Company | Textron Inc. (NYSE: TXT) |
Reporting Period | Q2 2026 (quarter ending June 30, 2026) |
Earnings Date | July 28, 2026 (before market open) |
Prepared | July 27, 2026 |
Last Earnings | Q1 2026 reported April 30, 2026 (beat on EPS and revenue) |
Sector ETF Benchmark | ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) |
Key Takeaway: Setup is modestly constructive — consensus is a manageable bar after Q1's large beat, but the single biggest swing factor is whether management provides clarity on the MV-75 GFY26 supplemental funding resolution and the timing of the pending LRIP catch-up charge ($60–$110M).
Heading into Q2 2026, the bar for TXT looks achievable: consensus EPS of $1.55 represents a modest step-up from Q1's $1.45 actual and is roughly in line with the prior-year Q2 print of $1.55, while revenue consensus of $3.81B implies ~2.6% YoY growth against a tough Q2 2025 comp of $3.72B. Management guided for sequential improvement in Aviation deliveries and margins each quarter through 2026 with a Q4 peak, and Q2 should show a meaningful step-up from Q1's 10.4% Aviation margin as supply chain headwinds ease and delivery cadence improves. The estimate trajectory has been mildly negative — Q2 EPS consensus has drifted from ~$1.55 in August 2025 to $1.55 today, essentially flat, suggesting the Street has not materially re-rated the quarter in either direction. The stock has lagged the A&D sector significantly since Q1 earnings (TXT +0.2% vs. ITA +11.6%), suggesting the market is still digesting the Industrial separation announcement and MV-75 funding uncertainty rather than pricing in a beat. The key wildcard is the MV-75 LRIP catch-up charge — management guided it could hit as early as H2 2026, and any Q2 recognition would be a meaningful EPS headwind; conversely, a clean quarter with no charge and positive Army supplemental funding news could be the catalyst to close TXT's discount to A&D peers.
Key Takeaway: Consensus is a moderate bar — Q2 EPS of $1.55 is flat YoY and below Q2 2025's actual, while revenue of $3.81B implies modest growth. Aviation segment margin is the bigger swing factor: management guided for sequential improvement each quarter, and Q2 is the first real test of that cadence after Q1's supply-chain-impacted 10.4% margin.
KPI | Q1 2026 Actual | Q2 2025 Actual (Prior Year) | Q2 2026 Consensus Est. | YoY Change | Guidance | Cons. vs. Guidance |
Total Revenue ($B) | $3.695B | $3.716B | $3.813B | +2.6% | No explicit Q2 guidance; FY2026 guide ~$15.6B | ~+0.4% vs. FY implied run-rate |
Adj. EPS - Operating ($) | $1.45 | $1.55 | $1.55 | 0.0% | FY2026: $6.50 midpoint (reaffirmed) | ~+0.3% vs. FY implied run-rate |
Revenue - Textron Aviation ($B) | $1.485B | $1.522B | $1.585B | +4.1% | Deliveries to increase each quarter; margin peak Q4 | N/A (no explicit Q2 rev. guide) |
Segment Profit - Aviation ($M) | $154M (10.4% margin) | $180M (11.8% margin) | $179M (~11.3% margin) | -0.6% | Sequential improvement each quarter; peak Q4 | N/A |
Revenue - Bell ($B) | $1.070B | $1.016B | $1.040B | +2.4% | MV-75 rev. flat YoY; Bell margin 8–9% FY2026 | N/A |
Segment Profit - Bell ($M) | $72M (6.7% margin) | $80M (7.9% margin) | $84M (~8.1% margin) | +5.0% | FY2026 Bell margin 8–9% | In-line with guidance midpoint |
Revenue - Textron Systems ($M) | $338M | $324M | $338M | +4.3% | No explicit guidance; FY2026 ~$1.35B | N/A |
Revenue - Industrial ($M) | $786M | $839M | $826M | -1.5% | Separation in progress; no new guidance | N/A |
Mfg. Free Cash Flow ($M) | -$240M | $317M | $162M | -48.9% | FY2026 Mfg. FCF ~$670M | N/A |
Backlog ($B) | $19.16B | $16.92B | $19.19B | +13.4% | No explicit guidance | N/A |
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. All consensus figures as of July 27, 2026. Q1 2026 actuals and Q2 2025 actuals from Visible Alpha reported figures.
Quarter | Reported | Consensus | Surprise % | Result |
Q1 2026 | $1.45 | $1.30 | +11.5% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $1.73 | $1.71 | +1.2% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $1.55 | $1.44 | +7.6% | Beat |
Q2 2025 | $1.55 | $1.44 | +7.6% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | $1.28 | ~$1.20 | ~+6.7% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | ~$1.60 | ~$1.55 | ~+3.2% | Beat |
Q3 2024 | ~$1.40 | ~$1.35 | ~+3.7% | Beat |
Q2 2024 | ~$1.50 | ~$1.45 | ~+3.4% | Beat |
Quarter | Reported ($B) | Consensus ($B) | Surprise % | Result |
Q1 2026 | $3.695B | $3.484B | +6.1% | Beat |
Q4 2025 | $4.175B | $4.079B | +2.4% | Beat |
Q3 2025 | $3.602B | $3.670B | -1.9% | Miss |
Q2 2025 | $3.716B | $3.628B | +2.4% | Beat |
Q1 2025 | ~$3.31B | ~$3.25B | ~+1.8% | Beat |
Q4 2024 | ~$4.00B | ~$3.95B | ~+1.3% | Beat |
Q3 2024 | ~$3.45B | ~$3.40B | ~+1.5% | Beat |
Q2 2024 | ~$3.55B | ~$3.50B | ~+1.4% | Beat |
Pattern: TXT has beaten EPS consensus in every quarter over the trailing 8 periods, with Q1 2026 representing the largest beat (+11.5%) driven by the Industrial separation announcement and strong Aviation delivery acceleration. Revenue beats are consistent but smaller in magnitude, with Q3 2025 the lone miss. The consistent EPS beat pattern suggests management guides conservatively, but the Q1 2026 magnitude was an outlier driven by one-time strategic news.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. Q1 2026 actuals and prior-year actuals from Visible Alpha. Pre-Q2 2025 consensus figures are approximate based on available data.
Key Takeaway: Guidance has been unchanged since the Q1 2026 earnings call on April 30, 2026 — FY2026 adjusted EPS of $6.50 midpoint was reaffirmed. The tone is constructive on Aviation delivery cadence and Bell margin recovery, but cautious on the MV-75 GFY26 funding gap and the pending LRIP catch-up charge.
Metric | Initial Guidance (Q1 2026 Earnings Call, Apr 30) | Revised Guidance | Current Consensus | Note |
FY2026 Adj. EPS | $6.50 midpoint (reaffirmed) | — | $6.48 | Unchanged; consensus essentially in-line with guidance midpoint |
Aviation Deliveries | Increase each quarter; ~200 jets target at equilibrium | — | N/A (unit metric) | Q2 should show step-up from Q1's 37 Citation jets + 35 turboprops |
Aviation Segment Margin | Sequential improvement each quarter; peak in Q4 2026 | — | ~11.3% for Q2 2026 | Q1 was 10.4%; Q2 consensus implies ~90bps sequential improvement |
Bell Segment Margin (FY2026) | 8–9% range | — | ~8.1% for Q2 2026 | Q1 was 6.7%; sequential improvement expected on higher commercial volume |
MV-75 Revenue (FY2026) | Flat YoY vs. FY2025 | — | N/A (not separately tracked in consensus) | Army pursuing supplemental GFY26 funding; near-term gap acknowledged |
MV-75 LRIP Catch-Up Charge | $60–$110M cumulative; timing H2 2026 or H1 2027 | — | Not in consensus estimates | Key risk: if recognized in Q2, would be a meaningful EPS headwind |
Mfg. Free Cash Flow (FY2026) | ~$670M (implied by FY consensus) | — | $670M | Q1 was -$240M use; Q2 consensus $162M; H2 weighted as typical |
Industrial Separation | Targeting completion within 12–18 months; sale or tax-free spin-off | — | N/A | No update since Q1 announcement; any process update would be a catalyst |
Key Takeaway: Estimates for Q2 2026 and FY2026 have been essentially flat since Q1 earnings — the Street has not materially revised up or down, suggesting the Q1 beat was viewed as a one-time event rather than a structural re-rating. The gap between FY2026 EPS consensus ($6.48) and guidance midpoint ($6.50) is negligible, indicating no meaningful cushion or risk embedded in the bar.
KPI (Period) | Estimate ~5 Days Post Q1 Earnings (May 5, 2026) | Current Consensus (Jul 27, 2026) | Estimate Δ (%) | Initial Guidance (Q1 Call) | Current Guidance | Guidance Δ | Cons. vs. Guidance (%) |
Adj. EPS - Operating (Q2 2026) | $1.546 | $1.553 | +0.5% | No explicit Q2 guide | Unchanged | — | N/A |
Adj. EPS - Operating (FY2026) | $6.467 | $6.483 | +0.2% | $6.50 midpoint | $6.50 midpoint (unchanged) | 0% | -0.3% (cons. slightly below guide) |
Total Revenue (Q2 2026) | $3.797B | $3.813B | +0.4% | No explicit Q2 guide | Unchanged | — | N/A |
Total Revenue (FY2026) | $15.597B | $15.603B | +0.0% | ~$15.6B implied | Unchanged | 0% | ~0% (in-line) |
Revenue - Aviation (Q2 2026) | $1.564B | $1.585B | +1.3% | Deliveries increase each quarter | Unchanged | — | N/A |
Revenue - Bell (Q2 2026) | $1.041B | $1.040B | -0.1% | MV-75 flat YoY; Bell margin 8–9% | Unchanged | — | N/A |
Mfg. Free Cash Flow (FY2026) | $642M | $670M | +4.4% | ~$670M implied | Unchanged | 0% | ~0% (in-line) |
Estimates have been remarkably stable since Q1 earnings, with virtually no revision in either direction. This suggests the Street is treating Q1's large beat as a one-time event (driven by the Industrial separation announcement) and is waiting for Q2 execution data before re-rating. The slight upward drift in Aviation revenue estimates (+1.3%) reflects growing confidence in the delivery cadence improvement narrative.
Source: Visible Alpha Consensus and Actuals Data. As-of-date consensus (May 5, 2026) and current consensus (July 27, 2026) from Visible Alpha.
Key Takeaway: TXT has dramatically underperformed the A&D sector since Q1 earnings — +0.2% vs. ITA +11.6% — suggesting the market is discounting the MV-75 funding uncertainty and LRIP charge risk rather than rewarding the Q1 beat and Industrial separation announcement. The underperformance is multiple-driven, not earnings-driven, and represents a potential re-rating opportunity if Q2 delivers a clean print.
TXT vs. ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) vs. S&P 500, indexed to 100 at Q1 2026 earnings date (April 30, 2026). Source: Stock Price Data.
Performance Summary (Apr 30 – Jul 28, 2026):
TXT's significant underperformance vs. ITA (-11.4pp) is notable given that peers LMT and RTX both reported strong Q2 2026 results with raised guidance. The stock briefly rallied to ~$95-96 on Q1 earnings day (from ~$89 pre-earnings), but has given back most of the relative gain as investors focused on the MV-75 GFY26 funding gap and the pending LRIP catch-up charge. The stock's inability to participate in the sector rally despite a strong Q1 beat suggests the market is pricing in execution risk around the MV-75 program transition and the Industrial separation process.
Source: Stock Price Data (Yahoo Finance).
Key Takeaway: Peer Q2 2026 earnings calls from LMT, RTX, and NOC (all reported July 21–23, 2026) paint a strongly positive picture for the defense budget environment and military aviation demand — a clear positive read-through for TXT's Bell and Systems segments. RTX's commentary on business jet OE demand and Embraer's record executive jet deliveries are constructive for Textron Aviation. The key TXT-specific read-through risk is the MV-75 program: LMT's Sikorsky ramp (4 platforms delivering more YoY, 53K potentially 2x deliveries) signals strong helicopter production demand, but also highlights that TXT's Bell must execute its own ramp flawlessly.
Relevance: High — LMT's Sikorsky helicopter ramp, defense budget commentary, and munitions demand are direct read-throughs for Bell and Textron Systems.
Relevance: High — RTX's Collins Aerospace was selected to supply 5 key systems for the MV-75 Cheyenne (announced April 13, 2026). RTX's commentary on business jet OE demand and defense budget is directly relevant.
Relevance: Medium — NOC's commentary on defense budget, autonomous systems demand, and the $350B reconciliation package are relevant to Textron Systems' unmanned systems business.
Relevance: Medium — Embraer is TXT's closest peer in business jets (Praetor vs. Citation). ERJ's Q1 2026 commentary on executive jet demand, supply chain, and delivery cadence is a direct read-through for Textron Aviation.
Relevance: Low-Medium — HII is a shipbuilder with limited direct overlap with TXT, but its commentary on the defense budget and autonomous systems is relevant to Textron Systems.
Peer | Report Date | Key Read-Through for TXT | Signal | TXT Segment Impacted |
LMT | Jul 23, 2026 (Q2 2026) | Sikorsky ramp accelerating; 4 platforms delivering more YoY; 53K potentially 2x deliveries; record $230B backlog; raised FY2026 guidance | Positive | Bell, Textron Systems |
RTX | Jul 23, 2026 (Q2 2026) | Collins selected for 5 MV-75 systems; business jet OE demand strong; Collins commercial OE +26%; record $289B backlog; raised FY2026 EPS to $7.10-$7.25 | Positive | Bell (MV-75), Textron Aviation |
NOC | Jul 21, 2026 (Q2 2026) | Record $105B backlog; $350B reconciliation package; autonomous systems demand surging; FMS approvals accelerating; 10 multiyear missile agreements | Positive | Textron Systems, Bell |
ERJ | May 8, 2026 (Q1 2026) | Best Q1 executive jet deliveries of the decade; demand strong, selling into 2029; no macro/tariff impact on executive jets; record $32B backlog | Positive | Textron Aviation |
HII | May 5, 2026 (Q1 2026) | FY2026 defense appropriations finalized; FY2027 budget shows increased autonomous systems investment; FMS approvals accelerating | Mildly Positive | Textron Systems |
Key Takeaway: The most important development since Q1 earnings is the Bell SPINE contract ($300M, announced July 27, 2026) — a firm-fixed-price contract for H-1 fleet upgrades that demonstrates Bell's ability to win new military work beyond MV-75 and provides near-term revenue visibility. The Flight School Next Phase 4 selection (Bell 505, April 7) is a second positive catalyst for Bell's commercial and training business.
Key Takeaway: No open-market buys or discretionary sells by executives since Q1 earnings. The only notable transaction is a director open-market purchase of $10,300 shares by Thomas A. Kennedy on May 1, 2026 — a modest but directionally positive signal. All other transactions are routine annual director equity grants (code A). No executive officer transactions were filed in the period.
Name | Title | Transaction Type | Shares | Date | Note |
Kennedy, Thomas A. | Director | Open Market Buy | 10,300 shares | May 1, 2026 | Discretionary open-market purchase; directionally positive signal from director |
Clark, R. Kerry | Director | Open Market Sale | 2,517 shares | May 6, 2026 | Discretionary sale; small size relative to 8,611 shares held post-transaction; not flagged as 10b5-1 |
Ambrose, Richard F. | Director | Annual Equity Grant (Code A) | 2,061 shares | Apr 29, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award; not an open-market transaction |
Clark, R. Kerry | Director | Annual Equity Grant (Code A) | 2,061 shares | Apr 29, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award; not an open-market transaction |
Garrett, Michael X. | Director | Annual Equity Grant (Code A) | 2,061 shares | Apr 29, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award; not an open-market transaction |
James, Deborah L. | Director | Annual Equity Grant (Code A) | 2,061 shares | Apr 29, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award; not an open-market transaction |
Kennedy, Thomas A. | Director | Annual Equity Grant (Code A) | 2,061 shares | Apr 29, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award; not an open-market transaction |
Mendez Echevarria, Maria Cristina | Director | Annual Equity Grant (Code A) | 2,061 shares | Apr 29, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award; not an open-market transaction |
Mionis, Robert | Director | Annual Equity Grant (Code A) | 2,061 shares | Apr 29, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award; not an open-market transaction |
Nowell, Lionel L. III | Director | Annual Equity Grant (Code A) | 2,061 shares | Apr 29, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award; not an open-market transaction |
Zuber, Maria T. | Director | Annual Equity Grant (Code A) | 2,061 shares | Apr 29, 2026 | Routine annual director equity award; not an open-market transaction |
Notable: Director Thomas A. Kennedy (former Raytheon CEO) made a discretionary open-market purchase of 10,300 shares on May 1, 2026 — the only non-routine transaction in the period. This is a modestly positive signal, particularly given Kennedy's deep defense industry background. The small discretionary sale by Director Clark (2,517 shares on May 6) is not concerning given the small size relative to his remaining holdings (8,611 shares). No executive officer (CEO, CFO, or segment presidents) filed any Form 4 transactions in the period, which is neutral.
Source: Insider Transaction Data (SEC Form 4 filings). Period covered: April 29, 2026 – July 27, 2026.