| TER |
Report |
Total Revenue (Q2'26) |
BEAT |
pred ~$1.24B vs. cons $1.21B |
MEDIUM |
| TER |
Report |
Semiconductor Test Revenue (Q2'26) |
BEAT |
pred ~$1.065B vs. cons $1.041B |
MEDIUM |
| TER |
Report |
Non-GAAP EPS (Q2'26) |
BEAT |
pred ~$2.15 vs. cons $2.05 |
HIGH |
| TER |
Guide |
Q3 2026 Revenue Guide |
BETTER |
guide ~$1.30B vs. cons ~$1.28B (Q3 2026) |
LOW |
| TER |
Guide |
Q3 2026 Gross Margin Guide |
UNCHANGED |
guide ~58.5% vs. cons 58.5% (Q3 2026) |
MEDIUM |
| TER |
Guide |
FY2026 Revenue Target/Outlook Reaffirmation |
BETTER |
guide/implied ~$4.90B vs. cons ~$4.75B (FY2026) |
LOW |
| TER |
Guide |
H2 Visibility / First-Half Revenue Mix Commentary |
UNKNOWN |
mgmt likely reiterates ~55-60% H1 mix vs. prior firmer 60% point est. (FY2026) |
LOW |
| TER |
Return |
Day-1 residual (stock − beta × S&P 500) |
-3.5% |
— |
MEDIUM |
| TER |
Return |
5-day cumulative residual |
-6.0% (FOLLOW-THROUGH) |
Even with a likely headline beat (strong AI/memory demand, first merchant-GPU shipments), the Q1 precedent (blowout beat yet stock fell ~19% next day on H2 visibility/lumpiness concerns) plus an already-fragile tape (stock -31% off its June 30 peak on China lithography/CXMT and tariff overhangs) sets a very high bar. If Q3 guide/FY commentary again signals limited H2 visibility or reiterates rather than raises the long-term target model, analysts are likely to trim out-quarter (Q3/Q4) estimates on the implicit compare against the already-elevated full-year AI-ramp assumptions, causing the initial reaction (whichever direction) to extend over the week rather than mean-revert; unresolved macro/geopolitical chip-sector overhangs (independent of TER fundamentals) reinforce continuation over stabilization. |
LOW |