PPG Industries (PPG) — Q2 2026 Earnings Preview

Ticker: PPG Upcoming Earnings Date: July 28, 2026 Reporting Period: Q2 2026 Prepared: July 28, 2026

Earnings Preview

Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 is a modest bar with consensus expecting flat-to-low-single-digit organic growth and EPS roughly in line with a year ago, but the key swing factor is whether pricing realization is outpacing the mid-single-digit raw material cost headwind faster than the market expects.

Heading into Q2 2026, the bar is intentionally modest: consensus Adj. EPS of ~$2.24 implies just +0.9% growth vs. the prior-year $2.22, and organic sales growth of ~+2.0% sits squarely within management's guided range of flat to positive low single digits. Management's tone on the Q1 call was cautiously optimistic — the company reaffirmed its FY2026 EPS guidance of $7.70–$8.10 and expressed confidence in H2 acceleration driven by Refinish normalization, European architectural restructuring savings, and continued Aerospace growth, while acknowledging the new geopolitical-driven raw material inflation cycle as a near-term headwind. Estimate revisions have been remarkably stable since Q1 earnings (Q2 EPS consensus ~$2.247 on May 5 vs. ~$2.244 today), suggesting the Street has fully digested guidance with no meaningful revision risk embedded in either direction. The stock has outperformed both XLB and the S&P 500 since Q1 earnings, up ~10% vs. XLB flat and SPY +3.8%, with the Bank of America upgrade to Buy on July 17 acting as a sentiment catalyst — some optimism is already priced in. The single biggest wildcard is the pace of pricing realization vs. the mid-single-digit COGS headwind: if PPG can demonstrate that low-single-digit pricing is landing faster than the market expects — as peers Axalta and Sherwin-Williams have signaled — segment EBITDA margins could surprise positively and drive a meaningful re-rating.

KPIs & Consensus Expectations

Key Takeaway: Consensus is a modest bar — flat-to-low-single-digit organic growth and EPS roughly in line with prior year — with segment EBITDA margin the bigger swing factor given the raw material cost cycle and the pace of pricing realization.

Table 1 — Q2 2026 Current Quarter Snapshot (All Key KPIs)

KPI

Q1 2026 Actual

Q2 2025 Actual

Q2 2026 Consensus

YoY Change

Q2 Guidance

Consensus vs. Guidance

Net Sales

$3.93B

$4.195B

$4.356B

+3.8%

Flat to low single-digit organic growth

In line

Adj. EPS (Diluted Operating)

$1.83

$2.22

$2.24

+0.9%

Flat to positive low single-digit %

In line

Segmental EBITDA

$755M

$852M

$880M

+3.3%

N/A

N/A

Organic Growth (Total %)

+0.9%

+1.8%

+2.0%

N/A

Flat to positive low single digits

In line

Performance Coatings EBITDA

$326M

$389M

$393M

+1.0%

N/A

N/A

Industrial Coatings EBITDA

$245M

$276M

$270M

-2.2%

Sequential margin improvement

N/A

Global Architectural Coatings EBITDA

$184M

$187M

$218M

+16.6%

Organic sales and margin momentum to continue

N/A

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Q2 2026 Consensus as of July 28, 2026.

Table 2 — Beat/Miss History (Last 8 Quarters)

Net Sales

Quarter

Reported

Consensus

Surprise %

Result

Q2 2024

$4.235B

N/A

N/A

N/A

Q3 2024

$4.032B

N/A

N/A

N/A

Q4 2024

$3.729B

N/A

N/A

N/A

Q1 2025

$3.684B

N/A

N/A

N/A

Q2 2025

$4.195B

$4.176B

+0.5%

Beat

Q3 2025

$4.082B

$4.046B

+0.9%

Beat

Q4 2025

$3.914B

$3.778B

+3.6%

Beat

Q1 2026

$3.930B

$3.826B

+2.7%

Beat

PPG has beaten on Net Sales in 3 of the last 4 reported quarters with consensus data available, with beat magnitude accelerating from +0.5% in Q2 2025 to +3.6% in Q4 2025 and +2.7% in Q1 2026.

Adj. EPS (Diluted Operating)

Quarter

Reported

Consensus

Surprise %

Result

Q2 2024

$2.35

N/A

N/A

N/A

Q3 2024

$2.03

N/A

N/A

N/A

Q4 2024

$1.61

N/A

N/A

N/A

Q1 2025

$1.72

N/A

N/A

N/A

Q2 2025

$2.22

$2.21

+0.5%

Beat

Q3 2025

$2.13

$2.09

+1.9%

Beat

Q4 2025

$1.51

$1.57

-3.8%

Miss

Q1 2026

$1.83

$1.76

+4.0%

Beat

PPG has beaten on Adj. EPS in 3 of the last 4 quarters with consensus data available; the only miss was Q4 2025 (-3.8%), with a strong recovery to a +4.0% beat in Q1 2026.

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.

Guidance & Commentary Evolution

Key Takeaway: Guidance has been unchanged since Q1 earnings — management reaffirmed FY2026 EPS of $7.70–$8.10 and Q2 organic growth of flat to positive low single digits — but tone has shifted to cautiously optimistic on Refinish recovery tracking ahead of schedule.

Metric

Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings, Apr 28)

Revised Guidance

Current Consensus

Note

Q2 2026 Organic Sales Growth

Flat to positive low single digits

+2.0%

No revision since Q1 earnings; consensus in line with guidance midpoint

Q2 2026 Adj. EPS Growth

Flat to positive low single-digit % vs. prior year

$2.24 (+0.9% YoY)

No revision since Q1 earnings; consensus at low end of guided range

FY2026 Adj. EPS

$7.70–$8.10

$7.87

Reaffirmed at Q1 earnings; consensus at midpoint of range; no post-earnings revision

Raw Material COGS Impact (Remainder of 2026)

Mid-single-digit % of COGS

N/A

New headwind introduced Q1 2026 (Iran conflict); low-single-digit pricing needed to offset; surcharges being used more broadly

Refinish Volume (Q2 / H2 2026)

YoY declines in Q2; volume growth in H2 2026

N/A

Recovery tracking ahead of expectations; Feb/Mar industry claims down only ~1% YoY; distributor fulfillment orders improving sequentially

Guidance vs. Estimate Revision Tracker

Key Takeaway: Estimates have been remarkably stable since Q1 earnings, with Q2 2026 EPS consensus essentially flat at ~$2.24 vs. the ~$2.25 post-print baseline — suggesting the Street has fully digested guidance with no meaningful revision risk embedded. The lack of upward revision despite Refinish recovery tracking ahead of schedule could represent a source of upside surprise.

KPI & Period

Estimate (May 5, 2026)

Current Consensus

Estimate Δ (%)

Initial Guidance (Q1 Call)

Current Guidance

Guidance Δ

Consensus vs. Guidance (%)

Net Sales — Q2 2026

$4.354B

$4.356B

+0.1%

Flat to low single-digit organic growth

Unchanged

In line

Net Sales — FY2026

$16.656B

$16.624B

-0.2%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Adj. EPS — Q2 2026

$2.247

$2.244

-0.1%

Flat to positive low single-digit %

Unchanged

In line

Adj. EPS — FY2026

$7.842

$7.869

+0.3%

$7.70–$8.10

Unchanged

At midpoint

Segmental EBITDA — Q2 2026

$874M

$880M

+0.7%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Segmental EBITDA — FY2026

$3.163B

$3.186B

+0.7%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Estimates have been remarkably stable since Q1 earnings, with virtually no revision in either direction — a sign the Street has fully priced in management’s guidance. The lack of upward revision despite Refinish recovery tracking ahead of schedule could represent a source of upside surprise if pricing realization exceeds the low-single-digit target.

Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. May 5, 2026 baseline = 5 trading days post Q1 2026 earnings (Apr 28, 2026).

Stock Performance

Key Takeaway: PPG has outperformed both the Materials sector (XLB) and the S&P 500 since Q1 earnings, up ~10% vs. XLB flat and SPY +3.8%, driven by a combination of multiple re-rating and improving sentiment on Refinish recovery — suggesting some optimism is already priced in heading into Q2.

PPG vs. XLB (Materials ETF) vs. S&P 500 — Indexed to 100 at Q1 2026 Earnings (Apr 28, 2026). Source: Stock Price Data.

PPG closed at $107.68 on April 28, 2026 (Q1 earnings day) and has since risen to $118.47 as of July 28, 2026, a gain of +10.0% vs. XLB flat (+0.0%) and SPY +3.8%. The outperformance appears driven by improving sentiment on Refinish normalization and the Bank of America upgrade to Buy on July 17 (PT raised to $134). The stock peaked at ~$123 in late June before pulling back modestly. XLB has been essentially flat over the period, confirming that PPG’s outperformance is company-specific rather than sector-driven. Sector ETF used: XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund), which is the appropriate benchmark for PPG’s specialty chemicals and coatings sub-sector.

Peer Commentaries — Q2 2026 Read-Throughs (Last 60 Days)

Key Takeaway: Peer commentary from the last 60 days is broadly constructive for PPG’s Q2 setup — Refinish destocking is abating across the industry, raw material inflation is real but manageable with pricing, and architectural/construction end markets show pockets of strength.

Note: Commentary below is sourced from peers’ Q1 2026 earnings calls (April 2026), RPM’s Q4 FY2026 earnings call (July 22, 2026), and Dow’s Q2 2026 earnings call (July 23, 2026). Only forward-looking commentary about Q2 2026 or the current operating environment is included — backward-looking Q1 results commentary is excluded.

A. Axalta Coating Systems (AXTA) — Q1 2026 Earnings Call (April 30, 2026)

Relevance: Direct peer in Refinish and Industrial Coatings; most comparable business mix to PPG’s Performance Coatings segment.

B. Sherwin-Williams (SHW) — Q1 2026 Earnings Call (April 28, 2026)

Relevance: Largest architectural coatings peer globally; strong read-through on architectural demand, pricing dynamics, and raw material cost trajectory.

C. RPM International — Q4 FY2026 Earnings Call (July 22, 2026)

Relevance: Most recent peer print (July 22, 2026); construction coatings and specialty products. RPM’s Q4 FY2026 covers March–May 2026 (calendar Q2 2026 overlap), making this the most timely read-through available.

D. Dow Inc. (DOW) — Q2 2026 Earnings Call (July 23, 2026)

Relevance: Key raw material supplier; acrylic monomers and silicones are inputs to coatings. Dow’s Q2 2026 results (reported July 23) provide the most timely macro and raw material read-through available.

Material News & Developments

Key Takeaway: The most material development since Q1 earnings is the CFO transition (Jamie Beggs effective July 6), which introduces modest execution risk but is offset by the Bank of America upgrade and improving Refinish data points.

Insider Transaction Activity

Key Takeaway: All insider transactions since Q1 earnings are non-discretionary phantom stock unit accruals and compensation-related awards — no open-market buys or sells. The absence of discretionary insider buying is neutral, not a negative signal given the compensation structure.

Name

Title

Transaction Type

Security

Date (Effective)

Note

Jamie Beggs

Senior VP & CFO

Award (A)

Employee Stock Options (18,503) + RSUs (5,039)

July 6, 2026

New CFO compensation grant upon joining; non-discretionary

Timothy Knavish

Chairman & CEO

Award (A)

Phantom Stock Units

Multiple dates (Apr 30 – Jul 15)

Routine quarterly phantom stock accruals; non-discretionary

Multiple SVPs (Bellezza, Braun, Foulkes, Hagerty, Hefel, Massy, Ericson)

Various SVP Roles

Award (A)

Phantom Stock Units

Multiple dates (Apr 30 – Jul 15)

Routine compensation accruals; non-discretionary

Board Directors (Fortmann, Novo, Heminger, Healey, LaMach, Ligocki, Nally, Roberts, Topalian)

Directors

Award (A)

Phantom Stock Units

June 12, 2026

Annual director compensation grants; non-discretionary

Brian Williams

VP & Controller

Award (A)

Restricted Stock Units (457)

May 8, 2026

Compensation grant; non-discretionary

No open-market purchases (code P) or sales (code S) were filed during the period. All transactions are compensation-related awards (code A) — phantom stock units, RSUs, or options. The new CFO’s equity grant is the only notable transaction and is standard for an incoming executive. The complete absence of discretionary selling is a mild positive signal.

Source: Insider Transaction Data (SEC Form 4 filings, April 28 – July 28, 2026).