Company | Qualcomm Incorporated |
Ticker | QCOM (NASDAQ) |
Reporting Period | Fiscal Q3 2026 (quarter ended June 28, 2026) |
Earnings Date | July 29, 2026 (after market close; call at 1:45 PM PT) |
Prepared | July 28, 2026 |
Last Earnings | April 29, 2026 (Q2 FY2026) |
Key Takeaway: The setup is a low bar on handsets but a high bar on the data-center narrative — the single biggest swing factor is whether management's Q4 China Android recovery call holds and whether the Investor Day data-center targets (>$5B FY2027 revenue) get any near-term validation.
Heading into Q3 FY2026, consensus sits at roughly $9.66B revenue and $2.23 non-GAAP EPS — both modestly above the guidance midpoints of $9.6B and $2.20, leaving a thin but achievable cushion. Management's posture has shifted from cautious to cautiously constructive since the April print: the explicit Q3 bottom call on China Android, the June 24 Investor Day doubling of the FY2029 revenue target to $40B, the naming of Microsoft and Meta as data-center CPU customers, and the announcement of a second hyperscaler custom-silicon win have all reinforced the diversification thesis. Estimate revisions have been modestly negative since last earnings — Q3 EPS consensus has drifted from ~$2.20 at the post-print baseline to ~$2.23 today, essentially flat, while FY2026 and FY2027 EPS have edged slightly higher — suggesting the Street has largely absorbed the guidance miss and is now pricing in the recovery narrative. The stock has underperformed SOXX materially since the April print (QCOM roughly flat to down vs. SOXX up ~9%), trading at only ~15.6x NTM P/E versus the sector at 25–30x, implying the market has not yet priced in the data-center optionality. The key wildcard is memory supply normalization timing: if DRAM pricing shows any sign of easing into Q4, China OEM build plans could recover faster than guided, creating upside to both Q4 guidance and FY2027 handset estimates; conversely, any further tightening or a delay in the hyperscaler custom-silicon ramp could pressure the stock despite an otherwise in-line print.
Key Takeaway: Consensus is a modestly low bar on revenue and EPS given the guided range, but QCT Handset revenue (~$4.96B consensus vs. ~$4.9B guidance) is the bigger swing factor — any sign that China OEM builds are recovering faster than feared could drive a meaningful beat, while automotive (~$1.48B, +50% YoY guided) is tracking well and unlikely to disappoint.
KPI | Q2 FY2026 Actual | Q3 FY2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q3 FY2026 Consensus Estimate | YoY Change | Q3 FY2026 Guidance (midpoint) | Consensus vs. Guidance |
Total Revenue (Operating) | $10.60B | $10.37B | $9.66B ¹ | -6.8% | $9.60B (midpoint of $9.2B–$10.0B) | +0.7% |
Non-GAAP Diluted EPS (Operating) | $2.65 | $2.77 | $2.23 ¹ | -19.5% | $2.20 (midpoint of $2.10–$2.30) | +1.5% |
QCT Handset Revenue | $6.02B | $6.33B | $4.96B ¹ | -21.6% | ~$4.9B (guided) | +1.2% |
QCT Automotive Revenue | $1.33B | $0.98B | $1.48B ¹ | +51.0% | ~+50% YoY (guided) | ~+1% vs. implied ~$1.47B |
QCT IoT Revenue | $1.73B | $1.68B | $1.83B ¹ | +9.0% | High single-digit YoY growth (guided) | ~+1% vs. implied ~$1.81B |
QCT EBT Margin (Operating) | 27.2% | 29.7% | 25.9% ¹ | -380 bps | 25%–27% (guided) | ~+90 bps vs. 25% floor |
QTL Revenue | N/A — not separately broken out in VA consensus for Q2 (est. ~$1.25B based on total less QCT) | N/A | N/A — not in VA consensus at segment level | N/A | $1.15B–$1.35B (guided); midpoint $1.25B | N/A |
¹ Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data
Top 2 KPIs: Total Revenue (Operating) and Non-GAAP Diluted EPS (Operating)
Quarter | KPI | Reported Actual | Consensus at Print | Surprise % | Result |
Q3 FY2024 | Revenue | $9.39B | N/A — not in VA for this period | N/A | N/A |
Q3 FY2024 | Non-GAAP EPS | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Q4 FY2024 | Revenue | $10.24B ¹ | $9.90B ¹ | +3.5% | Beat |
Q4 FY2024 | Non-GAAP EPS | $2.69 ¹ | $2.56 ¹ | +5.1% | Beat |
Q1 FY2025 | Revenue | $11.67B ¹ | $10.90B ¹ | +7.1% | Beat |
Q1 FY2025 | Non-GAAP EPS | $3.41 ¹ | $2.95 ¹ | +15.6% | Beat |
Q2 FY2025 | Revenue | $10.84B ¹ | $10.63B ¹ | +2.0% | Beat |
Q2 FY2025 | Non-GAAP EPS | $2.85 ¹ | $2.82 ¹ | +1.1% | Beat |
Q3 FY2025 | Revenue | $10.37B ¹ | $10.34B ¹ | +0.3% | Beat |
Q3 FY2025 | Non-GAAP EPS | $2.77 ¹ | $2.70 ¹ | +2.6% | Beat |
Q4 FY2025 | Revenue | $11.27B ¹ | $10.75B ¹ | +4.8% | Beat |
Q4 FY2025 | Non-GAAP EPS | $3.00 ¹ | $2.87 ¹ | +4.5% | Beat |
Q1 FY2026 | Revenue | $12.25B ¹ | $12.21B ¹ | +0.3% | Beat |
Q1 FY2026 | Non-GAAP EPS | $3.50 ¹ | $3.41 ¹ | +2.6% | Beat |
Q2 FY2026 | Revenue | $10.60B ¹ | $10.58B ¹ | +0.2% | Beat |
Q2 FY2026 | Non-GAAP EPS | $2.65 ¹ | $2.56 ¹ | +3.5% | Beat |
¹ Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data
Pattern: QCOM has beaten consensus on both revenue and non-GAAP EPS in every one of the last seven reported quarters, with EPS beats averaging ~5% and revenue beats averaging ~2–3%; the consistent beat pattern sets a high behavioral bar even against a low absolute guidance level heading into Q3 FY2026.
Key Takeaway: Guidance has not been formally revised since the April 29 earnings call, but the June 24 Investor Day materially upgraded the long-term financial framework — the FY2029 revenue target doubled to $40B and data-center revenue was pulled forward to FY2026 — shifting tone from cautious to structurally bullish without changing the near-term Q3 range.
Metric | Initial Guidance (April 29, 2026 Earnings Call) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
Q3 FY2026 Total Revenue | $9.2B – $10.0B | — | $9.66B ¹ | No post-earnings revision; consensus sits ~$60M above midpoint |
Q3 FY2026 Non-GAAP EPS | $2.10 – $2.30 | — | $2.23 ¹ | No post-earnings revision; consensus ~$0.03 above midpoint |
Q3 FY2026 QCT Revenue | $7.9B – $8.5B | — | N/A — not in VA at QCT total level | No change; handset guided ~$4.9B, auto ~+50% YoY, IoT high-single-digit YoY |
Q3 FY2026 QCT EBT Margin | 25% – 27% | — | 25.9% ¹ | No change; consensus near midpoint of guided range |
Q3 FY2026 QTL Revenue | $1.15B – $1.35B; EBT margin 67%–71% | — | N/A — not in VA at QTL level | No change; sequential decline expected due to weaker low-tier handset units |
FY2029 Non-Handset Revenue Target | $22B (prior Investor Day target) | ↑ Raised to $40B at June 24 Investor Day | N/A — FY2029 not in VA consensus | ↑ Raised at Investor Day June 24, 2026; nearly 2x increase; implies 40% CAGR FY2025–FY2029; more confident on diversification execution |
FY2029 Non-GAAP EPS Target | Not previously disclosed at this level | ↑ >$18.00 disclosed at June 24 Investor Day | N/A | ↑ New target set at Investor Day June 24, 2026; signals high confidence in margin expansion alongside revenue diversification |
Data Center Revenue (FY2027) | "Material" (multiple billions) — stated at Bernstein Conference May 27 | ↑ $5B target for FY2027 disclosed at June 24 Investor Day; two hyperscaler customers at global scale driving ≥1B within year | N/A — FY2027 data center not in VA consensus | ↑ Raised at Investor Day June 24, 2026; Microsoft (Azure CPU deployment) and Meta (multi-gen CPU supply) named; second hyperscaler custom-silicon win announced |
Automotive Revenue (FY2026 Exit Rate) | >$6B annualized exit rate for FY2026 | ↑ $10B FY2029 target raised at June 24 Investor Day (from prior $8B); design-win pipeline expanded to $65B | $5.46B FY2026 consensus ¹ | ↑ Raised at Investor Day June 24, 2026; 23 consecutive quarters of double-digit YoY growth; Stellantis adopting full Snapdragon Digital Chassis |
China Android Handset Bottom | Q3 FY2026 called as bottom; sequential recovery in Q4 | — | N/A | Unchanged; management has visibility via QTL licensing sell-through data; premium/high-tier holding, weakness in mid-low tier |
¹ Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data
Key Takeaway: Estimates have been remarkably stable since the April 29 print — Q3 FY2026 revenue consensus is essentially flat vs. the post-print baseline, and FY2026 full-year estimates have edged slightly higher — suggesting the Street has absorbed the guidance miss and is now anchored to the recovery narrative rather than pricing in further downside. FY2027 estimates have drifted modestly higher, reflecting early data-center revenue credit.
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~May 6, 2026 (Post-Print Baseline) | Current Consensus (July 28, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (April 29 Call) | Current Guidance / Target | Guidance Δ | Consensus vs. Guidance (%) |
Revenue — Q3 FY2026 | $9.62B ¹ | $9.66B ¹ | +0.4% | $9.2B–$10.0B (mid: $9.6B) | Unchanged | — | +0.7% vs. midpoint |
Non-GAAP EPS — Q3 FY2026 | $2.20 ¹ | $2.23 ¹ | +1.4% | $2.10–$2.30 (mid: $2.20) | Unchanged | — | +1.5% vs. midpoint |
Handset Revenue — Q3 FY2026 | $4.92B ¹ | $4.96B ¹ | +0.8% | ~$4.9B (guided) | Unchanged | — | +1.2% vs. guidance |
Automotive Revenue — Q3 FY2026 | $1.48B ¹ | $1.48B ¹ | 0.0% | ~+50% YoY (implied ~$1.47B) | Unchanged | — | +0.7% vs. implied guidance |
Revenue — FY2026 | $42.40B ¹ | $42.51B ¹ | +0.3% | N/A (no FY guidance given) | N/A | — | N/A |
Non-GAAP EPS — FY2026 | $10.67 ¹ | $10.73 ¹ | +0.6% | N/A | N/A | — | N/A |
Revenue — FY2027 | $42.38B ¹ | $44.20B ¹ | +4.3% | N/A | Investor Day target: $40B non-handset + data center by FY2029 | ↑ Long-term targets raised | N/A |
Non-GAAP EPS — FY2027 | $10.51 ¹ | $10.93 ¹ | +4.0% | N/A | Investor Day target: >$18 non-GAAP EPS by FY2029 | ↑ Long-term targets raised | N/A |
¹ Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data
Near-term estimates (Q3 FY2026 and FY2026) are essentially anchored at the post-print baseline, confirming the Street has not revised materially in either direction since April 29. The more notable move is in FY2027, where revenue and EPS estimates have risen ~4% since the post-print baseline, reflecting early credit for the data-center revenue ramp (Investor Day $5B FY2027 target) and the automotive pipeline expansion ($65B design wins, $10B FY2029 target). The gap between FY2027 consensus (~$44.2B revenue, ~$10.93 EPS) and the Investor Day long-term trajectory implies the Street is still discounting a significant portion of the data-center and diversification upside.
Key Takeaway: QCOM has significantly underperformed SOXX since the April 29 earnings print — the stock is roughly flat to slightly up from the pre-earnings close while SOXX is up ~9% — driven by multiple compression rather than estimate cuts, as the market has not yet assigned value to the data-center optionality disclosed at the June 24 Investor Day.
Chart: QCOM vs. SOXX vs. SPY — Indexed to 100 at April 29, 2026 (Last Earnings Date)
Date | QCOM (Indexed) | SOXX (Indexed) | SPY (Indexed) |
Apr 29 (Earnings Day) | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Apr 30 (Day +1) | 115.1 | 102.5 | 101.0 |
May 29 (Peak) | 160.9 | 126.5 | 106.3 |
Jun 24 (Investor Day) | 126.5 | 133.7 | 103.0 |
Jun 30 (Q3 End) | 118.5 | 142.4 | 104.9 |
Jul 22 (TXN Earnings) | 112.6 | 123.5 | 105.0 |
Jul 28 (Day Before Print) | 109.0 | 114.7 | 103.9 |
Note: Indexed to 100 at April 29, 2026 close ($156.00 QCOM, $449.99 SOXX, $711.58 SPY). Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance).
Key Events Since Last Earnings:
Performance Summary (Apr 29 – Jul 28, 2026): QCOM +9.0% | SOXX +14.7% | SPY +3.9%. QCOM underperformed SOXX by ~5.7 percentage points over the period. The 1-month performance (June 30 – July 28) shows QCOM -14.0% vs. SOXX -19.0%, suggesting QCOM has actually held up slightly better than the sector in the recent selloff. The NTM P/E of ~15.6x (vs. ~12.9x six months ago) reflects multiple expansion from the data-center narrative, but remains at a steep discount to semiconductor peers at 25–30x, implying the market is still pricing in significant execution risk on diversification.
Key Takeaway: The most important development since last earnings is the June 24 Investor Day, which doubled the FY2029 revenue target and named Microsoft and Meta as data-center CPU customers — a structural re-rating catalyst that the stock has not yet fully priced in. The secondary wildcard is Qualcomm's plan to implement double-digit chip price increases, which could provide a meaningful near-term revenue and margin tailwind if customers absorb the hikes.
Key Takeaway: All insider transactions since the April 29 earnings print are 10b5-1 planned sales — there are no discretionary open-market buys or sells, and no unusual clustering or outsized transaction sizes. The pattern is routine and does not signal any incremental insider view on the upcoming print.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Shares | Est. Value | Transaction Date | Note |
Palkhiwala, Akash J. | EVP, CFO & COO | 10b5-1 Planned Sale | 2,500 | ~$446K | Jul 14, 2026 | Pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan (est. Dec 8, 2025); third consecutive monthly sale of identical 2,500-share tranche; routine |
Palkhiwala, Akash J. | EVP, CFO & COO | 10b5-1 Planned Sale | 2,500 | ~$446K | Jun 11, 2026 | Pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan; second consecutive monthly sale of identical 2,500-share tranche; routine |
Palkhiwala, Akash J. | EVP, CFO & COO | 10b5-1 Planned Sale | 2,500 | ~$446K | May 12, 2026 | Pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan; first sale in the series post-earnings; routine |
Amon, Cristiano R. | President & CEO, Director | 10b5-1 Planned Sale | 10,000 (indirect, by Trust) | ~$1.87M | May 5, 2026 | Pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan; indirect ownership via trust; routine |
Amon, Cristiano R. | President & CEO, Director | 10b5-1 Planned Sale | 10,000 (indirect, by Trust) | ~$1.87M | May 4, 2026 | Pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan; indirect ownership via trust; routine |
Ace, Heather S. | EVP, Chief HR Officer | 10b5-1 Planned Sale | 3,200 (indirect, by Trust) | ~$600K | May 4, 2026 | Pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan; indirect ownership via trust; routine |
Grech, Patricia Y. | SVP, Chief Accounting Officer | 10b5-1 Planned Sale | 192 (indirect, by Trust) | ~$30K | Apr 30, 2026 | Pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan; very small tranche; routine |
Source: SEC Form 4 Filings (Insider Transaction Data)
All seven transactions since the April 29 earnings print are pre-scheduled 10b5-1 planned sales — none are discretionary open-market transactions. The CFO (Palkhiwala) is executing a regular monthly 2,500-share sale plan established in December 2025, and the CEO (Amon) sold via trust on May 4–5 in what appears to be a pre-scheduled plan. There are no open-market buys, no unusual clustering of sales ahead of the print, and no 10b5-1 plan initiations or terminations that would signal a change in insider sentiment. The absence of any discretionary activity is neutral — it neither confirms nor contradicts the constructive management tone expressed publicly.