue +6%+ YoY | Broadly in line with guidance |
Total Net Flows ($B) | $28.3B | -$6.6B | $11.5B | N/M (prior year negative) | No explicit flow guide; sequential step-down expected from record Q2 | N/A (no explicit flow guide) |
Ending AUM ($T) | $1.682T | $1.612T | $1.793T | +11.2% YoY | No explicit AUM guide | N/A |
Operating Income — Operating ($M) | $474.6M | $377.8M | $489.6M | +29.6% YoY | Q4 FY26 margin guided to high 29s; FY26 full year in high 27s | Broadly in line; implies ~27–28% margin for Q3 |
Sources: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data
Quarter | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
4Q FY2024 (Sep-24) | $0.59 | $0.595 | -0.8% | Miss |
1Q FY2025 (Dec-24) | $0.59 | $0.529 | +11.5% | Beat |
2Q FY2025 (Mar-25) | $0.47 | $0.470 | 0.0% | In Line |
3Q FY2025 (Jun-25) | $0.49 | $0.488 | +0.4% | Slight Beat |
4Q FY2025 (Sep-25) | $0.67 | $0.573 | +17.0% | Beat |
1Q FY2026 (Dec-25) | $0.70 | $0.544 | +28.7% | Beat |
2Q FY2026 (Mar-26) | $0.71 | $0.549 | +29.3% | Beat |
3Q FY2026 (Jun-26) — UPCOMING | — | $0.66 | — | TBD |
Quarter | Reported ($B) | Consensus ($B) | Surprise % | Result |
4Q FY2024 (Sep-24) | -$31.5B | -$29.9B | -5.3% (worse) | Miss |
1Q FY2025 (Dec-24) | -$50.0B | -$50.2B | +0.4% (better) | In Line |
2Q FY2025 (Mar-25) | -$23.5B | -$30.3B | +22.4% (better) | Beat |
3Q FY2025 (Jun-25) | -$6.6B | -$7.6B | +13.2% (better) | Beat |
4Q FY2025 (Sep-25) | -$4.7B | -$7.4B | +36.5% (better) | Beat |
1Q FY2026 (Dec-25) | +$26.8B | +$16.3B | +64.9% (better) | Beat |
2Q FY2026 (Mar-26) | +$28.3B | +$26.3B | +7.6% (better) | Beat |
3Q FY2026 (Jun-26) — UPCOMING | — | +$11.5B | — | TBD |
Pattern: BEN has beaten or matched net flow consensus in 6 of the last 7 reported quarters, with the magnitude of beats accelerating sharply in FY2026 as the organic growth inflection took hold. On EPS, the last three quarters have seen outsized beats of 17–29%, driven by revenue upside and cost discipline — setting a high bar for the Street to keep up with revisions.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data
Key Takeaway: Guidance is unchanged since the April 28 Q2 earnings call — no post-earnings 8-K, conference, or investor day has revised any metric. Management’s tone was explicitly confident, describing margin trajectory as “ahead of plan” and private markets fundraising as tracking to exceed the already-raised $30B+ annual target.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q2 FY26 Earnings Call, Apr 28, 2026) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
Effective Fee Rate (3Q26) | Mid-to-high 37s bps — “very consistent, stable with Q2” | — | ~37 bps (implied by revenue consensus) | Unchanged; no post-earnings update |
Compensation (3Q26) | $830M (assumes $50M perf. fee at 55% payout) | — | N/A — not separately tracked in VA | Unchanged; elevated fundraising-related G&A of $23–25M flagged |
IS&T (3Q26) | $155M (“a little bit higher than last quarter” due to AI investments) | — | N/A | Unchanged; AI investment spend explicitly called out |
G&A (3Q26) | $210–$215M (incl. ~$23–25M fundraising fees + $9–10M advertising) | — | N/A | Unchanged; management noted fundraising G&A is recurring, not one-time |
Occupancy (3Q26) | $70M | — | N/A | Unchanged |
FY26 Total Expenses | ~In line or slightly above FY25 ex-perf. fees; ~+1.5% vs. FY25 | — | N/A | Unchanged; voluntary buyout program included in full-year projection |
FY26 Inv. Mgmt. Fee Revenue | Expected to grow at ≥4x expense growth rate (≥6% YoY) | — | $7.152B (FY26 consensus) | Unchanged; consensus broadly consistent with guidance |
Q4 FY26 Operating Margin | High 29s | — | Implied ~29% from consensus | Unchanged; described as “ahead of plan” |
FY26 Full-Year Operating Margin | High 27s | — | ~27.4% (implied from consensus) | Unchanged; on track per management |
FY27 Operating Margin Target | 30%+ | — | ~29.8% (FY27 consensus) | Unchanged; management reiterated “ahead of plan” |
Private Markets Fundraising (FY26) | Exceed $25–30B target; CEO expects “above $30B” | — | $76.7B total net flows FY26 consensus (incl. all asset classes) | Unchanged; $22.7B raised YTD through Q2 already matched full FY25 |
Key Takeaway: Estimates have moved meaningfully higher since the Q2 print — 3Q26 Operating EPS consensus is up ~7% from the post-earnings baseline and revenue is up ~$44M — suggesting the Street has been upgrading its view in line with management’s confident tone. The gap between current consensus and guidance is narrow, leaving limited room for a “guidance beat” surprise but also little downside if the company simply executes to plan.
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q2 Earnings (May 5, 2026) | Current Consensus (Jul 30, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q2 Call, Apr 28) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance |
Operating EPS — Diluted (3Q26) | $0.614 | $0.658 | +7.2% | No explicit guide | Unchanged | N/A | N/A |
Operating EPS — Diluted (FY26) | $2.741 | $2.810 | +2.5% | No explicit guide | Unchanged | N/A | N/A |
Total Operating Revenue — Operating (3Q26) | $1.739B | $1.783B | +2.5% | Eff. fee rate mid-to-high 37s; inv. mgmt. fee rev. +6%+ YoY | Unchanged | N/A | Broadly in line |
Total Operating Revenue — Operating (FY26) | $7.045B | $7.152B | +1.5% | Inv. mgmt. fee rev. +6%+ YoY; expenses +~1.5% vs. FY25 | Unchanged | N/A | Broadly in line |
Total Net Flows (3Q26) | $6.7B | $11.5B | +72.4% | No explicit guide; sequential step-down from record Q2 expected | Unchanged | N/A | N/A |
Total Net Flows (FY26) | $66.1B | $76.7B | +16.0% | Exceed $25–30B private markets target; CEO expects above $30B | Unchanged | N/A | Consensus well above prior guidance range |
The most notable revision is in net flows, where the 3Q26 consensus has risen +72% from the post-Q2 baseline ($6.7B → $11.5B), reflecting the Street’s growing confidence in BEN’s organic growth trajectory. The FY26 total net flow consensus of $76.7B is now well above the $66.1B post-Q2 baseline, suggesting analysts are extrapolating the strong Q1/Q2 momentum into the back half of the year. EPS revisions of +7% for 3Q26 are directionally consistent with management’s confident tone but leave the bar still beatable given the recent pattern of 17–29% EPS beats.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data
Key Takeaway: BEN has outperformed both XLF (+10%) and the S&P 500 (+4%) by a wide margin since the April 28 earnings date (+13%), driven by a combination of multiple re-rating (P/B expanded from ~1.06x to ~1.33x over 6 months) and earnings estimate upgrades. The stock’s NTM P/E of ~10.6x remains well below the asset management peer group, suggesting the re-rating story is not yet complete if the organic growth narrative holds.
Sector ETF used: XLF (Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund) — appropriate for BEN as a diversified financial services / asset management company. The chart below is indexed to 100 at the April 28, 2026 earnings date.
Metric | BEN | XLF | S&P 500 (SPY) |
Price at Last Earnings (Apr 28, 2026) | $29.46 | $51.85 | $711.69 |
Price as of Jul 30, 2026 | $33.17 | $57.00 | $741.69 |
Return Since Last Earnings | +12.6% | +9.9% | +4.2% |
Peak Price Since Earnings | $34.44 (Jul 6) | $56.75 (Jul 16) | $756.48 (May 29) |
NTM P/E (Jul 30, 2026) | ~10.6x | N/A | N/A |
NTM P/B (Jul 30, 2026) | ~1.33x | N/A | N/A |
Performance Narrative: BEN’s outperformance since the April 28 print has been driven by two distinct phases: (1) an initial post-earnings rally through mid-May as the market digested the strong Q2 beat and raised fundraising guidance, and (2) a second leg higher in June–early July as broader financial sector sentiment improved and BEN’s alternatives narrative gained further traction. The stock pulled back modestly in mid-to-late July (from $34.44 peak to ~$32–33 range) as the market consolidated ahead of the Q3 print, suggesting some profit-taking but no fundamental deterioration in the thesis. The 6-month P/B expansion from 1.06x to 1.33x (+25%) confirms that multiple re-rating — not just earnings growth — has been the primary driver of the stock’s 29% 6-month return.
Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance)
Key Takeaway: Peer Q2 2026 earnings calls (reported July 2026) are uniformly constructive for BEN’s 3Q26 setup — alternatives fundraising is accelerating across the industry, wealth channel demand is recovering from April lows, and the private credit/infrastructure CapEx cycle is creating durable tailwinds. The most direct read-throughs come from BX (alternatives fundraising inflection), KKR (wealth channel rebound + record fundraising year), and OWL (evergreen inflows bottoming).
Methodology note: Only commentary explicitly about Q3 2026 (current reporting quarter) or post-Q2 forward-looking statements from peer earnings calls and conferences is included below. Retrospective commentary about peers’ own Q2 2026 results is excluded.
Relevance to BEN: BX is the largest alternatives manager globally and its commentary on wealth channel momentum, fundraising pipeline, and institutional demand is the most direct read-through for BEN’s alternatives business.
Relevance to BEN: KKR’s commentary on wealth channel recovery, record fundraising momentum, and private credit demand is highly relevant given BEN’s own alternatives fundraising targets and wealth channel penetration strategy.
Relevance to BEN: OWL’s commentary on evergreen inflow recovery, wealth channel durability, and institutional fundraising momentum is a direct read-through for BEN’s alternatives and wealth channel businesses.
Relevance to BEN: BLK’s commentary on digital assets strategy, ETF momentum, and private markets demand is relevant given BEN’s Franklin Crypto acquisition and ETF/Canvas growth initiatives.
Relevance to BEN: IVZ is BEN’s closest traditional active management peer and its commentary on margins, ETF competition, and SMA growth is directly comparable.
Relevance to BEN: AMP’s commentary on wealth channel advisor productivity, active ETF/SMA demand, and the competitive landscape for distribution is relevant for BEN’s Canvas and wealth channel strategy.
Key Takeaway: The most important development since the April 28 earnings call is the $60M retention equity award package granted to four senior executives on July 21 — a strong signal of leadership stability and strategic commitment to the private markets and margin expansion plan, but also a one-time compensation cost that investors should model carefully. The credit facility extension on July 30 is a minor positive for financial flexibility.
Key Takeaway: The only Form 4 transaction filed in the last 60 days is a large open-market sale by Clarion Partners Real Estate Income Fund Inc. (an affiliate of an investment adviser), not a direct insider sale by a named executive. There are no open-market purchases or discretionary sales by named officers or directors in the window — the absence of insider buying at current prices is worth noting given the stock’s 13% run since the last earnings date, but the $60M retention equity awards granted July 21 signal strong management commitment to the long-term plan.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Shares / Value | Date | Note |
Clarion Partners Real Estate Income Fund Inc. (Issuer) | Affiliate of Investment Adviser | Open Market Sale | 1,682,905 shares; ~$54.5M est. | Jul 20, 2026 (filed Jul 22) | Sale by an affiliated investment fund entity, not a named executive. Remaining position: ~5.1M shares. Likely a fund-level portfolio management decision, not a discretionary insider signal. |
No open-market purchases or sales by named officers or directors (CEO, CFO, Co-Presidents, or Board members) were filed in the last 60 days. The $60M retention equity awards (PSUs + RSUs) granted July 21 to four senior executives are equity-based compensation grants (Form 4 code “A” — acquisition/award), not open-market transactions, and are excluded from the table above per methodology. These awards carry 3–5 year cliff vesting schedules, which effectively lock up management’s economic interest in the stock through at least 2029–2031.
Source: Insider Transaction Data (SEC Form 4 Filings)