MGM Resorts International (MGM) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Company

MGM Resorts International

Ticker

MGM (NYSE)

Reporting Period

Q2 2026 (April – June 30, 2026)

Earnings Date

July 29, 2026 (After Market Close) — Conference Call 5:00 PM ET

Prepared

July 27, 2026

Last Earnings

April 29, 2026 (Q1 2026)

1. Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 2026 is mixed-to-constructive — consensus is a manageable bar, but the single biggest swing factor is whether the World Cup-driven softness in Macau (confirmed by LVS's Q2 print) and the BetMGM revenue trajectory can be offset by a Las Vegas Strip that management guided to accelerating convention mix and easier leisure comparisons.

Heading into the Q2 2026 print, the bar for MGM is achievable but not low. Consensus sits at roughly $4.42B in revenue and $623M in Adjusted EBITDA — both modestly below the Q1 2026 actuals on a sequential basis, consistent with typical Q2 seasonality. Management's tone on the Q1 call was constructive: CEO Bill Hornbuckle flagged April as "fine" and May as a "good month," convention room night mix was guided up 2 percentage points year-over-year to 20%, and the MGM Grand room renovation tailwind (54,000 incremental room nights) provides a structural lift absent in the prior year. Estimate revisions have been broadly stable since the Q1 print, with EPS drifting slightly higher from $0.57 to $0.68 over the past 60 days, suggesting the Street has modestly re-rated the setup. The stock has rallied sharply — up ~31% year-to-date and ~17% over the past three months — driven by multiple expansion and the Barry Diller/PPLI take-private bid at $48.30/share, meaning the stock is pricing in a meaningful premium to standalone intrinsic value and leaving limited room for a fundamental miss. The key wildcard is Macau hold: LVS reported the "largest hold adjustment in the history of Macau" in Q2, with VIP rolling hold at just 1.35% versus a 3.3% theoretical — a market-wide phenomenon that almost certainly weighed on MGM China's Q2 EBITDAR and could be the primary source of downside surprise relative to consensus.

2. KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus is a manageable bar on revenue and Las Vegas EBITDAR, but MGM China EBITDAR is the bigger swing factor given LVS's confirmed market-wide hold headwind in Q2. BetMGM EBITDA is the upside optionality.

Table 1 — Current Quarter Snapshot (Q2 2026)

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual

Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year)

Q2 2026 Consensus Estimate

YoY Change

Guidance / Mgmt Commentary

Consensus vs. Guidance

Total Revenue ($M)

$4,455

$4,405

$4,423

+0.4%

No specific Q2 guidance; mgmt guided to growth through balance of year, tempered modestly by macro

N/A — no numeric guidance

Adjusted EBITDA ($M)

$580

$648

$623

-3.8%

No specific Q2 guidance; expects Las Vegas EBITDA growth for full year

N/A — no numeric guidance

EPS — Diluted Operating ($)

$0.49

$0.79

$0.57

-27.8%

No specific EPS guidance provided

N/A — no numeric guidance

Las Vegas Property EBITDAR ($M)

$749

$710

$719

+1.3%

Convention room night mix guided +2pp YoY to 20%; 54K incremental MGM Grand room nights; high-end strength continuing

N/A — no numeric guidance

MGM China Property EBITDAR ($M)

$273

$301

$278

-7.6%

Mid-20s segment EBITDA margin guided under new branding fee structure; market share ~17% exiting Q1

N/A — no numeric guidance

BetMGM EBITDA ($M)

$20

$65

$74

+13.8%

FY2026 EBITDA guidance maintained at lower end of prior range; iGaming prioritized; sports spend moderated

N/A — no numeric guidance

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. All consensus figures as of July 27, 2026.

Table 2 — Beat/Miss History (Last 8 Quarters)

Top KPI #1: Las Vegas Property EBITDAR | Top KPI #2: MGM China Property EBITDAR

Quarter

LV EBITDAR Reported ($M)

LV EBITDAR Consensus ($M)

LV Surprise %

LV Result

China EBITDAR Reported ($M)

China EBITDAR Consensus ($M)

China Surprise %

China Result

Q2 2024

$710

$743

-4.4%

Miss

$301

$277

+8.7%

Beat

Q3 2024

$731

$745

-1.9%

Miss

$237

$267

-11.2%

Miss

Q4 2024

$765

$756

+1.2%

Beat

$255

$247

+3.2%

Beat

Q1 2025

$811

$763

+6.3%

Beat

$286

$255

+12.2%

Beat

Q2 2025

$710

$743

-4.4%

Miss

$301

$278

+8.3%

Beat

Q3 2025

$601

$651

-7.7%

Miss

$284

$273

+4.0%

Beat

Q4 2025

$735

$706

+4.1%

Beat

$332

$289

+14.9%

Beat

Q1 2026

$749

$749

0.0%

In-Line

$273

$280

-2.5%

Miss

Pattern: Las Vegas EBITDAR has missed consensus in 4 of the last 8 quarters, with misses concentrated in Q2 and Q3 (seasonally softer periods), while MGM China has beaten in 6 of 8 quarters — suggesting the Street consistently underestimates Macau momentum but may be caught off-guard by hold volatility in any given quarter.

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.

3. Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: Guidance has been largely unchanged since the Q1 2026 call, with no formal post-earnings revisions. The most notable post-earnings development is the Barry Diller / PPLI take-private bid at $48.30/share (June 1), which has dominated the narrative and overshadowed fundamental guidance evolution. Management tone on the Q1 call was constructive on Las Vegas and China, cautious on BetMGM revenue.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Call — Apr 29, 2026)

Revised Guidance

Current Consensus

Note

Las Vegas Strip Revenue Growth

Growth through balance of year; convention room night mix +2pp YoY to 20% in Q2; April "fine," May "good month"

$4,423M Q2 revenue (all segments)

Unchanged; no post-earnings update. Constructive tone maintained.

Las Vegas EBITDA Growth (FY2026)

Expects to grow Las Vegas EBITDA for full year 2026; 54K incremental MGM Grand room nights; high-end strength continuing

$2,807M FY2026 LV EBITDAR consensus

Unchanged. Consensus broadly in line with guidance direction.

MGM China Segment EBITDA Margin

Mid-20s margin after new branding fee (3.5% of revenue); market share ~17% exiting Q1, holding into April

$278M Q2 EBITDAR consensus (~24% implied margin)

Unchanged. Consensus margin consistent with mid-20s guidance. Hold risk is the key variable.

BetMGM FY2026 EBITDA

Maintained at lower end of prior range; revenue guidance lowered; iGaming prioritized; sports spend moderated; path to higher 2027 target affirmed

$259M FY2026 BetMGM EBITDA consensus

No post-earnings revision. BetMGM revenue guidance was lowered on Q1 call; EBITDA maintained. World Cup betting volumes a potential Q2 upside.

MGM Digital (LeoVegas) FY2026 Loss

Loss to materially narrow vs. 2025; close to breakeven in 2027; Brazil investment may modestly exceed original guidance

N/A — not separately tracked in VA consensus

Unchanged. Brazil investment caveat is a modest risk to the loss-narrowing trajectory.

Japan Funding (FY2026)

$200–$225M equity contributions; on time and on budget for 2030 opening; yen credit facility largely covers funding

N/A — not in consensus

Unchanged. No new Japan updates since Q1 call.

4. Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates have been broadly stable-to-slightly-higher since the Q1 print, with EPS revisions modestly positive and revenue/EBITDA largely unchanged. The gap between current consensus and the Q1 post-print baseline is narrow, suggesting the Street has not materially re-rated the fundamental outlook — the stock's 31% YTD move is almost entirely multiple expansion and M&A optionality, not earnings revision momentum.

KPI & Period

Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (May 6, 2026)

Current Consensus (Jul 27, 2026)

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Call)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Consensus vs. Guidance

Total Revenue — Q2 2026

$4,438M

$4,423M

-0.3%

Growth through balance of year (qualitative)

Unchanged

N/A — no numeric guidance

Total Revenue — FY2026

$17,713M

$17,657M

-0.3%

Growth through balance of year (qualitative)

Unchanged

N/A — no numeric guidance

Adjusted EBITDA — Q2 2026

$629M

$623M

-1.0%

Las Vegas EBITDA growth for FY2026 (qualitative)

Unchanged

N/A — no numeric guidance

Adjusted EBITDA — FY2026

$2,345M

$2,316M

-1.2%

Las Vegas EBITDA growth for FY2026 (qualitative)

Unchanged

N/A — no numeric guidance

EPS (Diluted Operating) — Q2 2026

$0.59

$0.57

-3.4%

No specific EPS guidance

Unchanged

N/A

EPS (Diluted Operating) — FY2026

$1.94

$1.79

-7.7%

No specific EPS guidance

Unchanged

N/A

Las Vegas EBITDAR — Q2 2026

$715M

$719M

+0.6%

Convention mix +2pp YoY; 54K incremental room nights; high-end strength

Unchanged

N/A — directional only

MGM China EBITDAR — Q2 2026

$291M

$278M

-4.5%

Mid-20s margin; market share ~17%

Unchanged

N/A — directional only

BetMGM EBITDA — Q2 2026

$83M

$74M

-10.8%

FY EBITDA at lower end of prior range; iGaming prioritized

Unchanged

N/A — directional only

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Post-Q1 baseline as of May 6, 2026 (5 trading days post April 29 earnings).

Commentary: The modest downward drift in FY2026 EPS (-7.7% from the post-Q1 baseline) reflects the Street absorbing the Q1 self-insurance charge and BetMGM revenue guidance reduction, while Las Vegas EBITDAR estimates have actually ticked slightly higher, consistent with management's constructive convention commentary. The MGM China Q2 estimate has been revised down ~4.5% from the post-Q1 baseline, likely reflecting the LVS Q2 read-through on Macau hold headwinds.

5. Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: The stock's ~31% YTD rally and ~17% 3-month gain are overwhelmingly driven by multiple expansion and M&A optionality (Barry Diller / PPLI bid at $48.30), not earnings revision momentum. EV/EBITDA has expanded from ~16.2x to ~17.2x over 12 months, while EPS estimates have drifted lower — a divergence that makes the stock vulnerable to a fundamental miss.

Metric

1 Month

3 Months

6 Months

12 Months

MGM Stock Price Change

-1.9%

+17.1%

+36.1%

+24.0%

NTM EV/EBITDA (then → now)

17.3x → 17.2x (-0.8%)

16.4x → 17.2x (+5.0%)

16.0x → 17.2x (+7.8%)

16.2x → 17.2x (+6.2%)

NTM P/E (then → now)

23.8x → 22.2x (-6.6%)

19.7x → 22.2x (+12.6%)

17.0x → 22.2x (+31.1%)

15.6x → 22.2x (+42.1%)

NTM P/FCF (then → now)

9.1x → 8.6x (-6.5%)

7.7x → 8.6x (+11.1%)

7.7x → 8.6x (+11.8%)

10.1x → 8.6x (-15.3%)

Source: Stock performance decomposition data as of July 27, 2026. Sector ETF benchmark: BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) / XLY (Consumer Discretionary) for broader context.

Performance Context: The stock's 6-month rally of +36% is almost entirely multiple expansion — EV/EBITDA expanded ~7.8% while earnings estimates were flat-to-down. The catalyst was the June 1 Barry Diller / PPLI take-private bid at $48.30/share, which created a floor and compressed the discount to intrinsic value. The 1-month pullback of -1.9% reflects some uncertainty around whether the deal closes at the offered price or at a higher level, as the MGM board has indicated the current offer undervalues the company. Key events since last earnings: (1) PPLI bid announced June 1; (2) Wells Fargo upgraded to Equal Weight with $48.30 PT; (3) BetMGM World Cup record volumes announced July 19; (4) Northfield Park sale closed April 2026 at 6.6x EBITDA.

6. Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The dominant development since Q1 earnings is the Barry Diller / PPLI take-private bid at $48.30/share — which has re-rated the stock and shifted investor focus from quarterly fundamentals to deal probability. The Q2 print will be the first opportunity for management to comment publicly on deal status since the bid intensified in July.

7. Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: Insider activity since the Q1 earnings is minimal — only one transaction was identified in the post-earnings window. The absence of open-market buying by insiders is notable given the take-private bid, but is likely explained by blackout periods and legal constraints around the ongoing deal process.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Value

Date

Note

Daniel J. Taylor

Director

Open Market Sale

~$0 (6,675 shares, grantor trust)

May 22, 2026

Discretionary sale via grantor trust; volume_owned_eod = 0 post-transaction. Modest size; no clear signal.

Source: SEC Form 4 Filings Database (filing date window: April 29 – July 27, 2026).

Context: The near-absence of insider transactions in the post-Q1 window is consistent with the company being in an active deal process (PPLI take-private bid). Insiders are likely subject to trading restrictions and legal counsel guidance during the special committee review. No open-market buys or large discretionary sales were identified — the single Director sale via grantor trust is not a meaningful signal.

8. Peer Commentary & Read-Through

Scope & Methodology: This section includes only commentary made within the last 60 days (on or after May 28, 2026) that directly addresses the current reporting quarter (Q2 2026 / April–June 2026) or was made after a peer's last earnings call. Commentary about a peer's own prior-quarter (Q1 2026) results is excluded. Read-through applicability to MGM is explicitly noted for each item.

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) — Q2 2026 Earnings (Reported July 22, 2026)

Relevance to MGM: HIGHEST — LVS is the most direct Macau read-through for MGM China. LVS has no Las Vegas Strip operations (sold in 2021), so its commentary is Macau- and Singapore-specific.

Wynn Resorts (WYNN) — Post-Q1 2026 Developments (July 22, 2026)

Relevance to MGM: MEDIUM — Wynn is a direct Macau competitor (Wynn Macau, Wynn Palace Cotai) and a Las Vegas Strip peer. WYNN reports Q2 2026 earnings after MGM (date TBD).

Note: Wynn's Q2 2026 earnings have not yet been reported as of July 27, 2026. No Q2 2026 operating commentary from Wynn management is available. The Cotai land amendment is the only post-Q1 Wynn development with read-through relevance.

Caesars Entertainment (CZR) — Sector Read-Through (May 28, 2026)

Relevance to MGM: MEDIUM — Caesars is a direct Las Vegas Strip and regional gaming peer. The Fertitta take-private deal is the most relevant sector comp for MGM's own take-private discussions.

Note: Caesars' Q2 2026 earnings have not yet been reported as of July 27, 2026. No Q2 2026 operating commentary from Caesars management is available. The Fertitta deal announcement is the only post-Q1 Caesars development with read-through relevance for MGM.

BetMGM / Digital Gaming Sector — World Cup Read-Through (July 19, 2026)

Relevance to MGM: HIGH — BetMGM is a 50/50 JV between MGM and Entain. World Cup betting volumes are a direct Q2 2026 revenue driver for BetMGM.

Peer Read-Through Summary Table

Peer

Commentary Date

Key Insight

MGM Segment Impacted

Direction

Confidence

LVS

Jul 22, 2026

Macau VIP hold at 1.35% vs. 3.3% theoretical — "largest hold adjustment in Macau history"

MGM China EBITDAR

Negative

High

LVS

Jul 22, 2026

Macau overall GGR flat YoY; mass GGR +4%; premium segment driving growth

MGM China Revenue

Neutral

High

LVS

Jul 22, 2026

World Cup reduced high-value patron visitation in June; May was all-time high for mass GGR

MGM China EBITDAR

Negative (June)

High

LVS

Jul 22, 2026

Macau opex growth to level off in H2 2026; reinvestment optimization ongoing

MGM China Margins (H2)

Positive (H2)

Medium

BetMGM

Jul 19, 2026

World Cup volumes tripled vs. 2022; most-bet World Cup in MGM history

BetMGM Revenue / EBITDA

Positive

High (volume); Medium (EBITDA)

WYNN

Jul 22, 2026

Cotai land concession amended for expansion — rising competitive investment in Macau premium mass

MGM China (medium-term)

Neutral / Negative (LT)

Low (Q2 impact)

CZR

May 28, 2026

Fertitta take-private at 49% premium validates private market casino valuations above public multiples

MGM Valuation / Deal

Positive

High (valuation anchor)

Read-Through Limitations: (1) LVS has no Las Vegas Strip operations — its commentary provides no read-through for MGM's Las Vegas segment. (2) Caesars and Red Rock Resorts (RRR) have not yet reported Q2 2026 earnings as of July 27, 2026 — no Q2 operating commentary is available from these peers. (3) VICI Properties (REIT landlord) has not yet reported Q2 2026 — no read-through on rent coverage or tenant health is available. (4) BetMGM volume data is self-reported by MGM/BetMGM and has not been independently verified by a peer operator. (5) Hold rates are inherently volatile and property-specific — LVS's hold miss does not guarantee MGM China experienced the same magnitude of impact.

Appendix: Key Risks to Watch

Disclosures: All financial data sourced from Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Database, SEC Form 4 Filings, and company earnings releases/transcripts. Consensus estimates as of July 27, 2026. This document is prepared for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.