Company | EMCOR Group, Inc. |
Ticker | EME (NYSE) |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026) |
Earnings Date | July 30, 2026 — 10:30 AM ET |
Prepared | July 29, 2026 |
Last Earnings | April 29, 2026 (Q1 2026) |
Key Takeaway: Setup is mixed — the fundamental demand story remains intact and consensus is not a high bar in absolute terms, but the stock has de-rated sharply since Q1 earnings, suggesting the market is pricing in execution risk around the mechanical margin mix-shift and project mobilization pace rather than a revenue miss.
Heading into Q2 2026, EMCOR's bar is manageable: consensus revenue of $4.71B (+9.5% YoY) and operating EPS of $7.27 sit modestly above the prior-year period but well within the trajectory implied by the raised full-year guidance range of $18.5B–$19.25B revenue and $28.25–$29.75 EPS issued on April 29. Management's tone at the June 2 William Blair conference was confident — they noted they "surprised ourselves on the revenue side" in Q1 and updated organic growth guidance to 9%–13% for the full year — suggesting the guidance bar is achievable and the tone has not deteriorated post-Q1. Estimate revisions have been essentially flat since the post-Q1 baseline (2Q revenue up ~$15M, EPS up ~$0.02 from the May 8 baseline), indicating the Street has largely digested the raised guidance without adding incremental cushion. The stock, however, has been a significant underperformer: EME is down roughly 19% since Q1 earnings versus XLI roughly flat and S&P 500 up ~2.5%, driven almost entirely by multiple compression (NTM P/E contracted from ~30x to ~22x over three months) rather than estimate cuts — a setup that could mean a clean print re-rates the stock, but also that the market needs more than just a beat to rebuild conviction. The single biggest wildcard is mechanical segment operating margin: the Q1 step-down to 10.9% (from 11.9% a year ago) due to GMP/cost-plus mix in AI data center geographies was flagged as anticipated, but any further deterioration or management commentary suggesting the mix shift is accelerating could weigh on the stock even if headline numbers beat.
Key Takeaway: Consensus sets a manageable bar on revenue (+9.5% YoY) and EPS (+8.2% YoY), but the bigger swing factor is operating margin — any recovery in mechanical segment margins from Q1’s 10.9% trough would be the positive catalyst, while further deterioration is the key downside risk.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Est. | YoY Change | FY 2026 Guidance | Consensus vs. Guidance Mid |
Revenue ($B) | $4.628B | $4.304B | $4.712B | +9.5% | $18.5B–$19.25B | ~+2.5% vs. mid ($18.875B) |
Adj. EPS (Diluted, Cont.) | $6.84 | $6.72 | $7.27 | +8.2% | $28.25–$29.75 | ~+0.5% vs. mid ($29.00) |
Operating Margin (Adj., %) | 8.73% | 9.65% | 9.29% | -36 bps YoY | "Continued strong margins" (no specific Q2 guide) | N/A — no Q2-specific guidance |
Adj. EBITDA ($M) | $456M | $462M | $487M | +5.4% | N/A — not guided | N/A |
Sources: Visible Alpha consensus and actuals data. All consensus figures as of July 29, 2026. Q1 2026 actuals are the most recently reported quarter. Q2 2025 actuals represent the prior-year comparable period.
Top 2 KPIs: Revenue and Adjusted EPS (Diluted, Continuing Operations)
Quarter | KPI | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q1 2026 | Revenue | $4.628B | $4.197B | +10.3% | Beat |
Q1 2026 | Adj. EPS | $6.84 | $5.91 | +15.7% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | Revenue | $4.513B | $4.288B | +5.2% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | Adj. EPS | $7.19 | $6.67 | +7.8% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | Revenue | $4.302B | $4.289B | +0.3% | In-Line |
Q3 2025 | Adj. EPS | $6.57 | $6.51 | +0.9% | In-Line |
Q2 2025 | Revenue | $4.304B | $4.103B | +4.9% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | Adj. EPS | $6.72 | $5.74 | +17.1% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | Revenue | $3.867B | $3.784B | +2.2% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | Adj. EPS | $5.41 | $4.62 | +17.0% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | Revenue | $3.770B | $3.807B | -1.0% | Miss |
Q4 2024 | Adj. EPS | $6.32 | $5.76 | +9.7% | Beat |
Q3 2024 | Revenue | $3.697B | $3.771B | -2.0% | Miss |
Q3 2024 | Adj. EPS | $5.80 | $4.98 | +16.5% | Beat |
Pattern: EME has beaten EPS consensus in 7 of the last 8 quarters, often by a wide margin (avg. ~12% surprise), while revenue beats have been more mixed — two revenue misses in Q3–Q4 2024 preceded the current strong-beat streak, suggesting the Street has been slow to fully credit the revenue ramp. Source: Visible Alpha consensus and actuals data.
Key Takeaway: Guidance was raised meaningfully at Q1 earnings (April 29) and reaffirmed at the William Blair conference (June 2) with no further changes — tone remains confident, with management noting they "surprised themselves on the revenue side" and updating organic growth to 9%–13%.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 29) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
FY 2026 Revenue | $18.5B – $19.25B | — | $19.00B | Reaffirmed at William Blair (Jun 2); no change to range. Raised from prior guidance at Q1 print. |
FY 2026 Adj. EPS | $28.25 – $29.75 | — | $29.41 | Reaffirmed at William Blair (Jun 2); consensus sits near top of range. Raised from prior guidance at Q1 print. |
FY 2026 Organic Growth | High single to low-to-mid teens (updated from ~9–10% initial) | — | N/A — not tracked by VA | Updated to "9%–13%" at William Blair (Jun 2); management noted volume, demand, and productivity as core drivers. |
FY 2026 Operating Margin | "Continued strong operating margins throughout 2026" — no specific % range given | — | 9.27% | Unchanged; management emphasizes rolling 12–24 month averages over quarterly precision. Margin dollars > margin % framing. |
FY 2026 Cash Flow Conversion | >80% of operating income (or at least equivalent to net income) | — | N/A | Reaffirmed at William Blair (Jun 2): "greater than 80% cash flow conversion this year." |
Key Takeaway: Estimates have been remarkably stable since the post-Q1 baseline — Q2 revenue up only ~$15M and EPS up ~$0.02 since May 8 — suggesting the Street has absorbed the raised guidance without adding incremental cushion. Consensus sits near the top of the EPS guidance range, implying limited room for upward revision but also a well-anchored bar.
KPI (Period) | Estimate (May 8, 2026 — Post-Q1 Baseline) | Current Consensus (Jul 29, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Last Call, Apr 29) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance Mid |
Revenue — Q2 2026 | $4.696B | $4.712B | +0.3% | N/A (FY only) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Revenue — FY 2026 | $18.975B | $18.997B | +0.1% | $18.5B–$19.25B | $18.5B–$19.25B (unchanged) | Unchanged | +0.6% vs. mid ($18.875B) |
Adj. EPS — Q2 2026 | $7.29 | $7.27 | -0.3% | N/A (FY only) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Adj. EPS — FY 2026 | $29.39 | $29.41 | +0.1% | $28.25–$29.75 | $28.25–$29.75 (unchanged) | Unchanged | +1.4% vs. mid ($29.00) |
Source: Visible Alpha consensus and actuals data. Post-Q1 baseline date of May 8, 2026 (approximately 5 trading days after the April 29 earnings release). Revision history data from Visible Alpha weekly consensus series.
The near-zero estimate drift since the post-Q1 baseline is notable: the Street has essentially locked in the raised guidance as the new consensus without adding further upside. This means a clean beat on Q2 revenue and EPS would likely require actual results to exceed the current $4.71B / $7.27 bar, and any positive commentary on mechanical margin recovery or RPO quality could be the incremental catalyst for upward FY revisions.
Key Takeaway: EME’s ~19% decline since Q1 earnings is almost entirely a multiple compression story — NTM P/E contracted from ~30x to ~22x over three months while estimates barely moved — suggesting the market is repricing execution risk and sector rotation rather than deteriorating fundamentals. XLI was roughly flat and SPY gained ~2.5% over the same period, making EME a significant underperformer.
EME vs. XLI vs. S&P 500 — Indexed Performance Since Q1 2026 Earnings (April 29, 2026 = 100)
Date | EME (Indexed) | XLI (Indexed) | SPY (Indexed) |
Apr 29, 2026 (Base) | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
May 6, 2026 | 113.2 | 104.1 | 103.1 |
May 29, 2026 | 99.2 | 101.9 | 106.3 |
Jun 2, 2026 (William Blair Conf.) | 99.3 | 102.5 | 106.7 |
Jun 30, 2026 | 99.6 | 109.0 | 104.9 |
Jul 28, 2026 | 84.7 | 107.4 | 104.1 |
Jul 29, 2026 (Latest) | ~80.7 | ~104.0 | ~102.5 |
Note: Indexed to 100 at April 29, 2026 close (EME: $833.37, XLI: $169.93, SPY: $711.58). XLI (iShares U.S. Industrials ETF) used as the sector benchmark — appropriate given EME’s classification as an engineering & construction company within the Industrials sector. Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance).
Key observations: (1) EME initially surged ~7% on Q1 earnings day (Apr 29→Apr 30) on the large beat and raised guidance, then continued to ~$943 by May 6 (+13% from base). (2) The stock then reversed sharply and has been in a sustained downtrend, underperforming both XLI and SPY by a wide margin. (3) The June 2 William Blair conference provided no re-rating catalyst. (4) The stock accelerated lower in July, falling from ~$830 at June 30 to ~$706 by July 28 — a further ~15% decline in one month. (5) NTM P/E compressed from ~30x (3-month ago) to ~22x currently, while NTM EV/EBITDA compressed from ~20x to ~15x — both driven by price, not estimate cuts.
Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the sustained and accelerating stock de-rating despite no negative fundamental news — the market appears to be pricing in sector rotation out of high-multiple industrials and concern about mechanical margin sustainability, creating a potentially asymmetric setup into the print.
Key Takeaway: All insider activity since Q1 earnings has been open-market sales — no buys — with the cluster of sales immediately following the Q1 earnings print (April 30) likely representing post-blackout discretionary selling at elevated prices near the stock’s recent highs. No 10b5-1 plans were flagged. The absence of any insider buying during the subsequent ~19% stock decline is a mild negative signal, though not alarming given the sales were at much higher prices.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Shares | Transaction Date | Filing Date | Note |
Schwarzwaelder, Steven | Director | Open Market Sale | 5,602 | Apr 30, 2026 | May 4, 2026 | Largest sale in the cluster; discretionary; sold near post-earnings high (~$891). No 10b5-1 plan. |
Nalbandian, Jason R | SVP, CFO, Chief Acct. Officer | Open Market Sale | 800 | Apr 30, 2026 | May 4, 2026 | CFO sale immediately post-earnings; discretionary; no 10b5-1 plan flagged. |
Lind, Robert Peter | VP and Controller | Open Market Sale | 675 | Apr 30, 2026 | May 4, 2026 | Discretionary; no 10b5-1 plan flagged. |
Altmeyer, John W | Director | Open Market Sale | 2,500 | May 1, 2026 | May 5, 2026 | Discretionary; no 10b5-1 plan flagged. |
Reid, William P | Director | Open Market Sale | 2,000 | May 11, 2026 | May 13, 2026 | Discretionary; no 10b5-1 plan flagged. |
Lowe, Carol P | Director | Open Market Sale | 950 | Jun 17, 2026 | Jun 18, 2026 | Most recent sale; stock had already declined ~10% from post-earnings peak; discretionary; no 10b5-1 plan. |
Source: SEC Form 4 filings. All transactions are open-market sales (transaction code S, disposition type D). No open-market purchases were filed in the period. No 10b5-1 plan elections were flagged on any transaction.
Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from the past 60 days is uniformly positive on data center demand — FIX’s record backlog and margin expansion, MTZ’s conviction on the data center cycle, STRL’s scale-up narrative, and DY’s "insatiable" demand language all corroborate EME’s Q2 setup. The one nuance is that labor scarcity is tightening across the industry, which is consistent with EME’s field leadership bottleneck narrative but also means execution risk is real.
Methodology: Only commentary from the past 60 days (on or after May 29, 2026) that addresses contemporaneous Q2 2026 (April–June 2026) or forward conditions is included. Prior-quarter result discussions (e.g., a peer’s Q1 2026 earnings commentary about Q1 results) are excluded. Each peer’s business mix differences from EME are noted.
Read-Through Type: Direct — FIX is a direct mechanical and electrical contractor with significant overlap with EME’s construction segments.
Business Mix Caveat: FIX’s modular operations (17% of YTD revenue) are a larger share of its business than EME’s; FIX is more heavily weighted toward industrial/technology (75% of revenue) vs. EME’s more diversified mix. FIX’s margins (25.9% gross, 17.1% operating) are structurally higher than EME’s due to its modular premium and mix.
Read-Through Type: Direct — Superior Group is a direct electrical infrastructure contractor serving data centers and mission-critical facilities, the same market as EME’s electrical construction segment.
Business Mix Caveat: MTZ’s core business is telecom/utility infrastructure; Superior Group is the data center electrical piece. Superior is "all union" labor, whereas EME operates with a mix. The acquisition commentary reflects MTZ’s strategic conviction rather than current-quarter operating results.
Read-Through Type: Indirect — STRL is primarily a civil/site development contractor that has recently entered electrical services; its data center commentary is relevant to EME’s end market but STRL does not directly compete in mechanical or building services.
Business Mix Caveat: STRL’s electrical business (CSC acquisition) is nascent and capacity-constrained; its core business is heavy civil site development. Margins and contract structures differ materially from EME’s.
Read-Through Type: Indirect — DY is primarily a telecom infrastructure contractor (fiber networks); its Power Solutions segment (90%+ data center) is the most relevant read-through for EME, but DY’s core business model (unit-based pricing, telecom focus) differs materially from EME’s.
Business Mix Caveat: DY’s communications work is unit-priced (per foot/per mile) vs. EME’s fixed-price/GMP construction contracts. DY’s Power Solutions segment is the most comparable piece, but it is a smaller portion of DY’s total revenue. DY’s BEAD program exposure is not relevant to EME.
Read-Through Type: Indirect — TTEK is an engineering and technical services firm (not a direct contractor); its relevance to EME is through shared end markets (water/wastewater, federal infrastructure, data centers at the design/engineering phase).
Business Mix Caveat: TTEK’s business is engineering/consulting services, not direct construction. Margins are structurally different. TTEK’s federal and international exposure is higher than EME’s. The data center read-through is at the design/engineering phase, which precedes EME’s construction phase.
Peer | Date | Read-Through Type | Data Center Signal | Margin Signal | Labor Signal | Net EME Read-Through |
FIX | Jul 24, 2026 | Direct | ⬆️ Very Strong | ⬆️ Expanding | Tight but manageable | Positive |
MTZ (Superior Acq.) | Jul 8, 2026 | Direct | ⬆️ Very Strong | Strong (14–15% EBITDA) | Scarce — key moat | Positive |
STRL | Jun 3, 2026 | Indirect | ⬆️ Very Strong | Improving (new geographies) | Constrained; prefab key | Positive |
DY | Jul 8, 2026 | Indirect | ⬆️ Very Strong | Improving (internal efficiencies) | Constrained; turning away work | Positive |
TTEK | Jul 29, 2026 | Indirect | ⬆️ Strong | Healthy (~14% op. margin) | N/A (engineering services) | Positive (water/infra) |