Ticker: TROW Upcoming Earnings: July 31, 2026 Reporting Period: Q2 2026 Prepared: July 30, 2026
Key Takeaway: The setup into Q2 2026 is modestly constructive — AUM is tracking well above consensus on strong markets, but the bar on net flows and fee rate compression remains the key swing factor.
Heading into Q2 2026, the consensus bar for TROW looks achievable on the top line but the quality of the beat will hinge on net flows and effective fee rate — the two metrics that determine whether the market views the print as structurally improving or merely market-driven. The preliminary AUM release (July 13) confirmed ending AUM of $1.893 trillion, well above the $1.889 trillion consensus estimate, driven by strong equity market appreciation and a June net inflow of $0.8B (including a large subadvised equity inflow); however, quarterly net outflows of $6.5B were better than the $8.2B consensus estimate, representing a meaningful sequential improvement from Q1's $13.7B outflow. Management maintained its full-year expense guidance of up 3–6% over 2025's $4.6B adjusted base at the Q1 print, and tone has been constructive — the Q1 call highlighted record ETF AUM surpassing $25B, OHA growing to $112B, and the Goldman Sachs and First Abu Dhabi Bank partnerships moving into execution — but fee rate compression remains a structural headwind, with the Q1 effective fee rate hitting a new low of 38.4 bps. The stock has rallied ~16% since the Q1 print (vs. ~3% for SPY and ~6% for IAI), suggesting the market has already priced in a solid quarter, leaving limited room for upside surprise unless flows or fee rate come in materially better than expected. The key wildcard is whether the large subadvised equity inflow in June is a one-time event or signals a broader stabilization in equity flows — if management guides to improving flow trends in Q3, the stock could re-rate further despite the already-elevated multiple.
Key Takeaway: Consensus is a manageable bar on AUM (already confirmed at $1.893T vs. $1.889T estimate) but net flows and fee rate are the real swing factors — a flow beat paired with any fee rate stabilization would be the most positive outcome.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual | Q2 2026 Consensus Est. | YoY Change | Guidance | Cons. vs. Guidance |
Total AUM (EOP, $T) | $1.710T | $1.677T | $1.889T | +12.6% YoY | No explicit AUM guidance | N/A |
Net Flows — Total ($B) | -$13.7B | -$14.9B | -$8.2B | Better YoY | No explicit flow guidance | N/A |
Net Revenues — Operating ($B) | $1.861B | $1.762B | $1.930B | +9.6% YoY | No explicit revenue guidance | N/A |
EPS — Diluted Operating ($) | $2.52 | $2.24 | $2.52 | +12.5% YoY | No explicit EPS guidance | N/A |
Operating Margin — Operating (%) | 37.9% | 34.9% | 37.1% | +220 bps YoY | Expenses +3–6% YoY (FY guide) | N/A (margin implied) |
Effective Fee Rate (bps, ex-perf fees) | 37.9 bps | 39.6 bps | 38.2 bps | -140 bps YoY | Continued compression expected | N/A |
Net Flows — Equity ($B) | -$22.6B | -$18.1B | -$17.6B | Better YoY | Continued equity outflows expected | N/A |
Net Flows — Multi-Asset ($B) | +$4.1B | +$0.9B | +$6.9B | Better YoY | Target Date blend driving inflows | N/A |
Net Flows — Fixed Income ($B) | +$3.5B | +$1.2B | +$3.3B | Better YoY | Positive flows expected | N/A |
Net Flows — Alternatives ($B) | +$1.3B | +$1.1B | +$0.8B | Roughly flat YoY | OHA growth continues | N/A |
Sources: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data; T. Rowe Price June 2026 AUM Press Release (July 13, 2026). Q2 2026 Actual AUM of $1.893T confirmed via preliminary release. All other Q2 2026 figures are consensus estimates.
KPI 1: Total EOP AUM ($T)
Quarter | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q2 2024 | $1.569T | $1.568T | +0.1% | Beat |
Q3 2024 | $1.631T | $1.632T | -0.1% | Miss |
Q4 2024 | $1.607T | $1.610T | -0.2% | Miss |
Q1 2025 | $1.566T | $1.575T | -0.6% | Miss |
Q2 2025 | $1.677T | $1.659T | +1.1% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $1.767T | $1.763T | +0.2% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $1.776T | $1.777T | -0.1% | Miss |
Q1 2026 | $1.710T | $1.704T | +0.4% | Beat |
KPI 2: Net Flows — Total ($B)
Quarter | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q2 2024 | -$3.7B | -$3.6B | -2.8% (worse) | Miss |
Q3 2024 | -$12.2B | -$12.4B | +1.6% (better) | Beat |
Q4 2024 | -$19.3B | -$21.1B | +8.5% (better) | Beat |
Q1 2025 | -$8.6B | -$9.5B | +9.5% (better) | Beat |
Q2 2025 | -$14.9B | -$12.6B | -18.3% (worse) | Miss |
Q3 2025 | -$7.9B | -$8.6B | +8.1% (better) | Beat |
Q4 2025 | -$25.5B | -$24.1B | -5.8% (worse) | Miss |
Q1 2026 | -$13.7B | -$16.9B | +18.9% (better) | Beat |
Pattern: Net flows have beaten consensus in 5 of the last 8 quarters, but the misses tend to be large (Q2 2025: -18.3%, Q4 2025: -5.8%), suggesting the street struggles to model the lumpiness of institutional outflows; AUM beats/misses are tight and largely market-driven. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: Management's guidance is unchanged since the Q1 2026 earnings call (April 30) — full-year expense growth of 3–6% over 2025's $4.6B adjusted base remains the only formal guidance; tone has been constructive with strategic partnerships moving into execution and OHA highlighted as a core growth driver.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 30) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
FY2026 Adj. Operating Expenses (ex-carried interest) | Up 3–6% over 2025's $4.6B base (~$4.74B–$4.88B) | Unchanged | ~$4.82B (mid-range) | Mgmt noted forecast "comfortably within range" despite market volatility; Q1 tailwinds from expense management expected to be absorbed as year progresses |
AUM Flows Outlook | Continued pressure in equities; multi-asset, fixed income, and alternatives expected to deliver positive flows | Unchanged | FY2026 net flows: -$51.6B consensus | June AUM release showed Q2 net outflows of $6.5B — better than consensus of -$8.2B; June had $0.8B net inflow including large subadvised equity inflow |
Effective Fee Rate | Continued compression expected; driven by Target Date blend growth and equity outflows | Unchanged | 38.2 bps (Q2 2026 consensus) | Structural headwind from mix shift to lower-fee vehicles and blend Target Date products; no guidance to stabilization |
Strategic Partnerships (Goldman Sachs, FAB) | Goldman: interval fund + Target Date sister series launch targeted mid-2026; FAB: targeted mid-2026 launch | Unchanged | N/A | Both partnerships in execution phase; OHA CEO joined Q1 call for first time, signaling elevated strategic priority for alternatives |
Capital Allocation / Buybacks | Opportunistic and selective; $340M repurchased in Q1 at elevated pace; balance sheet >$4.1B cash | Unchanged | N/A | Management explicitly framed accelerated buybacks as reflecting value seen in share price; M&A remains an active option |
Key Takeaway: Estimates for Q2 2026 have moved materially higher since the Q1 print — EPS consensus is up ~12% and revenue up ~4.4% — driven by the strong AUM recovery from Q1 market lows; the gap between current consensus and the post-Q1 baseline is almost entirely market-driven, not flow-driven, which limits the durability of the revision tailwind.
KPI (Period) | Estimate (5 Days Post Q1 Print, ~May 5, 2026) | Current Consensus | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Cons. vs. Guidance (%) |
EPS — Diluted Operating (Q2 2026) | $2.25 | $2.52 | +12.0% | No explicit guidance | No explicit guidance | N/A | N/A |
EPS — Diluted Operating (FY2026) | $9.34 | $10.20 | +9.2% | No explicit guidance | No explicit guidance | N/A | N/A |
Net Revenues — Operating (Q2 2026) | $1.848B | $1.930B | +4.4% | No explicit guidance | No explicit guidance | N/A | N/A |
Net Revenues — Operating (FY2026) | $7.493B | $7.820B | +4.4% | No explicit guidance | No explicit guidance | N/A | N/A |
Total EOP AUM (Q2 2026) | $1.774T | $1.889T | +6.5% | No explicit guidance | No explicit guidance | N/A | N/A (actual: $1.893T) |
Net Flows — Total (Q2 2026) | -$12.9B | -$8.2B | +36.4% (better) | No explicit guidance | No explicit guidance | N/A | N/A (actual: -$6.5B) |
Operating Margin — Operating (Q2 2026) | 34.9% | 37.1% | +220 bps | Expenses +3–6% FY (implied) | Unchanged | Unchanged | N/A |
The ~12% upward revision to Q2 EPS and ~4.4% to revenue since the Q1 print are almost entirely market-driven (AUM up ~11% from Q1 trough to June 30), not flow-driven. The flow estimate has also improved materially (+36%), with the preliminary release confirming Q2 net outflows of -$6.5B vs. the -$8.2B consensus — a meaningful beat. The key question for the call is whether management signals Q3 flow improvement or guides to re-acceleration of outflows. Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data.
Key Takeaway: TROW has significantly outperformed both the S&P 500 and the IAI (iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF) since the Q1 2026 earnings print, up ~15.9% vs. ~3.2% for SPY and ~5.9% for IAI — the outperformance is driven by a combination of multiple re-rating (from deeply discounted ~9x forward P/E) and positive estimate revisions as markets recovered from Q1 lows, but the stock is no longer cheap and the bar for further outperformance is higher.
TROW vs. IAI vs. S&P 500 — Indexed to 100 at Q1 2026 Earnings (April 30, 2026). Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance). Sector ETF: IAI (iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF), selected as the closest available proxy for the asset management sub-sector.
Since the Q1 2026 earnings print on April 30, TROW has rallied from $102.88 to $119.28 (as of July 30, 2026), a gain of approximately +15.9%, compared to +3.2% for the S&P 500 (SPY) and +5.9% for the IAI. The outperformance is attributable to three factors: (1) the Q1 EPS beat driven by lower expenses and a lower tax rate, which reset the earnings trajectory higher; (2) a strong market recovery from Q1 lows that drove AUM well above consensus by quarter-end; and (3) multiple re-rating from a deeply discounted ~9x forward P/E as investors gained confidence in the expense management story and OHA/alternatives growth. A notable pullback occurred around July 13 (the AUM press release date), likely reflecting profit-taking after the stock had already priced in the AUM beat. The stock has since recovered, trading at approximately $119 heading into the print. At current levels, TROW trades at roughly 11–12x forward P/E — still below historical mid-teens averages but no longer at the trough discount, suggesting the easy multiple re-rating trade is largely done and the next leg of outperformance requires evidence of structural flow improvement.
Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the June AUM release confirming Q2 net outflows of -$6.5B — materially better than consensus and the best quarterly flow result in several quarters — which sets a constructive tone heading into the print; the leadership restructuring (Eric Veiel named President) is a secondary but strategically meaningful signal.
Key Takeaway: Q2 2026 peer earnings calls from BLK, IVZ, AMP, NTRS, STT, BK, and SEIC paint a broadly constructive picture for asset managers — record flows at BLK and IVZ, improving margins across the board, and strong alternatives/ETF demand — but the read-through for TROW is nuanced: the industry tailwind is real, but TROW's structural challenges (active equity outflows, fee compression) are idiosyncratic and not resolved by a rising market.
Note: All peer commentary below is sourced from Q2 2026 earnings calls (reported July 2026), which are directly relevant to TROW's upcoming Q2 2026 print.
Read-Through Signal: Strongly Positive for Industry; Mixed for TROW
Read-Through Signal: Positive for Active Manager Flows; Positive for ETF/SMA Demand
Read-Through Signal: Positive for Wealth/Advice Channel; Mixed for Active Asset Management
Read-Through Signal: Positive for Alternatives and ETF Demand; Positive for Institutional Fee Growth
Read-Through Signal: Positive for AUM/Fee Growth; Positive for Alternatives Demand
Read-Through Signal: Positive for Institutional Demand; Positive for Fee Stability
Read-Through Signal: Positive for Alternatives in Retirement; Positive for Active Manager Outsourcing Demand
Peer | Key Theme | TROW Read-Through | Signal |
BLK | Record flows; active ETF leadership; private markets/insurance demand; margin at 5-year high | Industry flow environment strong; OHA institutional pipeline positive; TROW margin gap vs. BLK remains wide | Positive |
IVZ | Record net inflows; fee rate approaching stabilization; active equity still in outflows; SMA/ETF growth | Active equity outflows are industry-wide; fee compression may be moderating; SMA demand positive for TROW | Mixed |
AMP | Wealth AUM record; Columbia Threadneedle flows improving; fee rate stable; margin above target | Active equity flow rate improving at margin; fee stability possible with right product mix | Positive |
NTRS | 8th consecutive quarter of organic fee growth; alternatives AUA >$1T; 700+ bps operating leverage | Alternatives demand robust; institutional fee growth achievable; operating leverage environment favorable | Positive |
STT | Record AUM/fees; alternatives driving servicing growth; ETF environment "very different" from 5 years ago | Alternatives demand strong; ETF proliferation is a structural tailwind for TROW's ETF platform | Positive |
BK | Less pricing pressure vs. 2-3 years ago; equity outflows in LDI/index; 600 bps operating leverage | Fee pressure moderating for differentiated strategies; equity outflows industry-wide; operating leverage achievable | Mixed |
SEIC | LSV value equity inflows; alternatives in retirement early innings; outsourcing demand at record levels | Active value equity demand returning; retirement alternatives opportunity directly relevant to TROW's Target Date + Goldman partnership | Positive |
Key Takeaway: All insider transactions since the Q1 print are equity award grants (transaction code "A") to directors and one VP-level sale — there are no open-market buys or discretionary sells from senior executives, which is neither a bullish nor bearish signal; the absence of insider buying at current prices (stock up ~16% since Q1 earnings) is notable but not alarming given the stock is no longer at trough valuations.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Shares | Date | Note |
Jackson, Stephon A. | Vice President | Open Market Sale (Code S) | 3,000 shares | May 13, 2026 | Only open-market sale in the period; VP-level, not C-suite; concurrent award grant (175 shares) on same date suggests routine compensation-related activity |
Page, Sébastien | Vice President / Co-Head Global Investments & CIO | Award Grant (Code A) | 96,228 shares | June 1, 2026 | Large grant associated with appointment as Co-Head Global Investments & CIO effective June 1; compensation-related, not open-market purchase |
Multiple Directors (9 individuals) | Director | Award Grant (Code A) | 1,899 shares each | May 8, 2026 | Routine annual director equity compensation grants; includes Bartlett, Donnelly, Dublon, Golston, MacLellan, Rominger, Smith, Stevens, Verma, Wijnberg, Wilson |
Multiple Directors (8 individuals) | Director | Award Grant (Code A) | Varies (55–843 shares each) | June 29–30, 2026 | Quarterly dividend reinvestment / deferred compensation plan grants; routine, not discretionary open-market purchases |
Summary: The insider transaction picture is clean — no red flags. The only open-market sale (Jackson, 3,000 shares on May 13) is VP-level and accompanied by a concurrent award grant, suggesting it is compensation-related rather than a discretionary bearish signal. The large grant to Sébastien Page (96,228 shares on June 1) is tied to his appointment as Co-Head Global Investments & CIO and is not an open-market purchase. Director grants in May and June are routine annual and quarterly compensation awards. Notably, there are no open-market buys from C-suite executives despite management's stated view on the Q1 call that the stock represents good value — the accelerated buyback program ($340M in Q1) is the primary vehicle for capital return, not insider purchases. Source: Insider Transaction Data (SEC Form 4).