General Dynamics Corporation (GD) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

General Dynamics Corporation

Ticker

GD (NYSE)

Reporting Period

Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026)

Earnings Date

July 29, 2026 — Before Market Open

Last Earnings

April 29, 2026 (Q1 2026)

Prepared

July 28, 2026

Sector ETF Benchmark

ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF)

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: Setup favors a beat — consensus is a manageable bar after Q1’s massive outperformance, management raised FY2026 EPS guidance to $16.45–$16.55, and the biggest swing factor is whether Marine Systems throughput continues its Q1 momentum into Q2.

General Dynamics heads into Q2 2026 earnings with consensus expecting $3.98 EPS on $13.55B in revenue — a deliberately modest bar set against a Q1 print that beat by $0.43/share and $780M in revenue, the largest beat in recent memory. Management guided Q2 deliveries to be “very similar” to Q1’s record 38 aircraft, and explicitly flagged that Q2 and Q3 would trail Q1 and Q4 on mix, providing a clear framework that keeps the bar achievable. Estimate revisions have drifted modestly higher since the April 29 print — Q2 EPS consensus moved from $3.93 to $3.98 — suggesting the Street is cautiously building in continued momentum without fully extrapolating Q1’s exceptional cash conversion (174% in Q1). The stock has rallied ~16% since Q1 earnings, outpacing ITA (+15%) and the S&P 500 (+4%), so some beat is already priced in, but the multiple remains reasonable relative to defense peers given the record $131B backlog and multi-year submarine ramp. The single biggest wildcard is Aerospace margin durability: management called Q1’s 15% Aerospace operating margin “durable,” but Q2 mix is expected to shift slightly, and any tariff headwind or Middle East supply chain disruption on G280 components from Israel could pressure the segment and reset expectations for the back half.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus is a low-to-moderate bar across all four segments after Q1’s broad-based beat; Marine Systems revenue ($4.37B consensus vs. $4.34B actual in Q1) is the biggest swing factor given the throughput ramp story, while Aerospace margin is the key qualitative read.

Table 1 — Q2 2026 Current Quarter Snapshot (All Key KPIs)

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual (Last Qtr)

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year)

Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate

YoY Change

Guidance

Consensus vs. Guidance

Total Revenue ($B)

$13.48B

$13.04B

$13.55B

+3.9% YoY

No explicit Q2 guidance; FY2026 implied ~$55.5B

N/A (no Q2 rev. guidance)

EPS — Diluted Operating ($)

$4.10

$3.74

$3.98

+6.4% YoY

FY2026: $16.45–$16.55 (midpoint $16.50)

FY consensus $16.77 vs. guidance midpoint $16.50; +1.6% above

Operating Margin (%)

10.53%

10.01%

10.20%

+19 bps YoY

FY2026: ~10.4% (implied)

~In line with FY guidance

Revenue — Aerospace ($B)

$3.28B

$3.06B

$3.31B

+8.2% YoY

Q2 deliveries “very similar” to Q1 (38 aircraft)

N/A (no segment rev. guidance)

Aerospace Op. Income ($M)

$493M

$403M

$458M

+13.6% YoY

Margins “durable”; some Q2/Q3 mix headwind expected

N/A

Revenue — Marine Systems ($B)

$4.34B

$4.22B

$4.37B

+3.6% YoY

Throughput ramp ongoing; Columbia on track

N/A

Marine Op. Income ($M)

$316M

$291M

$316M

+8.6% YoY

Productivity improvements ongoing

N/A

Revenue — Combat Systems ($B)

$2.28B

$2.28B

$2.36B

+3.5% YoY

European orders converting; munitions growth

N/A

Combat Systems Op. Income ($M)

$310M

$324M

$327M

+0.9% YoY

Margins stable ~13.5–14%

N/A

Revenue — Technologies ($B)

$3.58B

$3.48B

$3.49B

+0.3% YoY

Mission Systems leading; GDIT backlog +5% vs. YE2025

N/A

Technologies Op. Income ($M)

$339M

$332M

$323M

-2.7% YoY

Mission Systems mix shift to differentiated programs

N/A

Free Cash Flow ($B)

$1.95B (174% conversion)

$1.40B

$0.65B

-53.6% YoY

Q1 was largest FCF quarter; Q2–Q4 positive but lower

N/A

Backlog ($B)

$131.0B

$103.7B

$127.9B

+23.3% YoY

Record backlog; continued order momentum expected

N/A

Book-to-Bill (x)

2.0x

2.15x

0.78x

Normalization expected after Q1 surge

Trailing 12-month B2B remains well above 1x

N/A

Pattern: GD has beaten revenue consensus in 6 of the last 8 quarters and EPS in 6 of 8, with the two misses both occurring in Q2–Q3 2024 when Marine Systems throughput was most constrained. The consistent beat cadence since Q4 2024 reflects improving operational execution, and the Q1 2026 beat was the largest in recent history. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.

3. Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: Management raised FY2026 EPS guidance from $16.10–$16.20 to $16.45–$16.55 at Q1 earnings — a meaningful $0.35 midpoint lift driven by Aerospace, Marine, and Technologies — and tone has shifted from cautious to confidently optimistic, particularly on Aerospace margin durability and Marine throughput.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q4 2025 Earnings Call, Jan 2026)

Revised Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 29, 2026)

Current Consensus

Note

FY2026 EPS (Diluted Operating)

$16.10–$16.20

$16.45–$16.55

$16.77

↑ Raised Apr 29, 2026; driven by Aerospace, Marine, and Technologies outperformance; consensus now $0.27 above guidance midpoint

FY2026 Free Cash Flow Conversion

~100% of net income

100% of net income; evaluating potential to exceed 100%

$4.85B (FY2026 FCF consensus)

↑ Tone more confident; Q1 delivered 174% conversion; management signaled possible upside to 100% target

FY2026 CapEx (% of Sales)

3.5%–4.0% of sales

3.5%–4.0% of sales (unchanged); profile grows each quarter

N/A — not separately tracked in VA

Unchanged; Q1 CapEx was ~1.5% of sales (front-end light); heavy investment in Electric Boat expected to accelerate

Aerospace Deliveries (Q2 2026)

Not explicitly guided

“Very similar to Q1” (~38 aircraft); Q3/Q4 highest

~42 aircraft (Zacks consensus)

Delivery cadence on plan; G800 gross margins already exceeding G650 despite early ramp

Aerospace Operating Margin

Mid-to-high teens by 2027

15% achieved in Q1; “durable”; some Q2/Q3 mix movement expected; strong Q4

~13.8% Q2 consensus (implied)

↑ Tone more confident; mid-teens ahead of plan; G800 outperforming G650 at same stage

Marine Systems Throughput

Improving; Columbia on track for 2028 delivery

21% revenue growth in Q1; 52% increase in sequence-critical material receipts vs. prior year; Columbia key milestone by end of 2026

Marine revenue $4.37B Q2 consensus

↑ Tone markedly more optimistic; supply chain improving; sole-source bottlenecks remain the key risk

FY2026 Tax Rate

~17.5%

17.5% (unchanged); Q1 actual 17.8%

~17.5%

Unchanged; consistent with guidance

Share Repurchases

Dilution coverage only; dividend primary return vehicle

~$200M in Q1 (dilution coverage only); 29 consecutive years of dividend increases

N/A

Deliberately cautious given political sensitivity around buybacks in current administration environment

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates have drifted modestly higher since the Q1 print across all key metrics, tracking management’s raised guidance rather than diverging from it — the gap between consensus and guidance midpoint is a modest cushion, not a stretched bar, suggesting limited downside risk from estimate resets.

KPI (Period)

Estimate at May 6, 2026 (+5 Days Post Q1 Print)

Current Consensus (Jul 28, 2026)

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q4 2025 Call)

Current Guidance (Q1 2026 Call)

Guidance Δ

Consensus vs. Guidance (%)

Revenue — Q2 2026

$13.48B

$13.55B

+0.5%

No explicit Q2 guidance

No explicit Q2 guidance

N/A

N/A

Op. EPS — Q2 2026

$3.93

$3.98

+1.3%

No explicit Q2 guidance

No explicit Q2 guidance

N/A

N/A

Revenue — FY2026

$55.39B

$55.48B

+0.2%

No explicit FY rev. guidance

No explicit FY rev. guidance

N/A

N/A

Op. EPS — FY2026

$16.71

$16.77

+0.4%

$16.10–$16.20 (midpoint $16.15)

$16.45–$16.55 (midpoint $16.50)

+$0.35 (+2.2%)

+1.6% above guidance midpoint

Op. EPS — FY2027

$18.15

$18.29

+0.8%

No FY2027 guidance provided

No FY2027 guidance provided

N/A

N/A

Marine Revenue — Q2 2026

$4.35B

$4.37B

+0.5%

No segment guidance

No segment guidance

N/A

N/A

Aerospace Revenue — Q2 2026

$3.25B

$3.31B

+1.9%

No segment guidance

No segment guidance

N/A

N/A

FCF — FY2026

$4.79B

$4.85B

+1.3%

~100% net income conversion

~100% net income conversion; evaluating upside

Unchanged; tone more confident

N/A

Estimates have moved in lockstep with management’s raised guidance since the Q1 print, with FY2026 EPS consensus now sitting ~1.6% above the guidance midpoint — a modest cushion that reflects Street confidence in continued execution without extrapolating Q1’s exceptional cash conversion. The revision trajectory is constructive but not stretched. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: GD has outperformed both the defense sector (ITA) and the S&P 500 since Q1 earnings, with the +16.1% gain driven primarily by the massive Q1 beat and guidance raise — the stock has re-rated on improved earnings quality and Marine throughput credibility, but the move means some beat is already priced in heading into Q2.

GD vs. ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) vs. S&P 500 (SPY) — Indexed to 100 at Q1 2026 Earnings Date (April 29, 2026). Source: Stock Price Data.

Name

Price at Q1 Earnings (Apr 29)

Price (Jul 29, 2026)

Return Since Q1 Earnings

GD

$338.73

$393.19

+16.1%

ITA (Defense ETF)

$213.14

$244.98

+14.9%

S&P 500 (SPY)

$711.58

$740.86

+4.1%

GD surged ~7.5% on the Q1 earnings day (April 29) and continued to grind higher through late June, reaching a peak near $390 before pulling back modestly in mid-July. The stock re-accelerated in late July alongside strong peer prints from LMT and RTX. The outperformance vs. ITA (+1.2 percentage points) is modest, suggesting the defense sector broadly re-rated on the strong budget environment, while GD’s specific alpha came from the magnitude of the Q1 beat and the guidance raise. Source: Stock Price Data.

6. Peer Commentaries — Read-Through for GD Q2 2026

Key Takeaway: Peer Q2 2026 prints from LMT, RTX, and NOC all point to an accelerating defense spending environment with record backlogs and strong book-to-bill ratios — a highly constructive read-through for GD’s Marine, Combat Systems, and Technologies segments. Business jet demand commentary from TXT is also supportive for Gulfstream.

Note: Only forward-looking commentary and Q2 2026 period observations from peer earnings calls are included below. Backward-looking Q1 2025 results commentary from peers has been excluded.

Lockheed Martin (LMT) — Q2 2026 Earnings (July 23, 2026)

RTX (Raytheon Technologies) — Q2 2026 Earnings (July 23, 2026)

Northrop Grumman (NOC) — Q2 2026 Earnings (July 21, 2026)

Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) — Q1 2026 Earnings (May 5, 2026)

Textron (TXT) — Q2 2026 Earnings (July 28, 2026)

7. Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the FY2027 defense budget request crossing $1 trillion with bipartisan support — a structural tailwind for GD’s entire portfolio — while the Mesquite artillery facility resolution removes a near-term overhang for Combat Systems.

8. Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: No open-market buys or discretionary sells from senior executives since Q1 earnings — the only notable activity is a large option exercise-and-sell by EVP Mark Burns (dilution-neutral, compensation-driven) and routine director stock award grants. Nothing in the insider activity signals unusual conviction or concern heading into Q2.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Shares

Date

Note

Burns, Mark Lagrand

Executive Vice President

Option Exercise & Open Market Sale

36,230 (May 11) + 36,480 (May 12) = 72,710 total

May 11–12, 2026

Exercised stock options (M code) and sold resulting shares (S code) on same dates; compensation-driven, not discretionary; no 10b5-1 plan flagged

Malcolm, Mark

Director

Option Exercise & Sale

5,480

June 17, 2026

Exercised options (M code) and sold shares (S code); routine director compensation exercise; no discretionary signal

Maisano, Dana Omahen

Vice President

Option Exercise & Stock Award

3,890 options + 480 shares

June 1, 2026

Option exercise (M code) and stock award acquisition (A code); compensation-driven; no open-market purchase or discretionary sale

DE LEON, Rudy F.

Director

Stock Award (Acquisition)

52 shares

June 16, 2026

Routine annual director stock award (A code); not an open-market purchase

HANEY, Cecil D.

Director

Stock Award (Acquisition)

10 shares

June 16, 2026

Routine annual director stock award (A code); not an open-market purchase

Hooper, Charles W.

Director

Stock Award (Acquisition)

20 shares

June 16, 2026

Routine annual director stock award (A code); not an open-market purchase

Mattis, James N.

Director

Stock Award (Acquisition)

58 shares

June 16, 2026

Routine annual director stock award (A code); not an open-market purchase

Nye, C. Howard

Director

Stock Award (Acquisition)

52 shares

June 16, 2026

Routine annual director stock award (A code); not an open-market purchase

Reynolds, Catherine B.

Director

Stock Award (Acquisition)

104 shares

June 16, 2026

Routine annual director stock award (A code); not an open-market purchase

Schumacher, Laura J.

Director

Stock Award (Acquisition)

104 shares

June 16, 2026

Routine annual director stock award (A code); not an open-market purchase

Stratton, John G.

Director

Stock Award (Acquisition)

104 shares

June 16, 2026

Routine annual director stock award (A code); not an open-market purchase

Source: Insider Transaction Data (SEC Form 4 filings). Open-market buys (code P) and discretionary sells (code S) only are flagged as signal-bearing; all other transactions above are compensation-driven (option exercises, stock awards).

Assessment: The absence of any open-market purchases or discretionary sales by C-suite executives (CEO, CFO, or segment presidents) since Q1 earnings is neutral — neither a bullish nor bearish signal. The EVP Burns option exercise-and-sell is a standard compensation monetization event and carries no informational content about management’s view of the stock. The director stock awards are routine annual grants. Overall, insider activity is unremarkable and does not alter the earnings setup thesis.