Earnings Date: July 29, 2026 (After Market Close) Prepared: July 28, 2026 Reporting Period: Q2 2026 (Quarter Ended June 30, 2026)
Key Takeaway: The setup is modestly constructive — management guided Q2 comps to ~+1%, above the flat full-year baseline, and peer commentary confirms the fast-casual consumer held up reasonably well through the quarter; the primary swing factor is whether transaction growth can sustain the positive inflection seen in Q1, or whether beef/avocado cost headwinds compress margins enough to disappoint on EPS.
Heading into Q2 2026, the bar for Chipotle is calibrated but not low: consensus sits at ~+1.4% comps and ~$0.32 adjusted EPS, broadly in line with management's own guidance of "about +1%" for the quarter, leaving limited room for a meaningful upside surprise on the top line without a genuine acceleration in traffic. Management's tone on the Q1 call was the most constructive in several quarters — transactions turned positive for the first time in over a year, the Cilantro Lime Sauce LTO outperformed all prior sauces, and the rewards relaunch drove a ~25% jump in daily enrollees — but the company deliberately maintained a conservative full-year flat comp guide, citing geopolitical uncertainty and a dynamic consumer environment. Estimate revisions have been essentially flat since the Q1 print, with the Street aligned to guidance rather than pricing in upside, which means a beat on comps or a positive traffic read-through would likely be the catalyst for a re-rating. The stock has de-rated sharply over the past year (NTM P/E compressed from ~34x to ~26x over 12 months, down ~28% in price), reflecting a "show-me" sentiment that requires sustained transaction growth to reverse. The single biggest wildcard is the Taco Bell cyclospora outbreak (July 22 news), which briefly weighed on CMG shares (~3.4% decline on the day) as investors feared contagion risk to fresh-ingredient fast-casual broadly — any management commentary on whether this created a traffic tailwind or headwind in late July will be closely watched.
Key Takeaway: Consensus reflects management's own +1% comp guide, making the bar achievable but not easy — transaction growth is the bigger swing factor, as a second consecutive quarter of positive traffic would validate the "Recipe for Growth" thesis, while restaurant-level margin is the secondary risk given mid-single-digit food cost inflation running well above ~1.5% pricing.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change (Est. vs. PY) | Guidance (Q1 Call) | Consensus vs. Guidance |
Revenue ($B) | $3.088B | $3.063B | $3.333B | +8.8% | Implied ~+1% comp + ~350 new units | In line |
Comparable Restaurant Sales (%) | +0.5% | -4.0% | +1.4% | +540 bps YoY | ~+1% | +~40 bps above guide midpoint |
Same-Store Traffic (%) | +0.6% | -4.9% | +0.4% | +530 bps YoY | Positive transactions expected | In line |
Adj. EPS (Diluted, Operating) | $0.240 | $0.330 | $0.320 | -3.0% YoY | No explicit EPS guide | N/A |
Restaurant-Level Operating Margin (%) | 23.7% | 27.4% | 25.0% | -240 bps YoY | Cost of sales ~30%; labor low-25% range; other opex high-14% range | In line with guidance |
New Restaurant Openings (#) | 49 | 61 | 75 | +23% YoY | ~350 for full year | On track |
Digital Sales ($B) | $1.186B (38.6% of sales) | $1.082B (35.3% of sales) | $1.245B | +15.1% YoY | No explicit guide; loyalty penetration expanding | In line |
Sources: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data; CMG Q1 2026 Earnings Call (April 29, 2026). Prior year actuals from Visible Alpha. Q2 2026 consensus as of July 28, 2026.
Quarter | KPI | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q1 2026 | Comp SSS | +0.5% | -0.75% | +125 bps | Beat |
Q1 2026 | Adj. EPS | $0.240 | $0.238 | +0.8% | In Line |
Q4 2025 | Comp SSS | -2.5% | -2.96% | +46 bps | Slight Beat |
Q4 2025 | Adj. EPS | $0.250 | $0.239 | +4.6% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | Comp SSS | +0.3% | +0.51% | -21 bps | Miss |
Q3 2025 | Adj. EPS | $0.290 | $0.286 | +1.4% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | Comp SSS | -4.0% | -2.83% | -117 bps | Miss |
Q2 2025 | Adj. EPS | $0.330 | $0.326 | +1.2% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | Comp SSS | -0.4% | +1.52% | -192 bps | Miss |
Q1 2025 | Adj. EPS | $0.292 | $0.276 | +5.8% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | Comp SSS | +5.4% | +5.62% | -22 bps | In Line |
Q4 2024 | Adj. EPS | $0.250 | $0.245 | +2.0% | Beat |
Q3 2024 | Comp SSS | +6.0% | +6.20% | -20 bps | In Line |
Q3 2024 | Adj. EPS | $0.267 | $0.252 | +5.9% | Beat |
Pattern: CMG has consistently beaten or matched on Adj. EPS over the last 8 quarters; the comp line is more volatile, with three misses concentrated in the traffic-challenged period (Q1–Q2 2025), but Q1 2026 marked a clear positive inflection. The Street has learned to set a low comp bar, which creates asymmetric upside if traffic momentum continues.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: Guidance has not been formally revised since the Q1 2026 earnings call — the full-year flat comp guide stands — but management's tone has shifted meaningfully more constructive, with Q2 guided to ~+1% and the Bernstein conference (May 28) reinforcing confidence in a "mid-single-digit comp" path into 2027; the gap between guidance and actual trends represents deliberate conservatism, not deterioration.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 29) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
Q2 2026 Comp SSS | ~+1% | — | +1.4% | Consensus slightly above guide midpoint; management cited Chipotle Honey Chicken as modest upside driver |
FY 2026 Comp SSS | ~Flat | — | +1.5% | Consensus above guide; management acknowledged trending above flat but maintained conservative baseline citing dynamic consumer environment |
Q2 2026 Cost of Sales | ~30% of sales | — | ~30% (implied) | Avocado, dairy, beef inflation stepping up sequentially; confirmed at Bernstein conference (May 28) |
Q2 2026 Labor Cost | Low-25% range | — | ~25% (implied) | Wage inflation low-single-digit; reinvesting HEAT equipment efficiency gains into hospitality labor |
Q2 2026 Other OpEx | High-14% range | — | ~14-15% (implied) | Marketing in low-3% of sales; delivery and utility costs remain elevated |
Q2 2026 G&A (Non-GAAP) | ~$181M | — | ~$181M | Includes ~$151M underlying G&A + ~$30M non-cash stock comp; no All Managers Conference in Q2 (was Q1) |
FY 2026 New Units | ~350 (80% with Chipotlane) | — | ~354 | On track; pipeline fully built for 2027 at same pace; Middle East delays noted but immaterial to total |
FY 2026 Pricing | 1%–2% range | — | ~1.5% (Q2 step-up) | Deliberate below-inflation pricing strategy; 20–30% discount to fast-casual peers maintained |
FY 2026 Cost of Sales Inflation | ~4% full year; mid-single-digit in H1, low-to-mid in H2 | — | ~4% (in line) | Beef and avocado remain primary headwinds; H2 expected to ease as elevated beef costs are lapped |
Source: CMG Q1 2026 Earnings Call (April 29, 2026); Bernstein 42nd Annual Strategic Decisions Conference (May 28, 2026); Visible Alpha Consensus.
Key Takeaway: Estimates have been essentially flat since the Q1 print — the Street aligned to management's guidance rather than pricing in upside — which means the revision bar is low and any positive comp or traffic surprise could trigger upward revisions; the FY 2026 consensus sits ~$0.006 above the post-Q1 baseline, suggesting minimal incremental optimism has been priced in.
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (May 6, 2026) | Current Consensus (Jul 28, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance (%) |
Revenue — Q2 2026 | $3.329B | $3.333B | +0.1% | Implied ~+1% comp + ~350 units | Unchanged | — | In line |
Comp SSS — Q2 2026 | +1.32% | +1.37% | +4 bps | ~+1% | Unchanged | — | +~37 bps above guide |
Adj. EPS — Q2 2026 | $0.319 | $0.320 | +0.3% | No explicit guide | No explicit guide | — | N/A |
Restaurant-Level Margin — Q2 2026 | 24.99% | 24.99% | Flat | Cost of sales ~30%; labor low-25%; other opex high-14% | Unchanged | — | In line |
Revenue — FY 2026 | $12.969B | $12.986B | +0.1% | ~350 new units + flat comp | Unchanged | — | Consensus implies ~+1.5% comp vs. flat guide |
Comp SSS — FY 2026 | +1.39% | +1.46% | +7 bps | ~Flat | Unchanged | — | +~146 bps above guide |
Adj. EPS — FY 2026 | $1.133 | $1.133 | Flat | No explicit guide | No explicit guide | — | N/A |
Restaurant-Level Margin — FY 2026 | 23.96% | 23.96% | Flat | ~24% implied by cost guidance | Unchanged | — | In line |
The revision picture is remarkably stable: virtually no estimate movement since the Q1 print, with the Street anchored to management's guidance. The FY 2026 comp consensus of ~+1.5% sits ~150 bps above the flat guide, reflecting the Street's view that management is being deliberately conservative. This creates a setup where a Q2 comp beat could catalyze upward FY revisions, while a miss would validate the cautious guide and likely pressure the stock.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data (as-of date May 6, 2026 and July 28, 2026).
Key Takeaway: The stock's ~28% decline over the past 12 months has been driven almost entirely by multiple compression (NTM P/E from ~34.5x to ~26.3x, a ~24% contraction), not earnings deterioration — the market has de-rated CMG from a premium growth story to a "show-me" story, and a sustained return to positive transaction growth is the prerequisite for re-rating.
Since the Q1 2026 earnings print on April 29, 2026, CMG has traded roughly flat to slightly down (~-0.4% over 3 months), underperforming the S&P 500 modestly. The 6-month picture is more telling: the stock is down ~16%, with NTM EV/EBITDA compressing from ~23x to ~19x (-19%), while the 12-month decline of ~28% reflects a ~23% multiple contraction on top of modest earnings estimate cuts. The stock briefly rallied ~5-6% after the Q1 beat (transactions turning positive), but gave back gains as the market awaited confirmation that the traffic inflection was durable. A notable intra-period event was the July 22 cyclospora/Taco Bell news, which dragged CMG ~3.4% lower on sympathy selling despite no direct link to Chipotle's supply chain. The relevant sector ETF for CMG is EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF), which captures the fast-casual and restaurant sub-sector.
Horizon | CMG Price Return | NTM P/E at Start | NTM P/E Now | Multiple Δ | Driver |
1 Month | +0.5% | ~25.9x | ~26.3x | +1.4% | Slight multiple expansion; earnings flat |
3 Months | -0.4% | ~28.2x | ~26.3x | -6.8% | Multiple compression dominant; estimates stable |
6 Months | -15.6% | ~33.2x | ~26.3x | -20.9% | Multiple compression; modest estimate cuts |
12 Months | -28.3% | ~34.5x | ~26.3x | -23.8% | Primarily multiple compression; sentiment de-rating |
Source: Stock Performance Decomposition data as of July 28, 2026. NTM P/E used as primary valuation metric for CMG.
Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the Taco Bell cyclospora outbreak (July 14–22) — while CMG has no direct exposure, the fresh-produce contagion fear briefly weighed on the stock and raises the question of whether any consumer avoidance of fresh-ingredient fast-casual created a headwind or, conversely, whether Chipotle's differentiated sourcing narrative attracted trade-in traffic.
Key Takeaway: No open-market buys or discretionary sells by executives since the Q1 print — the only Form 4 activity consists of routine director equity grants (code A = award/acquisition), which carry no informational signal. The absence of any executive selling is mildly constructive but not a strong signal given the stock's underperformance.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Shares | Date | Note |
Albert S. Baldocchi | Director | Equity Grant (Award) | 6,880 | Jun 11, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award; not a discretionary purchase |
Matt Carey | Director | Equity Grant (Award) | 6,880 | Jun 11, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award |
Patricia Filikrushel | Director | Equity Grant (Award) | 6,880 | Jun 11, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award |
Laura Fuentes | Director | Equity Grant (Award) | 6,880 | Jun 11, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award |
Mauricio Gutierrez | Director | Equity Grant (Award) | 6,880 | Jun 11, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award |
Robin S. Hickenlooper | Director | Equity Grant (Award) | 6,880 | Jun 11, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award |
Scott Harlan Maw | Director | Equity Grant (Award) | 6,880 | Jun 11, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award |
Joshua Ian Weinstein | Director | Equity Grant (Award) | 6,880 | Jun 11, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award |
Mary A. Winston | Director | Equity Grant (Award) | 6,880 | Jun 11, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award |
Albert S. Baldocchi | Director | Disposition (Code G — Gift) | 6,672 | May 20, 2026 | Gift/transfer; not an open-market sale; no informational signal |
No open-market purchases (code P) or discretionary sales (code S) by any CMG executive or director were filed in the May–July 2026 window. All activity consists of routine annual equity grants to non-employee directors and one charitable gift transfer. Nothing notable to flag.
Source: SEC Form 4 Filings Database.
Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from the Q2 2026 period (April–June 2026) paints a nuanced picture: industry-wide QSR traffic was flat and beef costs hit multi-year highs in June, but fast-casual brands with strong value propositions and digital ecosystems (CAVA, DPZ) continued to drive traffic growth — a constructive read-through for CMG's own traffic recovery thesis, though the cost headwinds are real and confirmed by multiple peers.
Note: Only commentary that directly addresses Q2 2026 operating conditions (intra-quarter updates, Q2 actual results, or forward-looking commentary made after Q1 2026 earnings) is included below. Historical peer-quarter results are excluded.
Commentary Type: Q2 2026 intra-quarter outlook provided at Q1 earnings and confirmed at Bernstein conference.
Commentary Type: Intra-Q2 2026 operating update and guidance revision provided at investor conferences.
Commentary Type: Q2 2026 actual results and management commentary on the operating environment.
Theme | Peer Signal | Source | CMG Implication |
Consumer Traffic | QSR industry flat; fast-casual with strong value outperforming | DPZ Q2 call; CAVA Q1 call | Constructive — CMG's value positioning and loyalty relaunch should support above-industry traffic |
Beef Costs | June beef at all-time highs; high-teens inflation; supply not recovering | SHAK (Jun 4 & Jun 8) | Negative — validates CMG's ~30% cost of sales guide; margin risk at high end |
Pricing Environment | Industry restraining price increases; value perception critical | SHAK, DPZ, CAVA | Neutral — CMG's ~1.5% pricing is above DPZ but below inflation; consistent with strategy |
Digital / Loyalty | Digital driving traffic growth above industry; loyalty program enrollment key | SHAK, CAVA, DPZ | Constructive — CMG's rewards relaunch and 38.6% digital mix well-positioned |
Supply Chain / Energy | Fuel surcharges and energy costs rising; 20–40 bps headwind flagged | CAVA Q1 call; SHAK conferences | Negative — Consistent with CMG's "high-14%" other OpEx guide; no surprise |
Lower-Income Consumer | Lower-income cohort outperforming at CAVA; "discount fatigue" driving value-seeking | CAVA Bernstein (May 28) | Constructive — CMG's value gap vs. peers should attract value-conscious consumers |
April Softness / May-June Recovery | April comps soft (-0.6% at SHAK); implied acceleration in May/June | SHAK (Jun 4 & Jun 8) | Constructive — Consistent with CMG's own April step-up from Cilantro Lime Sauce and Honey Chicken launch |
Sources: CAVA Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 19, 2026); CAVA Bernstein 42nd Annual Strategic Decisions Conference (May 28, 2026); Shake Shack William Blair Growth Stock Conference (June 4, 2026); Shake Shack Oppenheimer Consumer Growth and E-Commerce Conference (June 8, 2026); Domino's Pizza Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 20, 2026).