Diamondback Energy (FANG) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Ticker

FANG (NASDAQ)

Reporting Period

Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026)

Earnings Date

August 4, 2026 — 9:00 AM ET

Prepared

August 2, 2026

Last Earnings

May 4–5, 2026 (Q1 2026)

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: The setup is constructive — consensus is a manageable bar given pre-announced realized oil prices of $96.82/bbl unhedged in Q2, well above Q1’s $73.47/bbl, and the single biggest swing factor is whether FANG’s production volume comes in at or above the guided 515–525 MBO/d range.

Heading into the Q2 2026 print, Diamondback enters with a compelling macro tailwind: the U.S.-Iran conflict drove Brent crude to an average of ~$96.68/bbl in Q2, a 23% sequential jump, and FANG pre-announced unhedged oil realizations of $96.82/bbl (hedged: $94.33/bbl) on July 13 — removing the largest source of revenue uncertainty before the call. Consensus EPS has surged from ~$3.60 at last earnings to $5.96 currently, reflecting the oil price windfall, yet the bar still appears beatable given FANG’s Q1 operational outperformance (production beat, AI/automation-driven downtime reduction) and the company’s stated intent to draw down its DUC backlog in Q2 to support volumes. Management shifted decisively to a “green light” framework on the Q1 call — adding 2–3 rigs and a fifth frack crew — signaling confidence in the macro and operational execution; tone has not wavered since. The stock has recovered from its post-Q1 dip to trade near $203, roughly flat since last earnings (indexed), while XOP has also recovered, suggesting the market is pricing in a solid but not blowout quarter. The key wildcard is natural gas / Waha pricing: Waha basis remained deeply negative in Q2 (FANG pre-announced natural gas realizations of -$2.15/Mcf unhedged), and any commentary on the pace of new pipeline egress capacity coming online in H2 2026 could move the stock more than the headline EPS number.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus is a manageable bar — the pre-announced oil price of $96.82/bbl unhedged removes the biggest revenue uncertainty, and the bigger swing factor is oil production volume vs. the 515–525 MBO/d guidance range.

Table 1 — Current Quarter Snapshot (Q2 2026)

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual

Q2 2025 Actual

Q2 2026 Consensus Est.

YoY Change

Q2 2026 Guidance

Cons. vs. Guidance

Adj. EPS — Diluted ($)

$4.24

$2.69

$5.96

+122% YoY

N/A (no EPS guide)

N/A

Crude Oil Volume (MBO/d)

521.0

495.7

523.5

+5.6% YoY

515–525 MBO/d

+0.5% above midpoint

Total BOE Volume (MBOE/d)

979.4

919.9

979.0

+6.4% YoY

950–990 MBOE/d

-0.1% vs. midpoint

Adj. EBITDA ($B)

$2.70B

$2.31B

$3.59B

+55% YoY

N/A (no EBITDA guide)

N/A

Total Revenue ($B)

$4.24B

$3.68B

$4.90B

+33% YoY

N/A

N/A

Free Cash Flow ($B)

$1.42B

-$0.12B

$2.15B

N/M (prior yr. negative)

N/A

N/A

Capex ($B)

$0.93B

$0.86B

$0.99B

+15% YoY

$925M–$1,025M

-1.0% vs. midpoint

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data; Q2 2026 guidance from Q1 2026 earnings release (May 4, 2026). Adj. EPS = EPS — Diluted — Operating. All consensus figures as of August 2, 2026.

Table 2 — Beat/Miss History (Last 8 Quarters)

Top KPI #1: Crude Oil Volume per Day (MBO/d)

Quarter

Reported

Consensus

Surprise %

Result

Q1 2026

521.0

508.8

+2.4%

BEAT

Q4 2025

512.8

511.4

+0.3%

BEAT

Q3 2025

503.8

499.0

+1.0%

BEAT

Q2 2025

495.7

494.7

+0.2%

BEAT

Q1 2025

475.9

474.6

+0.3%

BEAT

Q4 2024

475.9

474.1

+0.4%

BEAT

Q3 2024

321.1

313.6

+2.4%

BEAT

Top KPI #2: Adjusted EPS — Diluted — Operating ($)

Quarter

Reported

Consensus

Surprise %

Result

Q1 2026

$4.24

$3.60

+17.7%

BEAT

Q4 2025

$1.74

$2.01

-13.4%

MISS

Q3 2025

$3.08

$2.90

+6.0%

BEAT

Q2 2025

$2.69

$2.71

-0.7%

IN LINE

Q1 2025

$4.56

$4.16

+9.5%

BEAT

Q4 2024

$3.64

$3.34

+9.0%

BEAT

Q3 2024

$3.38

$3.99

-15.3%

MISS

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.

Pattern: FANG has beaten crude oil volume consensus in all 7 of the last 7 reported quarters — a near-perfect track record of operational outperformance. On EPS, the record is 5 beats, 1 miss, and 1 in-line over the last 7 quarters; the two misses (Q3 2024, Q4 2025) were commodity-price-driven rather than operational. With oil prices pre-announced well above consensus assumptions, the Q2 2026 EPS bar looks beatable.

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates have surged dramatically since Q1 earnings — Q2 2026 EPS consensus jumped from $5.74 to $5.96 (+3.8%) and FY 2026 EPS from $18.24 to $18.38 (+0.8%) — tracking the oil price windfall. Estimates are running well above the guidance framework on production, suggesting the Street is already pricing in operational outperformance; the gap is a modest cushion, not a risk.

KPI (Period)

Est. at Last Earnings (May 9, 2026)

Current Consensus (Aug 2, 2026)

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Call)

Current Guidance

Cons. vs. Guidance (%)

Adj. EPS — Q2 2026

$5.74

$5.96

+3.8%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Adj. EPS — FY 2026

$18.24

$18.38

+0.8%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Crude Oil Vol. — Q2 2026 (MBO/d)

522.1

523.5

+0.3%

515–525 MBO/d

515–525 MBO/d

+0.5% above midpoint

Crude Oil Vol. — FY 2026 (MBO/d)

523.6

524.8

+0.2%

520+ MBO/d

520+ MBO/d

+0.9% above floor

Adj. EBITDA — Q2 2026 ($B)

$3.69B

$3.59B

-2.8%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Adj. EBITDA — FY 2026 ($B)

$12.88B

$11.32B

-12.1%

N/A

N/A

N/A

FCF — Q2 2026 ($B)

$2.09B

$2.15B

+2.9%

N/A

N/A

N/A

FCF — FY 2026 ($B)

$6.74B

$6.74B

Flat

N/A

N/A

N/A

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. “Est. at Last Earnings” = consensus as of May 9, 2026 (5 trading days post Q1 print). Note: EBITDA FY 2026 consensus decline vs. post-Q1 baseline likely reflects oil price strip volatility in the as-of date comparison; Q2 2026 EBITDA consensus of $3.59B is still +55% YoY.

EPS and production estimates have drifted modestly higher since Q1 earnings, tracking the oil price windfall from the U.S.-Iran conflict. FCF estimates are stable, consistent with the higher capex guidance offset by higher revenues. The EBITDA FY figure reflects strip volatility in the baseline comparison window rather than a fundamental deterioration.

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: FANG is roughly flat since Q1 earnings (May 4 close: $213.69 → July 31 close: $202.99, -5%), underperforming the S&P 500 (+4%) but broadly in line with XOP (-2%), suggesting the stock is tracking commodity sentiment rather than company-specific revisions. The recent recovery from the June lows (~$175) to ~$203 reflects the oil price surge from the Iran conflict escalation in mid-July.

FANG vs. XOP vs. S&P 500 — Indexed to 100 at May 4, 2026 (Q1 2026 Earnings Date). Source: Yahoo Finance / Stock Price Data.

Key events since Q1 earnings: (1) May 4–5: Q1 2026 earnings beat — stock hit 52-week high, then pulled back as oil prices softened in May. (2) June 12: Credit facility amended — $3.0B facility, extended maturity to 2031, lower rates. (3) Late June–early July: Stock declined to ~$172 as oil prices softened and macro uncertainty weighed. (4) July 7–23: Sharp recovery as U.S.-Iran conflict escalated, Brent crossed $100/bbl, and Houthi threats on Saudi tankers opened a second chokepoint. (5) July 13: FANG pre-announced Q2 realized prices ($96.82/bbl unhedged), removing revenue uncertainty. (6) July 27: Stock pulled back ~4% as Trump paused Iran strikes, raising de-escalation hopes.

6. Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The U.S.-Iran war and resulting oil price surge is the dominant development since Q1 earnings — it drove FANG’s Q2 realized oil price to $96.82/bbl (vs. $73.47 in Q1) and is the primary reason consensus EPS has surged ~65% since last earnings. The secondary watch item is the Waha natural gas basis, which remained deeply negative in Q2.

7. Peer Commentary & Read-Throughs

Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from the last 60 days is broadly constructive for FANG’s Q2 print — Occidental’s pre-announced realized oil prices of $96.78/bbl confirm the pricing environment, EOG’s Q2 commodity data validates the macro backdrop, and Devon’s Permian-heavy capex plan signals continued basin activity. The key forward risk flagged by peers is geopolitical de-escalation compressing Q3 oil prices.

Note: Only commentary published June 3–August 2, 2026 that explicitly addresses Q2 2026 conditions or forward Q3/FY2026 outlook is included below. Stale Q1 results discussion has been excluded.

Occidental Petroleum (OXY) — July 10, 2026 (8-K / Reuters)

Read-Through Relevance: HIGH — Direct Q2 2026 realized price confirmation for Permian-focused E&P operators.

EOG Resources (EOG) — July 9, 2026 (8-K)

Read-Through Relevance: HIGH — EOG pre-announced Q2 2026 commodity price data and hedging activity.

Devon Energy (DVN) — June 9, 2026 (Reuters)

Read-Through Relevance: MEDIUM — Post-merger (Coterra) FY 2026 guidance provides Permian basin activity context.

Matador Resources (MTDR) — July 22–23, 2026 (8-K)

Read-Through Relevance: MEDIUM — Permian M&A activity signals basin confidence and potential service cost implications.

Kinder Morgan (KMI) — July 22, 2026 (Earnings)

Read-Through Relevance: MEDIUM — Permian natural gas throughput data and demand outlook.

SLB (SLB) — July 24, 2026 (Earnings)

Read-Through Relevance: LOW-MEDIUM — Oilfield services demand and cost environment.

8. Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: Insider activity since Q1 earnings is entirely sales — no open-market buys. The most notable transaction is a 10M-share sale by 10% owner Lyndal Greth on June 4, which is large in absolute terms but appears to be a discretionary portfolio reduction by a major holder rather than a negative signal on fundamentals. CEO Van’t Hof’s 15,000-share sale on June 3 (discretionary, not 10b5-1) is worth noting but is small relative to his holdings.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Shares

Date

Note

Meloy, Charles Alvin

Director

10b5-1 Planned Sale

83,334

Jun 16, 2026

Indirect (Wolfrock Energy LLC); pre-planned 10b5-1 sale

Plaumann, Mark Lawrence

Director

Open Market Sale

500

Jun 9, 2026

Small discretionary sale; immaterial

Dick, Teresa L.

CAO, EVP, Asst. Secretary

Open Market Sale

5,000

Jun 4, 2026

Discretionary; part of ongoing pattern of periodic sales

Greth, Lyndal

10% Owner

Open Market Sale

10,000,000

Jun 4, 2026

Large block sale by major holder; discretionary; not 10b5-1

Van’t Hof, Matthew Kaes

CEO & Director

Open Market Sale

15,000

Jun 3, 2026

Discretionary; not 10b5-1; retains 133,614 shares post-sale

Zmigrosky, Matt

EVP, Chief Legal & Admin Officer

Open Market Sale

5,000

Jun 3, 2026

Discretionary; not 10b5-1

Dick, Teresa L.

CAO, EVP, Asst. Secretary

Open Market Sale

7,000

Jun 2, 2026

Discretionary; ongoing pattern

Zmigrosky, Matt

EVP, Chief Legal & Admin Officer

Open Market Sale

5,000

Jun 1, 2026

Discretionary; not 10b5-1

Dick, Teresa L.

CAO, EVP, Asst. Secretary

Open Market Sale

5,000

May 19, 2026

Discretionary; ongoing pattern

Barkmann, Albert

EVP & Chief Engineer

Open Market Sale

3,000

May 15, 2026

Discretionary; not 10b5-1

Thompson, Jere W. III

CFO, EVP

Open Market Sale

1,000

May 15, 2026

Small discretionary sale; immaterial

Dick, Teresa L.

CAO, EVP, Asst. Secretary

Open Market Sale

5,000

May 14, 2026

Discretionary; ongoing pattern

Zmigrosky, Matt

EVP, Chief Legal & Admin Officer

Open Market Sale

5,000

May 13, 2026

Discretionary; not 10b5-1

Meloy, Charles Alvin

Director

10b5-1 Planned Sale

7,857

May 7–8, 2026

Indirect (Wolfrock Energy LLC); pre-planned 10b5-1 sale

Source: SEC Form 4 Filings Database.

Assessment: The insider selling pattern is broad-based but not alarming — most transactions are small and consistent with periodic portfolio management. The Greth 10M-share sale is the largest in absolute terms but reflects a major holder reducing a concentrated position, not a fundamental concern. Notably, the CEO’s 15,000-share discretionary sale on June 3 (not 10b5-1) occurred at approximately $210/share, near the post-Q1 high — worth monitoring but not a red flag given his remaining 133,614-share position.

No open-market buys were recorded in the period. The absence of insider buying despite the stock’s pullback from ~$213 to ~$172 in June is a mild negative signal, though management’s stated preference for debt reduction over buybacks (including of their own shares) provides context.