Company | Fortive Corporation (FTV) |
Upcoming Earnings Date | Q2 2026 (expected late July / early August 2026) |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026) |
Prepared | July 28, 2026 |
Last Earnings | Q1 2026 — April 30, 2026 |
Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 2026 is constructive — consensus sits at a manageable bar (~$0.45 adj. EPS, ~$1.07B revenue), management guided Q2 EPS to be "broadly similar" to Q1's $0.47 beat, and April was described as tracking "nicely aligned with expectations" at the May Wolfe conference. The biggest swing factor is whether AHS healthcare capital demand continues its sequential recovery as the company laps the Q2 2025 trough.
Heading into Q2 2026, Fortive's setup is modestly favorable: consensus EPS of ~$0.45 sits below management's own implied guide of "broadly similar" to Q1's $0.47 actual, creating a low bar that the company should clear absent a macro shock. Management's tone at the May 19 Wolfe Research conference was notably upbeat — CEO Soroye confirmed April came in "strong" and the company remains "firmly on track" with its full-year framework — suggesting no deterioration in business momentum since the April 30 print. Estimate revisions have been stable-to-slightly-lower since Q1 earnings (FY2026 adj. EPS consensus ~$3.00, essentially flat since the print), consistent with a reaffirm-not-raise posture that leaves room for a modest beat. The stock has lagged XLI since Q1 earnings (+7% vs. XLI +4.5% on an indexed basis), suggesting the market has not fully priced in execution of the Fortive Accelerated strategy. The key wildcard is AHS healthcare capital equipment demand: management noted "modest sequential improvement" since Q2 2025 and expects favorable year-over-year comparisons beginning in Q2 2026 as the company laps the healthcare reimbursement policy headwind — a positive inflection here could be the catalyst for a guidance raise.
Key Takeaway: Consensus sets a low-to-moderate bar across all key metrics — adj. EPS of ~$0.45 is below management's implied guide of "broadly similar" to Q1's $0.47 actual. IOS organic growth (~4.0%) is the bigger swing factor; AHS organic growth (~2.8%) is the secondary watch item given the healthcare capex recovery narrative.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change | Guidance | Consensus vs. Guidance |
Revenue (Total) | $1,069M | $1,016M | $1,070M | +5.3% YoY | ~$4.3B FY2026 (~$1.07B implied Q2) | ~0% vs. implied midpoint |
Adj. EPS (Diluted — Operating) | $0.695 | $0.580 | $0.708 | +22.0% YoY | "Broadly similar to Q1" (~$0.47 adj. EPS basis) | Consensus ~in-line with guide |
IOS Revenue | $743M | $697M | $737M | +5.7% YoY | No explicit Q2 segment guide | N/A |
AHS Revenue | $326M | $320M | $333M | +4.1% YoY | No explicit Q2 segment guide | N/A |
IOS Organic Growth | +5.2% | -0.2% | ~+4.0% | +420 bps YoY | Upper end of 2–3% FY range | Above FY guide midpoint |
AHS Organic Growth | +5.8% | -1.9% | ~+2.8% | +470 bps YoY | Upper end of 2–3% FY range | Above FY guide midpoint |
Adj. EBITDA Margin | 29.3% | 28.4% | ~29.6% | +120 bps YoY | 50–100 bps annual expansion | Tracking above FY target |
Free Cash Flow | $194M | $180M | ~$75M | -58% YoY (Q2 typically light) | ~$1B FY2026 | N/A (Q2 seasonally low) |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data
Quarter | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q2 2024 | $0.589 | $0.597 | -1.3% | Miss |
Q3 2024 | $0.685 | $0.570 | +20.2% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | $0.905 | $0.844 | +7.2% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | $0.554 | $0.849 | -34.7% (Ralliant spin impact) | N/A (spin-off period) |
Q2 2025 | $0.580 | $0.597 | -2.8% | Miss |
Q3 2025 | $0.685 | $0.570 | +20.2% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $0.905 | $0.844 | +7.2% | Beat |
Q1 2026 | $0.695 | $0.655 | +6.1% | Beat |
Quarter | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q2 2024 | $1,016M | $1,011M | +0.5% | In-Line / Slight Beat |
Q3 2024 | $1,004M | $1,008M | -0.4% | Slight Miss |
Q4 2024 | $1,073M | $1,093M | -1.8% | Miss |
Q1 2025 | $993M | $1,496M | N/A (Ralliant spin) | N/A (spin-off period) |
Q2 2025 | $1,016M | $1,011M | +0.5% | In-Line / Slight Beat |
Q3 2025 | $1,027M | $1,008M | +1.9% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $1,123M | $1,093M | +2.7% | Beat |
Q1 2026 | $1,069M | $1,045M | +2.3% | Beat |
Pattern: FTV has beaten on adj. EPS in 3 of the last 3 comparable quarters as New Fortive (Q3 2025, Q4 2025, Q1 2026), with an average beat of ~+11% on EPS. Revenue beats have been more modest (+1–2%), consistent with management's conservative guidance posture.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data
Key Takeaway: Guidance is unchanged since Q1 earnings — FY2026 adj. EPS reaffirmed at $2.90–$3.00, with management signaling results are trending toward the upper half. The May Wolfe conference provided a positive intra-quarter update (April tracking well), but no formal guidance revision. Tone is constructively confident without being aggressive.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings — Apr 30) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
FY2026 Adj. EPS | $2.90–$3.00; trending toward upper half | — | $2.99 | Unchanged; May Wolfe confirmed "firmly on track" |
FY2026 Revenue | ~$4.3B | — | $4.34B | Unchanged; FX/M&A ~150 bps tailwind in Q2, moderating to 50–100 bps in H2 |
FY2026 Core Growth | 2–3%; trending toward upper end | — | ~3.5% implied | Strong order patterns cited; upper end of range increasingly likely |
Q2 2026 Adj. EPS | "Broadly similar to Q1" (~$0.47 adj. basis) | — | $0.45 | Consensus slightly below guide; easier comp + FX/M&A tailwind of ~150 bps |
Adj. EBITDA Margin | 50–100 bps annual expansion | — | ~30.1% FY2026 | Unchanged; corporate cost line running below prior guide (~$27M/qtr vs. $125–130M/yr prior) |
Tariff Impact | Gross margin headwind; fully countermeasured at bottom line; dissipates partway through Q3 | — | N/A | Q2 still carries tariff gross margin drag; full countermeasure lapping expected mid-Q3 |
Q4 2026 Selling Days | 4 fewer YoY days = $15–20M revenue headwind | — | N/A | Q2 does not have the Q1 selling-day tailwind; normalized growth broadly in line with Q4 2025 |
Key Takeaway: Estimates have been remarkably stable since Q1 earnings — FY2026 adj. EPS consensus of ~$2.99 is essentially flat vs. the post-Q1 baseline of ~$2.99, and Q2 EPS consensus of ~$0.45 is slightly below management's implied guide. This stability reflects management's reaffirm-not-raise posture and leaves room for a modest beat-and-raise at Q2 results.
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (May 7, 2026) | Current Consensus (Jul 28, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Earnings Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance (%) |
Adj. EPS — Q2 2026 | $0.707 | $0.708 | +0.1% | "Broadly similar to Q1" (~$0.47 adj. basis) | Unchanged | — | Consensus ~in-line with guide |
Revenue — Q2 2026 | $1,069M | $1,070M | +0.1% | ~$4.3B FY implied ~$1.07B Q2 | Unchanged | — | ~0% vs. implied midpoint |
Adj. EPS — FY2026 | $2.992 | $2.999 | +0.2% | $2.90–$3.00; upper half | Unchanged | — | Consensus at top of range |
Revenue — FY2026 | $4,334M | $4,338M | +0.1% | ~$4.3B | Unchanged | — | ~+0.9% above guide midpoint |
Adj. EBITDA Margin — Q2 2026 | 29.68% | 29.57% | -0.1 pp | 50–100 bps annual expansion | Unchanged | — | Tracking above FY target |
Adj. EBITDA Margin — FY2026 | 30.24% | 30.08% | -0.2 pp | 50–100 bps annual expansion | Unchanged | — | Tracking above FY target |
Estimates have been essentially flat since Q1 earnings, with no meaningful revision in either direction. Consensus FY2026 adj. EPS of $2.99 sits at the very top of management's $2.90–$3.00 guidance range, implying the Street expects a beat-and-raise scenario at Q2 results. The gap between Q2 consensus EPS (~$0.45 on a comparable basis) and management's implied guide (~$0.47) represents a modest cushion for a beat.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data
Key Takeaway: FTV has outperformed the S&P 500 (+7.2% vs. SPY +3.1%) but lagged XLI (+4.5%) since Q1 earnings on April 30, 2026. The move has been driven primarily by multiple expansion (EV/EBITDA expanded from ~15.5x to ~16.5x over 6 months) rather than estimate revisions, suggesting the market is beginning to re-rate the stock on execution of the Fortive Accelerated strategy — but the re-rating remains incomplete relative to the quality of the business model.
FTV vs. XLI vs. S&P 500 — Indexed Performance Since Q1 2026 Earnings (April 30, 2026). Source: Yahoo Finance / Stock Price Data.
Since Q1 2026 earnings on April 30, FTV has delivered a total return of approximately +7.2% (indexed to 100 at earnings date), outpacing the S&P 500 (+3.1%) but lagging the XLI Industrials ETF (+4.5%). The stock initially traded sideways through mid-May as the market digested the reaffirm-not-raise guidance posture, then re-accelerated in late June and July as industrial sentiment improved broadly. The 12-month performance of +24.4% has been driven by a combination of earnings growth (~18% adj. EPS growth) and modest multiple expansion (NTM P/E from ~18.9x to ~20.1x), with the stock now trading at 20.1x NTM EPS — still a discount to high-quality industrial peers, suggesting further re-rating potential if Q2 results confirm the growth acceleration thesis.
Valuation Context: FTV currently trades at 16.5x NTM EV/EBITDA and 20.1x NTM P/E. The 6-month multiple expansion of ~+6.4% on EV/EBITDA reflects growing confidence in the Fortive Accelerated strategy, but the stock remains at a discount to the quality of its recurring revenue base (~50% of revenue) and margin profile (30%+ adj. EBITDA margins).
Source: Yahoo Finance Stock Price Data; Visible Alpha Consensus Data
Key Takeaway: The most important post-Q1 development is the $1.1B notes offering completed May 14 to refinance debt at favorable rates, which reduces interest expense risk and supports the buyback program. Management's May 19 Wolfe conference commentary confirming April momentum is the key positive read-through for Q2.
Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from Q2 2026 earnings reports (Teledyne, Danaher, Xylem, Rockwell) is broadly constructive for FTV's Q2 setup: industrial short-cycle demand is inflecting to mid-single-digit growth, healthcare markets are recovering, and margin expansion is achievable. The most relevant read-through is Danaher's confirmation that industrial inspection and healthcare markets "began to inflect" in Q2, directly supporting FTV's AHS recovery narrative.
Note: Only commentary from peers' Q2 2026 earnings calls and post-Q1 2026 conferences (May–July 2026) is included below. Prior-quarter retrospective commentary has been excluded.
Relevance to FTV: High — TDY's instrumentation, industrial vision, and healthcare segments overlap with FTV's IOS and AHS end markets.
Relevance to FTV: High — DHR's life sciences, diagnostics, and industrial filtration businesses share end markets with FTV's AHS segment and IOS industrial businesses.
Relevance to FTV: Moderate — XYL's industrial end markets and data center exposure provide read-through for FTV's IOS segment; less direct overlap with AHS.
Relevance to FTV: Moderate — ROK's industrial automation end markets overlap with FTV's IOS segment; ROK's software/control commentary is relevant to FTV's FAL software businesses.
Key Takeaway: Only one open-market transaction was filed in the post-Q1 window — a discretionary open-market sale by the Chief Legal Officer on May 4, 2026. No open-market buys were filed. The absence of clustered buying or unusual selling activity is neutral; the single sale is not a meaningful signal given its discretionary nature and the CLO's remaining position of 87,780 shares.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Shares | Date | Note |
Peter C. Underwood | SVP — Chief Legal Officer | Open Market Sale | 47,557 shares | May 4, 2026 | Discretionary sale (not 10b5-1 plan); 87,780 shares retained post-sale. Filed May 6, 2026. |
No open-market purchases were filed by any insider in the April 30 – July 28, 2026 window. The single sale by the CLO is not unusual in size relative to his remaining position and does not represent a meaningful negative signal. The absence of insider buying is neutral given the stock's +7% post-earnings performance.
Source: SEC Form 4 Filings Database