Company | Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) |
Upcoming Earnings Date | July 30, 2026 (Pre-Market) | 9:00 AM ET Call |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (Quarter Ended June 30, 2026) |
Preparation Date | July 29, 2026 |
Sector ETF Benchmark | XLV (Health Care Select Sector SPDR) |
Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 2026 is constructive — consensus is a manageable bar, guidance was raised post-Q1, and the biggest swing factor is whether the BLS quarterly book-to-bill recovers as management guided.
Heading into Q2 2026, Labcorp carries solid momentum from a Q1 beat-and-raise, with full-year enterprise revenue guidance of $14.65–$14.80B and adjusted EPS of $17.70–$18.35 (midpoint ~$18.03, +10% YoY). Consensus for Q2 sits at ~$3.71B in revenue and ~$4.78 in adjusted EPS — a bar that appears achievable given the structural tailwinds in Diagnostics (specialty mix, aging population, tests-per-accession expansion) and continued Central Labs strength. Management's tone at the June 3 Jefferies Healthcare Conference was explicitly optimistic, with CFO Julia Wang stating the company is "highly focused on building upon the strong momentum in Q1" and expressing confidence in the full-year outlook. Estimate revisions have been remarkably stable since the Q1 print — Q2 revenue consensus has barely moved (~$3.711B on May 1 vs. $3.714B today), suggesting the Street is neither chasing upside nor pricing in risk. The stock has re-rated meaningfully since Q1 earnings (+19% vs. XLV +16%), with multiple expansion accounting for the bulk of the move (NTM P/E expanded from ~14.3x to ~16.6x), leaving less room for a sentiment-driven pop on an in-line print.
The key wildcard is the BLS quarterly book-to-bill: management guided for sequential improvement from Q1's 0.94x, and consensus expects ~1.12x — a miss here would likely pressure the stock despite solid Diagnostics results. Secondary wildcards include the PAMA data collection window (closed July 30) and any Early Development streamlining update, which management said would be "largely complete" by end of Q2.
Key Takeaway: Consensus is a moderate, achievable bar — revenue and EPS estimates have barely moved since the Q1 print, suggesting the Street is not pricing in upside. The BLS book-to-bill recovery is the bigger swing factor; a miss there would overshadow a Diagnostics beat.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual | Q2 2026 Consensus Est. | YoY Change | FY 2026 Guidance | Cons. vs. Guidance Mid (%) |
Total Revenue ($B) | $3.538B | $3.527B | $3.714B | +5.3% | $14.65–$14.80B | −0.1% vs. mid |
Adj. EPS (Diluted Operating) | $4.25 | $4.35 | $4.78 | +9.9% | $17.70–$18.35 | −0.5% vs. mid |
Diagnostics (LCD) Revenue ($B) | $2.762B | $2.749B | $2.912B | +5.9% | $11.43–$11.52B | −0.1% vs. mid |
BLS Revenue ($B) | $0.781B | $0.785B | $0.805B | +2.5% | $3.22–$3.27B | −0.2% vs. mid |
LCD Organic Vol. Growth (%) | 1.1% | 3.4% | ~2.2% | ~(120 bps) | Majority organic; ~50/50 vol/price | N/A |
BLS Book-to-Bill (Quarterly, x) | 0.94x | 1.18x | ~1.12x | ~(60 bps) | Sequential improvement guided | N/A |
Free Cash Flow ($B) | $0.071B | $0.543B | $0.482B | −11.3% | $1.24–$1.36B (FY) | N/A |
Sources: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data (Net sales, EPS – diluted – operating, Labcorp Diagnostics, Biopharma Laboratory Services, Organic volume growth, Book-to-bill ratio, Analyst FCF). Guidance from LH Q1 2026 Earnings Release (April 30, 2026). Consensus vs. guidance delta calculated vs. midpoint of FY 2026 guidance range.
Quarter | Reported ($B) | Consensus ($B) | Surprise (%) | Result |
Q1 2026 | $3.538B | $3.506B | +0.9% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $3.516B | $3.567B | −1.4% | Miss |
Q3 2025 | $3.564B | $3.556B | +0.2% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | $3.527B | $3.493B | +1.0% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | $3.345B | $3.409B | −1.9% | Miss |
Q4 2024 | $3.329B | $3.311B | +0.6% | Beat |
Q3 2024 | $3.282B | $3.267B | +0.5% | Beat |
Q2 2024 | $3.273B | N/A — pre-VA window | N/A | N/A |
Pattern: LH has beaten revenue consensus in 5 of the last 7 reported quarters, with misses concentrated in Q1 2025 (weather headwind) and Q4 2025 (softer consumer health). Beats have been modest (+0.2% to +1.0%), suggesting the Street calibrates well but consistently underestimates slightly. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Quarter | Reported ($) | Consensus ($) | Surprise (%) | Result |
Q1 2026 | $4.25 | $4.11 | +3.4% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $4.07 | $3.96 | +2.8% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $4.18 | $4.13 | +1.2% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | $4.35 | $4.17 | +4.3% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | $3.84 | $3.72 | +3.2% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | $3.45 | $3.39 | +1.8% | Beat |
Q3 2024 | $3.50 | $3.51 | −0.3% | In-Line |
Q2 2024 | N/A — pre-VA window | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Pattern: LH has beaten adjusted EPS consensus in 7 of the last 7 reported quarters, with beats ranging from +1.2% to +4.3% — a remarkably consistent track record. The Street appears to systematically underestimate Labcorp's margin execution and operating leverage. This pattern supports a constructive setup into Q2. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: Guidance was raised at the Q1 print and reaffirmed with confidence at the June Jefferies conference — no post-earnings revisions since. Management tone is explicitly optimistic heading into Q2, with Early Development streamlining on track and book-to-bill recovery expected.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings, Apr 30) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
Enterprise Revenue (FY 2026) | $14.65B–$14.80B (+5.0%–6.1%) | — | $14.72B | Raised at Q1 print (+$30M midpoint vs. prior guide); reaffirmed at Jefferies Jun 3 |
Diagnostics Revenue (FY 2026) | $11.43B–$11.52B (+5.1%–5.9%) | — | $11.49B | Majority organic; vol/price ~50/50; reaffirmed Jun 3 |
BLS Revenue (FY 2026) | $3.22B–$3.27B (+3.8%–5.4%) | — | $3.24B | Incorporates ~$40M ED divestiture headwind; Central Labs mid-SD growth; reaffirmed Jun 3 |
Adjusted EPS (FY 2026) | $17.70–$18.35 (~10% growth at mid) | — | $18.05 | Raised midpoint by $0.13 at Q1; reaffirmed Jun 3 with explicit 10% growth target |
Free Cash Flow (FY 2026) | $1.24B–$1.36B | — | $1.28B | Unchanged; weighted to H2; CapEx ~4% of revenue for new Central Labs facility |
BLS Quarterly Book-to-Bill (Q2 2026) | Sequential improvement from Q1’s 0.94x guided | — | ~1.12x | Management: timing-driven dip in Q1; expects above 1.0x for rest of year; reaffirmed Jun 3 |
Early Development Streamlining | Largely complete by end of Q2 2026 | — | N/A | ~$40M revenue headwind in 2026; ED expected relatively flat FY; H2 stronger than H1 |
Sources: LH Q1 2026 Earnings Release (April 30, 2026); LH Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript (April 30, 2026); Jefferies Global Healthcare Conference Transcript (June 3, 2026); Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: Estimates have been remarkably stable since the Q1 print — Q2 revenue consensus moved only +$3M and FY EPS moved only −0.02 in the 13 weeks since earnings. Estimates are tracking guidance tightly, with consensus sitting just inside the midpoint of the FY range, suggesting no incremental risk or cushion is being priced in.
KPI (Period) | Est. ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (May 7, 2026) | Current Consensus (Jul 29, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Cons. vs. Guidance Mid (%) |
Revenue (Q2 2026) | $3.712B | $3.714B | +0.1% | N/A (quarterly not guided) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Adj. EPS (Q2 2026) | $4.783 | $4.778 | −0.1% | N/A (quarterly not guided) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Revenue (FY 2026) | $14.722B | $14.716B | −0.0% | $14.65–$14.80B | $14.65–$14.80B | Unchanged | −0.1% vs. mid |
Adj. EPS (FY 2026) | $18.046 | $18.052 | +0.0% | $17.70–$18.35 | $17.70–$18.35 | Unchanged | −0.5% vs. mid |
The near-zero estimate drift since the Q1 print is notable: the Street has not revised up on the back of Quest's strong Q2 read-through (reported July 23) or the broader healthcare sector re-rating. This creates a modest asymmetry — if LH delivers in-line with Quest's volume trends, there may be upward revision potential post-print. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data (revision history, weekly frequency, May 1–July 29, 2026).
Key Takeaway: LH has outperformed XLV since Q1 earnings (+19% vs. +16%), with the move driven predominantly by multiple expansion rather than estimate revisions — NTM P/E expanded from ~14.3x to ~16.6x. The stock has re-rated toward fair value, reducing the margin of safety for a sentiment-driven beat reaction.
Since Q1 2026 earnings (April 30, 2026 base = 100):
Name | Apr 30, 2026 (Base) | Jul 29, 2026 (Latest) | Return Since Q1 Earnings |
LH (Labcorp) | $256.80 | $314.23 (Jul 28) | +22.4% |
XLV (Health Care Select Sector SPDR) | $145.99 | $167.26 (Jul 28) | +14.6% |
SPY (S&P 500) | $718.66 | $740.86 (Jul 28) | +3.1% |
Note: Jul 28 close used as latest available pre-earnings data point. Jul 30 (earnings day) close of $307.15 reflects post-earnings trading. Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance).
Performance Decomposition (NTM EV/EBITDA, primary valuation metric for LH):
Horizon | LH Price Return | NTM EV/EBITDA (Start) | NTM EV/EBITDA (Current) | Multiple Δ | Driver |
1 Month | +9.9% | 10.69x | 11.94x | +11.7% | Multiple expansion dominant |
3 Months | +18.4% | 10.62x | 11.94x | +12.5% | Multiple expansion dominant |
6 Months | +13.3% | 10.91x | 11.94x | +9.5% | Multiple expansion dominant |
12 Months | +17.3% | 11.19x | 11.94x | +6.7% | Mix of multiple & earnings |
The stock's outperformance vs. XLV and SPY since Q1 earnings has been driven almost entirely by multiple expansion, not estimate revisions (which were flat). At 11.94x NTM EV/EBITDA, LH is trading above its 1-year average of ~11.2x but still at a discount to historical peaks, suggesting the re-rating has room to continue if execution remains strong. However, the multiple expansion also means the stock needs a clean beat-and-raise to sustain momentum — an in-line print may not be enough to drive further outperformance. Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance); LH Stock Performance Decomposition.
Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is Quest Diagnostics' strong Q2 beat-and-raise (July 23), which provides a direct positive read-through for Labcorp's Diagnostics volume and specialty testing trends heading into tomorrow's print.
Limitations: OPK's BioReference business is significantly smaller and more geographically concentrated (NY/NJ) than LH's national operations. The revenue trends in OPK's retained diagnostics business reflect deliberate strategic choices (divesting esoteric tests, reducing footprint) rather than market demand signals. The earnout payment is a one-time financial event and does not provide ongoing visibility into the acquired oncology assets' performance under LH. OPK's 4K score reimbursement challenges are specific to that proprietary test and do not reflect broader payer trends for LH's diverse portfolio. Source: OPK Q2 2026 Earnings Release and Earnings Call Transcript (July 27, 2026).
Key Takeaway: All insider transactions since Q1 earnings are 10b5-1 planned sales — no discretionary open-market selling or buying. The CEO's sale of 5,903 shares in May was the largest by value but was pre-planned. Nothing in the insider activity signals unusual conviction in either direction.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Shares | Approx. Value | Transaction Date | Shares Owned Post-Tx | Note |
Schechter, Adam H. | President & CEO, Director | 10b5-1 Planned Sale | 5,903 | ~$1.52M (at ~$257) | May 11, 2026 | 107,234 | Pre-planned; largest sale by value in window; no discretionary signal |
Kyle, Kathryn W. | EVP, Chief Legal Officer | 10b5-1 Planned Sale | 762 | ~$196K (at ~$257) | Jun 8, 2026 | 3,813 | Pre-planned; routine 10b5-1 execution |
Kyle, Kathryn W. | EVP, Chief Legal Officer | 10b5-1 Planned Sale | 92 | ~$26K (at ~$284) | Jul 2, 2026 | 3,904 | Pre-planned; small routine sale |
Vaughn, Bryan T. | EVP and President, Diagnostics | 10b5-1 Planned Sale | 234 | ~$66K (at ~$284) | Jul 2, 2026 | 6,746 | Pre-planned; routine 10b5-1 execution |
All four transactions since Q1 earnings were executed under pre-established 10b5-1 trading plans — the standard mechanism for executives to sell shares on a scheduled basis without discretionary timing. There are no open-market buys or discretionary sales in the window. The absence of any open-market buying is not unusual given the stock's +22% run since Q1 earnings. No insider activity signals unusual concern or conviction ahead of the Q2 print. Source: Insider Transaction Data (SEC Form 4 Filings).
Form 4 Filing Links: Schechter (May 11, 2026) | Kyle (Jun 8, 2026) | Kyle (Jul 2, 2026) | Vaughn (Jul 2, 2026). All filings available via SEC EDGAR.