Hilton Worldwide Holdings (HLT) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Prepared: July 27, 2026 Upcoming Earnings: TBD (Q2 2026 — late July / early August 2026) Last Reported: Q1 2026 (April 28, 2026)

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 is mixed — consensus is a manageable bar given HLT’s track record of beats, but the Middle East conflict is the single biggest swing factor, with management guiding ~1.5 points of system-wide RevPAR drag in Q2 specifically. The stock has underperformed MAR since last earnings, suggesting the market is pricing in some caution, but peer data from WH’s Q2 print and MAR’s Q1 commentary both point to a resilient U.S. demand backdrop that could allow HLT to beat on the core business even if the Middle East remains a headwind.

Heading into Q2 2026, consensus sits at the high end of management’s own guidance — system-wide RevPAR growth of ~3.4% vs. the guided 2–3% range, and adj. EBITDA of ~$1,039M vs. the $1,015M–$1,035M guidance range — representing a manageable bar given HLT’s eight-quarter consecutive EBITDA beat streak. Management’s tone on the April 28 Q1 call was constructive: full-year RevPAR guidance was raised to 2–3% (from 1–2%) and full-year adj. EPS guidance was lifted to $8.79–$8.91, but management explicitly flagged Q2 as the peak Middle East headwind quarter (~1.5 points of system-wide RevPAR drag), with several one-time timing items also weighing on the Q2 year-over-year comparison. Estimate revisions have been modestly positive since the Q1 print — Q2 adj. EBITDA consensus has drifted up ~$10M from the post-print baseline, suggesting the street is incrementally more constructive, likely reflecting positive peer read-throughs from MAR’s Q1 beat and WH’s Q2 beat. On the stock, HLT has returned only ~+2.3% since the April 28 earnings date vs. MAR +6.9% and SPY +3.8%, underperforming peers and suggesting the market has not fully priced in a beat — creating a potentially attractive setup if Q2 results clear the Middle East overhang. The key wildcard is the pace and trajectory of Middle East recovery: management guided mid-to-high teens RevPAR decline for the region in 2026 with Q2 as the worst quarter, and any sign of faster-than-expected stabilization could be a meaningful positive surprise for both the Q2 print and the full-year outlook.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: System-wide RevPAR growth is the primary swing factor — consensus at ~3.4% sits at the high end of management’s 2–3% Q2 guidance range, leaving room for a beat if U.S. demand holds and Middle East drag is contained. Adj. EBITDA is the financial scoreboard; HLT has beaten EBITDA consensus in each of the last 8 quarters.

Table 1 — Current Quarter Snapshot (Q2 2026)

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual

Q2 2025 Actual

Q2 2026 Consensus

YoY Change

Q2 Guidance

Consensus vs. Guidance

System-wide RevPAR ($)

$105.97

$121.79

$124.64

+2.3%

N/A (growth guided 2–3%)

At high end of range

System-wide RevPAR Growth (%)

+3.6%

-0.5%

+3.4%

+390bps YoY

2% to 3%

+40bps above midpoint

System-wide ADR ($)

$157.14

$163.78

$168.21

+2.7%

N/A

N/A

System-wide Occupancy (%)

67.4%

74.4%

75.0%

+60bps

N/A

N/A

Adj. EBITDA ($M)

$901M

$1,008M

$1,039M

+3.1%

$1,015M–$1,035M

+$4M above midpoint

Diluted EPS — Operating ($)

$2.01

$2.20

$2.28

+3.6%

$2.18–$2.24

+$0.07 above midpoint

Revenue ex. Cost Reimbursements ($M)

$1,182M

$1,326M

$1,390M

+4.8%

N/A

N/A

Franchise & Licensing Fees ($M)

$696M

$745M

$806M

+8.2%

N/A

N/A

Total Rooms (#)

1,362,280

1,304,880

1,388,380

+6.4%

6–7% NUG

In line

Source: Visible Alpha consensus and actuals. All consensus figures as of July 27, 2026. HLT has beaten adj. EBITDA consensus in each of the last 8 quarters, with beats ranging from $8M to $47M. Franchise & licensing fees are a key non-RevPAR revenue driver that has consistently outperformed.

Table 2 — Beat / Miss History (Last 8 Quarters)

Top KPI #1: System-wide RevPAR Growth (%)

Quarter

Reported

Consensus

Surprise

Result

Q2 2024

+3.5%

+3.2%

+30bps

Beat

Q3 2024

+1.4%

+1.9%

-50bps

Miss

Q4 2024

+3.5%

+2.0%

+150bps

Beat

Q1 2025

+2.5%

+3.0%

-50bps

Miss

Q2 2025

-0.5%

+0.0%

-50bps

Miss

Q3 2025

-1.1%

-0.8%

-30bps

Miss

Q4 2025

+0.5%

+0.3%

+20bps

Beat

Q1 2026

+3.6%

+2.4%

+120bps

Beat

Top KPI #2: Adjusted EBITDA ($M)

Quarter

Reported ($M)

Consensus ($M)

Surprise ($M)

Result

Q2 2024

$917M

$902M

+$15M

Beat

Q3 2024

$904M

$885M

+$19M

Beat

Q4 2024

$858M

$831M

+$27M

Beat

Q1 2025

$795M

$781M

+$14M

Beat

Q2 2025

$1,008M

$961M

+$47M

Beat

Q3 2025

$976M

$950M

+$26M

Beat

Q4 2025

$946M

$924M

+$22M

Beat

Q1 2026

$901M

$893M

+$8M

Beat

HLT has beaten adj. EBITDA consensus in all 8 of the last 8 quarters, with beats ranging from $8M to $47M. RevPAR growth has been more mixed (5 beats, 3 misses), with misses concentrated in the soft demand period of mid-2025. The consistent EBITDA beat pattern reflects HLT’s ability to drive non-RevPAR fee growth and cost discipline even when RevPAR disappoints.

3. Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: Management raised full-year RevPAR and EPS guidance on the Q1 call, but Q2 is explicitly flagged as the peak Middle East headwind quarter. No post-earnings guidance revisions have been issued, so the April 28 Q1 earnings call remains the sole baseline.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Call, Apr 28)

Revised Guidance

Current Consensus

Note

Q2 System-wide RevPAR Growth

2% to 3%

+3.4%

Consensus at high end; Middle East ~1.5pt drag flagged as peak Q2 headwind

Q2 Adj. EBITDA

$1,015M–$1,035M

$1,039M

Consensus $4M above midpoint; one-time timing items flagged for Q2

Q2 Diluted EPS (Operating)

$2.18–$2.24

$2.28

Consensus $0.07 above midpoint; buyback optionality not in guidance

FY 2026 System-wide RevPAR Growth

2% to 3%

+2.8%

Raised from prior 1–2% range; Middle East 0.5–1pt full-year drag assumed

FY 2026 Adj. EBITDA

$4,020M–$4,060M

$4,054M

Consensus near high end of range; non-RevPAR fee growth a key upside driver

FY 2026 Diluted EPS (Operating)

$8.79–$8.91

$8.98

Consensus above guidance range; reflects buyback optionality not embedded in guidance

Net Unit Growth (FY 2026)

6% to 7%

~6.4%

Record pipeline of 527,000 rooms; construction starts up 20%+ for the year

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates have drifted modestly higher since the Q1 print — Q2 adj. EBITDA consensus is up ~$10M from the post-print baseline, and FY 2026 adj. EBITDA is essentially flat. The gap between consensus and guidance midpoints is small, suggesting the street is not pricing in a large beat but also not pricing in a miss. FY EPS consensus sitting above the guidance range reflects buyback optionality not embedded in guidance.

KPI (Period)

Estimate (May 3, 2026 — ~5 days post Q1 print)

Current Consensus

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Call)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Consensus vs. Guidance (%)

System-wide RevPAR Growth — Q2 2026

+2.3%

+3.4%

+110bps

2%–3%

Unchanged

+40bps above midpoint

Adj. EBITDA — Q2 2026

$1,029M

$1,039M

+1.0%

$1,015M–$1,035M

Unchanged

+$4M above midpoint

Diluted EPS (Op.) — Q2 2026

$2.24

$2.28

+1.8%

$2.18–$2.24

Unchanged

+$0.07 above midpoint

Adj. EBITDA — FY 2026

$4,043M

$4,054M

+0.3%

$4,020M–$4,060M

Unchanged

Near high end of range

Diluted EPS (Op.) — FY 2026

$9.02

$8.98

-0.4%

$8.79–$8.91

Unchanged

Above guidance range

Source: Visible Alpha. May 3, 2026 as-of date represents the clean post-print baseline ~5 trading days after the April 28 Q1 earnings release. The modest upward drift in Q2 EBITDA estimates (+$10M) since the post-print baseline likely reflects positive peer read-throughs from MAR’s Q1 beat and WH’s Q2 beat. FY EPS consensus sitting above the guidance range reflects buyback optionality not embedded in guidance (HLT targets ~$3.5B in total capital returns for 2026).

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: HLT has underperformed both MAR (+6.9%) and the S&P 500 (+3.8%) since the Q1 earnings date (April 28, 2026), returning only +2.3% on an indexed basis through July 28. The underperformance is likely driven by the Middle East overhang and the initial market disappointment that the FY EPS guidance midpoint came in below sell-side consensus — creating a potentially attractive setup if Q2 clears the overhang.

HLT vs. MAR (peer) vs. S&P 500 (SPY) — Indexed to 100 at April 28, 2026 (Q1 2026 Earnings Date). Peer benchmark: MAR (Marriott International). Event markers: Leadership Reshuffle (May 5), $1B Senior Notes (May 11), Incentive Plan Approved (May 18). Source: Yahoo Finance.

6. Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The most material post-earnings development is the leadership reshuffle (May 5) — the planned retirement of President Chris Silcock and the external search for a new CTO signal meaningful organizational change heading into a critical demand inflection period. The $1B senior notes issuance is routine balance-sheet management.

7. Peer Commentaries — Q2 2026 Read-Throughs (Last 60 Days)

Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from the last 60 days is broadly constructive for HLT’s Q2 print — U.S. demand is accelerating, group is strong, and leisure trends are durable. The Middle East remains a shared headwind across the sector, but peers confirm Q2 is the peak impact quarter, consistent with HLT’s guidance. Note: this section covers only forward-looking commentary about Q2 2026 and beyond — backward-looking commentary about prior quarter results is excluded.

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts (WH) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 23, 2026)

Most directly relevant — WH just reported Q2 2026 results, providing the most current read on the demand environment heading into HLT’s print.

Marriott International (MAR) — Q1 2026 Earnings Call (May 6, 2026)

Reported Q1 2026 results; forward-looking commentary about Q2 and full year is relevant for HLT’s setup.

Hyatt Hotels (H) — Investor Day (May 28, 2026)

Forward-looking strategic commentary; relevant for industry demand outlook and premium segment read-through.

Choice Hotels International (CHH) — Q1 2026 Earnings Call (April 30, 2026)

Reported Q1 2026; forward-looking commentary about Q2 and full year is relevant for HLT’s economy and mid-scale segment read-through.

8. Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: All transactions since the Q1 earnings date are director stock awards (grants), not open-market purchases or sales. No open-market buys or sells have been filed by any executive officer or director — the absence of discretionary insider buying is neutral, not a negative signal given the award-only nature of all activity.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Shares

Effective Date

Disclosed Date

Note

Charlene T. Begley

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

742

May 14, 2026

May 18, 2026

Routine director equity compensation

Chris Carr

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

742

May 14, 2026

May 18, 2026

Routine director equity compensation

Jonathan Gray

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

742 + 104

May 14 & May 1, 2026

May 18 & May 5, 2026

Routine director equity compensation (two grants)

Melanie Healey

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

742

May 14, 2026

May 18, 2026

Routine director equity compensation

Raymond E. Mabus

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

742

May 14, 2026

May 18, 2026

Routine director equity compensation

Marissa A. Mayer

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

742 + 115

May 14 & May 1, 2026

May 18 & May 5, 2026

Routine director equity compensation (two grants)

Elizabeth A. Smith

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

742 + 145

May 14 & May 1, 2026

May 18 & May 5, 2026

Routine director equity compensation (two grants)

Douglas M. Steenland

Director

Stock Award (Grant)

742

May 14, 2026

May 18, 2026

Routine director equity compensation

Multiple Directors (8)

Directors

Stock Award (Grant)

~5–9 shares each

June 30, 2026

July 1, 2026

Small fractional quarterly dividend reinvestment awards

Source: SEC Form 4 filings. All transactions are Form 4 code “A” (awards/grants), not open-market purchases (code “P”) or sales (code “S”). No executive officers (CEO, CFO, COO) have filed any Form 4 transactions in the period. The absence of open-market buying by executives is neutral given the award-only nature of all activity.