Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

Ticker

CMG (NYSE)

Reporting Period

Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026)

Earnings Date

July 29, 2026 (after market close)

Prepared

July 28, 2026

Last Earnings

April 29, 2026 (Q1 2026)

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: The setup is modestly constructive — consensus sits at ~+1.4% comps vs. management's guided “about +1%,” leaving a low bar on the most-watched KPI, but the real swing factor is whether transaction growth (positive for the first time in Q1) can sustain and whether restaurant-level margin can show sequential improvement despite peak beef/food cost inflation in Q2.

Heading into Q2 2026 results, the bar for Chipotle is deliberately low: management guided comparable sales to “about +1%” on the Q1 call, and consensus has settled at ~+1.4%, implying only a modest beat is needed to satisfy the Street. The more important question is whether the return to positive transaction growth seen in Q1 (+0.6% traffic) is durable — the Chipotle Honey Chicken LTO launched April 29 and management explicitly embedded a “modest” benefit from it in Q2 guidance, while the Cilantro Lime Sauce check tailwind from Q1 is expected to be “closer to flat” in Q2. On margins, Q2 is the peak pressure quarter: cost of sales is guided to step up to ~30% of sales (vs. 29.6% in Q1) driven by mid-single-digit food cost inflation (beef, avocado, dairy), while pricing remains only ~1.5% — the widest pricing-vs.-inflation gap of the year. Estimate revisions have been essentially flat since the Q1 print, suggesting the Street has already digested the conservative full-year flat comp guide and is not pricing in upside. The stock has underperformed the S&P 500 since Q1 earnings (CMG +1.6% vs. SPY +4.1% indexed), trading at a mid-30s forward P/E — well below its historical 40s-50s range — meaning the multiple is not stretched and a clean beat on traffic could catalyze a re-rating. The key wildcard is beef cost trajectory: peers (SHAK, TXRH, WEN) all flagged Q2 as the peak beef inflation quarter with relief expected in H2, and any signal from CMG that H2 food cost inflation is tracking below the guided ~4% full-year figure would be a meaningful positive surprise for margin expectations.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus sets a low bar on comparable sales (~+1.4% vs. guided ~+1%), but restaurant-level margin (~25.0%) is the bigger swing factor — any upside surprise there would require food cost inflation to track below the guided mid-single-digit Q2 range, which peers suggest is unlikely given peak beef prices in June.

Table 1 — Q2 2026 Current Quarter Snapshot

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year)

Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate

YoY Change

Q2 2026 Guidance (Mgmt)

Cons. vs. Guidance

Revenue ($B)

$3.088B

$3.063B

$3.333B

+8.8% YoY

N/A (implied by comp + unit growth)

N/A

Comparable Restaurant Sales (%)

+0.5%

-4.0%

+1.4%

+540 bps YoY

~+1%

+~40 bps above guide

Same-Store Traffic (%)

+0.6%

-4.9%

+0.4%

+530 bps YoY

Not explicitly guided

N/A

Restaurant-Level Margin (%)

23.3%

27.4%

25.0%

-240 bps YoY

Implied ~24.5–25.0% (cost of sales ~30%, labor low-25%)

~flat to guide midpoint

Food, Bev & Packaging (% of revenue)

29.6%

28.9%

30.0%

+110 bps YoY

~30% (guided explicitly)

~flat to guide

Labor (% of revenue)

26.1%

24.7%

25.1%

+40 bps YoY

Low-25% range (guided)

~flat to guide

Adj. EPS - Diluted (Operating)

$0.240

$0.330

$0.320

-3.0% YoY

Not explicitly guided

N/A

Sources: Visible Alpha consensus and actuals data. Q2 2026 guidance per Q1 2026 earnings call (April 29, 2026). Revenue consensus $3.333B; Comparable Sales consensus +1.37%; Traffic consensus +0.36%; Restaurant-Level Margin consensus 25.01%; Food & Bev % consensus 30.01%; Labor % consensus 25.14%; Adj. EPS consensus $0.320.

Table 2 — Beat/Miss History (Last 8 Quarters)

Comparable Restaurant Sales (%)

Quarter

Reported

Consensus

Surprise (bps)

Result

Q2 2024

+11.1%

+9.1%

+196 bps

Beat

Q3 2024

+6.0%

+6.2%

-20 bps

Miss

Q4 2024

+5.4%

+5.6%

-23 bps

Miss

Q1 2025

-0.4%

+1.5%

-192 bps

Miss

Q2 2025

-4.0%

-2.8%

-115 bps

Miss

Q3 2025

+0.3%

+0.5%

-21 bps

Miss

Q4 2025

-2.5%

-3.0%

+46 bps

Beat

Q1 2026

+0.5%

-0.8%

+130 bps

Beat

Adj. EPS — Diluted Operating ($)

Quarter

Reported

Consensus

Surprise (%)

Result

Q2 2024

$0.340

$0.316

+7.6%

Beat

Q3 2024

$0.267

$0.252

+5.8%

Beat

Q4 2024

$0.250

$0.245

+2.0%

Beat

Q1 2025

$0.292

$0.276

+5.7%

Beat

Q2 2025

$0.330

$0.326

+1.2%

Beat

Q3 2025

$0.290

$0.286

+1.4%

Beat

Q4 2025

$0.250

$0.239

+4.6%

Beat

Q1 2026

$0.240

$0.238

+0.7%

Beat

Pattern: CMG has beaten adj. EPS consensus in all 8 of the last 8 quarters, though the magnitude of beats has compressed sharply (from +7.6% in Q2 2024 to +0.7% in Q1 2026), reflecting a tighter bar and genuine margin pressure. On comparable sales, CMG missed in 5 of the last 8 quarters as the consumer demand reset played out, but has beaten in the last two quarters (Q4 2025 and Q1 2026), suggesting the bar has been reset low enough to clear.

Source: Visible Alpha consensus and actuals data.

3. Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: Guidance has been unchanged since the Q1 2026 earnings call — management maintained a conservative full-year flat comp guide despite trending above it, and no post-earnings 8-K or conference has revised any metric. Tone has shifted from cautious to cautiously optimistic, but management is deliberately holding back on raising guidance given geopolitical uncertainty and the dynamic consumer environment.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 29)

Revised Guidance

Current Consensus

Note

Q2 2026 Comparable Sales

~+1%

+1.4%

Unchanged; includes modest benefit from Honey Chicken LTO launched Apr 29

FY 2026 Comparable Sales

~Flat

+1.5%

Unchanged; mgmt acknowledged trending above guide but maintained conservative stance citing dynamic consumer environment and Iran conflict

Q2 2026 Cost of Sales (% rev)

~30%

30.0%

Unchanged; mid-single-digit food cost inflation guided for Q2 (beef, avocado, dairy)

Q2 2026 Labor (% rev)

Low-25% range

25.1%

Unchanged; wage inflation guided low-single-digit range

Q2 2026 Other Operating Costs (% rev)

High-14% range

N/A

Unchanged

Q2 2026 G&A (non-GAAP)

~$181M ($151M underlying + ~$30M stock comp)

N/A

Unchanged

FY 2026 New Restaurant Openings

~350 (US & Canada); ~80% with Chipotlane

N/A

Unchanged; Middle East openings may be fewer than anticipated due to geopolitical conditions; Singapore pushed to 2027

FY 2026 Pricing

1%–2%

N/A

Unchanged; Q2 pricing ~1.5%

FY 2026 Cost of Sales Inflation

~4% full year; H2 steps down to low-to-mid single digits as beef lapped

N/A

Unchanged; Q2 is peak inflation quarter

Management tone evolution: The Q1 2026 call marked a clear shift from defensive to cautiously optimistic. CEO Scott Boatwright cited “early indications that our Recipe for Growth strategy has started to translate into real results,” while CFO Adam Rymer maintained conservative guidance “given the dynamic consumer environment, especially with the conflict in Iran and gas prices.” The deliberate decision to hold guidance below trending performance is consistent with prior quarters — management is building credibility by under-promising and over-delivering rather than raising the bar prematurely.

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates for Q2 2026 and FY 2026 have been essentially flat since the Q1 print — the Street has aligned to management’s conservative guidance rather than pricing in upside, which means any beat on comps or margins would be a genuine positive surprise rather than a consensus-chasing move.

KPI (Period)

Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (May 6, 2026)

Current Consensus

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Call)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Cons. vs. Guidance

Revenue — Q2 2026

$3.329B

$3.333B

+0.1%

N/A (implied)

Unchanged

N/A

Comp Sales % — Q2 2026

+1.32%

+1.37%

+4 bps

~+1%

~+1% (unchanged)

+~37 bps above guide

Traffic % — Q2 2026

+0.21%

+0.36%

+15 bps

Not guided

Not guided

N/A

Restaurant-Level Margin % — Q2 2026

25.01%

25.01%

~0 bps

Implied ~24.5–25.0%

Unchanged

~flat to guide

Adj. EPS — Q2 2026

$0.319

$0.320

+0.3%

Not guided

Not guided

N/A

Revenue — FY 2026

$12.969B

$12.986B

+0.1%

N/A (implied)

Unchanged

N/A

Comp Sales % — FY 2026

+1.39%

+1.46%

+7 bps

~Flat

~Flat (unchanged)

+~146 bps above guide

Restaurant-Level Margin % — FY 2026

23.94%

23.90%

-4 bps

N/A (not explicitly guided)

Unchanged

N/A

Adj. EPS — FY 2026

$1.133

$1.133

~0%

Not guided

Not guided

N/A

Estimates have been remarkably stable since the Q1 print — virtually no revision in any direction across all key KPIs. This reflects the Street’s acceptance of management’s conservative flat-comp framework for FY 2026, with consensus sitting ~146 bps above the full-year guide on comps. The gap between consensus and guidance represents potential upside optionality if the “Recipe for Growth” initiatives (HEAT equipment, loyalty relaunch, LTO cadence) continue to gain traction, but the Street is not yet pricing in a guidance raise.

Source: Visible Alpha consensus and actuals data. Baseline as of May 6, 2026 (5 trading days post Q1 2026 earnings).

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: CMG has lagged the S&P 500 since Q1 earnings (+1.6% vs. SPY +4.1% indexed), with the stock caught in a mid-June selloff that erased post-earnings gains — the underperformance is multiple-driven (de-rating from ~35x to ~33x forward P/E) rather than estimate-driven, as revisions have been flat, suggesting sentiment rather than fundamentals is the drag.

CMG vs. SBUX vs. S&P 500 (SPY) — Indexed to 100 at Q1 2026 Earnings (Apr 29, 2026). Sector ETF: SBUX used as a restaurant-sector peer proxy given direct competitive overlap in fast-casual/premium dining. Source: Stock Price Data.

Performance summary (Apr 29 – Jul 28, 2026): CMG +1.6% | SBUX -2.3% | SPY +4.1% (all indexed). CMG rallied ~5–6% in the immediate aftermath of Q1 earnings on the positive transaction growth surprise, but gave back those gains through a mid-June selloff (stock touched ~$28–29 range in early June) before recovering to ~$33–34 by late July. The Morgan Stanley downgrade to Equal-Weight (June 3, PT cut to $37) and broader market rotation weighed on the stock, while the JPMorgan upgrade to Overweight (June 5) provided a partial offset. SBUX has underperformed CMG over the period, reflecting its own turnaround execution risk. The stock currently trades at approximately 33–35x forward P/E — a meaningful discount to its 5-year average of 45–50x — suggesting the market is in “show-me” mode and the multiple is unlikely to re-rate until comp and margin trajectory are more firmly established.

6. Peer Commentaries — Q2 2026 Read-Throughs

Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from the last 60 days paints a mixed but directionally constructive picture for CMG’s Q2: industry traffic remains under pressure but share-gainers (TXRH, MCD, DRI) are posting positive comps, beef inflation is universally flagged as a Q2 peak with H2 relief expected, and the consumer is resilient at premium/value-oriented concepts while the low-income cohort remains stressed. These read-throughs support CMG’s guided ~+1% comp but do not suggest meaningful upside surprise.

Darden Restaurants (DRI) — Q4 FY2026 Earnings (June 25, 2026)

Relevance: DRI is the most directly relevant read-through as it reported its fiscal Q4 (calendar Q2 2026) results on June 25 — the same calendar quarter CMG is reporting. DRI’s results cover the full April–June period.

Shake Shack (SHAK) — Multiple Conferences (June 2–8, 2026)

Relevance: SHAK is a direct fast-casual peer operating in the same calendar Q2 2026 period. Management provided real-time Q2 commentary at TD Cowen (June 2), William Blair (June 4), and Oppenheimer (June 8) conferences.

Starbucks (SBUX) — Bernstein Conference (May 28) & Evercore Conference (June 9, 2026)

Relevance: SBUX is a premium consumer brand in a similar “experience-driven” positioning to CMG, with overlapping younger/millennial demographics. SBUX’s turnaround commentary provides read-through on consumer willingness to pay for premium experiences.

McDonald’s (MCD) — Q1 2026 Earnings (May 7, 2026)

Relevance: MCD is the largest QSR operator and a bellwether for industry traffic trends. Its Q1 2026 results and Q2 commentary cover the April period and provide context on the broader consumer environment.

Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) — Q1 2026 Earnings (May 7, 2026)

Relevance: TXRH is a casual dining share-gainer with strong traffic growth, providing a benchmark for what “good” execution looks like in the current environment.

Wendy’s (WEN) — Q1 2026 Earnings (May 8, 2026)

Relevance: WEN is a QSR burger chain with significant traffic headwinds, providing a cautionary read-through on what happens when value positioning erodes.

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) — Bernstein Conference (May 28, 2026)

Relevance: RBI operates Burger King, Tim Hortons, Popeyes, and Firehouse Subs — a broad QSR read-through on consumer trends across income cohorts and geographies.

7. Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the Morgan Stanley downgrade to Equal-Weight (June 3) — a sentiment headwind that contributed to the mid-June stock selloff — while the JPMorgan upgrade to Overweight (June 5) partially offset it. Operationally, the leadership team is now fully in place with Fernando Machado (Chief Brand Officer) officially starting June 1, which is the key catalyst for accelerating the brand and digital pillars of the “Recipe for Growth” strategy.

8. Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: No open-market buys or discretionary sells by executives or directors since Q1 earnings — the only transactions are routine stock award grants (Form 4 code “A”) to directors at the June 11 annual meeting and one gift/transfer by a director. The absence of any open-market selling by insiders is a mild positive signal; there is nothing here that raises a red flag.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Shares

Date

Note

Baldocchi, Albert S.

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

6,880

Jun 11, 2026

Routine annual director equity grant; not an open-market transaction

Carey, Matt

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

6,880

Jun 11, 2026

Routine annual director equity grant

Filikrushel, Patricia

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

6,880

Jun 11, 2026

Routine annual director equity grant

Fuentes, Laura

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

6,880

Jun 11, 2026

Routine annual director equity grant

Gutierrez, Mauricio

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

6,880

Jun 11, 2026

Routine annual director equity grant

Hickenlooper, Robin S.

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

6,880

Jun 11, 2026

Routine annual director equity grant

Maw, Scott Harlan

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

6,880

Jun 11, 2026

Routine annual director equity grant

Weinstein, Joshua Ian

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

6,880

Jun 11, 2026

Routine annual director equity grant

Winston, Mary A.

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

6,880

Jun 11, 2026

Routine annual director equity grant

Baldocchi, Albert S.

Director

Gift / Transfer (Code G)

6,672

May 20, 2026

Disposition via gift (not an open-market sale); no economic signal

Note: No open-market buys (Form 4 code P) or open-market sales (Form 4 code S) were filed by any CMG insider since the Q1 2026 earnings date (April 29, 2026). All transactions above are routine stock award grants (code A) at the annual meeting or a non-economic gift transfer. No 10b5-1 plan initiations or discretionary sales were identified. The absence of insider selling ahead of earnings is a neutral-to-mild positive signal.

Source: Insider Transaction Data (SEC Form 4 filings).