Ticker | FRT | Earnings Date | July 31, 2026 (Pre-Market) |
Sector | REIT – Retail | Prepared | July 30, 2026 |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (ended June 30, 2026) | Conference Call | July 31, 2026 at 9:00 AM ET |
Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 is a moderate beat, with consensus at $1.856 Core FFO/share sitting just above management’s $1.83–$1.86 guidance midpoint — the biggest swing factor is whether the Q1 timing pull-forward creates a tougher comp or whether operational momentum (leasing, occupancy, ancillary income) offsets the known refinancing drag and Blair lease-up headwind.
Heading into Q2 2026 results, the bar for FRT is calibrated but not demanding: consensus Core FFO of $1.856/share sits at the top of management’s $1.83–$1.86 guidance range, implying the Street is already pricing in a clean quarter but not a blowout. Management explicitly flagged two known headwinds — a ~$0.01 refinancing drag from the repaid 1.25% notes and early-stage Blair lease-up dilution — while seasonal tailwinds (less weather disruption vs. Q1) and a robust signed-not-occupied pipeline of $36M in incremental rent provide a natural offset. Estimate revisions have been remarkably stable since the Q1 print, drifting only fractionally lower from $1.855 to $1.856 (effectively flat), suggesting the Street has fully digested guidance and is not pricing in incremental upside. The stock has rallied ~8% since the Q1 earnings date and trades at ~17.9x NTM EV/EBITDA, a meaningful re-rating that reflects growing confidence in the Q4 contractual step-up and 2027 acceleration — meaning the stock has already priced in a solid print, and a miss on comparable POI growth (guided to dip into the low-2% range in Q2) could disappoint even if FFO is in-line. The key wildcard is same-store NOI: peers KRG and REG both reported Q2 same-property NOI growth of 3.7–3.8%, well above their own guidance, and if FRT’s comparable POI similarly surprises to the upside (management guided “closer to 2” on a GAAP basis), that would be the single most powerful catalyst for a positive stock reaction.
Key Takeaway: Consensus Core FFO of $1.856/share sits at the top of management’s guidance range — a clean but not heroic bar. Same-store NOI growth is the bigger swing factor: management guided “closer to 2%” GAAP for Q2, but peers are printing 3.7–3.8%, making any upside surprise here the most likely driver of a positive stock reaction.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual | Q2 2026 Consensus | YoY Change | Mgmt Guidance (Q2) | Cons. vs. Guidance Midpoint |
Core FFO per Share – Diluted ($) | $1.88 | $1.806 | $1.856 | +2.8% YoY | $1.83–$1.86 | +0.3% vs. $1.845 mid |
Same-Store NOI Growth (%) | 4.7% | 4.5% | 4.5% | Flat YoY | “Closer to 2%” GAAP | Cons. well above guidance |
Commercial Occupancy (%) | 93.8% | 93.6% | 93.8% | +20 bps YoY | Mid-to-upper 93% range | In-line with guidance |
Commercial Leased Rate (%) | 96.1% | 95.4% | 96.0% | +60 bps YoY | Held firm ~96% | In-line with guidance |
Lease Rollover Markups – Cash (%) | 13% | 10% | 11.4% | +140 bps YoY | No specific guidance | N/A |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data; FRT Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 1, 2026); FRT 2026 Investor Day (May 21, 2026).
Quarter | Reported ($) | Consensus ($) | Surprise (%) | Result |
Q1 2026 | 1.88 | 1.820 | +3.3% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | 1.84 | 1.857 | -0.9% | Miss |
Q3 2025 | 1.767 | 1.764 | +0.2% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | 1.806 | 1.725 | +4.7% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | 1.70 | 1.691 | +0.5% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | 1.728 | 1.737 | -0.5% | Miss |
Q3 2024 | 1.707 | 1.716 | -0.5% | Miss |
Q2 2024 | 1.689 | 1.679 | +0.6% | Beat |
Pattern: FRT has beaten Core FFO consensus in 5 of the last 8 quarters, with the two largest beats (+3.3% in Q1 2026 and +4.7% in Q2 2025) driven by operational outperformance and timing pull-forwards; the three misses were narrow (−1% or less), suggesting the Street tends to underestimate FRT in strong leasing environments.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Quarter | Reported (%) | Consensus (%) | Surprise (bps) | Result |
Q1 2026 | 4.7% | 5.3% | -60 bps | Miss vs. Cons. |
Q4 2025 | 2.8% | 4.2% | -140 bps | Miss vs. Cons. |
Q3 2025 | 4.4% | 3.2% | +120 bps | Beat |
Q2 2025 | 4.5% | 2.2% | +230 bps | Beat |
Q1 2025 | 2.6% | 3.7% | -110 bps | Miss vs. Cons. |
Q4 2024 | 3.8% | 5.9% | -210 bps | Miss vs. Cons. |
Q3 2024 | 2.0% | 4.7% | -270 bps | Miss vs. Cons. |
Q2 2024 | 2.3% | 3.0% | -70 bps | Miss vs. Cons. |
Pattern: The Street has consistently set an overly optimistic bar for same-store NOI growth — FRT has missed consensus on this metric in 6 of the last 8 quarters. However, the two beats (Q2 and Q3 2025) were large, suggesting the metric is lumpy and management guidance is a better anchor than consensus. With management guiding Q2 2026 to “closer to 2%” GAAP, the current consensus of 4.5% appears materially above guidance and represents a key risk to the downside on this line.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: Guidance was raised and tightened at Q1 earnings (May 1) and reaffirmed at Investor Day (May 21) — no post-Investor Day revisions. Tone is constructive: management is confident in the Q4 contractual step-up and 2027 acceleration, while being explicitly conservative on Q2/Q3 comparable POI given known timing headwinds.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, May 1) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
FY2026 Core FFO/Share | $7.46–$7.55 (raised from $7.43–$7.51) | — | $7.525 | Reaffirmed at Investor Day (May 21); midpoint implies 6.3% growth vs. 2025 |
Q2 2026 Core FFO/Share | $1.83–$1.86 | — | $1.856 | Consensus at top of range; ~$0.01 refinancing drag + Blair lease-up headwind flagged |
Q3 2026 Core FFO/Share | $1.84–$1.87 | — | N/A (not separately tracked) | Q4 expected to step up to low-to-mid $1.90s, driven by contractual occupancy growth |
FY2026 Comparable POI Growth | 3.125%–3.625% (raised from 3.0%–3.5%) | — | 3.05% | Q2/Q3 guided to dip to “closer to 2%” GAAP; Q4 expected to rebound to 3.5%–4.0% |
Commercial Occupancy (Year-End) | Mid-to-upper 94% range by Q4 | — | 94.2% (FY2026 avg.) | Q2/Q3 expected to hold ~93.8%; spike in Q4 powered by already-signed leases |
Term Fees (FY2026) | $8M–$9M | — | N/A | ↑ Raised at Q1 earnings from prior range; strong leasing leverage over underperforming tenants |
Incremental Redevelopment POI (FY2026) | $14M–$15M | — | N/A | ↑ Raised at Q1 earnings; tenants opening sooner than forecast |
Source: FRT Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 1, 2026); FRT 2026 Investor Day (May 21, 2026); Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: Estimates for both Q2 and FY2026 Core FFO have been remarkably stable since the Q1 print — drifting only ~$0.001 lower over 12 weeks — indicating the Street has fully absorbed guidance and is not pricing in incremental upside or downside. The gap between consensus same-store NOI (4.5%) and management guidance (“closer to 2%”) is the most notable divergence and represents the key risk to the downside if management’s more conservative view proves correct.
KPI (Period) | Estimate (5/8/26, Post-Q1 Baseline) | Current Estimate (7/30/26) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Cons. vs. Guidance Mid |
Core FFO/Share – Q2 2026 | $1.855 | $1.856 | +0.1% | $1.83–$1.86 | Unchanged | — | +0.3% vs. $1.845 mid |
Core FFO/Share – FY2026 | $7.525 | $7.525 | Flat | $7.46–$7.55 | Unchanged | — | +0.3% vs. $7.505 mid |
Same-Store NOI Growth – Q2 2026 | 4.54% | 4.55% | +0.1% | “Closer to 2%” GAAP | Unchanged | — | ~250 bps above guidance mid |
Same-Store NOI Growth – FY2026 | 3.05% | 3.05% | Flat | 3.125%–3.625% | Unchanged | — | -32 bps vs. 3.375% mid |
Commercial Occupancy – Q2 2026 | 93.87% | 93.79% | -0.1% | Mid-to-upper 93% | Unchanged | — | In-line |
The most notable divergence is on same-store NOI: consensus at 4.5% for Q2 is roughly 250 bps above management’s explicit guidance of “closer to 2%” on a GAAP basis. This gap likely reflects the Street anchoring to the strong Q1 print (4.7%) rather than management’s forward commentary. If management’s guidance proves accurate, same-store NOI will be a headline miss — though FFO may still land in-line given the metric’s lower direct impact on reported earnings.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data; FRT Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 1, 2026).
Key Takeaway: FRT has outperformed both the REIT sector (IYR) and the S&P 500 since Q1 earnings, driven almost entirely by multiple expansion (EV/EBITDA re-rated from ~15.9x to ~17.9x over 6 months) rather than estimate revisions, which have been flat. The stock’s +7.6% gain since May 1 vs. IYR’s +4.6% and SPY’s +2.9% reflects growing investor confidence in the Q4 contractual step-up and 2027 acceleration narrative.
[Image not found: gs://implied-user-data-prod/conversations/yhua@lumosity.ai/projects/_default/history/c2de6f48-3b97-433e-8bec-fbc3685bf2c4/plotly_charts/frt_stock_performance.json]
FRT vs. IYR (REIT ETF) vs. S&P 500 — Indexed to 100 at May 1, 2026 (Q1 2026 Earnings Date). Source: Yahoo Finance.
Note: Chart uses IYR (iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF) as the sector benchmark, which is appropriate for FRT’s retail REIT sub-sector. All three series indexed to 100 at May 1, 2026 (Q1 2026 earnings date). FRT closed at $115.32 on May 1 and $125.78 on July 29, a gain of +9.1% over the period. IYR gained +4.5% (102.36 → 107.01) and SPY gained +1.2% (720.65 → 729.46) over the same window.
Series | May 1, 2026 Close | July 29, 2026 Close | Return Since Q1 Earnings |
FRT | $115.32 | $125.78 | +9.1% |
IYR (REIT ETF) | $102.36 | $107.01 | +4.5% |
S&P 500 (SPY) | $720.65 | $729.46 | +1.2% |
Key events since Q1 earnings: The stock’s most notable move was a sharp rally around the May 21 Investor Day, where management presented a multi-year FFO growth framework of 5%–7.5% for 2027–2028 and a $1.4B acquisition pipeline. The stock also benefited from broader REIT sector strength in mid-July as rate expectations shifted. The stock has given back a small amount in the final days of July ahead of the print.
Source: Yahoo Finance (Stock Price Data).
Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings was the May 21 Investor Day, where management laid out a compelling multi-year growth framework and a $1.4B acquisition pipeline — this was the primary catalyst for the stock’s re-rating. No negative developments have emerged; the macro backdrop (K-shaped consumer, low retail supply) remains supportive.
Key Takeaway: All three retail REIT peers that have reported Q2 2026 results (REG, KRG, PECO) delivered strong same-property NOI growth of 3.7–3.8% and raised full-year guidance — a broadly positive read-through for FRT. The common themes are healthy tenant demand, low supply, strong rent spreads, and better-than-expected bad debt. The key question is whether FRT’s comparable POI, guided to “closer to 2%” GAAP, will similarly surprise to the upside as peers did.
Note on peer selection: Only Q2 2026 operational commentary and forward outlook from peers that have already reported is included below. Prior-quarter results and commentary about prior periods are excluded.
Overall Read-Through: Positive.
Overall Read-Through: Positive.
Overall Read-Through: Positive.
Key Takeaway: No open-market buys or sells by FRT insiders in the last 60 days. The only Form 4 activity was estate planning transfers (gift code “G”) by CEO Donald Wood and Director Thomas McEachin in early June — these are non-economic transfers to revocable trusts with no change in beneficial control. No insider selling signal; the absence of open-market activity is neutral.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Shares | Value | Date | Note |
Donald C. Wood | CEO & President | Gift (Estate Planning Transfer) | 37,038 | $0 (non-economic) | June 3, 2026 | Transfer of directly-held shares to personal revocable trust; Wood retains sole control as trustee and beneficiary. Not a sale. Not a 10b5-1 plan. |
Thomas McEachin | Director | Gift (Estate Planning Transfer) | 1,339 | $0 (non-economic) | June 3, 2026 | Transfer of directly-held shares to personal living trust; McEachin and wife are sole trustees and beneficiaries. Not a sale. Not a 10b5-1 plan. |
No open-market purchases (Form 4 code “P”) or open-market sales (Form 4 code “S”) were identified for FRT insiders in the 60-day window prior to July 30, 2026. The two Form 4 filings identified are estate planning transfers (code “G”) with no economic significance — beneficial ownership and voting control are unchanged. There are no 10b5-1 plan initiations or discretionary sales to flag.
Source: SEC Form 4 filings (EDGAR).
Metric | Current (NTM) | 3 Months Ago | 6 Months Ago | 12 Months Ago |
EV / EBITDA (NTM) | 17.9x | 17.0x | 15.9x | 15.4x |
Price / Earnings (NTM) | 34.6x | 36.0x | 32.9x | 28.9x |
Price / Book Value (NTM) | 3.73x | 3.39x | 3.05x | 2.82x |
Stock Price (July 29, 2026) | $125.78 | — | — | — |
12-Month Price Return | +30.9% | — | — | — |
The 12-month re-rating from 15.4x to 17.9x EV/EBITDA (+16%) has been the primary driver of FRT’s +30.9% total return over the past year, with estimate revisions contributing minimally. At 17.9x NTM EV/EBITDA, FRT trades at a premium to the retail REIT peer group, reflecting its high-quality coastal portfolio, record leasing momentum, and the embedded growth from the signed-not-open pipeline. A miss on Q2 comparable POI growth could pressure the multiple, while a beat would validate the premium.
Source: Stock Performance Decomposition Data (Implied Platform).